#Solve the following limit
200 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Do not ping the Moderators, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- Do not ping the Helper Moderators, unless there is a conflict between helpers.
- Do not ping other members randomly for help.
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- If the Helper has answered your question, remember to thank them with the Mathematics Ranks bot and close the thread with:
+close
Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
The exercise itself is to study the convergence for a given series depending on the values of x, x is a real number
But I arrived at this indetermination for |x|>1 and I'm not sure how to solve
I know that the limit will be inf since x^n for |x|>1 will always grow quicker than sqrt(n)
However I need to justify this and I'm not sure how to either
$$ \frac{1}{R} = \limsup _n \sqrt[n]{|a_n|} $$
aL
a_n = 1 / sqrt(n) in your case
R is the radius of convergence
this sort of reasoning is not correct
So what's the correct way to justify it
calculate the radius of convergence by the formula I gave you
you have a power series of the form
$$ \sum a_nx^n $$
aL
it's a power series about the point 0
I'm pretty bad with sequences/series so I'm not sure how to do all this lol sorry
Could you explain how would you do this if you don't mind
for a_n = 1/sqrt(n)?
aL
for n->inf?
aL
the limit is 1
which means your radius of convergence is also 1
what that means is the series converges absolutely for any x in (-1,1)
you have to check separately whether you have convergence for x=1 and x=-1
are you clearing for R here
I'm confused since I haven't seen this formula
Lucho what happened to the previous thread
this problem is about convergence of power series
aL start from the absolute basics
and the radius of convergence formula has to be one of the first things you see
well not quite
but you are clearing for R
R=1 as per the formula
what note taking app do you use btw
sounds dumb but if I saw this solved step by step I'd probably understand better lol
goodnotes
appreciate it 👍
we are solving it step by step
not really if you jumped from the formula straight to the result
you mean looking at a solution and then explaining it to you?
just the solution itself step by step
- Determine at which point the power series is defined
- Calculate its radius of convergence
- If R>0 check the end points of the interval for convergence
because i don't get how is the limit written for the convergence radius formula
Let me know if I misinterpreted, do you need help understanding why/what's the proof of R being the radius of convergence?
yes
you posted this under real analysis tag, so I have to assume you have covered power series in your lectures
nvm i was just tweaking on how to write the limit itself lol
ok, are you up to speed now?
so R = 1, then what else is the justification again
and unfortunately no
at which point is the power series defined?
wait so this is just applying cauchy-hadamard theorem
good
given radius of convergence 1 don't you then check for |x| > 1 and |x|<1 like i did?
no
it's already clear that |x|<1 is the case where absolute convergence occurs by the C-H theorem
but the theorem doesn't say anything about endpoints of the interval
btw if I'm taking time to respond it's because i have to find the translation to the english terms since i do all my math in spanish
sorry
no because I can't find the translation for endpoints
(-1,1) is the open interval with endpoints -1 and 1
do you mean whether {1} and {-1} are included
the C-H thm implies that this power series converges absolutely for every x in (-1,1)
we don't need to worry about those
but the radius itself is 1, so we have to check for convergence at x=1 and x=-1 separately
yes
that's what I meant
does this not cause an indetermination 1^inf in the numerator for lim n->inf
aL
this converges, yes?
there is no (-1)^înf
?
what do you know about convergence of alternating series?
serie alterna
theorema de leibniz
for {a_n} monotonically decreasing and since lim n->inf = 0 the series converges
1/sqrt(n) monotonically decreasing so the series converges for x=-1 no?
for x=1 you can't rewrite it like this can you
i mean
you could
$$ \sum \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} $$
aL
la serie armonica
and 1^n = 1 for every n, yes?
only for n is a real number
but in the series n=1 to inf
are you never supposed to assume n becomes infinity in a series
of course
that's something i was not taught in my lectures, thank you
$$ \sum _{n=1}^\infty a_n = \lim _{m\to\infty} \sum _{n=1}^ma_n $$
aL
this is the definition
so then it's for x=1 it converges too?
or does 1/sqrt(n) not converge?
not sure how the criteria goes for this lol
aL
es una serie armonica
yeah i've not done the integral test for this i have no idea what the reasoning is
well, you must have covered this by now, I refuse to believe you didn't
i mean i assume they did i just missed the first few lectures due to illness
but you do have lecture notes for the course, yes?
i just bluntly assumed it diverges
yes, but they're very surface level and don't dig too deep into reasoning
oh brother 😦
very good
so all in all, the power series converges absolutely in (-1,1), converges in [-1,1)
and diverges everywhere else
so to sum it all up, calculate the radius of convergence (according to cauchy theorem) and evaluate for the endpoint values
that is correct
$$ \sum a_n (x-2)^n $$
aL
where is this power series defined?
what again is the difference between converges absolutely in (-1,1) and converges in [-1,1)?
also i'm just taking long to process because language barrier
defined means what here
aL
is defined at point 0 becuase it's of the form (x-0)^n
i seriously have a problem with understanding math in english
la serie de potencias?
correct!
aL
is a power series defined at x=a
now suppose your power series is defined at x=2
and has radius of convergence 3
in which interval does the series converge absolutely?
if i were to give an answer it'd have no basis behind it i'm just confused
you already know everything necessary to answer it
im just guessing (-3,3) since it's the radius of convergence
the key element is the C-H theorem
but not around 0
but around 2
correct
oh okay
thank you
do i need to close this thread or? i have to rewrite it once i get home
you can +close it if you think that's all, yes
Can I also use this same channel for a different question?
Please thank the helpers who assisted you by clicking the buttons below. You can thank each helper only once. Once you're done, click "Close Post" to close this thread.