#Partial differentiation
119 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules. If there is a conflict amongst multiple helpers feel free to ping “Helper Mod”
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
by the way this was while I was deriving the expression for schrodinger's equation in spherical coordinate system
the notation is not consistent either
then ?
what does this mean for instance?
this is just the operator
the partial derivative operator
i have the equation screenshot
applied to r^2?
how do i send it
im asking because how is one supposed to read this
yeah i have the correct screenshot
where do i share
yes
find out how you're supposed to read this expression
does the operator apply to what is before it, or after it
aL
okay
$$ \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} \left( r^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial r} \right) = -\frac{2}{r^3}r^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial r} $$
aL
but howcome did this result show up
since its just an operator
its not being applied on anything
$$= -\frac{2}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r} = \frac{2}{r^2}$$
aL
and you have the same thing on the RHS
let me check
the operator applies to what is on the left
yes, physicist notation
$$ \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}r = \frac{2}{r^3}r = \frac{2}{r^2} $$
aL
so that is what is happening in the above equation ?
beats me, not my field of study
well in this case it does
thats weird
.
it's not unusual
in math sometimes it's also written xf instead of f(x)
old school writing style
well you have to because there is nothing to the right from the operator here
okay wait let me check
okay that is because
its just an operator
this is only way the equality makes sense
yes
well, it's your study material, read it and it will hopefully make sense
and if it's a physics textbook, ..pray
it is
Quantum Mechanics textbook
gg
professor is weird, he said he explained it in the classs, and wont say anything more
why is that weird
good professor, not giving special treatment
it's just a small calculation to verify the equality in question
yes
OKAY
figuredd outt !!!
let me send u the pic wait
@unkempt phoenix look
both give the same result
and psi is some function of r
i just applied psi on rhs one
could be, I don't know the rules of reading this text