#Circle Geometry
40 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules. If there is a conflict amongst multiple helpers feel free to ping “Helper Mod”
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
(not really rigorous) but rotation around a point
what do you mean
yeah, scratch that.
hmm, exactly how do you rigorously price co-linearity?
think about the conditions required
I was thinking proving that dst plus angle rsd makes a stragith line idk if it works
this is the simson line
i think this is a good idea
hint: you have more than one cyclic quadrilateral
CDST?
i briefly thought you were talking about a timezone
yes, CDST is cyclic
DST and DCT will be supplementary
yes
and there is another cyclic quadrilateral
can we prove dct equals rad
why?
cuz rad equals dsr
oh
which would be supplementary to dst
RAD is very conveniently supplementary to another angle
yeah it can't be cyclix
yeah
so you’re left with BAD and DCB
which are supplementary
putting it all together:
<DST = 180 - <DCT = 180 - <DCB = <BAD = 180 - <RAD = 180 - <RSD
annoying to scroll up and down