#Comparison of surds
71 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules. If there is a conflict amongst multiple helpers feel free to ping “Helper Mod”
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
roltt
sometimes decimal approximations and bounding will work, usually you would try to square them
decimal approxmiation is not efficient
and not accurate
and time consuming
sad
i said "and bounding"
bounding as in?
rt(17) - 1 is a little bigger than 3
compare that to rt(2)+1, which is definitely smaller than 3
okay but what if they are closer in numerical value
like rt(14) - 1
now?
usually you would try to square them
you could also try to use difference of two squares
is there no surefire way
squaring them?
okay so
$$ \sqrt{2} + 1$$ $$ \sqrt{17} - \sqrt{2} $$
$$ 5 + 2\sqrt{2} $$ $$ 19 - 2\sqrt{34} $$
roltt
all of these?
their squares are down
now even with squares
Its not amply clear
as he said, bounding
ok, take two of them
not always easy, depending on the given quantities
they might be very close to one another so you need very precise bound
it's going to be very hard to compare 4 at once if you're going to use algebraic manipulation
Bro
I am only comparing the top two
I just squared them
also, did i mention that you should simplify these surds beforehand?
and the bottom two are the squares
sorry
$$ \sqrt{2} + 1$$ $$ \sqrt{17} - \sqrt{2} $$
we compare these
roltt
you wrote rt(17) + rt(2)
your original was rt(17) - 1
upon squaring we get
$$ 5 + 2\sqrt{2} $$ $$ 19 - 2\sqrt{34} $$
roltt
yeah was just an example
I just wanted method
this is the question from the book
ok, you do not directly square these
you write it as rt(17) and 2rt(2)+1 first (adding rt(2) to both numbers will not change which is bigger)
then you square those
one gives you 17 and the other gives you, what, 9+4rt(2)?
now subtract 9 off both
8 vs 4rt(2)
guess which one of those is bigger
Wow
8 ofcourse
so then rt(17) - rt(2) is bigger than rt(2) + 1
no like super systematic way?
isn't that systematic?
alternatively, write as rt(17)-1 and 2rt(2) and note that only one of these is bigger than 3
apply arithmetic to get two easily comparable quantities?
maybe you are right
if i were to describe this as an algorithm, it would be "start by minimizing the number and size of square roots you have, isolate the biggest one on one side, square both sides, and repeat until you have no more square roots"
i don't know how many systematic ways of comparing weird numbers exist
Thanks @still nimbus
@ancient shoal has given 1 rep to @feral parrot
+close