#Cyclic quadrilateral area(Maths olympiad)
115 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Well you can calculate $\cos{135}=\cos{(90+45)}=\cos{90}\cos{45}-\sin{90}\sin{45}$
God of Arctic
We can use
Area of Cyclic quadrilatral is given by
$$ \sqrt{(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)(s-d)} $$ where s is semi-perimeter and a,b,c,d are sides of cyclic quadrilateral
roltt
( Brahmagupta's Formula )
Perhaps that could be useful to your question
Well, all you need to do is cosine law bash.
All you need to do is to use this to find cos135 value
Or even better cos(90+x)=-sin(x)
so 135=90+45
cos(135)=cos(90+45)=-sin(45)
Find radius and then the sides
and use this formula finally
Here s=a+b+c+d/2
You got the answer?
Oh okay.
Yes
That was a wrong assumption, I see.
You can still find QR
P,O,R aren't collinear though
so you can't say that QOR=45
Np
QSR=QPR=22.5 (chord QR)
same for PRS=22.5
talking abt the angles
so angle SOR=135 degrees
in SOR you can use cosine law now and find SR
We don't rlly need to prove them collinear
Just consider triangle SOR
you have got 2 angles in SOR so you got the third angle as well
Well you're right
Those points arent necessarily collinear
So, this doesn't hold good either.
Lets use the cyclic properties
Last thing which we can do
I've probably found out a way, gimme some more time
this is a hard problem
easily 3 marker
I've got it though
Are you comfortable with trigo?
I'm in the same country
Okay, area of a triangle is 1/2 absin(x) where x is the angle bw the sides a and b
Yeah
And you would need to know jensen inequality for this
Np
I'm sending a picture of the solution in like 10 mins
I'll quickly explain that inequality
clear with this?
r=1, you sure?
nice
okay
You can do the calculations
@austere kelp
pls ask if you've any doubts
this is honestly a 5 mark problem
alright
Its at least a 3 marker lol
Sorry, bad camera, pls co-operate
Not necessary
for maximum area, yes
You will have to consider a sqaure for max area
so that altitude length is maxmium
as for why S is the midpoint
suppose S isn't the midpoint
now try drawing altitudes from S to PR
move S from a point, which is close to P to a point close to R
No it is not
srry for terrible diagram
and draw altitudes
Now when do you think that the altitude lenth will be max
Yes
Right
So, thats why S is midpoint for maximum area
yes
Yes
Its possible to prove that with trigonometry too
Hey sorry
Its not a square
PQ is not necessarily equal to the other 3 sides
We cant prove that PQ is equal to the other sides
yes
and if it were actually a square then poq should have been 45
So, yes not a square
How?
SR=PS=RQ.....
opposite sides are equal in rectangle
?
not a square, not a rect.
I dont think so
so, how confident are you?
Yes
huh
My MT will start from 9th...:(
same
Am doing nothing except for maths
good
same
Say thanks @austere kelp
@subtle vigil has given 1 rep to @gleaming jasper @sand mural
@sand mural has given 1 rep to @gleaming jasper
a=b=y (used a,b,y for alpha,beta,gamma)
so a+b+y+135=360
3a=225
a=75
Thx.
@austere kelp
@gleaming jasper has given 1 rep to @sand mural
Thanks bruv
@subtle vigil has given 1 rep to @gleaming jasper
Perhaps because they subtend the arc of equal length (assuming O is the center)
@sand mural has given 1 rep to @subtle vigil