#Can anyone verify my answers? I'm not sure.
edgy lodgeBOT
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
sand moat
I only disagree with -6 and 6.
pale scaffold
hmm why?
I think at point -6, there is no left continuous right?
So, the left continuous will be DNE
young folio
there is a small dot at -6, and one at 6
it is unknown how the graph behaves after those points
pale scaffold
However, the right continuous is at -6
sand moat
I think at point -6, there is no left continuous right?
That only matters if the function is defined on the other side.
After all, we don't say that, for example, f(x) = arcsin(x) is discontinuous at x = ±1.
young folio
it is unknown how the graph behaves after those points
i would assume it doesn’t exist
sand moat
I would assume that this is just the whole domain of the function.
In which case there's no problem at x = ±6.
young folio
That only matters if the function is defined on the other side.
After all, we do...
*unless you are wolfram alpha documentation; goodness knows why
sand moat
Thanks
You're welcome!
Though, if there's a possibility of seeing whether that would be the correct answer, please share. Maybe they follow Micabo's convention.
sand moat
*unless you are wolfram alpha documentation; goodness knows why
Hm, weird...
young folio
rude
pale scaffold
Both wrong