#Find the average velocity over the given time intervals

159 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

rich furnace
hasty jettyBOT
#
  1. Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
  2. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  3. Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
    +close
    
  4. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  5. Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  6. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
rich furnace
#

So I'm a lil confused

#

Bc I plugged in the numbers where I thought they were supposed to go but apparently that's incorrect

#

This was an example problem I did earlier

#

So I used this for reference when completing it

#

I think if I can figure out what I did wrong in the first one I'll have no trouble solving the other ones

burnt fiber
#

the first one, for instance

burnt fiber
#

That doesn't sound right

#

it should be (y(2) - y(1))/1

rich furnace
#

.

#

ohhhhhhhhhhhh........

burnt fiber
#

with y(t) = 14t - 1.86t²

rich furnace
#

Wait wait
So should I just switch the places of the 2 numbers?

burnt fiber
#

No

#

What is y(2) ?

rich furnace
#

I.... Am not sure

burnt fiber
#

What is y(t) ?

#

for any t

rich furnace
#

1?

burnt fiber
#

y(t) is 14t - 1.86t²

#

as indicated by the question

#

now, y(2) is just that, but you replace t by 2

rich furnace
#

So for question 1

#

I would just replace both with 2

burnt fiber
#

that is to compute y(2)

#

you also need to compute y(1)

#

and then compute their difference

rich furnace
#

And get the answer 12.14? Or am I still squaring the second number to get 12.40 instead?

#

I think I did some math wrong actually

#

Ohhhhhhhhh

burnt fiber
#

So what in the end?

rich furnace
#

So the answer ends up being 8.42

#

But if I use the same method for the others it doesn't work?

burnt fiber
#

you also need to divide by the length of the interval

rich furnace
#

Ohhhhh

burnt fiber
#

in the first case, the interval is [1, 2] so the length of this interval is 1

#

in the second case, the interval is [1, 1.5]

rich furnace
#

So the answer would be 21.49?

burnt fiber
#

I got something different for the 2nd one

#

what did you do?

rich furnace
burnt fiber
#

No

#

The first line is indeed y(1.5)

#

but you seem to be computing y(1.5)/0.5 - y(1)

#

which is not what you should be computing

rich furnace
#

Because I divided by 0.5?

#

I thought that was the length?

burnt fiber
#

you should be computing $\frac{y(1.5) - y(1)}{0.5}$

viscid zephyrBOT
burnt fiber
#

not $\frac{y(1.5)}{0.5} - y(1)$

viscid zephyrBOT
rich furnace
#

.

#

OHHHHH

#

So for the very last part when it asks for the instantaneous velocity when t=1, how come it isn't 12.14?

burnt fiber
#

The instantaneous velocity is not computed the same way as the average velocity over a period

#

it's given by the derivative

rich furnace
#

I'm a little confused

#

So

#

I learned about derivative yesterday when finding the slope of a secant

#

I thought that was what a derivative was

void oracle
#

Besides, there are infinitely many secants at a given point, but at most one tangent.

rich furnace
#

Oh

void oracle
# rich furnace

Better to first write the general formula for ∆y(1, 1 + ∆t)/∆t, simplify it, and then substitute various values of ∆t.

rich furnace
#

Sorry- What are the triangles?

void oracle
#

What?

rich furnace
#

void oracle
#

Oh, delta.

rich furnace
#

OH

void oracle
#

That is used to show change in something. So, for example, ∆y(t1, t2) = y(t2) - y(t1).

#

Anyway, try calculating y(1) and y(1 + ∆t) first.

burnt fiber
#

that would be the instantaneous speed

void oracle
#

Yes, but also doing it generally first will allow you to more easily find average velocities, too.

burnt fiber
#

The question here asks you to "estimate" this instantaneous speed based on your previous answers

#

in question (a)

#

which should converge to a certain value if you did it right

void oracle
#

And you can calculate it exactly, too.

burnt fiber
void oracle
rich furnace
#

Wait so

#

Calculating y(1) would be 12.14 like earlier right? So what am I doing with y(1 + ∆t) if ∆ is to show a change in something?

#

What's changing if I'm just using y(1)?

burnt fiber
#

∆t is a small quantity

void oracle
#

Well, for a secant it isn't necessarily small.

burnt fiber
#

Let's try to reformulate the problem in a different way

#

We need to (algebraically, not numerically) compute y(t+h)

#

for any t and h

void oracle
#

I think I'll move to my PC, I'll be back in a sec.

burnt fiber
#

So here, the task is not that complex

#

you take the expression of y(t), which is: y(t) = 14t - 1.86t²

#

and now, to compute y(t+h), you take the expression above and replace every occurrence of the symbol "t" with "(t+h)"

#

what does that give?

rich furnace
#

14(t+h) - 1.86(t+h)²

burnt fiber
#

correct

#

now, please expand the new expression

void oracle
#

Oh, a more general form, ok.

#

That's even better.

burnt fiber
#

what would an expansion give? @rich furnace

rich furnace
#

14t + 14h - 1.86t² - 1.86h² - 3.72th

#

?

burnt fiber
#

Perfect

#

now, sneakily in there, you see y(t)

void oracle
#

Wait, should we expand it, even?

burnt fiber
#

if you group the 14t and -1.86t²

void oracle
#

I think it's better to find y(t + h) - y(t) without expanding everything.

#

A bit less clutter.

burnt fiber
#

So that gives you the expression of y(t+h) - y(t) for free

#

y(t+h) - y(t) = 14h - 1.86h² - 3.72th

#

Now, all that is left to compute the average speed in [t, t+h] is to divide by the length of this interval

#

What is the length of this interval?

#

@rich furnace

rich furnace
#

For a second there I thought I was just supposed to subtract all the ts

burnt fiber
#

algebraically, by substracting them

rich furnace
#

Should've gone with my first thought

burnt fiber
#

I'm not trying to trip you here, don't worry

#

Just trying to steer you in the right direction

rich furnace
#

So
Is 14h - 1.86h² - 3.72th the difference?

#

Since I would need to divide to get rid of that other t

burnt fiber
#

My question was more so about the length of the interval [t, t+h]

rich furnace
#

Is the length not the difference?

burnt fiber
#

Which is?

rich furnace
#

14h - 1.86h² - 3.72th

burnt fiber
#

no I'm not asking about y(t+h) - y(t)

#

I'm asking about the thing we need to divide this with

#

the length of the interval

rich furnace
#

So..... h??

burnt fiber
#

Yes

#

That was it

rich furnace
#

ohhhhhh.....

burnt fiber
#

So the average speed is given by $\frac{y(t+h) - y(t)}{h}$

viscid zephyrBOT
burnt fiber
#

but since you know what y(t+h) - y(t) is, you can plug that in

#

And you will get the average speed in [t, t+h]

#

So what does that yield?

rich furnace
#

Plug in with the actual numbers?

burnt fiber
rich furnace
#

OH
14 - 1.86h - 3.72t

burnt fiber
#

Very good

#

now, you can see that as the interval length (h here) becomes very very small

#

the term 1.86h will go closer and closer to 0

#

so you can throw it away (it's so small that we'll ignore it)

#

what remains?

rich furnace
#

14 - 3.72t

burnt fiber
#

that's your instantaneous speed at time t 🙂

#

and it just happens that in the case of t = 1, you get the quantity you've been trying to approach all this time in question (a)

rich furnace
#

WA

#

Wow

void oracle
#

Yeah, and in general the rate of change of f(t) is the limit of Δf(t, t + Δt)/Δt as Δt -> 0 (if that limit exists).

rich furnace
#

Thank you so much for your patience tytytytysobsquietly

burnt fiber
#

You are welcome

rich furnace
#

+close