#Augmented matrix
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Hint: look at the last row
Notice how in this form:
$\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & -5 \
0 & \lambda & -3\
0 & 0 & a
\end{pmatrix}\cdot
\begin{pmatrix}
x\
y\
z
\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}
C_1\
C_2\
C_3
\end{pmatrix}$
Lumberdude #LeaveWolfAsHeIs
whats a ?
It's the entry you had there
okay
What does the matrix having just one entry on the bottom row mean?
(z)(a) = C
(z)(a) ! = C
When is that the case?
evey other case than (z)(a) = C
undefined
So that means that?
there is no solution
Perfect!
Which one has to be zero for that to be the case?
And what happens if both are zero?
the denominator
it's undefined
all
Exactly, so infinitely many z satisfy this condition
Give me one second
I will try to see if your work is correct so far
Your top row is incorrect
really
So the rest will probably be incorrect too
okay
Yeah it should equal -4 not -6
That's ok, you noticed that Vinland saga is goated at least
These kind of mistakes will always happen!
yeah i think i can do it now
I got the solution for "no real solution" and for "infinitely many"
this is what happens when you do math while sleep deprived
Also for one solution
Yeah take care of yourself man
Sleep deprivation can do you in
Good, I agree
Ok so we determined for what lambda we get no solution and for what lambda we get infinite solutions.
When is there exactly one solution?
Are there more numbers for which this true?
i guess -2 ?
Didn't you determine that -2 yielded infinitely many solutions?
yeah
So that can't be one that yields only one solution, right?
Huh, didn't you say -3 and -2?
-3 yields no solutions
What is this exactly?
i set the bottom last row (z coeffecient) to equal C
fourth column bottom row
So you're saying c*z=c gives not exactly one solution?
Ok, we determined what values give infinite and no solutions, those won't give unique solutions
Is there other values we can exclude?
Think of things like the determinant being 0
Because that is the only other thing that could bring us no solution, right?
okay
Otherwise there should always be singular solutions
yeah
i think the question asks for one example for each
actually
no
it's pretty vague
-1
I think it wants you to tell when each of these cases occur. If there are infinitely many $\lambda \in \real, \lambda \neq -2,-3$
Lumberdude #LeaveWolfAsHeIs
They'd want you to mention that
yes
Are you sure? Don't forget that you multiply the last row by the vector to yield the bottom constant
We have already excluded all values for which this system will not have a unique solution, bare the case when det(A)=0
you are right
-1 gives a unique solution actually
Yes, any matrix that is non-singular, does not have a zero row equals some constant and where a row does not give 0*x=0 has a unique solution. I believe
i think that's it
inf solution = -3
no solution = -2
unique solution = any other value
i am kinda sure
this is what i get for doing comp
Computer science?
yes
you a math major ?
No, I'm a chemical engineering student in grad school
oh
I did notice something that could have saved a lot of headache, the determinant of the matrix yields the solution too, due to the fact that it determines when a matrix is singular if it is 0...
oh yeah
+close