#Linear transformation or not
132 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Ask your question and show the work you've done so far. If you've posted a screenshot of a question, specify which part you need help with.
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close - Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
What’s F(0,0)?
(0,-1)
Yep it isn’t (0,0)
cause even the transformation of each vectors in a vector addition is not equals to the linear transformation of the whole vector addition
okay thanks
also can u help
with singularity
@snow perch has given 1 rep to @amber burrow
Im not familiar with the term does it mean that the null space is non reduced to (0,0)?
that only the null subspace can have a null image
no other subspaces
can have a null subspace
and also F inverse transformation also exist
and F F^-1 = I
where I is identity
Well it isn’t even a linear transformation so can you even define it
also this all
i said here
is for non singular
not for singular
singular is opposite
Okay I see
a non zero subspace may have a null image and inverse F does not exist --> singular
F F^-1 is not equal to identity
this all is for singular
It’s basically just that it has a non zero null space
You can’t define F^-1 if F is not bijective null space not 0 => F non bijective
You’re welcome
also can I continue posting questions here , or do i have to create a new forum for that
Hmmm I don’t really know but I think you can post here
Check if there is stability and if each element has an inverse in S
but for group i remmeber
theres just one operation
and we check its associative under that , additive inverse, identity element
No here you need to check if it’s a group for x
so i need to check all these but with x
right ?
You can check if it’s a subgroup of Gl2(C)
Yep
Calculate A x B
Well is it in S?
lemme chec
its not
its making the B matrix
but interchange
0 and iota
that matrix its making
okay it follows one of
em
it has an identity element whihc is the identitty matrix
lemme chec other
uhmmm
What properties does a group have to satisfy ?
associatve under operation
existence of identity element under operation
existence of operative inverse
Yes but you forgot one
commutative under operation ( optional)
Stability
So here is it stable under multiplication ?
What I meant by stability is « closure »
ohh
closuree
i get it now
but wasnt it for vector spaces
and maybe fields as well
So if A and B are in S A x B must be in S
ohh I see
A vector space is a group under addition
Yep
That’s right it’s commutative
they have used closure
in this proof
but why didnt they tell
in
the properties
Well because closure isn’t a property of the group itself but the inner operation
So x for S
You’re very welcome !
You could’ve also proved that the inverse of B isnt in S if you wanted
Yeah, conventions differ on that. Some people list closure as an "axiom", but it's usually redundent. Typeically a group is defined as something like
A group is a set G together with an operation (⋅) on G such that ...
so to make sure a definition is a group, you need to check that (⋅) really is an operation on G (which closure is a part of)
so to check if a definition is a group, you have to check that the operation is well-defined and satisfies closure, as well as the group axioms
oh i seee thanks