#can anyone prove why there are 360 degrees in a circle?
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
369 looks a lot neater
this could have been the first one they tried
simply because of it's aestetic qualities
besides, if your just getting atarted in a field that is toatlly new
why would you need more than that?
if you can divide the circle into 3 equal parts and fit 3 equilateral triangles into it
you'd be happy as pie
ypu would work with that until you exhaused it
then say let's try something else
369 is interesting
just in it's digits
3:6 is double
6:9 is sesquialter (2:3)
3:9 is triple
that gives the octave, 5th and a 5th above the octave
have to look under the hood of this one
369 is divisible by 9
it's 3*123
of course 123 is going to appeal for aestetics
123/3=41
369/9=41
3 is triple of 1
6 is triple of 2
9 is triple of 3
1:2:3 :: 3:6:9
41 is prime
it's not very useful
but who cares if it looks good
you see this in the ancients very often
the appeal to aestetics over functionality
you see this at archeaological sites
here's a bowl
you can makde a bowl in no time
but they have to put all of these engravings and artsy frills on a bowl
it's a huge waste of labor
but they get into and do it that way
a bowl is a bowl
they often elevate the aestetic over the functionality
all of that gets trimmed off untill the system is more purely functonal but it takes 1000;s of years
if you take aestetics as the beginning
that they developed their customs to be pleasurable
then it;s easy to see that if you believe that god is made of 3 parts
man is made of body, soul and spirit
and you alreading preconcieve the universe as being composed of 3 parts
then you are going to begin astronomy and geometry using 3
equilateral triangles in a circle
that just looks good
and you already have a religion or mythology that elevates 3
the thing could have started as 369
then a newer generation had to fight tooth and nail about the functionality of 360 over 369
the old guard never gave in because "society might collapse!"
eventually the old guard died off
and 369 died out with them
up comes the swanky new 360 generation
and that's that
end of story
or end of chapter
I got a million stories
but think about
number and math had to have beginnings
those beginning are in ideas like 1, 2 and 3
so if you are going to found a science
it's probably going to begin in simple ideas like those
2 comes from some very simple ideas
like here and there
that's a good start to get to 2
me & not me
or me and -me
everything that is not me
that's a good start for getting the idea of 2
that's another topic
don't get me yapping on that
I'll yap yer ear right off
i got my yappin' stick
anybod be messin wif me i yap em upside the gibside
What's the difference between soul and spirit?
that's not the point
any division of thought could have led to math
but that's another thread
This dude needs his own custom role.
@compact barn
here's anoter tidbit. The 12 signs of the zodiac link modern astronomy to it's supersticious path on the way to becoming a science. Of course 360 lends itself to a division of 12.
Now, wouldn't it serve well, if they had chose a bas 12 system?
since numbers are just symbols for the ideas the represent
why not use the 12 signs of the zodiac as numbers which represent the corresponding ideas
Those 12 numbers would then look like this:
Aries ♈︎
Taurus ♉︎
Gemini ♊︎
Cancer ♋︎
Leo ♌︎
Virgo ♍︎
Libra ♎︎
Scorpio ♏︎
Sagittarius ♐︎
Capricorn ♑︎
Aquarius ♒︎
Pisces ♓︎
now are these in the correct order as to their appearance in the night sky?
yes they are
The we can designate Aries ♈︎ as 1
Taurus ♉︎ as 2
Gemini ♊︎ as 3 etc
in this system ♈︎ + ♉︎ = ♊︎
and ♊︎ is the first triangular number
you ony need to have you Secret Decoder Book handy and all is well
but the really tricky part will be the base 12
let's see how our whiz kids do at this
but seriously I just want to remind you that astronomy has it's roots in astrology and math has it's roots in numerology
Jeez
A circle is 360 degrees But have you ever thought why is a circle not a simpler number, like 10 degrees or 100 degrees? As it turns out 360 is actually a very good number. From a purely mathematical standpoint, a number like 10 or 100 would have been more inconvenient.
You see, the number 360 is divisible by every number from 1 to 10, aside fro...
3b1b explained it too in a video
i forgor which
I imagine this has been mentioned at some point, but a related question is "why are there 60 seconds/minutes in a minute/hour?"
(or 24h in a day, for that matter)
how do you figure that? 360 = 60 in base 60?
Thanks. We covered that earlier but nice to have some review
I did an examination of the harmonic innards of 300
it will be interesting to do the same with some other numbers
60 in base 60 is 10
360 is 6×60
In base 60 it would be 6×10
Which is 60
Base 12²
other numbers that can be divied by 7
in base 60 360 is 60? was this a typo?
No
I'd also like to look at the astrology that existed prior to the advent of astronomy
why not begin the system by plotting out 12 areas of the sky according to the zodiac
Wha the fu-
as a matter of fact, isn't that what happened?
Idk what the zodiac is
how does base 60 work?
in this post you said in base 60 360 is 60
Imagine instead of having 10 symbols for numbers (0-9), we had 60
0-9, A-Z, a-z what else
oh wait
They had special symbols
I don't think they used the Latin lexicon
it's nice to have a few people here who speak math
I'm still a high schooler my maths is a little basic
this would be interesting to look into
(laugh at my joke)
because I can see no reason (because of the strological roots of astronomy) that they wouldn't divide the sky by the divisions of the zodiac
(which it is obvious that they did)
and also adopt the siggns of the zodiac forf their base numerals
those signs would serve well as numbers
they are a bit elaborate though
I believe it was because the relevant civilisation(s) used base 60, a number system which favours the numbers, 12, 24 & 36
it's ok My math is basic also
yes, it favors 12 so the zodiac is appropriate and the fact is that they did divide the sky by the zodiac
maybe because of base 60?
is that what you are saying?
that would make sense
Base 60 obviously favours the number 60, which would explain why there are 60" in 1' and 60' in an hour
It also makes 24 hours/day convenient
As well as 30 days/month funnily enough
yes
what about the harmonic intervals in 360?
Aries ♈︎
Taurus ♉︎
Gemini ♊︎
Cancer ♋︎
Leo ♌︎
Virgo ♍︎
Libra ♎︎
Scorpio ♏︎
Sagittarius ♐︎
Capricorn ♑︎
Aquarius ♒︎
Pisces ♓︎
These are only too elaborate for notation
Uhh wut are "harmonistic intervals"?
go back and read the discussion over
it's chock fulla goodies
My knowledge says "harmony" = works together and "interval" = gap
I'm too tired to read a novel rn
War & Peace is what I'm writing here
The DEcline and Fall of the Roman Empire
The Complete Works of J. S. Bach
I swear everyone I ask thinks about the Roman empire once a week
Yeah
they don't give the romans due
It's kind of crazy tho
render to caesar the things that are caesar’s
Imagine building an empire that everyone living thousands of years in the future thinks about every week
never thought of the romans like that
Greece, Rome, Babylon, Britian, USA
there are lots more empires
Inca
Mayan
Aztec
all important
indus
and what is the greatest empire of all time?
German
i dont think there is one
there are faults in all of them
There was
MATH
Less than a century ago...
ok
Mathematics doesn't need an empire
Less than is an interesting mathematical concept
more or less
Manly men in skirts:
5" is the lesser part of a millenium
how is it that 10 played an important role in seagesimal?
sexagesimal
10 looks more prominant in these figures
10 is in a more simplified from than any multiple of 6 on this chart
10 has it's own special form
after 10 first appears on the chart, it serves as a prefix for the following numbers
the system looks decimal to me
after 20 first appears (a double 10) it goes on to serve as a prefix for the next numbers
Likewise for all multiples of 10
The 59 digits of the Babylonian number system used in ancient Mesopotamia. Although it is a base 60 system, it has a sub-base of 10, making the numbers fairly easy to interpret without extensive cuneiform experience.
Then it is not so in the cuniform experience?
because it should not appear so
it should appear that muliples of 60 or 6 are most prominent
Thanks for your contribution. You make a much better entrance into this topic than many others.
since we can fit 6 equilateral triangles inside a circle this makes for a number of convenient divisions
like the diameter can be can be calculated along with the semi-circle
the clock gets it's divisions from the sundial
the sundial uses a circle
bc in 1 line it is 180 degrees so 180 + 180 = 360 so 1 circle is 360
that's a circular argument?
you are using your premise as the conclusion of your logic
rockhoven has been timed out for 5m 

Reason: Links Spam
“Who Made Sexagesimal System? Explained By FAQ Blog”. 2022. faq-blog.com. https://faq-blog.com/who-made-sexagesimal-system.
S. Silvia, “Sexagesimal, also known as base 60 or sexagenary, is a numeral system with sixty as its base”. 2023. Quora. https://qr.ae/prE6uG.
Lamb, Evelyn. 2014. “Ancient Babylonian Number System Had No Zero”. Scientific American Blog Network. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/roots-of-unity/ancient-babylonian-number-system-had-no-zero/.
The surprising difficulties of ancient Mesopotamian arithmetic
Lamb, Evelyn. 2017. “The Joy Of Sexagesimal Floating-Point Arithmetic”. Scientific American Blog Network. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/roots-of-unity/the-joy-of-sexagesimal-floating-point-arithmetic/.
Lombardi, Michael A. 2007. “Why Is A Minute Divided Into 60 Seconds, An Hour Into 60 Minutes, Yet There Are Only 24 Hours In A Day?” Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/experts-time-division-days-hours-minutes/.
“Research Guides: Cartographic Resources For Genealogical Research: Eastern Europe And Russia: Latitude And Longitude”. 2022. guides.loc.gov. https://guides.loc.gov/maps-genealogy-eastern-europe/coordinates/latitude-longitude.
“Sexagesimal – Wikipedia”. 2022. en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexagesimal.
“Systems Of Measuring Angles”. 2022. onlinemath4all. https://www.onlinemath4all.com/systems-of-measuring-angles.html.
“Units Of Longitude And Latitude – Basic Coordinates And Seasons – NAAP”. 2022. astro.unl.edu. https://astro.unl.edu/naap/motion1/tc_units.html.
“Why Did Sumerians Use The Sexagesimal System? | Nagaitoshiya.Com”. 2013. nagaitoshiya.com. https://www.nagaitoshiya.com/en/2013/sexagesimal/.
"The Sumerian sexagesimal system used ten as a sub-base. The following table indicates that the vertical wedge (V) represents 1 and the horizontal one (<) 10. It is decimal until it reaches 59. The Sumerian used a decimal system around 3500 BC and then their system evolved into the sexagesimal."
This is what I said when I began on this channel. Sexagesimal and decimal met as two cultures came into contact with each other. Ten is a sub-base. It was decimal until it evolved into the base 60.
So what do those who have supplied us with the information that the sexagesimal system is base 60 have to say? The system is decimal until 59.
No problem. I thought it was base 6.
I was surprised to find any number higher than 5 or 6 in this system.
Plimpton 322 is a Babylonian clay tablet, notable as containing an example of Babylonian mathematics. It has number 322 in the G.A. Plimpton Collection at Columbia University. This tablet, believed to have been written around 1800 BC, has a table of four columns and 15 rows of numbers in the cuneiform script of the period.
This table lists two o...
This table lists two of the three numbers in what are now called Pythagorean triples, i.e., integers a, b, and c satisfying a2 + b2 = c2. From a modern perspective, a method for constructing such triples is a significant early achievement, known long before the Greek and Indian mathematicians discovered solutions to this problem. At the same time, one should recall the tablet's author was a scribe, rather than a professional mathematician; it has been suggested that one of his goals may have been to produce examples for school problems.
Does 360 lend itself to the production of Pythagorean triples?
How could you answer this question?
1/2 the diameter is 90
64 72 90? I think that is a Pythagorean triple
but can we get these numbers from the division of 360?
it doesn't look like it
The lines could be drawn as perpendiculars to the radius
360/72=5 this looks good
90 is given
but 360/64 gives 5.625
hmmm
that's not bad
we only need to raise all of these numbers up
5625 72000 90000
that should be a Pythagorean triple
but that's no great feat
any circle must contain a Pythagorean triple
but maybe it's 5625 7200 9000?
that looks better
9000 is the hypotenuse
sq of 9000 = 81,000,000
sq on 7200 = 51,840,000
sq on 5625 = 31,640,625
NOPE
doesn't work
the sq on 7200 + sq on 5625 ≠ sq on 9000
well, I know there's a triple in there because it's a circle
how do you get this triple out of 360 is what I want to know
if it's possible
3 4 5 is a triple
these can divide 360
what can I do next?
they divide 180 and 90
90:5 :: ?:4 :: ?:3
90:5 :: 72:4 :: 54:3
is this correct?
sq on 5400 = 29,160,000
Yes, we can place a Pythagorean triple on the radius in 360 from the division of 360
because 29,160,000 + 51,840,000 = 81,000,000
we can cancel the last 3 digits for 29,160 + 51,840 = 81,000
or 2916 + 5184 = 8100
this requires the expansion of the radius to the square on 90 or 8100
the Pythagorean triple consists in 3 perpendiculars on the radius
these are parallel lines
they can be reassembled to form a right angle in the quadrant
I might scan Ptolemy and Copernicus to see if they use these numbers
oh my
jesus rock
or does the triple fit into the whole semi circle?
oh + my = oh my
oh + my - oh = my
but really the triples can be gotten with any circle regardless of the divsion of the circumference
i was just wondering what it would look like in 360
it should be noted that in actual astonomical calculations the numbers are multiplied up into the 100's of thousnads
the diameter or radius is multiplied
Ima gonna dig up some of these calculations
bros summoning beings now
it's the Return of the Mummy
$\theta=l/r$
Duke of Gloucestershire
Perhaps this is how you will get the result
I can't believe that you people managed to rack up 2300 messages on this topic!
I heard that the year sistem used to have 360 days, so that's why someone decided that the circle is 360 degree
We can't prove it because is a kind of axiom, the rest of angles are given by starting assuming a circle is 360 degree
However, 360 is just an arbritary number, but it's efficient because it can be divided by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, etc
In formal terms, the real angle of a circumference is 2.pi
Sorry for my English I don't speak it
i wonder how many of them are yours
2299/2300
I think I posted at least once.
the question is how many did YOU post which contained math?
at least a few of my posts contained some maths.
*you
Ok
Let's take a break
10 minutes
get yerself a cup of coffee
here's a song to refresh your spirits
Where were we on this topic? I was looking at the intervals that can be generated from a given number.
So I took a day or two to examine the insides of 300. I was also interested in compraing these numbers to the internal anatomy of the number 360 and maybe a few others like 666 and 144, on the supposition that the number had to be able to generate certain harmonic frequencies.
because quator of circles angle is 90
total angle is 360 and circle has 2 halfs
so first half like circle is 180
and so
tautology
yes
Take my poll: Do you believe the universe is designed?#1203441419344289793 message
goingtoohio has been timed out for 5m 

Reason: Similar-Messages Spam
L
among us
proof: there are 360° in a circle ◼
Lmfao very thorough explanation though
Here is a list of harmonic intervals I worked out using 360 as the tonic.
***P5
360 3
240 2
P4
360 4
270 3
M3
360 5
288 4
m3
360 6
300 5
360 8
315 7
m2
360 9
320 8
M6
360 5
216 3
There may be many others that can be worked out but these are the principal intervals that make the scale
and I think we have always been looking for a unified theory
so 360 would have been suited for a unified theory of geometry, arithmetic, and harmonics.
This is meant to be an addition to what others have said here and in no way negates those theories
It is complimentary information
360
180
90
45
That outlines three whole octaves
and there are many other intervals that can be extracted from 360
these are just a few of the most important
the list of octaves is in a 2:1 relation
almost every relation listed was a superparticular
I may have missed some
then there are the superpartients
with 360, you get a wide range of harmonic intervals using only whole numbers
Now depending on how you divide the Greek curriculum
you have anywhere from 3 to 5 sciences that they were seeking to unify
geometry, arithmetic, harmonics and astronomy
there may be another
we know that they wrote a lot on harmonics
but the treatises are only mentioned
most of them were lost
a few things survive
but this is also an interesting subject and deserves a new topic
which I may post in the coming weeks
the point now was to mention it and clearly state the math
and show the relation of harmonics with astronomy, geometry and arithmetic
via the 360 degree circle
360 had to be useful for the whole curriculum
i AGRee with you AGReeing with me that math is a language
5040
#1266361767072895007 message
Don't forget that science in it's earliest stages was rules by mysticism like astrology, numerology, alchemy etc.
36 is the first number that is a potential triagonal, rectangle and square.
360 can be achieved from 36 either by multiplying by the decimal 10 or the triagonal 10
eh?
@fallow mesa has the potential to write a book, out of 2500 (approx.) messages 2000 messages are his
lol
to measure anything you need a unit
now that smallest unit could be anything..
it depends on the discoverer
i mean circle could have 370 degrees, or 180 degrees etc etc if 'degree' measure was diff
like if a second was a different measure i day wouldnt have 24 hours
u mean like our ancestors randomly gave the number 360 as it was easy to divide
so can we ask why are there 24 hours a day?
haha maybe
or there could be some definition
like for example the 'atomic mass units'
to define it they divided carbons's atomic mass into 12
similarly there might be definition of each measure
the unit is arbitrary. Descartes was the first to acknowledge this.
That is like about 2500 years after the history of math began
then descartes defines the unit as arbitrary
that is amazing
2500 years before that idea was documented
another interesting thing (units of time and things related to circle)
Earth's rotation as unit of time (24 hrs and 3600s in 1hr)
Days in a month and year, all are related to the factors of 360
@fallow mesa what do u think about it?
well, it is probably cultural
i mean 360 does divide
so it's not cultural
but you can not, even though they tried, fit the cycle of a year into 360
but it is close enough to have been used in the early attempts to produce a consistent calendar
IDK what do you think?
yeah cuz of orbit of earth is an ellipse
if it was a circle then we could say 360 don't u?
this is just my assumption
yeah
so they added 1 number in alternaet months
in rome
they added
we are talking babaylonian
it's necessary to consider their whole number theory
and the sexagesimal system
there is a lort to consider
12hrs in half a day and 12 hr in month
60 seconds a minuite and 60 min an hour
(360 if revolution was a circle) days and 360 degree
i don't think it is a mere co-incidence
also the great interest in harmonics
and amu =(1/12) mass of C12 isotope
lol
yeah
i don't think there is a lot more we can do with this topic without studying their math systems
that was decided from experiments ig?
My chem teacher told me that
we could look more at harmonic intervals using 6, 60 or 360 as a tonic
mass spectrometer thingy
yup
@fallow mesa gotta go for now, we will discuss later