#How do i find the Crit.#'s and PIPS here
160 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Well, I think a good place to start would be reading the instructions.
i did i have to find the crit.#s and pips in order to do the second derivative test
"PIPs"?
yeah we equaled the equation to 0 and than factored. than lets say we had (x - 2)(x + 3) then our crit #s or our PIPs would be x = 2 and -3
but i dont know how i would factor out here or how i should find them
Okay, the factoring part is not important.
like is there another method
What's important is that you set the derivative equal to 0, and then solve for x.
so i would just use square root of 1 during the test?
...what's the square root of 1?
1
Or?
-1
What's the domain of h?
what do you mean domain of h
mb still not sure what you mean
Try to calculate h(-1) for me, please.
oh they both equal to 0
ln-1 is just coming up as an error
Let's think about why that might be. What's ln?
it sa natual log or in other works log base e
Right. So if ln(-1) = k, then -1 = e^k, right?
yeah
Can e^k ever be negative if k is a real number?
no right?
Right. e^k is always positive for real k. Therefore the range of e^x is (0, inf), and since ln(x) is its inverse, it has that same interval as its domain.
Trying to take a logarithm of a non-positive number doesn't give us a real answer.
oh so because of that for what i was doing earlier -1 isnt in the domain of h
Right.
becuase -1 cant exist with ln
And let's take a moment to just clarify why we're so interested in solutions to h'(x) = 0.
We're looking for local extrema, right?
yeah
What are those?
rel max or min
Okay, but what are those?
when the slope is 0
Why?
the line goes from neg to pos or pos to neg, its a curve
Right, but what I'm trying to guide you towards is the visual intuition.
A local maximum is, literally, a value of the function that is higher than any other point around it.
A local minimum is a value of the function that is lower than any other point around it.
So in order to be a maximum, the curve has to climb as it approaches the maximum, level off at the maximum, and then dive as it leaves the maximum.
If it's continuous at the maximum, at least.
So, like - wait.
If you kinda already knew all this, why were you so confused about how to find critical points?
i learned this on wednesday and friday and have homework due tommorow, i kinda put it off till right now. And im also kind of confused on what i learned for extrema, first and second deriv test, and curve sketching
Okay, well, like we just talked about, (potential) extrema are the points at which the derivative is zero because, with the exception of discontinuity, if the derivative wasn't 0 at that point, it would be impossible for it to be an extremum.
yeah that makes sense
So we found x = 1, so what do we do now?
do the test and find extrema and inf. pts.
...do what test, how, on what?
oh do the test with x = 1, but from what i see here isnt this just an inflection point since it stays positive, and i can send a picture of what the test looks like
...what "stays positive"?
That doesn't help me.
what stays positive is the slope
Okay, I'm like 90% sure you've confused yourself, but the only way that I can show you that is if you're more explicit about what you did.
Like, all I see is a chart. You didn't tell me how you drew the chart or filled it in.
so after i found the derivative, i set the equation to zero and got the crit #. when i made the chart the numbers with the line going up are the crit #s and the numberst to the right and left are just the direct numbers next to them(if there are multiple numbers you put 0 in the middle) after the i plugged in the equation to the chart and checked where it was positive and where it was negative
oh i just saw that i did 1 instead of x - 1/x
"Plugged in the equation to the chart" is not... a thing.
Yeah, it would've been something like that, but also this is the first derivative test, not the second.
That's also not the second derivative test.
The second derivative test is when we evaluate the second derivative at the zeroes of the first derivative.
But this does mean that there's no points of inflection.
Well, again, no real points of inflection.
Since sqrt(-1) = i.
honestly sorry but im so confused right now
Okay, well let's relax and take it slow.
What does the second derivative measure?
extrema, concavity, and inflection points
Okay, it doesn't measure extrema.
Concavity was the answer I was looking for.
That includes inflection points, since an inflection point is just the point at which concavity changes.
First derivative measures slope, second derivative measures concavity.
oh okay so we find extrema with the first by seeing when the slope changes, and concavity/inflection with the second
Right.
And the second derivative test tells us which kind of extremum we're looking at.
yeah if it faces down or up right?
Because what does it mean when the second derivative is positive?
its facing up/ concave up
So if h'(a) = 0 and h''(a) > 0?
then its concave up
And?
Right. And if h'(a) = 0 and h''(a) < 0?
then its a max at a and concave down
Right. More specifically it's a max at a because it's concave down.
So what if h'(a) = 0 and h''(a) = 0?
isnt that just a line like h(x)=a
oh so than its an inflection point where it goes from pos to 0 to pos or neg to 0 to neg
Right. Because what "concavity" really is is the rate of change of the slope.
"Concave down" is when the slope is decreasing, "concave up" is when it's increasing.
So if the slope at a point is 0, and the slope is increasing at that point, that means that to the right of that point the slope is greater than 0.
And to the left of that point the slope is less than zero, because it increased to zero.
yeah
And if the slope at a point is 0 and it's decreasing, that means it was more than 0 on the left and less than 0 on the right.
But then when we look at f(x) = x^3, we see a case where the slope is 0 and the change in slope is also 0, and in this case it turns out to be because that's the point that the change in the slope goes from decreasing to increasing; an inflection point.
okay that makes sense
But a 0 in the second derivative isn't always an inflection point, because, y'know, what's the second derivative of f(x) = a?
0
Right, but it's just a horizontal line. It has no slope, much less change in slope.
So anyway, going all the way back to the original question.
We have h'(x) = 0 when x = 1.
So we know x = 1 is something. How do we figure out what it is?
we do the test to see what we get at that point
...okay, can you use words other than "do the test"?
use the 1st derivative test to find which extrema it is
Is that what the question says to do?
it says exterma, but than also inflection points which can be gotten from the 2nd derivative test
It says use the second derivative test.
That's what it says.
Use the second derivative test to find the extrema.
That is what the question says to do.
And I just went to great pains to explain in excruciating detail exactly what that means and why it works.
nono im pretty sure i understand this now
i really am thankful and your explenation has helped
i got to use the 2nd derivative test to find the extrema and the inflection points
By doing what?
by finding if h''(a) < 0 or h''(a) > 0
And what's a in this context?
1
So what result do we get?
Which means?
rel. min. at h(1), dec. from (-inf, 1), and inc. from (1, inf)
...no.
First of all, we talked about the function's domain, right?
Second of all, the second derivative has no real zeroes, meaning that concavity doesn't change direction.
Thirdly, why are you even talking about the intervals of decrease or increase? Those weren't part of the question.
But also, concavity never changes direction. That means that the slope of the function never decreases, so that's not just a relative minimum, it's the absolute minimum.
oh okay, and what do you mean when you said that concavity nevery changes direction and that slope never decreases. Isnt that what happenes on the left of concave up and on the right of concave down?
Okay, look, the function is concave down at x = 1, right?
That means the slope is increasing, right?
ok
But the slope is always increasing, is my point.
It starts negative, increases to 0, then increases past 0.
oh ok