#help confused
243 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Its number 8 btw
i noticed that thats the formula for the double tangent
so i got a closed form of:
$s_n = tan (4 * 2^n)$. However, I was unable to find the periodicity of this function
!𒐪cut rizzly bear𒐪!
do you know the periodicity of tan
no
this is a mth competition problem
or its homework
but its for math competition
well
i know that tan (theta) = tan (360k + theta)
for any integer k
bro doesn't know shit but won't look it up
?
so like every 180?
wait im special
that aint the tan function
thats just a recursive
🫢
Should be tan(4°*2^n), not tan(4*2^n). We have:
tan(4°*2^n) = tan((π/45)2^n)
So, for some integer m:
(π/45)2^(n + k) = (π/45)2^n + πm
2^(n + k) = 2^n + 45m
Not sure how to continue from here, though.
wait
what does the little circle mean
Degrees, as usual.
Then you should've specified it.
4° is not 4, it's π/45.
just use the formula for tan(2A)
i did
then?
so i got the closed form of s_n
is that even periodic
idk
hmm okay let's see
It is, as the angle is rational.
Look what I wrote above.
It just seems to require some number theory.
im looking at this
um
can u pls not use radians
i am familiar but i don't like it
Why not? Radians are the natural way of measuring angles.
s1 : tan(8)
s2 : tan(16)
s3 : tan(32)
s4 : tan(64)
s5 : tan(128)
s6 : tan(256)=tan(256-180)=tan(76)
s7 : tan(152)
s8 : tan(334)=tan(334-180)=tan(154)
a9 : tan(308)=tan(308-180)=tan(128)
and we repeat so the period is 5->9
unless I messed up the calculations
ah crap
you didn't
i did mess it up
fixed it
s7
what was wrong
i wrote 162 there
o
so starting from s5 the sequence is 4-periodic
but wouldn't you need to change the rest
what
2 * 152 is not 334
bro
i can't
im not typing each individual
also it should be assumed that no caluclator
ok but what should i do
@faint dragon any ideas
what is htis
use inequalities
but they need to hbe equal
ok
how should i approach it
o
i have idea
so ceil(x) + ceil(y) <= x + y + 2
right
then
ceil(x+y) <= x+y+1 right
and each is greater than or equal to x+y
wait actually stricly less than

wait I'll close my laptop
okay
okay so first
nvm than
okay
so is the area of $\qty{(x, y) \in \bR:x^2+y^2<1}$
Coffey, Slavic Taiga
Oh, hold on.
2^(n + k) = 2^n + 45m
2^n (2^k + 1) = 45m
If the left side is even, then the right side has the largest odd factor 45, which isn't 1 above a power of 2. So, n = 0 and m = 2m' + 1 is odd:
2^k + 1 = 45(2m' + 1)
2^k + 1 = 90m' + 45
2^k = 90m' + 44
From here... Well, we probably need number theory. I tried brute force, but couldn't find a solution.
it's 12 periodic
via brute force
Wait, is it? Hm...
I don't think my equation works, then... Not sure why.
$\sum_{1\leq i\leq k} \ceil{x_i} = \ceil{\sum_{1\leq i\leq k}x_i}$
Coffey, Slavic Taiga
preety trivial but still
if its simpler
ok
did you know that the intersection of countably many dense subsets in a complete space is non empty and even dense in the space this is known as baire theorem
i have no idea what ur saying
okay ill stop
ok so how to do the prolem
gimme 45 seconds
k
do yk what linearity is
no
how about we not gereralize it
and just do the problem
it seems we are getting too out of hand
wii
okay
so
let's start with
What's the probability of having $\ceil{x+y}=\ceil{x}+\ceil{y}$ Where $x, y\in [0,1]$
Coffey, Slavic Taiga
idk
Coffey, Slavic Taiga
because then ceil(x+y) is 2
while ceil(x)+ceil(y) is always 2
ok 1/2
R2?
nvm I'll write it
The above results in a probability of $0.5$ in any square $\$ $[m, m+1]\times [n, n+1]$ where $m, n\in\bZ$
okay?
yeah
Coffey, Slavic Taiga
so can we say that for any rectangle $[a, b] \times [c, d]$ with $a, b, c, d\in \bZ$ such that $a<b, c<d$ it holds
Coffey, Slavic Taiga
bruh
any real can be split into n+f where n is an integer and f in [0,1)
so if we move the square up or down or in any direction by 1
we just add/subtract an 1 from both sides of the equation
resulting in the same equation
we move it by an integer
the bottom left vertex it s2,2
side length 1
then all the numbers we work with can be broken into 2+f
done
bro dissappear
anyways this is the trivial idea
you can generalise it to any dimensions
yes
the probability is
$\text{vol}\qty(\qty{(x_1,\ldots, x_n) \in \qty(0,1)^n : \Sigma_{i=1}^nx_i>1})$
Coffey, Slavic Taiga
??????????
wdym which is still 1
okay let's talk 3D
what's the area of the 1 side length cube
draw the plane x+y+z>1
,w graph x+y+z=1
gtg sry
.


bro