#Real sequences
106 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
were you told the initial starting terms?
yeah the problem is in the last question
you did 2?
yepo
okay
u(n+1)+v(n+1)=1/3 * (3un+3vn)=un+vn
so u(n+1)+v(n+1)=u0+v0
basically u(n) +v(n) is constant
and so what about its limitation
what
hwo can that help us detrmine the limit l of the two
what's the limit of a constant sequence an_xoze
oh you aren't talking about 3?
U0
ofc
oh right so how would we define the limit of un and vn from this eigjr6
right*
un+vn -> u0+v0
you proved that un, vn have the same limit.
so un, vn -> (u0+v0)/2
how so ?
which line?
last one
okay
suppose
un -> L
vn -> L
then, un+vn -> 2L
now we already have, un+vn -> u0+v0
so 2L=u0+v0
as a sequence can't have 2 limits
L = (u0+v0)/2
what'd you try till now?
i tried to prove directly that it is a cauchy sequence by applyibng the definition
but there is no way out
continuity is an important factor
in which way
Interesting!
From the first sequence:
v(n) = 3u(n + 1) - 2u(n)
v(n + 1) = 3u(n + 2) - 2u(n + 1)
We substitute this into the second sequence.
3(3u(n + 2) - 2u(n + 1)) = u(n) + 2(3u(n + 1) - 2u(n))
9u(n + 2) - 12u(n + 1) + 3u(n) = 0
3u(n + 2) - 4u(n + 1) + u(n) = 0
This is a linear recurrence relation, which is easy to solve. After you solve it, substitute it into the first equation for v(n) above to find it.
I'm sure this is not the better way
you can prove that a limit exists
then take the limit on the relation itself
Yeah, probably. It is quite easy, though. I don't remember the required theorems, unfortunately 😅
monotone bounded
There is also the matrix approach. I'm a bit rusty on it, but let me try after I move to my PC.
no
no matrice
matrix??!
well ig the f' < 1 gauruntees it's not something weird like sin(1/x) or 1/x
Bro I am looking out for anything that could provide additional info but idk how the hell we can proof it is a Cauchy sequence
I have thought about using the reciprocal function
Let r(n) = {{u(n)}, {v(n)}}, A = {{2/3, 1/3}, {1/3, 2/3}}. Then we have:
r(n) = Ar(n - 1)
In other words:
r(n) = A^n r(0)
So, let's find A^n. We need to diagonalize it.
det(A - λI) = λ^2 - (4/3)λ + 1/3 = 0
The roots are λ1 = 1/3, λ2 = 1.
For λ1 = 1/3:
A - (1/3)I = {{1/3, 1/3}, {1/3, 1/3}}
The eigenvector is r1 = {{1}, {-1}}, which we normalize to {{1/√(2)}, {-1/√(2)}}.
For λ2 = 1:
A - I = {{-1/3, 1/3}, {1/3, -1/3}}
The eigenvector is r2 = {{1}, {1}}, which we normalize to {{1/√(2)}, {1/√(2)}}.
Thus:
P = {{1/√(2), 1/√(2)}, {-1/√(2), 1/√(2)}}
P^(-1) = P^T = {{1/√(2), -1/√(2)}, {1/√(2), 1/√(2)}}
A = P{{1/3, 0}, {0, 1}}P^(-1)
A^n = P{{3^(-n), 0}, {0, 1}}P^(-1) = {{1/√(2), 1/√(2)}, {-1/√(2), 1/√(2)}}{{3^(-n), 0}, {0, 1}}{{1/√(2), -1/√(2)}, {1/√(2), 1/√(2)}} = (1/2){{1 + 3^(-n), 1 - 3^(-n)}, {1 - 3^(-n), 1 + 3^(-n)}}
Thus:
u(n) = (1/2)(1 + 3^(-n))u(0) + (1/2)(1 - 3^(-n))v(0) = (1/2)(u(0) + v(0)) + (1/2)(u(0) - v(0))3^(-n)
v(n) = (1/2)(1 - 3^(-n))u(0) + (1/2)(1 + 3^(-n))v(0) = (1/2)(u(0) + v(0)) - (1/2)(u(0) - v(0))3^(-n)
For (1) we need the values of u(0) and v(0).
For (2) it's now quite obvious what the common limit is. Even more obvious if we follow the advice from (3).
continuous functions map cauchy sequences to cauchy sequences
the limit is (u0+v0)/2
Yeah.
Well, it's pretty easy! Just look at what I did.
The matrix was nice and easy to diagonalize.
The rest is easy.
Yes but consider sin(1/x) it's continuous on (0,1]
Besides, while I'm sure you can do this without finding the exact formulas for u(n) and v(n), aren't you at least a little bit curious what they are? 😉
Basically f' < 1 gives us that
for any x,y, f(x)-f(y) / x-y <= 1
mhm?
i.e. lipschityz
continous
cute
ye
from this
f(u_n) is cauchy for any cauchy u_n
trivially

Aw, does noone like to find exact formulas in these exercises if possible? 😔
and all cauchy sequences are convergent :3:3:3:3
nOpE
although I have something for you to try
Ah, that's a shame...
$a_{n+1} = \frac{a_nb_n}{a_n+b_n};b_{n+1}= \frac{a_n+b_n}{2}$
tetotetotetotetotetotetoteto
find the limits
Oh, arithmetic-harmonic mean! I've heard it converges to the geometric mean.
@heady oak which gives us f(1/n)-f(1/m) <= 1/n - 1/m and 1/n-1/m can be made really small
So from here u should be able to fill in the details of the proof
I wonder if it works for arbitrary power means of opposite powers.
Oh, by the way, the RHS of the first equation should be multiplied by 2, I believe.
Lip shits continuous => continuous btw
thanks mate
@final umbra has given 1 rep to @heady sparrow
Quite a cool problem!
