#Fourier series

44 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

final sail
#

Need help with a fourier series question. The series I'm getting is nowhere near the expected form after substituting the given x. While on it, how does x = 4pi + a even fit in the domain of the fourier series substitution?

graceful micaBOT
#
  1. Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
  2. Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
  1. Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
  2. Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
  3. If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
fallen arrow
final sail
fallen arrow
#

Let me check, hold on.

fallen arrow
#

Here's the definition I'm using, by the way.

final sail
#

although it's still different, brb i'll verify it

final sail
fallen arrow
final sail
#

and similarly for cos - cos

fallen arrow
#

Hm... Hold on, let me think about that.

final sail
#

a is supposed to be greater than -pi because that's given

fallen arrow
final sail
#

and the substitution 4pi + a will be greater than 3pi, which will fall outside the range the fourier series is defined, right?

fallen arrow
#

So, f(a + 4π) = f(a + π).

final sail
#

from my notes, we were given this. I thought the values of x were "allowed" to substitute were "in" the first cycle of the function?

#

the alpha < x < alpha + 2pi part (seeing period is 2pi here)

fallen arrow
#

That is because f(x) does indeed equal to that in the interval we define it, but outside of it it is continued periodically.

#

Here is what our function looks like for a = 0, b = 1, for example (and n = 500).
The vertical lines show the initial segment.

final sail
fallen arrow
#

Oh, by the way: if the function has jump discontinuities at some points (including the boundary points), then the value of the Fourier series will be the average of one-sided limits.

final sail
#

that... is interesting

#

we never learnt the topic well enough to understand much more than "here's the formulae, solve" ;-;

fallen arrow
#

Now, let's work with the expression.
πn(a(n)cos(2nx/3) + b(n)sin(2nx/3)) = (sin(2bn/3) - sin(2an/3))cos(2nx/3) + (cos(2an/3) - cos(2bn/3))sin(2nx/3) = (sin(2bn/3)cos(2nx/3) - cos(2bn/3)sin(2nx/3)) - (sin(2an/3)cos(2nx/3) - cos(2an/3)sin(2nx/3)) = sin(2(b - x)n/3) - sin(2(a - x)n/3) = 2sin((b - a)n/3)cos((a + b - 2x)n/3)
So:
a(n)cos(2nx/3) + b(n)sin(2nx/3) = 2sin((b - a)n/3)cos((a + b - 2x)n/3)/(πn)
Though, I don't really know why they offer such a value. I think x = a will give a better result.

fallen arrow
#

Ok, yeah: I checked, you can get the result for x = a.

fallen arrow
final sail
jolly larkBOT
#

@final sail has given 1 rep to @fallen arrow

final sail
#

i literally got scared by the trig simplification

fallen arrow
#

I can DM you my result where I substituted x = a if you want. It will be in a spoiler so you can still try it.

final sail
final sail
#

almost got the whole answer anw flush

dense ploverBOT
final sail
#

+close