#particles
55 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Note that v = dx/dt, a = dv/dt.
So, you need to solve a(t) = 1 in (a), integrate v(t) in the required interval in (b) (and take the absolute value if necessary), solve v(t) = 0 and integrate in (c) and integrate |v(t)| in (d).
for a), dx/dt so that v goes to 0, then solve for 't' right?
Yes. However, note that you are already given v(t), not x(t).
Hm... Well, one-dimensional motion equations, I guess.
right, thank you!
You're welcome!
ok i think i got it. do dv/dt = 1
because dv/dt = a
and a=1
dv/dt=1?
then solve for t
?
Yes.
im getting 2t= -1 but i dont think thats right
Ah, sorry, I forgot: we need the magnitude of acceleration, so |a| = |dv/dt|.
right so 'v' is a vector value not a scalar value in this question?
idk how to find 'a' then lol
Yeah, technically a one-dimensional vector.
Well, we have:
v(t) = 8 + 2t - t^2
a(t) = 2 - 2t
|a(t)| = |2 - 2t| = 2|t - 1|
We need |a(t)| = 1. So:
2|t - 1| = 1
Now you need to solve this equation. Of course, you only need the nonnegative values of t.
t=1.5?
Is that the only root?
i think so
Can you show how you did it?
You forgot the absolute value.
isnt the t=2 the absolute value though as its non-negative?
i dont know how to find another t value
We have:
2|t - 1| = 1
|t - 1| = 1/2
When we remove the absolute value, we place a ± on one of the sides.
t - 1 = ±1/2
t = 1 ± 1/2
So, we get two values: t = 1 - 1/2 = 1/2 and t = 1 + 1/2 = 3/2.
You're welcome! Try the others now, they are a bit trickier.
b)
or am i way off
Well... Notation kinda sucks, to be honest 😅
agreed
oh right i get it
its way more simpler when you write it lol
i need to work on my notation
for c)
80/3 is the answer i got (its kind of hard to read)
Yeah, seems good.
this is what part c is asking for right?
If you meant part (d), then yes.
+close