#how can 130* have a sine
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
when ur first introduced to trig, you deal with triangles
the formal definition after that is using a unit circle
trigonometry can deal with any positive or negative angle
if u look at the unit circle u can see that sine is defined for any and all angles
the triangle is the most basic definition and is not the formal definition for trig
But isn’t sine for example the ratio between opposite and hypotenuse?
How could a 130* triangle have them
^
Wait so is sine always just the y value?
yea it’s the y value of a unit circle
And that’s by definition
yup
yup
we need a unit circle to use them as a function
a triangle cant do that
Ok so the application for trig from what I can see went from tryna figure triangle lengths
To figuring out locations relative to each other
Is that correct?
wym by this
So you know how trig ratios only worked with figuring out distances between a triangle but with trig functions what you are dealing with is location or distance for all angles. So let’s say we have a motor that turns a arm 240 degrees anticlockwise then the location would be at ((rcos(240),(rsin(240). Where r is the length of the arm
So it’s just a way to measure distance given a angle and one length
well yeah but we would break the 240 degrees to a smaller angle using trig identities
or the other way around
and its still valid for finding lengths of triangles
best of both worlds