#PLEASE HELP DUE TOMORROW MORN ONLY HAVE 2 QUESTIONS LEFT ITS CALCULUS
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
@fast wyvern
where did the random multiply by 2 come from
i did this like a week a go with the help of my teacher I couldnt even tell you, I've had some time of sick and then been slammed with this im so confused
i might've just made an error im not sure it was hard enough to get to that stage
i assume for part 1 b I just use the volume formula of a rectangle box
can anyone help me ive been trying to watch youtube videos on it and I just do not understand
im up to part 1 b
we only just started learning it in class and I missed a fair few lessons due to sickness
well yes
yes Im not entirely sure on how to plug it in I assume the smaller squares would relate to width
be like 2x or something maybe im not sure
what is the width of the folded up sides
wdym
you cut off 2 squares of side length x, what does that leave the formerly a-long side as?
no, the box when folded up is not 30 long
the sheet started with a side of 30
but you can see the box is smaller than that
its not to scale im not getting what you mean what im thinking is
390 x 2x
and then make x the subject
maybe
but I haven't been taught any of this our teacher wants us to figure it out
no
no?
the box is not 30 long
explain
yes
the base of the box is a rectangle inside the 30x13 rectangle
it must be smaller in both dimensions
im so confused its okay
honestly I dont know I just dont get it
its hard for me to learn like this ig i have learning
dissabilites
id prefer a vc but i dont want to if ohter people arent comfortable with it
visualiziation i guess
yeah
the point is the part of the 30x13 rectangle that ends up being the base, is not the whole rectangle
otherwise
there would be no sides
it is smaller
you would like to find the dimensions of the inner rectangle
so like
looking at it like this
the inner rectangle
thats what I need to find
before I found the whole sheet
mhm
how would I find what to subtract?
yeah but i dont have the values
you do
i do?
that segment is also on one of the cut-out squares
you've lost me again
im attempting to find that top bit
with the side segments gone
yes, that's right
x is the length of each of those segments
you have x + middle + x = 30
can you find middle now, in terms of x
i did. it sorry went to sleep and been at school
ive graphed it etc
up to using calculus to prove the max point using the quadratic formula
i’m now stumped as i’ve put it in the quadratic formula and tried to put it in a calculus calculator and i’m not getting the estimated value
@balmy wren
this is the formula i tried but i’m not sure i got it right
i think i got it i think the one on the right is the correct answer
nevermind
i need to get the derivate of the volume equation i got
i’m just confused how like do i use product rule
i haven’t done it for a while
@fast wyvern @balmy wren
you can also multiply out the polynomial and take power rule
generally the way to do product rule is for example (abc)' = a'bc + ab'c + abc'
(abcd)' = a'bcd + ab'cd + abc'd + abcd'
i think im meant to use the power rule
much simpler
is this correct? have I ordered it correctly?
theres an x next to the 3600 btw
i don't think that -60x^2 is right
once you correct that:
remember the power rule, that (a*x^n)' = a*n*x^(n-1)
indeed
uh no i think b = -86 like you said
but dont I need to derive it first before I put it into the quadratic equation?
yees
would that be correct
and then I just test both plus and minus of it
over 24
like 172+104/24 and 172-104/24
,calc (172^2 - 4(12)(390))^0.5
Result:
104.23051376636
yeah its estimated
well one of them doesn't make sense if you go back to the original problem
??
just find approximate values and then you'll see
remember that one of the box lengths is 13 - 2x
if x = 11.5, this is a negative number
boxes don't have negative lengths
... or you can use second derivative test yeah
yeah I know what you nean but yeah
Im pre sure I ned to use the second derivative tesrt
that's right, anyway
would that be correct i’m not too confident with min and max
but i’ve just been watching a shit ton of youtube vids
i’m not sure what to do from here
one thing, -172 + 24(11.5) is 104 > 0
they should be the same, due to symmetry of cubic equations
but beyond that, it's correct
minimum volume?
min volume is 0
right?
to get the material, plug values of x you found into the formula from part A probably
cheers
like that?
or plug 188 in instead of 11.5
because i got that for min
i got 59.375 it doesnt seem right
because I got 390 for the area in part A it just doesnt make sense
don't use so much precision (unless you didnt round in any previous step)
remember you rounded 104.23 to 104
that is correct to the nearest integer
would that be correct though
i mean if you answer it as 369.9310278
then rhrhrhhr uhhhh
i would say no
too much precision
the actual value is slightly higher than 370
but for all intents and purposes in real life
its right
would you consider hopping in a vc with me and giving me a hand all g if not though just thought id asked im pretty confused
sorry, cant
thats all g ]
I just dont understand how the surface area of it could be lower than the area I got earlier for part a
do you not understand why this is the case
and if so what I did wronhg
does the min matter
should I have more than one asnwer for at as the min and max
not for e i guess
then for f who knows what they're saying
not me aha Im so confused for e
is it like best volume to area ratio? is it best volume?
for e, just plug in x = 0 (minimum) and x = 2.8 (maximum) i think
what
im confused
the maximum volume is when x is 2.8, right?
wait sorry
so I plug it into the part 1 A formula I made
make x 0
for min
and make max 2.8
that's what i think
ill give it a go
i got 369.93 for max
I didnt plug min in properly
IS THAT RIGHT
OR HAVE I GOT MY HOPES UP
@balmy wren
the first one is right
is the second one not?
i’m confused again where do i go wrong
you started with a sheet of area 390 and cut some parts from the corners away
it's going to be less than 390
so 370 was correct
yes