#Exponential integral
22 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
So the issue is the extra u factor? If so, I think you can just do integration by parts
the lower limits leads to blowing up the log, therefore I can not do partial integration
nah partial doesn't really work, we need something beautiful for this
I'm trying feynmans rn
see where i can get
because it's pretty obvious we have to end up with the integral for euler macaroni constant
Feynman works thank you!!
whats so incredible about it?
So I did e^(alpha u ) for Feynman, I guess you did sth else to obtain the digamma
Can you share?
What I found fun is that this implies that exp(-u) (u-1) log(u) is a probability density
nice so much unrevealed
oh that is nice also
Yes more generally up to a prefactor exp(-u) (u^k- k!) log(u) yields a density