#Relations proof
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
well notice if you use induction, and assume it holds for $n-1$, that the product there is equal to $(R_{n-1} - 2)\cdot R_{n-1}$
Pyrokinetics
then you can sub in
Wht
are you familiar with induction?
we barely touched on it
but im aware we need to prove it for a base case and prove for n + 1
that is indeed induction
what are your thoughts about n=0?
an "empty" product can be set to equal to 1
so n=0 also holds
ive never seen that bridge looking notation but i assume its similar to sigma but with products
if n = 0
then it will go up to -1 times?
$$ \prod _{k=1}^n x_k = x_1\cdot x_2\cdot \ldots\cdot x_n$$
aL
$\prod_{n=a}^{b} f(n)$ is called an empty product if $a > b$ because there are no numbers that are at least $a$ and at most $b$
so this is often set to 1 just like an empty sum (the sum of no numbers) is usually set to 0
Pyrokinetics
no, its by convention
we never even seen the sum of product sign so i cant assume that the empty product is 1 without any proof
in how many ways can you order a queue with no people in it?
1
don't worry about it too much, empty product = 1, empty sum = 0, figure it out when you are a phd student and are required to chase rabbits down rabbit holes 
Ok