#Multivariable Calc Help Needed
88 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
@queen shale sorry to ping but if u get a chance, u mind taking a look at this?
you can sorta assume omega is constant for now as you're told you can assume friction is negligible
10sin(theta)=0 theta=0,pi which makes sense as for theta=0 the GPE is as low as it'll get and at pi it's gone from increasing to decreasing in GPE (going up to coming down)
The critical points have nothing to do with the gradient right?
critical points are when the gradient is 0
(or undefined, but cos is a nice friendly function)
I'm confused here because usually when we find gradient we take partial derivatives or x and y
but there is no x or y here
so instead do I take w.r.t theta and omega?
refer to this
but yes, your variables are theta and omega this time
E'(theta, omega)=(10sin(theta), omega)
Ok so that will be the gradient and I set that = 0 to find the critial points?
yes
so you have either when omega=0 or when sin(theta)=0 which is at theta=0,pi
hmm those r the only critical points?
yeah
visualise it, just like i did with the theta derivative
when the rotational velocity is 0 it's gonna either stop forever or turn around, which is a critical point
ahh ok ok
stopping forever is stable equilibrium, instantaneous 0 velocity is an unstable equilibrium
use this
and you need to set up pairs of theta and omega
(0,0), (π,0) are your critical points
ok
Do u know how to do part c) above?
if it's at an unstable equilibrium then it's got just GPE but no KE, E=10, then at the bottom we have theta=0 so we have 10=1/2 omega^2 -10 so omega is 2sqrt(10)
What is GPE and KE?
kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy
you calculate the total energy at the top and then have that equal to the total energy at the bottom because negligible energy was lost to friction
But doesn't it say we r ignoring any eneregy added via perturbation or removed via friction?
so you do E(pi, 0)=E(0, omega)
yes
that's what i did
just have potential at the top, just have kinetic at the bottom
ok
Also, when finding the critical points, we r setting the partial deriviatves = 0 right?
I don't need to use Hessian Matrix to determine whether it's a saddle point or local max/min right?
you can just use the equation on the khan academy page using f_xx • f_yy - (f_xy)^2
Ok so I got that:
a) grad is (10sin(thetha), w) like u said
critical points r (0,0 and (pi, 0) like u said
b) I got that (0,0) is a local minimum point and (pi, 0) is a saddle point
I'm still not too sure what is going on for c)...
local minimum means that no matter how you nudge it, it'll fall back down the 'slope' of your original function, saddle point or maximum means you can nudge it into a lower energy state if you want @indigo plinth
it wants to reach the lowest energy
hmm ok
The point at which the equilbrium is unstable is (pi, 0) right since that is the point which isn't the local minimum?
take a look at this
you can see your critical points
if you were to nudge theta a little larger or a little smaller it would slip down into those pits
yes
but at (0,0) you can see if you nudge it it's already at the lowest point it can be
no, that's our energy equation
hence that graph is a graph of the energy
and since things are at their most stable when they have the least potential energy
yeah that's right
it tracks, makes sense?
yeah but then
how is it asking us for velocity without giving us a velocity equation 😭?
ohh, sorry sorry, i'm dumb
you know the start and end points, so you plug those in and use conservation of energy
start: E(π,0)=10
end: E(0,w)=½w²-10
start=end energy
10=½w²-10
40=w²
w=2√10
ohhh, given that the pendelum reaches the bottom, theta = 0?
yes
So we start the point where the equilibrium is unstable?
yes
it mentions you want to find the point on the same level curve, why do you think it needs to be on the same level curve?
@indigo plinth answer soon, please, I need to sleep imminently
because the pendelum comes back?
total energy
so staying on the same level curve means you're keeping what constant?
we can't lose energy, it has to remain the same
correct
I need to sleep now, good luck with any additional parts
post them in a separate thread if you need any additional help, someone else will probably help out
np, cya
+close