#Suggestions and corrections for my trigonometry chart?
41 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
Also yes I made it in paint, if anyone knows a better digital alternative I'm all ears.
No clue what it's suppose to encode
how you go from what to what
Yes
oh oops I forgot to mention that
Also if your =HYPOTENUSE is supposed to be pythagorean... it's wrong
why?
oh wait its hypotenuse squared right?
For legs a and b, and hypotenuse c
sure
still confused on why you have something about gradient, and why you want so much redudancy
especially when... there's no 100 to be seen in the gradient formula
I think its gradient percentage
I just recall having to multiply tan angle by 100 to get gradient in class
I study mathematics in dutch so it can be a mistranslation
yeah... no
gradient is rise/run, which is just tan(t) for whatever angle t
there's no 100
but either way, it just feels overly complicated when the typical mnemonic SOHCAHTOA encapsulates all that and more
Sine: Opposite Hypotenuse
Cosine: Adjacent Hypotenuse
Tangent: Opposite Adjacent
SOHCAHTOA
I will find a way
That isnt even the original graph btw, the original is in dutch and its also colour coded but its in my notebook which I don't have with me rn and taking pictures looks horrible
k
+close
