#Sequence
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
idk what that is
oh oof
i just wanna get through 11th grade
lol
oh then its prolly AP base
alr I'll help
just lemme study the question
no it isn't an AP
oh ok
thank you
@outer stream has given 1 rep to @hollow knot
you also try it
wdym?
hmmm
wait a min
how would you prove $\sum_{n=1}^{k}n = \frac{k(k+1)}{2}$
Inverse Cupid
for all natural k?
imma be honest man i dont know
Okay yes
Given: $a_{n+2} = a_{n+1} + a_n, a_0=0, a_1=1$
TP $a_{n+2} = 1 + \sum^{n}_{k=0}a_k$ :
Let's first check for a few values of n:
if $n = 0$:
$a_2 = a_0 + 1$
$a_1 = a_0 + 1$
$1 = 1$
now for $n=1$:
$a_3 = a_0 + a_1 + 1$
$a_2 + a_1 = a_0 + a_1 + 1$
$1 + 1 = 0 + 1 + 1$
Now, let's assume the following is true for $n=k$:
So, $a_{k+2} = 1 + \sum^{k}_{j=0}a_j$
Now, let's prove it for $n=k+1$:
$a_{k+3} = 1 + \sum^{k+1}_{j=0}a_j$
$a_{k+2} + a_{k+1} = 1+ \sum^{k+1}_{j=0}a_j$
$a_{k+2} = 1+ \sum^{k}_{j=0}a_j$
The above is what we assumed to be true
As we derived the above from trying to prove for $n=k+1$
By the hypothesis of induction
hence proved.
Inverse Cupid
induction works like dominoes
we proved it's true for 1, 2 and k+1 for any value of k
so if k=2, then it's also true for 3
now, if k=3, it's also true for 4
and so on till positive infinity
wait lemme try to understand
alr
so does that mean
a2 = 1 + an
but since
a(n+2) = 1 + a0 + a1 + … + an
for n = 0
isn’t it supposed to be
a2 = 1 + a0 + a1 + …. + a0 ?
😭😭
upto a(n)
i’m so dum
nah you're not
wait gonna read it over again
alr
is this really a proof?
it’s kinda like a checking
Idk
yeah it's a way of proving
for some reason
it's called induction in mathematics
but it just works like dominoes
well i haven’t learned about series yet so the bottom half is kinda confusing for me
oh the sigma part huh
is there a different way we can write it?
that's just compact notation for the ... thing
yeah ofc you can
can u write it without using the summation
maybe i can understand it better
appreciate it
alr
Given: $a_{n+2} = a_{n+1} + a_n, a_0=0, a_1=1$
TP $a_{n+2} = 1 + a_0 + a_1 + ... a_n$ :
Let's first check for a few values of n:
if $n = 0$:
$a_2 = a_0 + 1$
$a_1 = a_0 + 1$
$1 = 1$
now for $n=1$:
$a_3 = a_0 + a_1 + 1$
$a_2 + a_1 = a_0 + a_1 + 1$
$1 + 1 = 0 + 1 + 1$
Now, let's assume the following is true for $n=k$:
So, $a_{k+2} = 1 + a_0 + a_1 + ... + a_k$
Now, let's prove it for $n=k+1$:
$a_{k+3} = 1 + a_0 + a_1 + ... a_k + a_{k+1}$
$a_{k+2} + a{k+1} = 1 + a_0 + a_1 + ... a_k + a_{k+1}$
$a_{k+2} = 1 + a_0 + a_1 + ... a_k$
The above is what we assumed to be true
As we derived the above from trying to prove for $n=k+1$
By the hypothesis of induction
hence proved.
Inverse Cupid