#Prove that 1+1=2 without using any math

4225 messages · Page 5 of 5 (latest)

nocturne venture
#

LOL

#

FELL FOR IT TOO

cerulean fox
#

Like
Look at the 214 clown reactions

nocturne venture
#

Yeah, one more from me

#

Even I got ragebaited

#

As someone who doesn't get ragebaited easily

remote pike
#

this question makes me mad

jagged mural
#

Meow

raw ridge
#

how is this still alive

jagged mural
#

Or any valid proof has been buried by incompetent proofs

raw ridge
jagged mural
astral craneBOT
#
Ban <User:Mention/ID> <Duration:Duration> <Reason:Text>
Ban <User:Mention/ID> <Reason:Text> <Duration:Duration>
Ban <User:Mention/ID> <Duration:Duration>
Ban <User:Mention/ID> <Reason:Text>
Ban <User:Mention/ID>

[-ddays ddays:Whole number - Number of days of messages to delete]

Invalid arguments provided: No matching combo found
cerulean fox
jagged mural
remote pike
#

I DID IT ! !

#

stored it in a doc cuz it wont let me message it in here .

#

its almost at message limit

#

.

remote pike
#

i can prob dm proof if you want . .

cerulean fox
remote pike
#

i cant dm u .

crystal gyro
#

1+1=2 Cuz it came to me in a dream

copper thistle
#

it's absurd

#

"math" it self has been discovered by using it

#

with counting

jagged mural
#

You can’t use math

#

:p

copper thistle
#

🏳️‍🌈

remote pike
#

{10, 10, 1, 2} in ban

past dove
#

*1+1 can be written as S(0) + S(0)

remote pike
#

guys im finnally releasing TSAN

lone valve
remote pike
#

alright so i managed to get a RAYO(38) lower bound to be 362889 but i can easily get this alot higher

∅:={};S(x):=x∪{x};Sn:=S^(n-1)(n);S9(9)

remote pike
#

but why?

#

people accept it lol they just dont know why .

remote pike
#

i love playing the piano!

quasi summit
#

in simple terms

cerulean fox
#

Syntax from set theory can be seen

#

Which comes under math

cerulean fox
lone valve
# cerulean fox Syntax from set theory can be seen

bruh it would take a whole other page or two to define set theoretical symbols in propositional logic from the ground up, just accept this as set theory being (one of the few) foundations of math and not as arithmetic

remote pike
#

oks

lone valve
#

@quasi summit

remote pike
#

first order piano theory .

lone valve
#

does terraria have piano

remote pike
#

yeah

cerulean fox
#

Again this question is ragebait
It's asking you to prove math without math

#

So good luck but there's no answer

quasi summit
jagged mural
jagged mural
onyx dew
#

the proof of that looks stupid though

#

$1 = \frac{2}{2} = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \sim \frac{\aleph}{2\aleph} + \frac{\aleph}{2\aleph} = \frac{\aleph}{\aleph} + \frac{\aleph}{\aleph} \sim \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{1} = 1 + 1$

mystic sandBOT
#

\nothing

onyx dew
#

it's not good

#

also it's math

cerulean fox
#

Move on innit I even shared a chatgpt Convo where we agree this is fking impossible

gilded goblet
#

I’ve asked ChatGPT a lot of things that it got wrong

cerulean fox
#

And if u don't wanna read the chat then come up with a proof but how do you prove what 1, addition, equations, 2 etc. are without math?

remote pike
#

"2/2 = 1/2 + 1/2"

#

proof?

#

d1 beat beater over here

#

atp just divided both sides by aleph null 💀 💀

undone seal
remote pike
austere venture
#

each day some clouds appear

#

one day you saw only a lonely cloud

#

that doesnt have any other cloud nearby it

#

after an hour another cloud came by and both clouds look the same

#

so a cloud and a cloud makes two clouds in the sky

remote pike
#

i hate you now 🙂

jagged mural
cerulean fox
remote pike
#

exactly why 🙂 🙂 🙂

#

i can easily prove 1 + 1 = 2 without using the words "any" or "math"

remote pike
#

proof cant fit in discord message

#

oh wait it can .

#

js doesnt let me post it

jagged mural
cerulean fox
remote pike
#

1 is just 1 .

#

we really dont need much more

#

2 is just 2

dark ginkgo
#

Why is this post still going bru

jagged mural
tawdry bobcat
#

Why has this thread been up for so long bruh its a troll thread

remote pike
#

real

cerulean fox
jagged mural
quiet coyote
tawdry bobcat
remote pike
#

holup ive been spending the past 2 days thinking of a response to this

#

lemme cook

#

ahh yes

cobalt rock
#

sorry

#

i meant

#

cl*nker

#

👍

remote pike
#

lol

quiet coyote
# cobalt rock clanker

I get where you're coming from — and you're right to call that out. But I'm going to gently push back — just so that things stay calm and respectful.

☑️ clanker

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

📖 Final notes

And honestly? You're not crazy — you're just noticing things other people would gloss over — and that's rare

remote pike
#

gwab

remote pike
#

btw forgor to mention he is using chatgpt and he tried copy and pasting from chatgpt but the notes after the bullet points are outpit as images so he cant just copy them and the text

toxic jungle
#

that is why AI needs to be banned

#

useless crap

midnight tendon
#

what is math?

#

one plus one is equal to two BOOM DONE

jagged mural
#

What if everything is a figment of Miku’s imagination?

storm kite
#

this never aged

jagged mural
#

It didn’t

lavish kelp
#

Fr?

jagged mural
#

No one ever proved it

#

Well, some did, but it got buried

cerulean fox
#

you can't prove this without defining what one is, two is, addition is, equals is without axioms
axioms fall under math

#

in this particular case that is

jagged mural
lapis basalt
#

I have one apple i have been given another apple now I have two apples

cerulean fox
#

look this channel is ragebait

#

and we all fell for i

lapis basalt
quaint hazel
void gust
#

The fact that this has >4k comments is astounding

lone valve
#

You're all crackpots who don't understand thermodynamics

lone valve
#

im a crackpot who knows the definition of entropy and preaches fhe entire field to people online who ptobably know way more than I

#

do not underestimate my crackpot-ness

jagged mural
#

There’s this guy in my school who thinks he knows everything, and he really pisses me off

#

Like, this person “wins” arguments by just interrupting the other guy or saying unrelated stuff (usually internet brainrot)

#

Furthermore, he’s the ex of a good friend of mine

#

Basically, he sucks

cerulean robin
#

Most of the dynamical systems I work with are 0 entropy systems so I don't know a ton about entropy, but I know a bit.

lone valve
lone valve
jagged mural
lone valve
#

ok i do not wanna be associated with that guy anymore

dark ginkgo
#

Except the Epstein part

#

Plus he had the same name as me

cerulean robin
# lone valve cool now tell me about this pear category theroem

Not really much to say. I tend to work with things like stationary Bratteli-Vershik systems, subtitution dynamical systems, sturmian shifts, interval exchange transformations, etc., all of which have typically have topological measure 0. Then you can put a measure on them, sure, but still measure 0 by the variational principle.

#

Not sure if I need the word "typically" there, it's mostly just to cover my ass in case there are pathologies I have not considered.

cerulean robin
dark ginkgo
#

Same pfp and everything

cerulean robin
#

A rando wouldn't be manager red.

dark ginkgo
#

I know lol, I was joking

cerulean robin
jagged mural
tepid scarab
#

what counts as "math" or "not math", is logic math?

jagged mural
tepid scarab
#

🥹

tepid scarab
tender nova
#

Using the well known ramen ujan identity $1+2+3+\dots = -1/12$ we know $1 = -1/12-2-3-\dots$ so $1+1 = -(1/12+2+3+\dots+1/12+2+3+\dots) \implies 12 = -1-4-6-8-\dots = 2 $

mystic sandBOT
tender nova
#

qed

jagged mural
hearty owl
#

The way I'd prove that 1+1=2 without using math. I'd say something like: mommy and daddy made you. Done! Or it takes two to tango🙃 🙈

nocturne venture
#

I still wonder how people are still talking in this forum lol

broken owl
#

its easy guys

#

its not always equal to 2

#

it depends

#

nerd knows it can be even 1+1=2.0000000000000000001

#

so its just an assumption

#

not a fact

#

case closed

#

by the way what i stated is used in modern calculators

#

its called floating point arithemetic

#

before answering this question one should study cycles of digits

#

what is significance of zero

#

in number system you do

blissful lotus
#

That is exact reason limits were used

tawny marsh
tacit dock
#

but my argument rests on the objection to me using logical inference invalid due to use of logical inference, this can be extended to any proof for 1+1=2

#

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

nocturne venture
#

The same thing followed by the same thing gives its double.

#

That's why 1+1=2

blissful lotus
#

I have a better explanation

#

1+1=2 if it's not true then prove it

jagged mural
blissful lotus
tacit dock
#

I THINK IVE GOT IT

#

the condition only restricts us to NOT using math in the dorect proof of 1+1=2

#

BUT it doesnt stop us from using math elsewhere

#

nvm

jagged mural
dark ginkgo
nocturne venture
celest gull
#

I have an apple, I have a pen. Boom! Apple pen.

1 (apple) + 1 (pen) = 2 (apple pen)

tacit dock