#Prove that 1+1=2 without using any math
4225 messages · Page 5 of 5 (latest)
Like
Look at the 214 clown reactions
Yeah, one more from me
Even I got ragebaited
As someone who doesn't get ragebaited easily
this question makes me mad
Meow
how is this still alive
Because no one has proven it yet
Or any valid proof has been buried by incompetent proofs
i am the proof
-ban
Ban <User:Mention/ID> <Duration:Duration> <Reason:Text>
Ban <User:Mention/ID> <Reason:Text> <Duration:Duration>
Ban <User:Mention/ID> <Duration:Duration>
Ban <User:Mention/ID> <Reason:Text>
Ban <User:Mention/ID>
[-ddays ddays:Whole number - Number of days of messages to delete]
Invalid arguments provided: No matching combo found
Ragebaited smh
Lmao
I DID IT ! !
stored it in a doc cuz it wont let me message it in here .
its almost at message limit
.
Lmao
i can prob dm proof if you want . .
Do it
i cant dm u .
1+1=2 Cuz it came to me in a dream
🏳️🌈
{10, 10, 1, 2} in ban
*1+1 can be written as S(0) + S(0)
guys im finnally releasing TSAN
repost
alright so i managed to get a RAYO(38) lower bound to be 362889 but i can easily get this alot higher
∅:={};S(x):=x∪{x};Sn:=S^(n-1)(n);S9(9)
i love playing the piano!
This is math my boy
Syntax from set theory can be seen
Which comes under math
This is a ragebait channel and we all fell for it
Feel free to mark the clown emoji
okiiii brither
bruh it would take a whole other page or two to define set theoretical symbols in propositional logic from the ground up, just accept this as set theory being (one of the few) foundations of math and not as arithmetic
oks
@quasi summit
first order piano theory .
yeah
You have to prove without math
Again this question is ragebait
It's asking you to prove math without math
So good luck but there's no answer
yea
@onyx dew
the proof of that looks stupid though
$1 = \frac{2}{2} = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \sim \frac{\aleph}{2\aleph} + \frac{\aleph}{2\aleph} = \frac{\aleph}{\aleph} + \frac{\aleph}{\aleph} \sim \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{1} = 1 + 1$
\nothing
Partner how can you prove something from math without it?!
Move on innit I even shared a chatgpt Convo where we agree this is fking impossible
I’ve asked ChatGPT a lot of things that it got wrong
Read the chat
And if u don't wanna read the chat then come up with a proof but how do you prove what 1, addition, equations, 2 etc. are without math?
3rd step alrady makes my balld wanna blow . . .
"2/2 = 1/2 + 1/2"
proof?
d1 beat beater over here
atp just divided both sides by aleph null 💀 💀
They accept it because they have to start somewhere:)
then js start at 67
each day some clouds appear
one day you saw only a lonely cloud
that doesnt have any other cloud nearby it
after an hour another cloud came by and both clouds look the same
so a cloud and a cloud makes two clouds in the sky
i hate you now 🙂
No, they make three
That's like saying that I have one apple and someone gave me another one so now I hv 2 apples
This ain't an acceptable proof because addition is involved
exactly why 🙂 🙂 🙂
i can easily prove 1 + 1 = 2 without using the words "any" or "math"
Do it
Fermat!?!?
So
That means u need to prove what 1 is, what 2 is, what addition is, and what an equation is without using the words "any" or " math" or anything related to the above 2 terms
Yes
Why is this post still going bru
It’s the best post in the server
Why has this thread been up for so long bruh its a troll thread
It’s funny
real
Cause idh perms to delete
This thread ragebaits me so much
It’s a peak thread
Wait. Breathe—You’re not crazy, you were just in survival mode—And honestly? You’re SO real for that. 🎉
please take a captcha test and send me the results
holup ive been spending the past 2 days thinking of a response to this
lemme cook
ahh yes
clanker
sorry
i meant
cl*nker
👍
lol
I get where you're coming from — and you're right to call that out. But I'm going to gently push back — just so that things stay calm and respectful.
☑️ clanker
- 1
- 2
- 3
📖 Final notes
And honestly? You're not crazy — you're just noticing things other people would gloss over — and that's rare
gwab
clonker?
or are u a clinker
btw forgor to mention he is using chatgpt and he tried copy and pasting from chatgpt but the notes after the bullet points are outpit as images so he cant just copy them and the text
What if it equals Miku though
What if everything is a figment of Miku’s imagination?
this never aged
It didn’t
Fr?
nope
no one did
you can't prove this without defining what one is, two is, addition is, equals is without axioms
axioms fall under math
in this particular case that is
Nuh uh, it falls under this new thing I created called “Charlie Kirk”
I have one apple i have been given another apple now I have two apples
that is math
look this channel is ragebait
and we all fell for i
No that is apple
how
The fact that this has >4k comments is astounding
You're all crackpots who don't understand thermodynamics
So are you
im a crackpot who knows the definition of entropy and preaches fhe entire field to people online who ptobably know way more than I
do not underestimate my crackpot-ness
Lmao
There’s this guy in my school who thinks he knows everything, and he really pisses me off
Like, this person “wins” arguments by just interrupting the other guy or saying unrelated stuff (usually internet brainrot)
Furthermore, he’s the ex of a good friend of mine
Basically, he sucks
I also know a bit about entropy.
Most of the dynamical systems I work with are 0 entropy systems so I don't know a ton about entropy, but I know a bit.
how do you know that I'm not secretly him hmmm
cool now tell me about this pear category theroem
You haven’t made some unrelated sexual comment yet, or brought up Epstein
ok i do not wanna be associated with that guy anymore
some guy in my class in ms was like that
Except the Epstein part
Plus he had the same name as me
Not really much to say. I tend to work with things like stationary Bratteli-Vershik systems, subtitution dynamical systems, sturmian shifts, interval exchange transformations, etc., all of which have typically have topological measure 0. Then you can put a measure on them, sure, but still measure 0 by the variational principle.
Not sure if I need the word "typically" there, it's mostly just to cover my ass in case there are pathologies I have not considered.
Anyway; what do you do with entropy? Information theory? Dynamical systems? Thermodynamics? Something else I don't know?
Some guy called pearmetheus was impersonating you
Same pfp and everything
I changed my screen name briefly as a joke to that because Darcy suggested that my real name was "prometheus".
A rando wouldn't be manager red.
I know lol, I was joking
What an elegant name to have
The more I think about it I think I was just wrong and BV systems can have positive entropy.
Not Manager role ∃ I think
what counts as "math" or "not math", is logic math?
Just rebrand it as dih and say that you used dih to prove that 1+1=2
🥹
Using the Dih definition of dIH (d🍆 Di(h)=Di(d 🍆 h) you can say 1🍆 Di(0)=Di(1🍆0)=Di(1)=2 therefore via dih theory we know 1+1=2
Using the well known ramen ujan identity $1+2+3+\dots = -1/12$ we know $1 = -1/12-2-3-\dots$ so $1+1 = -(1/12+2+3+\dots+1/12+2+3+\dots) \implies 12 = -1-4-6-8-\dots = 2 $
don
qed

The way I'd prove that 1+1=2 without using math. I'd say something like: mommy and daddy made you. Done! Or it takes two to tango🙃 🙈

Mr GPT
I still wonder how people are still talking in this forum lol
Because funny
its easy guys
its not always equal to 2
it depends
nerd knows it can be even 1+1=2.0000000000000000001
so its just an assumption
not a fact
case closed
by the way what i stated is used in modern calculators
its called floating point arithemetic
before answering this question one should study cycles of digits
what is significance of zero
in number system you do
Dude limits exist
That is exact reason limits were used
computer nerds i guess
but my argument rests on the objection to me using logical inference invalid due to use of logical inference, this can be extended to any proof for 1+1=2
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

this is math
1+1=3
Prove it
I THINK IVE GOT IT
the condition only restricts us to NOT using math in the dorect proof of 1+1=2
BUT it doesnt stop us from using math elsewhere
nvm
Because I said so
It’s modulo 1
I mean, you can say it's philosophy too
I have an apple, I have a pen. Boom! Apple pen.
1 (apple) + 1 (pen) = 2 (apple pen)
all math is philosophy