#linear algebra
55 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
- Wait patiently for a helper to come along.
- Once someone helps you, say thank you and close the thread with:
+close
- Feel free to nominate the person for helper of the week in #helper-nominations
- Do not ping the mods, unless someone is breaking the rules.
- If you're happy with the help you got here, and the server overall, you can contribute financially as well:
There's any constant on this type of equation, it can't describe any vector space.
The only approach I imagine is to prove you can't distribute scalar multiplication to a vector addition.
In other words, show that $\forall u,v \in E, \forall a \in \mathbb{R}, a(u+v) \neq au + av$ (if k is a constant $\neq 0$)
Yojda
I didn't understand it
Okay, if E is a vector space, so $\forall u,v \in E$, I can multiply those vectors $u$ and $v$ by a scalar $a$ such that $a*(u+v) = au + av$
Yojda
Yes. Of course we can
But if $k \neq 0$, you can't
Yojda
Try it, and tell me if the result is again in the vector space
Even if you calculate $a*v, a \in \mathbb{R}$ and $v \in E$
Yojda
the 0 vector has to be in the space
so plugging in (0,0,0) must satisfy the equation, hence k=0
Yes it will satisfy but I am confused what should we do with the equation?
2x1-x2+3x3=k
the vector space is all vectors (x1,x2,x3) that satisfy that equation
Find what the vectors from E are
for that set to be a vector space, 0 must be a solution to that equation, hence k=0
I guess i have to need more readings
or read the question
So here we are finding any value which satisfy the equation?
read the question...
"Let W be (this set). If W is to be made into a vector space, what must k be?"
(0,1,1)
what does this have to do with anything?
X1,x2,x3
Ill ask again
what does (0,1,1) have to do with anything the question is asking?
look up the axioms of being a vector space.
It satisfies the equation
it doesnt unless k is 2
If $W$ is a vector space, then $0\in W$, so $(0,0,0)$ must, by the definition of $W$, satisfy $2(0)-0+3(0)=k$
Omegabet_
hence k must be 0.
Yes
You are right
It must satisfy other properties
yes, like being closed under + as was initially pointed out
which, if you do the algebra, tells you 2k=k so k=0.
if $x,y\in W$, then $x+y\in W$, so $2(x_1+y_1)-(x_2+y_2)+3(x_3+y_3)=k\to (2x_1-x_2+3x_3)+(2y_1-y_2+3y_3)=k\to k+k=k$
Omegabet_
Wow. Nice explanation tq so much