#some one explain how to solve this
316 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Hey noob
Ok so
This is a conditional
LT is a conditional
what is a conditional
😀😄 it’s a math problem in and of itself
nails
Quite
Sure
.....
how do you delete the x
Temporarily removed
It’s ancient knowledge, it works
huh
This ain’t common core son!
There’s a negative sqrt
nails
Sorry for my weirdness
I’m glad!
@ me if theres a reply
Oh
U didn’t ping me
Can’t expect me to remember if u don’t ping me
Ok
Now I help
Do u know the trick to getting the derivative of sqrt x?
It’s not exactly a trick but a step
@burnt nebula
nails
nails?
the what
And then u get the correct result if my mental math is right
oh i looked
its
the
@frank sonnet its the rationalizing denominator trick but instead its the numerator now!
Hm
how do u evaluate
How dumb is it

anyways thats cause im solving this shit on notepad
Anyway when u write it down correctly it’s 8x lol
no like how do u evaluate those problems
Or what are u referring to
2+3x - 2 + 5x
Yes
Damn u suck
i dont
im just having brain problem
How tf did u manage to become undergrad?
What are u studying?
(Don’t take this too serious)
i used to be pretty insane at studying
just fell off during covid
trying to reclaim my throne (insert wolf alone meme)
?
comp sci
yeah im pretty good just rusty as shit
i started actually caring about studies again like a week ago
so
@frank sonnet how to simplify this (sqrt(2+3x) + sqrt(2-5x))
I assume ur now in the denominator
yaes
Since now the denominator isn’t 0 anymore u can distribute the limit
And since sqrt is continuous u can also get the limit in the sqrt
wait is that the condition before you can distribute the lim
that denom isnt 0
bro
Yes
i did not know that
i just thought you had to simplify as much as possible before applying lim
Ye I know that’s how they teach it in school
They smh don’t trust the children to have more than 1 iq
man
It does
you're trivial
I know right
U use it yes
no like i don't even get the question
no
i see
U do the rest
theres an example solution but i didnt understand how it worked and yea
It is
okay
My drawings are great
Now make me helper of the century
please explain how
What don’t u get
literally everything
U just gotta calculate the ratio between the two sides next to the right angle
I forgot how u call them in English
the lim questions make so much more sense now that i know you apply it when the equation doesn't collapse
I know, I’m great
Ok sucker
I will give u the start
U gotta do the rest
Understood?
no
cos?
okay
Just the answer
I wanna check my work
Even though I don’t think I made a mistake
i have nails'd irl
also ima need another flip because i have another insanely complicated question
m
this makes no sense to me
How…
Look
U calculate the ratio
Of the triangle in red
Since we know both side lengths
6-2 and d
Yes
Bcs
The ratio will be the same
As for the green one
Since they are similar
They are just scaled
nvm brain dmg question sorry
plinking is crazy btw
So now we wanna know x
To do that
We apply the ratio and the side length we know, 6
We get 1.5d
We gotta take away 1d since we just calculated x+d
And then we have x
what is he saying
x
why do we need x
Cause x is the shadow length u nerd
THERE IS NO Y IN MY DIAGRAM TF
Call it x
we need rate of change of y
Or I kill u
okx
why do we need x
we need dx/dt
oh so we can differentiate it
moron
sorry
If we know x in respect to d we can just take the derivative
who the fuck is d
???
so we need to find shadow length wrt distance to pole
so we can differentiate wrt time
?
We can simply multiply by 6 later
Since we move 6 steps per second
Then we can just ignore t
i mean shadow length in terms of distance to pole
what
i dont get it
+closse