#series
101 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
How to solve this question? I trued to seperate an+1
Notice that if u want to show it’s not bounded u can choose a lower bound. Also notice a_n >= 0 obv
Actually mb
I just noticed that I made it an upper bound
Notice that $a_n = a_{n-1}$ for $a_n = 3$
Dappiest Dog Dappina
It’s trivial from there
How is it trivial
Who said it will ever equal 3
Bruh
Pyro
U stupi
If it goes above it will fall back
If it’s below it will go up
Obv it will converge to 3 then
Who's saying that
You? Lmao
There are conditions for convergence to a fixed point
You didn't verify anything
U gotta be trolling
There are easy lemmas for this
One can prove them literally with calculus knowledge
Dappy, stop and get help
If you have a lemma or whatevershit, you have to state it
Not everyone cares enough to know about this stuff
Stop saying obv
It's really not helping you mathematically
As a certified human being, it is not at all obvious to me why the sequence should converge to 3
And I can probably very easily construct a similar example that does NOT converge
Go ahead
Construct a similar example with that condition meet, yet doesn’t converge
U can’t
They all look like this
What condition
Well it should be obv that u can’t just pull sin and e out of ur ass
This is a special form
It’s not a polynomial and I don’t know the official name but I think u know what I mean
Talking to you is like decrypting with brute force
You have such a ridiculous way of talking about math
Anyway
Look at this
It’s a n to a n+1
If it goes above it will go below
If it goes below it will go above
Therefore if such an exists
It must converge to it
The only Argument u could bring is a cycle
That is not a proof
This is roughly the result I know
And it doesn't do a cycle either
Ofc it isn't I never said it is
It's the intuition
The author asked if it's bounded and how to prove it
I gave him the answer to the first question and important intuition for problems like tjst
At least I hope I did
Did you prove its bounded
I can't see where
First you said it's trivial
Then you said it must converge
Then not so sure it converges
But if it doesn't its a cycle (no idea why?)
I hope you start actually doing math one day
That would be epic
The reason you're hard to understand is not because you're too good
I am 100% for real
Communication is one of your weakest points
And you tend not to justify your statements, and being correct does not excuse your handwavy approaches
In short, excuse rejected, get better
It's discord
Like I am actually gonna elaborate
I gave a hint
Maybe it will help maybe it won't
I asked the question and you guys are not talking related to the question. You can move to other channels for chat
I wanted to help u, pyro just wanted to shit on me, I'm sorry
It's okay. You can give me advice right now. How to solve this
There are several ways to approach this after the hint that I gave u
Idk how experienced u are so I'm just gonna advice u to do the simplest one
For that simply show that [0,3] maps to [0,3] using derivatives
Well if u solve for a n+1 u have a function from a n to a n+1
If u show that any a n in 0 3 is mapped to another a n+1 in 0 3 u are done
Can you suggest any youtube video related to it?
It is actually related, believe it or not
I'm not just shitting on him. Does it not bother you that he keeps saying trivial and obviously every other message when he hasn't even provided an answer to your question?
Pyro just bcs u don't find it trivial don't hate me for it
