please help i need it to get done today

[dusk gazelle]

answer only this one

[sturdy vale]

Prove using 3 axioms

[cerulean drift]

1. <KMN = <KML | Bisects
2. NM = LM | Given
3. 🔺️KNM ~ 🔺️KLM | SAS

[sturdy vale]

≅

[dusk gazelle]

can u type it in

Statements | Reason format

cant understand it through discord or chat

[sturdy vale]

The left is statement and the reason in bracket is reason

First one is A
Second is S

And last but not written is because of common remaining side (S)

[cerulean drift]

edited

[dusk gazelle]

hi swindle is this right

@cerulean drift

[cerulean drift]

yes

[dusk gazelle]

hi

can u give me

explanation

or how this was solved

or ive solution

[cerulean drift]

both triangles have 2 congruent sides(NM=LM and KM=KM), and the angle between those sides are also congruent, hence both triangles are congruent (SAS)

[dusk gazelle]

tthnaks swindle

@cerulean drift

yo swindle

[dusk gazelle]

do i puit an angle between KN and KL?

[cerulean drift]

for what?

[dusk gazelle]

cuz its SAS

Side Angle side

does that mean i put an angle in the shape on KN KL

[cerulean drift]

I mean the angles <KMN=<KML

[dusk gazelle]

can u draw where i put the angle here

[dusk gazelle]

@cerulean drift

both triangles have 2 congruent sides(NM=LM and KM=KM), and the angle between those sides are also congruent, hence both triangles are congruent (SAS)

did u do a typo here

KM=KM?

[cerulean drift]

what typo?

[dusk gazelle]

look

u repeated

KM=KM

@cerulean drift

[cerulean drift]

cuz both triangle share the same side which is KM

[dusk gazelle]

ok

about this can i ask u one last thing

do i also change the shape to look like this ?

@cerulean drift