#Delta and Epsilon help

81 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

devout falcon
#

Calculus: Am doing some homework, have no idea how to approach this problem. Would appreciate if someone could take some time to walk me through steps.

cosmic trail
#

all of them or a particular part?

devout falcon
#

The whole thing, I've been pretty lost on this topic

cosmic trail
#

ok.

devout falcon
#

I have the solutions if needed, but I've tried working backwards and confused myself

cosmic trail
#

no, don't work backwards from the answer key.

devout falcon
#

Yeah I fried my brain 😢

cosmic trail
#

so given $4<x<4+\epsilon$, we have $2<\sqrt{x}<\sqrt{4+\epsilon}$. (Everything is non-negative so we're fine). Now, We need to bound the right hand side. The hint (which is pretty obvious algebra) states that $4+\epsilon<(2+\epsilon)^2$, which implies that $\sqrt{4+\epsilon}<2+\epsilon$, so by transitivity of inequality we have the result. Note that $\epsilon>0$ is crucial as it makes taking square root a legit operation, so you should constantly refer to that in a formal proof.

lyric nicheBOT
#

Kevin S

devout falcon
#

Ok ok things are starting to make a little sense

#

so this section is just basic algebra

#

if epsilon was not restricted to just being >0, we would have +- versions which would muddle up everything right>

cosmic trail
#

Part b) is a bit tricky. We should immediately identify that $f(x)=\sqrt{x}$ and $L=2$. Now, since we require $4<x<4+4\epsilon$, it means that we are trying to approach to $4$ from the right hand side, so the limit is $$\lim_{x\to 4^+}\sqrt{x}=2$$

lyric nicheBOT
#

Kevin S

cosmic trail
#

it's a one-sided limit.

devout falcon
#

why is it not f(X) as x approaches 2 from the right?

#

ah wait

cosmic trail
devout falcon
#

because sqrt 4 is 2

cosmic trail
#

you are trying to arrive at |f(x)-L|<epsilon at the end. so clearly f(x) should be sqrt x and L=2.

#

Is part b ok?

devout falcon
#

why do we not use x instead of sqrt x

cosmic trail
#

can you elaborate that question?

devout falcon
#

you typed lim (sqrt x) as x approaches 4 = 2

cosmic trail
#

4^+

devout falcon
#

lim x as x approaches 2+ = 2?

cosmic trail
#

Well, if you're trying to prove $\lim_{x\to 2^+}=2$, then why do you need all those extra stuff like $4<x<4+4\epsilon$? The proof of that is just trivial, given $\epsilon>0$, there exists $\delta=\epsilon$ such that $0<x-2<\delta\implies |x-2|<\delta=\epsilon$.

lyric nicheBOT
#

Kevin S

devout falcon
#

ok thanks so much for clarifyin g

cosmic trail
#

so let's move on to part c.

#

Now, part c) is just to complete the proof. Given part a), we know that given an arbitrary $\epsilon>0$, if $4<x<4+4\epsilon$, then we have the desired implication, of $|f(x)-L|<\epsilon$. The issue is how to choose a value of delta that depends on epsilon. Well, that's just the given inequality, so take $\delta=4\epsilon$, we thus have that given $\epsilon>0$, there exists $\delta=4\epsilon>0$ such that $0<x-4<\delta$ (recall the inequality $4<x<4+4\epsilon$ in part a)) implies $|\sqrt{x}-2|<\epsilon$. This implication holds precisely because of part a).

lyric nicheBOT
#

Kevin S

devout falcon
#

what exactly is the given inequality is it 4<x<4+4epsilon?

cosmic trail
#

that is the assumption in part a, and we need to use this inequality to choose delta so that the implication (of proving limit) is true.

devout falcon
#

2<sqrt(x)<2+epsilon

cosmic trail
devout falcon
#

did you get to delta by subtracting 4 from 4<x<4+4epsilon?

#

Sorry if I'm super slow

cosmic trail
lyric nicheBOT
#

Kevin S

cosmic trail
#

now, this implication holds when $\delta =4\epsilon$, which is obtained precisely by manipulating $4<x<4+4\epsilon$ in part a). So you're right!

lyric nicheBOT
#

Kevin S

devout falcon
#

sorry I keep asking questions so in similar problems would we obtain delta by manipulating the function to isolate epsilon?

#

so if the function were like 5<x<5+5epsilon would delta in terms of epsilon be 5epsilon?

cosmic trail
lyric nicheBOT
#

Kevin S

devout falcon
#

I'm still so confused about part c

#

I get up to f(x) -2 <epsilon

#

we have to choose the value of delta based on the given inequality?

cosmic trail
#

that's usually hard, but in this case we have that given inequality which can help us make a decision about delta.

devout falcon
#

so is it kind of like guessing based on the given inequality?

cosmic trail
# devout falcon so is it kind of like guessing based on the given inequality?

it's not actually guessing. In general when we do a formal proof, that epsilon-delta implication is what we really want, so usually we will "cheat" a little bit by working backwards from the implication, i.e., if |f(x)-L|<epsilon is true, then what should delta (depends on epsilon) be? Part a) addresses this in your problem.

devout falcon
#

oh wait hold up

#

ohhh

#

ok because we found limit in part 2

#

and then the thing for delta is 0<x-c<delta

#

found that c is 4

#

0<x-4<delta

#

the inequality is 4<x<4+4e

#

which happens to evaluate to 0<x<4e

#

4e=delta

#

that chain of logic makes sense or did i get lucky?

cosmic trail
#

I think you got the idea.

#

altho a bit unorganized, that's not a big issue as you come across more examples/exercises in the future.

devout falcon
#

ok thank you so much! Sorry for any headaches given along the way

#

Really appreciate it, this problem has been gnawing on what's left of my brain

cosmic trail
#

nonono it's okay, I also spent a lot of time when I studied this concept two yrs ago.

devout falcon
#

college student?

cosmic trail
#

I will be a college student.

devout falcon
#

bruh I'm in college 💀

#

child prodigy or something?

cosmic trail
#

no, i'm not. just self-study.

devout falcon
#

from the states?

cosmic trail
#

not from the US.

devout falcon
#

oh where you from?

cosmic trail
#

from this earth.

devout falcon
#

fair enough, have you already applied to colleges?

cosmic trail
#

yeah, will be a college student in a few weeks.

devout falcon
#

ah nice good luck and thanks for the help again man