#Delta and Epsilon help
81 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
all of them or a particular part?
The whole thing, I've been pretty lost on this topic
ok.
I have the solutions if needed, but I've tried working backwards and confused myself
no, don't work backwards from the answer key.
Yeah I fried my brain 😢
so given $4<x<4+\epsilon$, we have $2<\sqrt{x}<\sqrt{4+\epsilon}$. (Everything is non-negative so we're fine). Now, We need to bound the right hand side. The hint (which is pretty obvious algebra) states that $4+\epsilon<(2+\epsilon)^2$, which implies that $\sqrt{4+\epsilon}<2+\epsilon$, so by transitivity of inequality we have the result. Note that $\epsilon>0$ is crucial as it makes taking square root a legit operation, so you should constantly refer to that in a formal proof.
Kevin S
Ok ok things are starting to make a little sense
so this section is just basic algebra
if epsilon was not restricted to just being >0, we would have +- versions which would muddle up everything right>
Part b) is a bit tricky. We should immediately identify that $f(x)=\sqrt{x}$ and $L=2$. Now, since we require $4<x<4+4\epsilon$, it means that we are trying to approach to $4$ from the right hand side, so the limit is $$\lim_{x\to 4^+}\sqrt{x}=2$$
Kevin S
it's a one-sided limit.
think about the definition of limit.
because sqrt 4 is 2
you are trying to arrive at |f(x)-L|<epsilon at the end. so clearly f(x) should be sqrt x and L=2.
Is part b ok?
why do we not use x instead of sqrt x
can you elaborate that question?
you typed lim (sqrt x) as x approaches 4 = 2
4^+
lim x as x approaches 2+ = 2?
Well, if you're trying to prove $\lim_{x\to 2^+}=2$, then why do you need all those extra stuff like $4<x<4+4\epsilon$? The proof of that is just trivial, given $\epsilon>0$, there exists $\delta=\epsilon$ such that $0<x-2<\delta\implies |x-2|<\delta=\epsilon$.
Kevin S
ok thanks so much for clarifyin g
so let's move on to part c.
Now, part c) is just to complete the proof. Given part a), we know that given an arbitrary $\epsilon>0$, if $4<x<4+4\epsilon$, then we have the desired implication, of $|f(x)-L|<\epsilon$. The issue is how to choose a value of delta that depends on epsilon. Well, that's just the given inequality, so take $\delta=4\epsilon$, we thus have that given $\epsilon>0$, there exists $\delta=4\epsilon>0$ such that $0<x-4<\delta$ (recall the inequality $4<x<4+4\epsilon$ in part a)) implies $|\sqrt{x}-2|<\epsilon$. This implication holds precisely because of part a).
Kevin S
what exactly is the given inequality is it 4<x<4+4epsilon?
in part a.
that is the assumption in part a, and we need to use this inequality to choose delta so that the implication (of proving limit) is true.
2<sqrt(x)<2+epsilon
this is the thing we want to arrive at after choosing delta.
did you get to delta by subtracting 4 from 4<x<4+4epsilon?
Sorry if I'm super slow
we want to choose delta such that $0<x-4<\delta$ implies $|\sqrt{x}-2|<\epsilon$.
Kevin S
now, this implication holds when $\delta =4\epsilon$, which is obtained precisely by manipulating $4<x<4+4\epsilon$ in part a). So you're right!
Kevin S
sorry I keep asking questions so in similar problems would we obtain delta by manipulating the function to isolate epsilon?
so if the function were like 5<x<5+5epsilon would delta in terms of epsilon be 5epsilon?
We are trying to obtain $0<x-4<\text{something}$, not isolating epsilon.
Kevin S
I'm still so confused about part c
I get up to f(x) -2 <epsilon
we have to choose the value of delta based on the given inequality?
the formal process is to choose delta depending on epsilon so that we can have the desired implication.
that's usually hard, but in this case we have that given inequality which can help us make a decision about delta.
so is it kind of like guessing based on the given inequality?
it's not actually guessing. In general when we do a formal proof, that epsilon-delta implication is what we really want, so usually we will "cheat" a little bit by working backwards from the implication, i.e., if |f(x)-L|<epsilon is true, then what should delta (depends on epsilon) be? Part a) addresses this in your problem.
oh wait hold up
ohhh
ok because we found limit in part 2
and then the thing for delta is 0<x-c<delta
found that c is 4
0<x-4<delta
the inequality is 4<x<4+4e
which happens to evaluate to 0<x<4e
4e=delta
that chain of logic makes sense or did i get lucky?
I think you got the idea.
altho a bit unorganized, that's not a big issue as you come across more examples/exercises in the future.
ok thank you so much! Sorry for any headaches given along the way
Really appreciate it, this problem has been gnawing on what's left of my brain
nonono it's okay, I also spent a lot of time when I studied this concept two yrs ago.
college student?
I will be a college student.
no, i'm not. just self-study.
from the states?
not from the US.
oh where you from?
from this earth.
fair enough, have you already applied to colleges?
yeah, will be a college student in a few weeks.
ah nice good luck and thanks for the help again man