stable pine
Hey does anyone know what the fastest way for a webview window and my Rust backend to communicate is?
Commands?
Events?
Channels?
Are commands and channels not the same? Both are just tauri's http-based IPC in disguise no??
Why doesn't tauri use webview bindings?
stable pine
@valid oyster thanks -- do you know if there's any performance drawback to having MANY channels?
i have many lists of... things. and i'm wondering whether to make one channel per list, or one per thing
valid oyster
as per Tauri docs
it might not be suitable to sending a large amount of data.
looking through the issues on github, i don't seem to find any issues related to having many channels
valid oyster
another option could be to have custom URI protocol
valid oyster
oh each packet would be super small, it's just lots of them
this shouldn't be a problem i think
stable pine
another option could be to have custom URI protocol
i think that shouldn't really be much faster than using channels right? tauri itself shouldn't add a lot of overhead to tauri::ipc responses
oh wait what, actually it seems like channels are using webview.eval too?
valid oyster
i have many lists of... things. and i'm wondering whether to make one channel pe...
one channel per thing would be logical but that also depends
stable pine
but i wonder why they then say that channels are faster than events?
they say events eval, and channels are faster
valid oyster
serialization
stable pine
seems like that's the only difference
