sand vessel
Title. I am trying to port a electron "app" that it heavily depends of WebGL (1 or 2) so I tried running some WebGL benchmarks on Tauri before porting it and the score is very, very low compared to the Chromium Engine.
Tauri: https://i.ayaya.beauty/mALU.png (When using WebGL either 1 or 2, the results are the same)
Chromium Engine: https://i.ayaya.beauty/zTVF.png
Gecko (Firefox): https://i.ayaya.beauty/fkDW.png
fierce nacelle
That was in release build? May not matter, anyway.
sand vessel
That was in release build? May not matter, anyway.
Yes, latest one from npm
signal marten
We really need more information here
What OS, what does tauri info report
How are you integrating the benchmark
signal marten
I am not familiar with the benching tool. Is this an Intel Mac?
brave compass
Linux, which has been known to have poor painting performance but I've never tried testing OpenGL/WebGL.
signal marten
I was confused, because it says apple GPU in the first screenshot
brave compass
Good point, I forgot that it's possible to install Linux on Apple devices. I think "Apple GPU" only shows up for their own "M" series chips.
fierce nacelle
@signal marten WebKit doesn't return unmasked vendor or renderer like firefox or chromium does it, it will always return's Apple GPU (since Tauri + WebKit (Linux either macOS)
https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/WebKit/WebKit/-/blob/Source/WebCore/html/canvas/WebGLRenderingContextBase.cpp?L2365:20
Since Tauri uses webkit2gtk and it is using WebKit, so yes, result will be like this.
It is tauri application running on Linux
