New cool blessing… again

[wooden dawn]

Pig:

After taking damage heal 10 hp (min)
After taking damage heal 20 hp (max)

Something like that:

[compact yoke]

What do you think the cooldown should be..?

[wooden dawn]

Idk)

[nimble comet]

seems like what defense should do but just negate the damage

also looks like a frog

[wooden dawn]

Frog is absolutely different, it’s like elephant and hyppo

[nimble comet]

im saying it looks like a frog not a pig

hippo*

[wooden dawn]

Unlike percentage reduction, a pig is ideal against many small attacks, but not very effective against 1 large one

[wooden dawn]

It's like comparing a hippo and an elephant - they both have the same effect, but it's not the same thing.

[nimble comet]

idk what ur talking about

ur asking for a 10 hp damage reduction

literally same thing why would you get hit lose hp and insta heal hp instead of negating the initial 10 dmg.

id say do something like a healing buff after hit

but we have one for encouraging not being hit which is hippo

maybe using both would allow for perm healing bugf

buff

[wooden dawn]

It is for this reason that I wrote 10 hp instead of strengthening healing

[nimble comet]

yeah either way the way ur saying it is weird u should be asking for damage negation not instant health for taking a hit lmao

[wooden dawn]

There is no "damage negation" in the game, does it make sense to create new mechanics if it is optional?

[wooden dawn]

And the green pig looks like the piglets from Angry birds

[nimble comet]

dude stop talking to me u def not english or something cause u not getting my point the purpose of yr blessing idea should be damage mitigation not take damage instant heal thats weird and convoluted im done someone else will have to explain to u

[wooden dawn]

My English isn’t good, sorry

[tender sedge]

It's axyenno

[obtuse pecan]

erm... weirdly shallow and aggressive comment lol. not sure why you're being so rude when he clearly understood what you were saying and offered a valid point- there's no "damage negation" in the game right now, so why not use a mechanic that already exists? technically speaking, the armor stat already mitigates damage for you, so an instant heal would make more sense as a blessing and would basically be a side-grade to Frog

[wooden dawn]

Yes! That's exactly what I meant, it's just that I don't speak English very well, so it was hard to argue. (It's good that there is a translator)

Ty

[waxen folio]

I think Instant would make it function literally like armor with the caviat that you die to hits that armor would block, but what about an "after x Seconds" delay and a stronger payoff?

[wooden dawn]

I think if it's too much, you need to reduce the healing itself, the very idea is that it will work well against a lot of attacks

[waxen folio]

in that case it would literally just be armor and pretty pointless

[wooden dawn]

think it will be fun. Armor gives less profit when there is more of it, and healing - especially even 10 healings from an attack - is very good, it will help with a dragon, it will help you survive a battle with a salamander, and in principle it's not bad to save 10 hp - it's always nice

[waxen folio]

Instant healing is very much just damage mitigation - which is the job of the armor value, I personally dont think we need 2 stats with the exact same purpose honestly

This would essentially be some true damage armor but I think the enemies that have true damage do so because otherwise you could sit inside them and nothing would happen - with this blessing Dragon would effectively do 3 damage per projectile and you could endlessly sit inside him, which is something I personally dont want to see

[wooden dawn]

10 armor is not a negation of 10 damage, the more armor, the less negation there will be, and if the blessing heals by 10, the dragon, although with difficulty, will be able to kill the player

[waxen folio]

If the intent behind certain mobs was that they could have their damage mitigated, they would not do true damage. I dont think we need this blessing for now

[nimble comet]

i think u got it wrong it to doesnt make sense

[nimble comet]

^^

[nimble comet]

^^

[obtuse pecan]

it does make sense, it would protect you from hits that deal low damage but it wouldn't prevent you from being 1-shot by larger hits and/or shotgun attacks that happen instantly

and if we wanted to balance it around mountain dragon (or bleeds), we could make it so that true damage doesn't trigger the heal

[wooden dawn]

I think the purpose of the true damage was only to penetrate the armor, and yet most of the true damage would still work if it was treated after being hit, rather than after taking damage

[pure breach]

I don’t believe it is the same as damage mitigation because let’s say a player is at 10 hp, and takes a hit that does 10 damage if that gets negated they live, but if they lost it then tried to heal it, their hp would have hit 0 and they would have died before they healed it back, not to mention I’d imagine it’d still heal if let’s for say yak was to proc on that same hit too, then it’s a free heal and you wouldn’t have noticed anything at all aside from yak if it was just a damage mitigation instead.

I do think it should heal on a delay or something though, because I could see this being really broken with certain builds as is

Like what if it tracked your hits during combat and then healed you 10 for every hit you took after combat, or just stacked up and healed whatever amount every 5 secs. Then you couldn’t just sit on things etc but you’d still get the benefit of having full hp after combat

[wooden dawn]

👍