#PAM does not work with Beacon3D
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
At the speed of the beacon... why does PAM matter? you could up the bed mesh to like 50x50 without issue correct? EG: doesn't the mesh still just adjust where you are printing?
still takes a long time to measure a complete bed
and imagein, with pam you can mesh a benchie in less than a second
oh...right.... you're talking still limiting the mesh to the PAM desfined area...but AT beacon speed to boot dooohl!
beacon is not as fast as you think
even if you move super fast, the beacon measures only a small line on the bed, means if you wish a high resolutiuon you ened to wait as well
As with the Super Pinda, when you change between beds (flex metal sheet based, garolite, and/or a carbon fiber sheet) that zero space changes. So i still feel my reversion to my BLTouch was the simplest. with PAM as you state, I get the resolution needed...WHERE I'm printing.
beacon is still cool
most definitely.
...would love to use one if I could figure a way to 'properly and accurately' save a bed thickness offset
you can easily save and reuse variables in a gcode macro
oh yes. but how would you prove to yourself the Beacon was reading variations in say a CF or garolite plate compared to the metal it was sensing under the plate
ha...those 'sanding ' videos
ahh, you mean using different plates
thats already possible
yes
there are two ways
a dedicated plugin, or just using the mainsail presets
but dont let us hijack this thread
but again... the Beacon is seeing the bed...not those non-ferrous surfaces
normaly, you glue these non-ferrous surfaces to a spring steel sheet, beacon still works
so this still works
PEI is also a non-ferrous surfaces btw
all print surfaces are
agreed.
link(s) come up 404 not found!