13
#Up vs. Down
humble swallow
umbral tangle
12
humble swallow
11
leaden skiff
12
rancid bison
13
prime scarab
14
wet rose
13
mystic sparrow
12
umbral tangle
11
wet rose
Too soon
leaden skiff
Azen trying to cheat over here
humble swallow
10
mystic sparrow
9
wet rose
8
rancid bison
10±1
prime scarab
9
leaden skiff
10
rancid bison
11
umbral tangle
10
mystic sparrow
9
leaden skiff
10
rancid bison
11
prime scarab
12
wet rose
11
umbral tangle
10
humble swallow
9
umbral tangle
8
leaden skiff
9
rancid bison
10
wet rose
9
mystic sparrow
8
prime scarab
9
leaden skiff
8
humble swallow
shit
prime scarab
8
wet rose
7
mystic sparrow
6
umbral tangle
5
rancid bison
.
prime scarab
6
leaden skiff
7
rancid bison
8
wet rose
7
umbral tangle
6
humble swallow
@modest crow
mystic sparrow
5
humble swallow
4
leaden skiff
@edgy mortar
rancid bison
???
umbral tangle
we have two 5 here
leaden skiff
5
rancid bison
the . is 6
umbral tangle
1
rancid bison
2
prime scarab
the . is 6
Hadn't you already counted at that time
rancid bison
??
wet rose
4
humble swallow
3
prime scarab
?
wet rose
3
mystic sparrow
2
umbral tangle
0
leaden skiff
Mine is correct because Azen’s was correct
humble swallow
@modest crow
rancid bison
did down win
wet rose
He was allowed to count again
His was wrong as he counted twice in a minute
prime scarab
No but it's already at 0
leaden skiff
Nope
prime scarab
His was wrong as he counted twice in a minute
No because the first one was wrong
leaden skiff
His was wrong as he counted twice in a minute
He was right bc his prev count was wrong
umbral tangle
he coubted wrong then right after then another one in the same min
rancid bison
you can not just
humble swallow
i dont see any wrong
umbral tangle
After this, Azure counted 4, then it went 3 4 3 2 1 0
I also see it this way
prime scarab
-2
leaden skiff
-3
modest crow
0 days since last win
tranquil oar
After this, Azure counted 4, then it went 3 4 3 2 1 0
This is right
modest crow
-4
rancid bison
-5
tranquil oar
-6
prime scarab
-7
tranquil oar
just for good measure
modest crow
Now if there's mistakes, down still definitely won
leaden skiff
lol
rancid bison
,
prime scarab
-8
rancid bison
-9
tranquil oar
500
tranquil oar
Jokes over guys
prime scarab
240±251
leaden skiff
500±1
rancid bison
240±251±1
umbral tangle
What does this + with a - on the bottom mean?
leaden skiff
500±2
prime scarab
What does this + with a - on the bottom mean?
It means either + or -
leaden skiff
What does this + with a - on the bottom mean?
It means both sides can win 😅
prime scarab
So 500±1 is either 501 or 499
leaden skiff
500±3
umbral tangle
It means both sides can win 😅
That makes no sense for me because then it is up for interpretation?
prime scarab
That makes no sense for me because then it is up for interpretation?
Yes
modest crow
It would be funny if everyone just counted ± until 500
leaden skiff
Yes /j
rancid bison
500±(3+1)
prime scarab
500±5
leaden skiff
500±6
prime scarab
500±8
rancid bison
500±9
prime scarab
500±10
leaden skiff
500±11
modest crow
500±12
rancid bison
500±13
prime scarab
500±14
modest crow
500±15
leaden skiff
500±16
rancid bison
500±17
prime scarab
500±18
leaden skiff
500±19
rancid bison
500±20
leaden skiff
500±21
modest crow
500±22
prime scarab
Oh right
rancid bison
500±23
prime scarab
500±24
rancid bison
500±24±1 (can mean 500±23 or 500±25)
leaden skiff
500±25
rancid bison
500±26
modest crow
500±27
prime scarab
500±28
leaden skiff
500±29
rancid bison
500±30
modest crow
500±31
prime scarab
500±32
leaden skiff
500±33
rancid bison
500±34
prime scarab
~~500±24±1 (can mean 500±23 or 500±25)~~
I thought they would both have to be the same symbol
Otherwise what is ∓ for
modest crow
500±36
leaden skiff
500±37
modest crow
500±38
rancid bison
I thought they would both have to be the same symbol
Otherwise what is ∓ for
then what about the 3rd
+|?
(assuming we do not know what the +- and -+ are)
500±39
leaden skiff
500±40
prime scarab
500±41
rancid bison
500±42
leaden skiff
500±43
rancid bison
500±45
prime scarab
500±46
rancid bison
500±47
leaden skiff
500±48
prime scarab
500±49
rancid bison
500±50
prime scarab
500±51
leaden skiff
500±52
prime scarab
500±53
leaden skiff
500±54
rancid bison
500±55
prime scarab
500±56
rancid bison
500±57
leaden skiff
500±58
rancid bison
500±59
prime scarab
500±60
leaden skiff
500±61
rancid bison
500±63
prime scarab
500±64
leaden skiff
500±65
rancid bison
500±66
leaden skiff
500±67
rancid bison
500±68
prime scarab
500±69
leaden skiff
500±70
prime scarab
500±71
rancid bison
500±72
leaden skiff
500±73
prime scarab
500±74
rancid bison
500±75
prime scarab
500±77
leaden skiff
500±78
prime scarab
500±80
rancid bison
500±81
prime scarab
500±82
leaden skiff
500±83
rancid bison
500±84
prime scarab
500±85
leaden skiff
500±86
rancid bison
500±87
prime scarab
500±88
leaden skiff
500±89
rancid bison
500±90
prime scarab
500±91
leaden skiff
500±92
rancid bison
500±93
prime scarab
500±94
leaden skiff
500±95
rancid bison
500±96
leaden skiff
500±97
rancid bison
500±98
leaden skiff
500±99
prime scarab
500±100
rancid bison
500±101
modest crow
500±102
prime scarab
500±103
leaden skiff
500±104
rancid bison
500±105
leaden skiff
500±106
prime scarab
500±107
rancid bison
500±108
prime scarab
500±109
leaden skiff
500±110
rancid bison
500±111
prime scarab
500±112
modest crow
500±113
rancid bison
500±114
leaden skiff
500±115
prime scarab
500±116
leaden skiff
500±117
prime scarab
500±118
rancid bison
500±119
leaden skiff
500±120
rancid bison
500±122
prime scarab
500±123
leaden skiff
500±124
rancid bison
500±125
prime scarab
500±126
rancid bison
500±127
leaden skiff
500±128
prime scarab
500±129
rancid bison
500±130
prime scarab
500±131
leaden skiff
500±132
rancid bison
500±133
leaden skiff
500±134
prime scarab
500±135
rancid bison
500±136
leaden skiff
500±136
prime scarab
500±137
rancid bison
500±138
prime scarab
500±139
leaden skiff
500±140
rancid bison
500±141
prime scarab
500±142
leaden skiff
500±143
rancid bison
500±144
prime scarab
500±145
rancid bison
500±146
leaden skiff
500±147
prime scarab
500±148
leaden skiff
500±149
prime scarab
500±150
rancid bison
500±151
leaden skiff
500±152
prime scarab
500±153
rancid bison
500±154
prime scarab
500±155
leaden skiff
500±156
rancid bison
500±157
prime scarab
500±158
leaden skiff
500±159
rancid bison
500±160
prime scarab
500±161
leaden skiff
500±162
rancid bison
500±163
prime scarab
500±164
leaden skiff
500±165
rancid bison
500±166
prime scarab
500±167
leaden skiff
500±168
rancid bison
500±169
leaden skiff
500±170
prime scarab
500±171
rancid bison
500±172
prime scarab
500±173
leaden skiff
500±174
rancid bison
500±175
leaden skiff
500±176
rancid bison
500±177
prime scarab
500±178
rancid bison
500±179
prime scarab
500±180
leaden skiff
500±181
rancid bison
500±182
leaden skiff
500±183
prime scarab
500±184
leaden skiff
500±185
prime scarab
500±186
rancid bison
500±187
prime scarab
500±188
leaden skiff
500±189
rancid bison
500±190
leaden skiff
500±191
rancid bison
500±192
prime scarab
500±193
leaden skiff
500±194
rancid bison
500±195
prime scarab
500±196
rancid bison
500±197
leaden skiff
500±198
rancid bison
500±200
prime scarab
500±201
rancid bison
500±202
leaden skiff
500±203
rancid bison
500±205
prime scarab
500±206
leaden skiff
500±207
rancid bison
500±208
prime scarab
500±209
leaden skiff
500±210
rancid bison
500±211
vague lotus
Excuse me, wtf are you doing?
leaden skiff
Finally someone noticed
rancid bison
we are counting by ±1
prime scarab
Excuse me, wtf are you doing?<:uwucat:885930144412356698>
The fourth team
leaden skiff
500±213
rancid bison
500±214
vague lotus
Amazing, after all this time there's still surprises. Well, have fun!
leaden skiff
500±215
prime scarab
500±216
rancid bison
500±217
leaden skiff
500±218
rancid bison
500±219
prime scarab
500±220
leaden skiff
500±221
rancid bison
500±222
prime scarab
500±223
leaden skiff
500±224
rancid bison
500±225
prime scarab
500±226
leaden skiff
500±228
rancid bison
500±229
prime scarab
500±231
leaden skiff
500±232
prime scarab
500±234
leaden skiff
500±235
rancid bison
500±236
leaden skiff
500±237
rancid bison
500±238
prime scarab
500±239
leaden skiff
500±240
rancid bison
500±242
prime scarab
500±243
leaden skiff
500±244
prime scarab
500±245
leaden skiff
500±246
rancid bison
500±247
leaden skiff
500±248
rancid bison
500±249
leaden skiff
500±250
prime scarab
500±251
rancid bison
500±252
prime scarab
500±253
leaden skiff
500±254
rancid bison
500±255
leaden skiff
500±256
rancid bison
500±257
leaden skiff
500±259
rancid bison
500±261
prime scarab
500±262
rancid bison
500±264
leaden skiff
500±265
rancid bison
500±267
leaden skiff
500±269
prime scarab
500±270
rancid bison
500±271
leaden skiff
500±272
leaden skiff
500±274
modest crow
500±275
leaden skiff
500±276
rancid bison
500±277
prime scarab
500±278
leaden skiff
500±279
rancid bison
500±280
leaden skiff
500±281
prime scarab
500±282
modest crow
500±283
leaden skiff
500±284
modest crow
500±285
rancid bison
500±286
leaden skiff
500±287
prime scarab
500±288
rancid bison
500±289
modest crow
500±290
leaden skiff
500±291
modest crow
500±292
rancid bison
500±293
leaden skiff
500±294
rancid bison
500±296
leaden skiff
500±298
rancid bison
500±300
leaden skiff
500±301
modest crow
500±302
rancid bison
500±303
leaden skiff
500±304
rancid bison
500±305
modest crow
500±306
leaden skiff
500±308
rancid bison
500±309
leaden skiff
500±310
modest crow
500±311
rancid bison
500±312
leaden skiff
500±313
rancid bison
500±315
leaden skiff
500±316
modest crow
500±317
rancid bison
500±318
leaden skiff
500±319
prime scarab
you mean 3
No I wouldn't count 400, but true
modest crow
500±321
rancid bison
500±322
prime scarab
500±323
modest crow
500±324
leaden skiff
500±325
rancid bison
500±326
leaden skiff
500±327
prime scarab
500±328
leaden skiff
500±329
modest crow
500±330
prime scarab
500±331
leaden skiff
500±332
modest crow
500±333
rancid bison
500±334
modest crow
500±335
rancid bison
500±336
prime scarab
500±337
leaden skiff
500±338
modest crow
500±340
rancid bison
500±341
prime scarab
500±342
leaden skiff
500±343
modest crow
500±344
prime scarab
500±345
rancid bison
500±346
leaden skiff
500±347
rancid bison
500±348
prime scarab
500±349
leaden skiff
500±350
prime scarab
500±351
leaden skiff
500±352
rancid bison
500±353
leaden skiff
500±354
prime scarab
500±355
rancid bison
500±356
prime scarab
500±357
leaden skiff
500±358
rancid bison
500±359
prime scarab
500±360
rancid bison
500±361
leaden skiff
500±363
prime scarab
500±365
leaden skiff
500±366
rancid bison
500±367
prime scarab
500±368
leaden skiff
500±369
prime scarab
500±370
leaden skiff
500±371
prime scarab
500±372
leaden skiff
500±373
prime scarab
500±375
leaden skiff
500±376
prime scarab
500±377
rancid bison
500±378
leaden skiff
500±379
prime scarab
500±380
leaden skiff
500±382
prime scarab
500±384
leaden skiff
500±385
wet rose
Is it a win for team up and down once you guys are done?
prime scarab
I guess
leaden skiff
500±389
prime scarab
500±391
leaden skiff
500±392
rancid bison
500±393
leaden skiff
500±394
rancid bison
500±396
leaden skiff
500±397
rancid bison
500±399
leaden skiff
500±400
rancid bison
500±402
edgy mortar
500±403
leaden skiff
500±404
rancid bison
500±405
rancid bison
500±407
leaden skiff
500±409
rancid bison
500±411
leaden skiff
500±412
modest crow
500±413
leaden skiff
500±414
modest crow
500±416
leaden skiff
500±417
rancid bison
500±422
leaden skiff
500±423
rancid bison
500±424
leaden skiff
500±425
rancid bison
500±426
leaden skiff
500±427
rancid bison
500±428
leaden skiff
500±429
rancid bison
500±430
leaden skiff
500±431
rancid bison
500±432
leaden skiff
500±433
rancid bison
500±434
leaden skiff
500±435
rancid bison
500±437
leaden skiff
500±438
rancid bison
500±439
leaden skiff
500±440
rancid bison
500±441
leaden skiff
500±442
rancid bison
500±443
modest crow
500±444
leaden skiff
500±445
rancid bison
500±446
modest crow
500±447
leaden skiff
500±448
modest crow
500±449
prime scarab
500±450
rancid bison
500±451
modest crow
500±452
rancid bison
500±453
leaden skiff
500±454
rancid bison
500±456
leaden skiff
500±457
prime scarab
-# Imagine an Up and. Down where you put this format to use.
Could be something like https://discord.com/channels/580647218378309644/1261393853923983492 but with a±b instead of (x, y)
rancid bison
500±459 | we are ±41 away from reaching 500±500
leaden skiff
500±460
leaden skiff
500±462
prime scarab
500±463
rancid bison
500±464
leaden skiff
500±465
prime scarab
500±466
leaden skiff
500±468
rancid bison
500±469
leaden skiff
500±470
prime scarab
500±471
rancid bison
500±472
prime scarab
500±473
leaden skiff
500±474
rancid bison
500±475
prime scarab
500±476
leaden skiff
500±477
prime scarab
500±478
leaden skiff
500±479
rancid bison
500±480
leaden skiff
500±481
prime scarab
500±482
leaden skiff
500±483
rancid bison
500±484
leaden skiff
500±485
rancid bison
500±486
leaden skiff
500±487
rancid bison
500±488
leaden skiff
500±489
rancid bison
500±490
leaden skiff
500±491
rancid bison
500±492
leaden skiff
500±493
rancid bison
500±494
prime scarab
500±495
leaden skiff
500±496
rancid bison
500±497
prime scarab
500±498
leaden skiff
500±499
rancid bison
500±500
prime scarab
Hmmm
rancid bison
next step ping op and see if it counts
prime scarab
**500±500**
-# @tranquil oar Could you add a win for both teams
It wouldn't really affect the leaderboard
Up would still be winning by 8
modest crow
**500±500**
damn, 2 wins in a day
rancid bison
3*
leaden skiff
Yes, 3 😂
prime scarab
😔
tranquil oar
500
prime scarab
Rigged
tranquil oar
As much as I admire the dedication this is AGAINST the rules
prime scarab
It's not beneficial for any of the teams
leaden skiff
Um, actually there's no rule against it
modest crow
All that counting for nothing
leaden skiff
And changing the rules afterward does nothing because it already happened
modest crow
Yeah rules shouldn't apply retroactively
rancid bison
a waste of time^2
leaden skiff
That's a win for up and down, legally.
Whether you like it or not
This is the one time
rancid bison
rule 2a was applied after the first game of up vs down
so its either removing 1 up win or giving 1 up win/ 1 down win
leaden skiff
You gotta think of these situations ahead of time to prevent them.
prime scarab
Um, actually there's no rule against it
The fact that there isn't a rule specifically against it doesn't mean it's allowed
leaden skiff
The fact that there isn't a rule specifically against it doesn't mean it's allow...
Huh?
modest crow
Oh yeah it doesn't say you can't bot the count
prime scarab
So it all comes down to how interpret this "or"
rancid bison
its or, not xor
prime scarab
Good catch
leaden skiff
Lmao
modest crow
± means plus or minus
so... ± means up or down
wet rose
499
prime scarab
500
umbral tangle
499
worldly zodiac
497
umbral tangle
497
worldly zodiac
498
prime scarab
500
tranquil oar
Um, actually there's no rule against it
- Do not put more than one number per post.
499
leaden skiff
> 1. Do not put more than one number per post.
That's one number
leaden skiff
That rule was to prevent people from counting twice in the same message
tranquil oar
497
leaden skiff
That is called maths, which is traditionally recognized as one number.
prime scarab
498
worldly zodiac
499
leaden skiff
I will be adding NO wins to either team
38437880250919346082513138635401 is anti-fun confirmed
leaden skiff
This is the person whose post you’re choosing to follow, for anyone interested
tranquil oar
518
worldly zodiac
519
leaden skiff
520±1
leaden skiff
523±1
leaden skiff
523±3
leaden skiff
3.1415926535897932384626433832795
leaden skiff
0x20F
worldly zodiac
528
humble swallow
528
worldly zodiac
529
umbral tangle
533
worldly zodiac
533
modest crow
welp, at least this solves the up vs. down addiction
umbral tangle
532
worldly zodiac
533
umbral tangle
532
worldly zodiac
532
edgy mortar
win=up, lose=down
hallow parcelBOT
edgy mortar
531
worldly zodiac
532
edgy mortar
531
umbral tangle
530
prime scarab
This is the person whose post you’re choosing to follow, for anyone interested
FoldingScarf typa argument
prime scarab
win=up, lose=down
Last time you did this it was down but then you became up
I thought you had committed to up
modest crow
~~FoldingScarf typa argument~~
I think you should not bring her in unnecessarily
worldly zodiac
531