#Im doing A levels Sociology, Biology and Psychology with to become CTS, would law be wise In Uni?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Your subject combo isn’t rlly ideal for law ngl
Sociology isn’t that respected as an essay subject and it’s your only one with 2 stem
Law isn’t impossible but for a good uni you’d need work exp and like top tier extra curricular
law is still possible js not the best combo for it, its ideal for things like neuroscience or biomedical science
ty then
nah it does work for law
socio is an essay based subject, and so is psychology because it is not considered stem
are you thinking of taking a level law or thinking of pursuing law in university?
because you can definitely do law in university
doing a level law as a fourth would be more difficult as the workload of that is worse than maths
the only essay subject which is not considered on par with the rest is business
psychology is viewed as both a science and essay subject it does "work" its not the best option u could pick as an essay subject they're social sciences not hard essay subjects
sum like history or classics will always be better
but your right asw
buisness
isnt preferred at all
social sciences are essay-based subjects regardless AND it has equal consideration to other essay subjects
history is only recommended for law due to the workload of the subject itself, not because what you learn in the subject being beneficial to the course
ik but they are slightly preferred no? with equal grades classics history bio would get chosen over psychology sociology bio
no
there is equal consideration in most top universities, especially in the uk
because those unis prefer if you take essay-based subjects
you could do maths physics econ and get the same grades as someone who does socio psych history yet still have the same edge
many people get admitted into law with full maths and sciences
true but check the statistics of acceptance rates
english lit history usually get in
ill find the source
and send it
oxbridge and ucl yea
ik ucl and cambridge
def prefer history english lit classics
im not saying his combo
is impossible for law
im js saying factually
somebody with classics history english lit
is more likely
to get in
no
😭
there are more factors than just subjects gang
the admissions test, the personal statement
ik i agree 100 percent
but its like u wanna give yourself the best chances possible for somewhere like oxbridge
like for eng chem and dt are both preffered subjects
but for mechanical courses dt
is better
but his combo is ideal for law
it's not the 'perfect' combo that cambridge likes to state, even then most people just have one subject from lit, history or modern languages
tbf your right i still think swapping psych or sociology to classics history or lit would still give slightly better chances
but after going back and reading entry reqs
it is a good combo js not "the best" combo
you can have this opinion, that is fair. but what you cannot say is that bio + psych + socio is not ideal for law and that the person would need "work experience and like top tier extra curricular"
because that's not really true
yk what thats valid but for oxbridge everybody should aim for work exp and top extra curriculars regardless of combo
but u def right
icl
is work exp even that helpful anymore
in the UK
it feels like everybodys got it
schools give it out like candy
oxbridge cares more for supercurriculars than extracurriculars anyways
work experience/internships are beneficial if you can make use of it in your personal statement
supercurriculars? idk what the difference is im js talking about things like awards essay comps projects etc
because yeah everyone has it, but the difference is the impact it had on you and how it potentially changed your thinking, thus gearing you more for uni and what you aspire to do afterwards
yea true
ive got some this summer
but im mainly gonna focus on projects and awards
supercurriculars is out of school/syllabus reading as in research papers, books, documentaries that revolve around the topic of your desired course
yea thats what im talking about
awards, comps and projects are all considered extracurricular which is different
im lowkey lost things like gold crest or a personal project or comps aren't like to do w school though
i thought these are more valuable than js reading?
im talking about stuff like this
the value it has is what use can you make of it in the personal statement
the whole point is why should they admit you, if you did 20 comps and you briefly mention it in the ps withouth any elaboration, why should the uni admit you because all they see is that you did comps, that's it
olympiads can be objectively more valuable than reading
it's just that cambridge and oxford expect students to have supercurriculars too, not just extracurriculars
true i mean reading seems much easier to do than awards anyway
im aiming for DA anyway which value diff things
what is DA?
degree apprenticeship
they value awards and projects
far more
than essay comps or reading
ahh okay
i wanted to apply. i had looked into law apprenticeship programmes for the uk before i started a levels
u apply like after A levels though dont u
at least for eng idk about law
applications are y13 same time as UCAS
some accepted gcse at the time
oh cool
i think most of the big law firms and companies
offer after a level
ive only seen 1
that was gcse
yeah, i mean a levels is compulsory education in the uk so it makes sense
yea fr kinda weird how the government are trying to push them to the side though'
there has been talk about abolishing a levels in the uk for quite a bit now
wanting to introduce a curriculum like ib
yea that got cancelled but colleges started pushing T levels a lot
they're releasing a new qualifcation soon asw
meant to replace btecs
i've read yeah
i guess to get people into vocational
not everyone wants to spearhead into harsh academics
v levels thats it
true ig but unis took ages to start accepting btecs
gonna take a while for t levels and v levels
true, at least there's more options