#Neuro ARG
1 messages · Page 39 of 1
title is
Distinguishing Compressed and Encrypted File Fragments
Our results show that current approaches cannot reliably
tell apart encryption and compression, even for large fragment size.
but they mention two other methods apart from entropy analysis
NIST SP800-22
and
HEDGE
(section 3.3)
as I understand it, HEDGE NIST SP800-22 is a software (by the NIST) that combines multiple randomness analysis approaches.
HEDGE is a combination of that and some other stuff
(idk, I think the in-document links are kinda fucked.)
haven't been able to get it to work correctly yet :/
the only issue with this is that it will add complexity to entropy calculation while it is already a major bottleneck. it's not that bad even for 10 000 keys, but i dont think i am willing to rewrite it for that extra accuracy when it's pretty clear that nothing is clear
understandable
was just about to say, even modern block ciphers exhibit different charteristics under the DIEHARDER suite and there have been classifiers for them better than random chance 10.7717/peerj-cs.1110 so you'd think compression vs encryption would be easier. 10.48550/arXiv.1001.3485 looks to suggest compression fails the tests pretty badly
I think the keyword is "reliably"
If we had dozens of ciphertexts, the results could be a lot clearer
if we can classify something with an accuracy of 80%. that's still not enough to say "we can be sure it is X and should ignore all other possibilities"
so it doesn't really help
we'd still be at "yea, it's probably encrypted"
yeah, I was about to comment that. We're still at square 1
feelsStuckMan
so uh, anyone wanna mug vedal?
https://xkcd.com/538/
(for legal reasons: this is a joke)
(i do not plan or wish to harm anyone and I do not encourage anyone to do so)
Typed that just in time, man
The FBI were onto you
not really, more like square 2, because it's almost surely not a custom alphabet. and almost surely is generally enough.
i don't even really remember why did we start trying custom alphabets at all but here we are.
there's ecc in pycryptodome, i guess i'll try adding that, and also add more sample strings, like encrypting a string of python code
here are values for 10 000 keys for a text file with added entropies for xor+sub and custom hex alphabet
and .txt with everything, if you want to for some reason look at that
custom base64
custom customs.
Man, if we need to read these messages as fragments rather than a full file/payload, that'd be so mean. But it's a valid point. It could still be compressed data, just not a normal file, because we'd have detected this by magic bytes. A fragment of compressed data could not be identified that way though.
looking at these aes pycryptodome docs, modern types of aes ask not only for a key to decrypt, but also for a nonce and a tag for decryption verification.
so not just 16 byte key we're looking for, but also 7-16 byte long nonce/iv and a 16 byte tag.
actually i went into this with hypothesis that aes gives entropy too high compared to given, but in fact, it turned out the other way, not even 7z's aes methods fall within a single standard deviation from the mean
wait... a breakthu?
we can guess at the IV just being 16 bytes of all zeroes, but that's guesswork even if it's not uncommon. How'd you determine that it's within one standard deviation? Or where'd you find the expected SD for AES
Depends on since when. You can check the timelog spreadsheet, but i'm just gonna guess it will turn up a big fat nothing new
Sadge
actually, some methods automatically generate a nonce/iv if one isn't given, so one would have to get out of their way to make it all zeroes.
the values are in the picture and in the txt file
#1112082183235047506 message
if you mean how did i get them, i got them by encrypting the same 5 sample strings with 10 000 random keys
This feels like a pretty far reach, but also pretty good thinking! We should probably give this a closer look
Alright, thanks!
I'm not sure cyberstalking tutel is gonna give us any clues
pb is an admin here
pretty sure shes too busy on her life to be making music
im going to search for help online
?
Abcdefg is a cipher. I solved it and got "baedcfg", but I think it's "badcfg". So, in solving the second puzzle, which we see throughout the video, Neuro talks about numbers and the final result. If you solve the equations, you get 645. Here's the cipher "DQ5z14ighWwiag7y+cWFQg==" I managed to decrypt it and got the following words: "hi, wish, dag, sighs, if" but I think it's possible to form the following sentences: "Hello, if you feel like it, put on a wig, Desire evokes a sigh of greeting, If you have a wig, express your desire, A sigh of greeting is a desire to see a wig.
the code in description dose not lead to that
imagine chatgpt being wrong 
it is wrong
im starting to think that base64 code isnt to ascii
not only we havent figured out the numbers meaning
we cant even come up with ideas
even if it is to ascii, it's only after compression and then heavy encryption, but by that point it can be anything really.
the idea is to bruteforce aes, it's pretty good 
it'd be pretty wild if it could be unpacked by 7zip, when it wasn't detected from magic bytes already
Start from X. End with Y. Remove XY + odd one out "Open" in FireFox
open in firefox may come after the first step
Start from X. End with Y. Remove XY + odd one out
could be related to numbers 2
x and y
we've gone thru this
im just refreshing my mind
x/26Y
26
gah im going schizo again
this is reaching don't you think
What would it give us if it turns out they made the music tho? One thing is exploring all possibilities, but we may want to be careful when it comes to examining actual people
if you are going for the "start with X end with Y" then wouldn't you want to start from capital X, not lowercase?
true
It's an openminded technique for sure. I'm not gonna argue with that. It might lead to results. Just saying we shouldn't turn actual people's lives over.
also this is just straight up wrong
For now the strongest theory is AES encryption. I even cheeked it with a random UK number, you get something similar to the study base64. I don't think it's a custom alphabet, it's not a 0 chance but one of the lowest in my opinion.
a 16 bytes integer 
The most annoying thing is the "abcdefg" and the fib.
it's pretty much 0 for custom alphabets, entropy doesn't match at all
decimal is integer???
I mean it can't be a number with custom alphabet, but it can be a number ecnrypted with a key.
probably decimal as in base-10
also btw
I don't see any evidence why it has to be AES and not another modern encryption
heptagon refers a lot as "abcdefg" and there is some things with heptagons and fibs.
like?
@daring acorn has leveled up! (1 ➜ 2)
DES is a big one that comes to mind. Could even be single-DES instead of triple. But of course I have no evidence for this either. It could be any modern semantically secure algorithm.
i might look into that firefox book that was mentioned a while back for the numbers found in numbers ii; that part might be a book cipher? its not too logical atm but ill see if theres anything readable from it
Doesn't look like DES...
How exactly does DES ciphertext look?
longer
Hmm, I don't really understand. AFAIK DES ciphertext can easily be as short as 8 bytes.
try to decode UK number both in AES and DES
see the difference
the study code looks more like AES
Seems like the ciphertext of a UK phonenumber encrypted with AES and DES both have the same number of bytes (16) to me
huh? how so, show me please
It doesn't looks like the study code, also I understood what you did. You encoded it to UTF-8 and then to both, right?
decoded from utf to get raw bytes
but if you do it straight
the output is the same whether or not you do the utf decode btw (at least if you have "raw bytes" or "utf-8" selected as the input encoding below the input text field)
I like making sure it's doing what I expect it to
> Buffer.from('DQ5z14ighWwiag7y+cWFQg==', 'base64')
<Buffer 0d 0e 73 d7 88 a0 85 6c 22 6a 0e f2 f9 c5 85 42>
> BigInt('0x'+Buffer.from('DQ5z14ighWwiag7y+cWFQg==', 'base64').toString('hex'))
17355005654666773979791917897625208130n
it does start with 17
CyberChef's "to decimal" operates per-byte iirc
yeah i figured it out.
btw, does anyone have any compressed data, preferrably over 2 kb, because i am havign trouble compressing sad.jpg lmao
Hey, just realized that maybe you were thinking triple-DES? Doing DES on DES makes it longer.
edit: Actually I don't know if this is how triple-DES is implemented.
like just a picture inside a zip?
anything inside a zip (or rar or 7z), just so that the zip won't actually turn out larger than the original file
I have one with a frame from number compressed in zip 0.01kb lower in size.
here's a text file in a zip with two different compression algorithms
It's longer, I mean I got: "e8 25 4f 60 c6 36 e3 f9 73 e2 9f 4c 45 50 65 65"
but I did with another site because cyber just doesn't work for me
"e8 25 4f 60 c6 36 e3 f9 73 e2 9f 4c 45 50 65 65
DQ 5z 14 ig hW wi ag 7y +c WF Qg =="
This is what I mean
If it can also be DES, the changce of decrypting it is almost non existence.
every combination you need to try with everything...
if it's encrypted, surely vedal has thought of a way to clearly communicate the encryption scheme, right?
he wouldn't just design a puzzle around guessing the encryption algorithm.... right?
@red brook has leveled up! (2 ➜ 3)
pog
yes, there's a loooot of possible combinations once we open the doors for other algorithms too
That's the question. If there's a clue in the prose or if the cipher gives itself away in some way.
IF we would figure out the key it wouldn't be too unreasonable to check the modern/common ones. the problem is that without knowing anything it's decreasing the chance of our bruteforcing efforts to result in anything
I think there is 2 big questions. wth is abcdefg and what we need to do with the fibs, especially the last two without any instructions at all.
The only thing we now it's like a 9 step fib, first 2 the same and the next 7 different.
"2, 2, 4, 6, 10, 16, 26, 42, 68" if you start from 2, if I'm not mistaken.
how much do profile images etc. on YT and spotify get compressed / resized?
would LSB steganography get lost? has anyone checked already?
yes
It's already hard to see what is on the surface, so something like this will be harder.
No very deep checks, but i think it's a fair assumption that any stegranography secrets are gonna be completely messed up
^ also if you take the frames in best quality possible you
will see a lot of artifacts
wonderful lossy compression
I don't know if anybody has thought about this, but what if abcdefg has something to do with the music? It is, after all, the musical alphabet
All three videos are also songs
google docs
check it
Yeah I don't see it
You have unlocked new role
second
Yoooo
Lost or new? Check out Music Theory Analysis 1 Melody sung at the beginning of Numbers: C#, E, C#, B, A G#, A, G# (TODO: Find the/a source that this is the case. Like a spectrogram or similar) TODO: Someone with an actual music background should analyse this. Do we have any in chat? TODO: c...
seems rather empty though
If you have ideas you can write in that document below everything.
Got it, I'll do it after school ends
changed target string from numbers 1 desc to numbers 2 desc, so it is lower by 0.12
the values for a compressed and then encrypted string don't seem to be any different however lmao.
also i optimized the entropy calculation a little so i'll try to do that idea with calculating entropy with 2 bytes per symbol
random thought I don't really have time to test, but could the "remove XY + odd one out" somehow reference to the fact about 1/3 of fibonacci is even?
honestly, those are some impressive connections you managed to find
no idea if that's it tho
I'll keep it in mind
am i stupid or what is up with python-camellia. first time seeing this error trying to install a library tbh.
i guess i am stupid for trying to use 8 year old library with incorrect documentation
yeah doesn't work for me on windows as well. debian works fine
well that's cringe then, i can't write it myself, nor do i want to get a linux vm just to test it
but it does seem pretty tempting, given convenient 16 bytes key
there, entropy with 2 bytes per symbol
once again it doesn't really tell anything about aes, but if anything it at least puts a simple xor outside of even 3 standard deviations from the mean
oh you actually implemented it
neat
some general crypto modules probably have a camellia implementation
oh, there is one that's literally just called "cryptography"
pip install cryptography
https://cryptography.io/en/latest/hazmat/primitives/symmetric-encryption/#cryptography.hazmat.primitives.ciphers.algorithms.Camellia
looks like you don't have much control over modes etc. though
nvm, the way you'd write it is just a bit weird
Are you sure it's Firefox related? Also all the sources says it's Japanese cipher and the key is 128 and above, or I mistaken something?
yes, just like AES it has 128, 192 or 256 bit keys. not sure what firefox has to do with openssl but firefox did support camellia from version 3 to 37 (and openssl does support several modes of camellia)
How is progress?


are we just stuck to the mercy of our corpa turtle lord for the new infos?
Hi what U guys trying to do rn?
agreed. these are some pretty neat connections. Definitely worth writing down in a more permanent place.
neat connections 
Well, better to look for coincidences that don't pan out than to give up and say nothing works
Are there any secret musicians lurking here that can come out and transpose Numbers into sheet music?
I want to sift through the piece to find some clues that can hopefully help
A random idea just popped in my head, what if the AES key has to be Caesar boxed first before it can be used? Prob unlikely though
Oh! And the image I wanted to post last time
Someone started work on it, I can't remember who now, but it was straining work to them since they were more a musician than a composer. I don't think they finished, or at least I don't recall seeing it in the docs.
It's the one from the slander meme?
??
There is a part about music in the meme video
I have no idea what you're talking about
I suspect you're newer (:
So how you don't know and I'm do..
Cause it's presumably a thing among younger people is what I'm saying
We don't all watch memes all day :p
How old are you?
Old enough to know not to identify myself
Smart
nawh, just old lel
This one
Of course that format has a name (also nice ping)
And yes, it would likely be them then if music transcription is mentioned in the vid
but it was in this channel, you should be able to find them if you search
do you just have this frame ready
got all the frames indexed with sentiment embedding, got it.
aww so wholesome of her
there people who have copypastas on their macro keys and multiple folders of meticulously categorized memes. they're prepared for almost everything.
I am not one of them, but I can say I have witnessed their greatness
Everyone's gotta have a hobby
its still not solved?
No progress for some time now
mid solvers
too many people asking whether it's solved, not enough people actually trying to solve it
Imagine contributing 
check out my new username 
am musician, i dont really read sheet music tho
i can try
didnt see this in the numbers doc but maybe some of it is a part of a transposition cipher? i was looking at the wikipedia page and some of this could relate to using the fibonacci spiral and the lyrics
if my ideas are baked properly (and right) we could be closer to cracking the cipher
who knows tho
the only problem with my suggestion is that all the numbers arent on the sequence
ex: we dont have 1,6,8 in 572943

Hmm......Hello!How is progress?I just dont know what happened now,the fibonacci?


nahh I don't even know notes, only tabs
just saw the music stuff on the docs and decided to include it
the slander video needs to be pinned or something its amazing
yea it's good
will do
just generate more scitzo theories and disprove them
I'm on it!
try your best 
@elder oar has leveled up! (3 ➜ 4)
Fib is chasing me
"new" entropies, now with fernet and camellia, also made aes use 32 byte keys instead of 16 bytes, practically no difference.
idk why fernet has such low entropy 
Anything new been found?!
Only "camellia" theory.
also the same thing but with 2 bytes entropy calculation
going to plug these values into some probability theory formula to get prettier numbers
Well, things seem to be going alright
The numbers what do they
Still solving arg? We already have a fully lore and theory with the arg
is the theory the real arg was the friends we made along the way
bruh lmao nah

just bruteforce aes, it's literally that simple
i love that video can't wait for the next MAN banger
@native maple has leveled up! (12 ➜ 13)
Same
hdhshgbbt
i hate aes
why aes
theres something easier
cant we force the awsners out of him
social engineering
We could but I doubt he'll respond
||[filter]||mailing vedal sounds like a good idea!
Lmao
yeah
it can be camellia if you want, it really makes the choice simpler, only 1 type and only 16 bytes key
why not normal base64
wait
waitwait
what if we take the lyrics of numbers 1
and apply it to numbers 2
have we gone thru this theory
like
how do we even apply lyrics
schizo, i am confusing myself```I can never say oh it’s been so long
Counting all the days, it’s been so damn long
Oh how much I’m scared to let you go…
Somewhere in the walls I hear you talk…
Finding all these numbers
Start with number 2 yeah
Matching all the letters
572943.
Add another 9 yeah
Add another line yeah
Multiply by 5 yeah
How long will I keep this up?
Oh how much it hurts to see you go…
Generating lyrics is a pain
Add another 6 yeah
Flip the numbers backwards
Make the 2 a 3 yeah
Abcdefg.
Multiply by 9 yeah
Add the numbers 2 4
17 is first yeah
Abcdefg.
start from x end with y
Coming out of lurking here to say I had this idea a couple days ago and added it to the Numbers II doc under 'syllables'. Seemed really promising considering both songs seem to have 4 blocks of 3 lines in the main verses that could line up with each other. I couldn't crack anything though especially since some instructions are vague like 'matching all the letters'
"Finding all these numbers"
does it mean theres more than 17 sequences of numbers
also here 906 is the odd one
i can't get python to calculate f(5831), even an extremely rough approximation gives overflow error, number too large
i think this idea is already in the docs, was probably one of the first things that were tried
Found this as results in online calculator.
3.13e+1214
Pog we found the size of pi 
here, without 1321
[84787475302008849948050583645054932102228061357533288620624028954689005525654241165112151230105130703534283968767405582965065908863532391233655219303166737, 193048048973983181421514924194289363095619311241528324991492595362812366177810042904423919117787628092739003046738254876558249313623756961376768580637]
[2242078311320349160804015718043036082054171733573840468952625315221391947825066947905636248691862060483006835747329499742497894355779460518674655899304658879188891886536343247826376546, 327114817135866584604445222092786289485901368902485200957962177358441191520429751667933217022727867825940121997174498761270528946466892595242473813640691701043259805745267891689561625]
[984729762650247500517208505027019748580915316836544098698206971848465938083481761308953633422991427320587207624093505863713887660617908141081091367124435474030411762223507419719362603649208]```
Why is 906 the odd one here
Remember when doing any maths to follow the Neuro specific laws
only numbers said with 4 neuros on the screen if you look all other screen have less than 4
Oh I thought there was a diff reason related to digits
gotcha
Somehow seems like there is a pattern between these pictures and fibonacci on the "572943" but might be a coincidence
Like, the numbers 9 consist of would be f(9)=13+21 i.e. 2nd frame, the 2 before the 9 would be f(2)=0+1 i.e. last 2 numbers of the frame 1st frame
"Start with number 2, yeah" "Start with X, end with Y"
But then, what do the other numbers mean?

dunno, can't figure that out
like, the 58 from "5831" could be the f(7)=5+8
but cannot find anything to fit with the single 2 or the 31 using this method
so maybe those would be "the odd one out"?
^managed to find all of 57294 but missing 3 using that logic
201 1321 5831 | 01 = f(2)=0+1 | 1321 = f(9)=13+21 | 58 = f(7)=5+8
723 743 4913 | 23 = f(5)=2+3
879 875 2145 | 21 f(4)=1+2 (maybe reverse since it's the 4 with reverse frames?)
716 906 4156
is there any place i can recap what we know already and what are we working on?
the docs?
what are the docs
the docs in the pins of this
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17KrbPUAVu4wDTbj3sBtWTnjRsjDTCdh89F_5L1LvX0A/edit# here if you cant find it
but yeah its pinned
along with the amazing slander video
could we say that three is the odd one out?
Maybe, but could also be the numbers which is not included
y’all finna stop being schizo?
also, from the first "201" it could be understood as all numbers being in since f(2)=0+1, but that would mean f(9)=13+21 wouldn't be in then
considering we havent gotten any hints/clues what else should the neuro arg members do
my knowledge ain’t working on this ARG
btw, here's the "pretty" numbers. this is how close the average encrypted string is close to numbers 1 desc string. (now with 10 times more samples)
as you can see, none, even literally just random bytes which is "keys" string even approach 99% of numbers 1 desc entropy
did we already check the static in ‘I think I saw a ghost’ in a spectrogram?
someone's tried looking at it (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RBvEINbc--fCZ_pVhPVEIbrbN2CJtPo60sxx8cx85HA/edit)
Study - Glitch Patterns In , during both ‘???’ (end of ghost) timestamps, and both ‘uʍop uǝllɐɟ’ timestamps, there are horizontal glitch lines that change every few frames. The static from both ‘???’ segments have the same glitch pattern and the same duration (checked each frame). The ...
all spectograms are in the docs, and it was found like day 2 static is a stock sound
thank
oh nvm i didnt read the "as a spectrogram"part
still works
i was thinking about checking the frames to see if you could xor it but im not sure how to check all the frames easily
I just kinda want the sound into a visual diagram
no idea how to do it though cuz I’m lazy
Lost or new? Check out Study Voice, Art, Music: unknown source but might be AI-Generated as well. Description For the best experience, listen with headphones, while studying in a quiet room. 0:00 - I don't want to be an engineer Duration: 258 seconds 4:18 - Fallen down Duration: 205 sec...
this doc has the spectrograms for everything in study
this nice youtube comments
ur joining the schizo club
vedal rhyming 1 with 1, 3 with 3, 9 with 5 and 6 with 6
generating lyrics is a pain 
just waiting for the video titled "Exam" surely it's gonna be the actual ARG
we get a full college semester of neuro arg
neuro college grand opening
it's just vedal starting his own CS engineer online courses
vedal should work at a gas station that sells sushi
or he could try the game gas station simulator it's pretty good
perhaps new neuro stream
is there any possible if its relate to cartesian coordinates
You have unlocked new role
good point
By the end of this, if this were to be remade with most important events, this thing would be over an hour long
Hah
Nothing new on the Soundcloud
I'm occasionally checking the YouTube and Soundcloud at this point to make sure that nothing new's been posted
no, i am just cringe and just latin being high entropy
I would try to think of ideas, but I don't know enough about ciphers and even if I did, I'd be too afraid of posting red herrings
I mean, maybe it's double ciphered with some sort of cipher that only rotates the letters and numbers?
I think that's already suggested, but I don't know what else I could suggest
Is there any type of encryption only Firefox uses?
likely not
we're looking at http requests, firefox itself doesnt have an encryption
what about the password one?
?
I read that Firefox encrypt your passwords in some way
Someone created this thing
Is it useful in any way?
You can try it if you want
it literally says in the picture it's 3des.
copium, still haven't added it.
copium, latin doesn't have any significantly higher entropy than regular text
High quality version
can disord stop
good
for example, username can be "abcdefg"
Looks like a schizo artifact to be preserved
With the "open in firefox" like 3 times I'll not be surprised if it's somehow related.
aren't 3des keys like 24 bytes in the first place
so glad the slander video is pinned because it's the only way i'm understanding anything that happens anymore
it's already outdated though, and most people after making their initial theory lowkey gave up
Yeah I'd love to help I'm just not sure what to do or where to start, honestly
Most promising theorys are already being worked on
same, doesn't help that i understand every 3rd word lmao, need to study and be a CS engineer
pycryptodome disagrees. or maybe it doesn't. what the hell does 'parity bits ignored' mean.
but basically, it is 24 bytes, the primary identificator of 3des key, and the string in 10:21 is only 16 bytes
well each key is 56 bits or 64 bits when including the parity. using keying option 2 (i.e. key3 = key1) would result in a 16 byte key including parity when omitting the repeated subkey
(doesn't change the fact tho that the short base64 string doesn't have odd parity when decoded)
i see. i guess option 2 would make sense, a little, but what's even the point of using tdes for only 16 bytes key, aes at least makes sense as a "modern encryption algorithm". how would that be justified other than "you just have to figure it out".
and, pycryptodome just has a method that adjusts parity of key for you, so if it's actually this simple, the key may not necessarily have parity when given.
and finally, its entropy is way too low
i just realized my 2 byte entropy is incorrect and every result gotten with it is now irrelevant, ont that it was relevant ever. too bad
so if it's actually this simple, the key may not necessarily have parity when given
of course. fixing the parity would be extremely easy but that would require us to overwrite the LSB in each byte (and it's not like they are all 0 or 1). at that point we are just overwriting stuff to make it fit into some "random" format.
so I agree: either it's not DES/TDES or at least the string from the javascript isn't the key
we might get a new vid tomorrow
coincidentally enough, tomorrow is day 17
"17 is first"

Thoughts on the video name? I'm hoping it's study ii
exam
wow!
dropped out 
burntout 
but we still didn't count the AA floorboard!! it's gonna be a clue!!!

also i've added iv to tdes (which i shouldve done in the first place because everything else also uses an iv diesofcringe)
and it actually has higher entropy than aes, but only with 24 byte key, with 16 byte key it becomes lower by ~0.0004
this is actually cringe but it seems as though i overenginnered entropy calculation for the sake of speed and none of these numbers, not even ones from single byte algorithm, are actually correct
ok, no. they are correct, but only because of technicalities, so i'll need to rewrite everything anyway
sanity check
yall fine?
never
but have you tried... any keys?
I’m not going to miss it this time if there is one!
Keep a lookout while the stream is ongoing!
The last one was posted in the middle of a stream
but vedal is supposedly remote this time and everything except study was posted manually
copium
an ARG clue at a convention would honestly not be the worst way to gain interest. But it'd be a real ballsy move. Wouldn't blame him if not prepared or willing to do it.
its been a while since ive been here i wonder if there has been any progress 😃
nope
GUYS D=3??
@daring acorn has leveled up! (2 ➜ 3)
the unvoluntary engineers
i don't even care about the arg, _neurosama's songs are fire
especially numbers II i unironically listen to it and wake up with urges to listen
fair. I just wish I think I saw a ghost had a full version. I hope if nothing else, that at least when the arg finishes he'll release a full version. The arg is cool, but so is the music.
ong preach
i think it's really interesting that the songs use eleanor forte
makes me doubt it's made by vedal
and its like really well tuned too
I mean the only truly certain thing iirc is that vedal sponsors the arg. Besides that... 
mhm
it COULD be made by vedal but i just think
wouldn't he have made neuro sing it??
so yeah my theory is that its made by sum1 else
They aren't sung by neuro?
Hm, cool.
Though if I remember how neuro sings right it'd be harder to make her sing an original song, so using something else could make sense
accidentally pressed enter one sec
true
I won't lie, its been ages since I used eleanor forte, so at first i assumed it was neuro singing
But as soon as i listened to the vocals closely
it's 100% eleanor
Mmmm maybe
ong preach
because, correct me if im wrong of course, but doesn't neuro essentially extract the "vocals" from the song, mix them with her own voice, and then merge them back together?
I'm fairly certain thats what it is. Because I was keeping close tabs on the recent AI covers popping up everywhere and they all require an audio clip of someone singing the lyrics
But surely vedal could sing himself or get someone else to, for free or paid
Yeah. I think I heard that somewhere, but I don't recall if it was from vedal or from a youtube comment or similar
🤷🏻♂️
Every single AI cover I saw had credits in the description to the original clip they used which had the singing
Mmm, probably. Though, I don't know how much of a difference it'd make.
(when i say AI cover im not referring to neuro ones, but probably the same thing with them)
yeah, yeah
Wdym by how much of a difference
there's not too much of a reason to use neuro specifically, honestly. It sounds very familiar if you don't look too close, and it almost certainly a whole lot less work to do it with something like Elanor.
Honestly I don't agree. You bring up good points of course, but eleanor is REALLY hard to tune in such a coherent and understandable way as the video presents her in
Plus its kinda neuro's arg 🤷🏻
They don't sound all that far appart though
True, true. I don't know a lot about tuning, so not too sure about what I've said myself. And as far as we know there is a reason neuros not the one singing.
Wouldn't surprise me too much with some of the lyrics honestly.
I'd say my personal theory is that the person making it doesn't have access to her voice 🤷🏻
Maybe vedal just wants to show off his killer tuning skills
always a chance. Though if vedal sponsors the arg I don't know why he wouldnt lend em the voice
Mhm. I agree. Maybe there's some sort of reason he wouldn't give it like mayb he doesnt trust them (which doesnt make sense since hes sponsoring it but yk technically possible)
At the end of the day there's no real way to be sure unless its related to the arg and we find it, or vedal tells us
Indeed, indeed
The main thing the arg has taught me so far is that I need to do more ctfs. I thought with all the cybersecurity stuff I've been doing recently I'd be better at it but its a surprisingly different skillset
Yeah, but I wouldn't have gotten nearly as much as everyone else has so far. The best I've done at ctfs in the past is just trying all the stupid simple stuff, because people forget to do it. Not to say I can't do more, its just a surprising amount of people overlook it allowing you to do it first.
Damnnn
?
Isn't this voice v2?
No
googled eleanor forte, doesn't sound alike to me at all, i think you're reaching. also it's paid, like $70 with a discount, that's messed up.
definitly not v2 voice tho
yeah same i googled it and doesnt sound like the voice in songs at all
there are two paid eleanor voices and one free one, numbers and study sound closer to her free one, but i agree it’s not exactly a match, especially the way she pronounces words. (i’ve spent far too much time working with eleanor among other synthv banks lmao)
it’s not like it really matters for the actual ARG who sings it either way but it’s very interesting to me
and what exactly would this "way she pronounces words" be.
if anything, you working so much time with it shows mental bias towards hearing it where it isn't.
also look at this graph. it has garbage quality because neither discord nor google docs support vector graphics
eleanor has very strong clear vowel sounds that are very different to what we hear in numbers and study, and if it IS the free voice then there’s no way to change the strength of them. either way i’m not convinced it’s her, but i would be very interested to find out how the songs were made regardless
||yeah i need to learn to read correctly the first time|| understandable, the information you have presented makes sense.
👍
look at another graph. i will dump these into numbers thread library
of course! i’m always glad to drop information on things i’m into. i’m not too good with cryptography stuff so i mostly stay out of the discussion here, but i thought i’d give some input.
what the chances that the IV and the key are the same?
if you're thinking it may be possible to tell from looking at data that the iv and the key are the same, it isn't.
there may not be an iv, there may be a nonce instead, it may be an algorithm that doesn't use an iv or nonce at all.
in fact, the data from entropy analysis consistently shows, it is significantly most likely to be literally just random.
excluding keys which is as close to random bytes as it gets and file7z, compressed and deflate which are compressed files,
it becomes extremely uniform between tdes using 24 byte key, 8 byte iv and modern variations of aes, using 16 byte key, 7-16 byte nonce and 16 byte tag for decryption
I tried to see how much time it'll take me to brute force it if we assume that 17 is first and 24 last. I managed to check "114,217,974,100" keys in 15 hours, but it was a low budget version code. On 32 cores checking part of the keys on each it'll take a lot of time.
how exactly are you checking validity tho, what algorithm are you bruteforcing and did you steal a cpu from nasa, because even intel 13900k has only 24 cores
runpod
you can lend a 32 CPU PC
cheapest I found is 0.2$ per hour
they had like 64 cores CPU a week ago, but for some reason it was taken down.
I tried first the small code we had from study, it found too much false keys probably because I used UTF-8, but I just wanted to check if it's even possible to brute force it.
First attempt I gave it 1 core out of the 32 and let it run for 15 hours, then I split the work on 30 cores out of 32 and gave each core a pert of the possible keys to work on.
ic. well i have exactly $0 so ngmi.
well obviously there are too much false keys, even 128 bit aes means there 2^128-1 false keys
There was even one key that managed to give something with +4 at the beginning lol
1783367953735824
+4.W"w2㽾)fd
OwO
thats it, arg solved 
lol
I also noticed something
if you guess the key right, but the IV wrong it still can give you part of the result.
like the first letters or numbers and so on
really? seems like fake news, isn't the point of an iv to obfuscate such an attempt with only key. i am going to test rn
Not for all but for some parts.
idk why but some codes give part of the decoded message and some give error
For example, I encoded "+447062917601" with the key "1736754403572424" and the IV the same.
If I decrypt it with key: "1736754403572424" but IV "1746754403572424" - third number is "4" instead of "3" the decoded result is: "+437062917601"
if I use this IV "1745643213572424" the decoded result is: "+434175?07601" As you can see it is still pretty similar to my encoded number if the IV is close to the used IV in the encoding I guess.
From what it seems it is true.
i am trying to camellia encrypt with iv and decrypt without and it's nowhere close for even just 16 byte message
same with aes
that's true, but in the most commonly used mode, every block affects the following block
if you want I can give you full list with all the keys I have tried, but all of them are false and there is TONS of keys. All in utf-8.
I have no idea for 30 cores, because I gave it part of the possible keys to each core. but I know that I cheked from 1700000000000024 to 1700114217974124+ in like 15 hours +- (1 core). Which is about 114,217,974,100 combinations divide it by 15, and you get "7,614,531,606" per hour. It's not 100% maybe 2-3 billion lower I guess if you use all 30 cores.
or something wrong with my math, I just know that last false key on 1 core was "1700114217974124"
yea
that's a pretty cringe method tbh, if you're decoding from utf, why not also include letters, and if you're also including letters why not include special symbols, and by that point why not go through all 255 possible byte variations, so much computing power going towards something that is highly likely to turn out with nothing.
also yeah, modern aes modes don't have the 'problem' with correct key incorrect iv (unlike classic aes modes and camellia)
For now we assume the key is starting with 17 and maybe ending with 24, and it's probably only numbers? I go with it for now. If we include also letters and so on, it will impossible to brute force. Even with only 12 possible number from 16 is hard.
what are you even bruteforcing, ecb?
bred already tried ecb between 17 and 24 with only utf8 numbers
I'm trying a theory that it's the same key for all the codes
if it's the case I'm trying to brute force the "DQ5z14ighWwiag7y+cWFQg==" with 17 first and 24 last.
as the second biggest theory it's a phone numbers
so we need to get something with + and numbers, probably UK number.
i am telling you, bred already tried for + on DQ5z14ighWwiag7y+cWFQg== with 17 first and 24 last with aes ecb, what are you bruteforcing if not ecb
some rust threading magic, i wouldn't know with my cringe python
#1112082183235047506 message
but since bred already tried ecb, if you're going to try other aes modes, they all need an iv or nonce and more importantly are much more processing power intensive.
you can maybe try for single des if you want to, only 8 bytes. no one tried afaik
hmmm ok
have you guys solved it ? its going to be close to a month now
We're currently hard at work writing a bot to answer no to those questions to clear up time for building our quantum computer
As a quick digression in the same vein as the possible phone number base64, what's up with the accompanying error message? Doesn't seem like the subsequent error path console.log could have produced it (who writes a multi-line error message?), unless that whole message is indeed a successful response. Is there a bot on the receiving end of the message?
If the error was produced by the library, surely the error message would be more specific, like invalid phone number or something
What would be the point of providing almost-executable code but inaccurate error messages?
darkeew's eva sama is already in the server, ask him to add functionality 
doesn't look to me like a multi-line error message, i would presume executing... is not a part of the error message but sendMessage function.
the error message is provided to the send function along with success message and context.
since the code doesn't show what is inside either error or response variables, one can start making wild assumptions like that actually error: failed to execute is a response output.
but at that point you might as well start unsuspending disbelief. like clearly sendMessage from the library is supposed to take in a phone number in predetermined format.
why are they inputting the recipient as an encrypted base64, are they stupid
is it? 
The easy answer could be, it's Airis / Neuro. If their code is not "allowing" to send non-encrypted messages, then they could try to send it as an encrypted number, because for them is a regular number as they know the key, but not for us. You can't send an SMS to a phone number such as the code, so get the error.
I use IV the same as the key. I think it's common?
If you use a different IV for two encryptions, then the same message with the same key should appear different, right? From this I think it would or should be more common to use a random IV.
That way if an adversary gets hold of the ciphertext for "Yes.", they won't be able to detect each time "Yes." is sent in subsequent ciphertexts (Because the ciphertexts would be identical with IV = Key)
I don't think if it's AES it will be too complicated, otherwise, we will never solve it without a good clue. Unless some crazy CPUs will come out in the next 10 years, and AES will be useless.
Yo new thing
chat wake up from slumber something happenning soon
literally just now
damn thought it was gonna just end but looks like we'll have some more SCHIZO in a few days
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
@wintry notch has leveled up! (4 ➜ 5)
NICE
it's tagged with subtitles so maybe we'll get subtitles
I dunno if the premiere was set up manually just now but if it is, the game master might be making changes
time to recheck everything SCHIZO
j*va
Oh dang
I mean yea the title is very different from the theme so far
Im gonna guess it's c#
Probably based on C# because Neuro's non LLM side & abandoned archive are in Unity C#... unless...?
Vedal does have java knowledge his website says android development
But static is a real nightmare in java so im gonna guess c# yea
It's missing a function name tho
Should be public static void FunctionName()...
Could be main ?
True actually
Oh wait im looking it up but in c# it's static public void main
So it is java
Oh wait no the position doesn't matter
Unless... there's more code in the song or something
Who would put static first thats so weird not seeing public as first
(me) 

Actually no I put public first
Got confused with referencing the song name
Brain melted
Classic java bully line: Say it with me, "public static void Main"
Arggggg
So glad C# is moving away from main function
I’ll show you who can yell, you hear me? 
Args? Arguments? which arguments? 
Java main have args
Public static void main(args)
... no way they made a joke with args as ARG
I guess tutel doesn't want europe to sleep
Yeah it's releasing 2 AM for me
I'll just... catch it the day after...
He lives there tho he just have a bad sleep schedule
Yeah, but he already knows what's in the video 

jesus i haven't looked up on ARG Channel for a week now
well you picked a good time
Dw you didn't miss anything 
What ???
The video name is not related to static-sama, it's a reference to a programming thing
oh , I thought vedal run static-sama as canon now lolz
No it was confirmed to be someone pretending to be part of the arg
it's a programming term
I hope it will be a good clue.
ALL MY HOMIES LOVE STATIC
Nawh, it was confirmed to be a jacker, but who knows if tutel's incorporating the static lore into the ARG. Like, the image also looks like something staticsama would've used.
The image was in study tho
Ah, right
You do realize staticsama took the image from the videos
holy shit static became canon
It's probably a clue to study
Two very different ways of saying that thing. Guess which works better lel
Would make sense yea
scroll up my dude
CC

YOOO
Holy
Public Static Void
Finally something good
we're getting into C
he fed up with our arguing about lyric for a weeks with no progress lolz
Thought the same lel
Nah let's hope for C#
Also tbh Public Static Void kinda fits the vibe with "static" and "void", but, also important to note that "void" means it's a function (might have been a variable otherwise! if it was an "int" (integer number) or something), and that it's a function that returns nothing
or maybe the subs will have some messages too, like mandela catalogue has for example
wake up
scroll up lmao
you're repeating what we just discussed twice lel :p
static solo stream when?
Could be c#
wait
wanna know something funny
gamejam happening
wanna know something else funny
Public Static Void-sama 
suposedly neuro herself
nuero
Theme is arg you mean
Yea
its obvious he can but its confirmed
what if void-sama is full schizo but full filtered mode lolz
I mean Filtered was kinda proof
Oh wait, is that a real thing? would be cool tbh
its confirmed
There is a thead for gamejam
today at dev stream hes gonna reveal stuff about it
Announcement during dev stream


oh my god
ayo
stop complaining
RASCAL?
pascal
pascal?
Rascal is an experimental domain-specific language for metaprogramming, such as static code analysis, program transformation, program generation and implementation of domain-specific languages. It is a general meta language in the sense that it does not have a bias for any particular software language. It includes primitives from relational calc...
"can be accessed anywhere" thats got to be a lie
having ptsd of number II when everybody started to repeat everything that was said
It could be many languages. public static and void are standard terms
But main tho
it doesn't actually say main
public static void:
- public (anyone can access)
- static (wont leave the place)
- void (minecraft void)
Holy pog NeuroJam sounds awesome
void just means any arguments passed will be voided
static means it cant be changed
Thank you for bringing it to my attention @digital radish & @native maple 
Np
public means it can be accessed anywhere
for the non coders
You'll get to see it on stream anyway
okay
We exploring java?
c#
Oh
ill write something
We don't know what langauge it is lel
heres my ptsd again gonna see this link pop up 10 times probably
Watch me send it again 

Surely this video will contain a program like this being a phone number body.messages[0].destinationNumber ='DQ5zl4ighWwiag7y+cWFQg=='; 
Static mean every instance will have it the same or something right ?
Guyssssss it's a cluuuuu
It kinda of means it can be accessed from anywhere within the program
Neuro fell of the world?
i wonder if it'll keep the song trend
Okay so that does mean every instance of neuro would have it 
On the newest video:
(https://youtu.be/ymYFqNUt05g)
Explanation of the title 'Public Static Void'
- This is for the non programmers, so no speculations arise until the video releases.
Publicmeans it can be called anywhere in any file (take for example discord channels, everyone can access a non locked channel)
Static"a keyword that can be used to declare a member of a type so that it is specific to that type." - cannot be changed anywhere else
Voidany keywords passed in the class will be discarded and returns nothing.
This can be many languages, but we've stuck with C# as the ARG is neuro related and she uses Unity (C#) to function.
Imagine getting a github repo this time
@hybrid scarab we need a pinner
Technically void means that it will not return a value, and sometimes that returned values are discarded
does pins even matter people will just have the same conversation 10 times
well you can just redirect them into the pin
True but it also sneakily says that it's a function rather than a variable 
But you can still return to exit hehe
true, but my part is also true
both are correct
by declaring the return or lack thereof, yes
void has alot of possible context. we last heard it as "fill the void"
With so much number im guessing the type is number
2
Don't pin dumb unverified shit, there's a pin limit
now the question is which flavor of number is it float int double...
We also have the docs for all our stuff. Pins will flood and be hard to navigate
Save it for dank things like the slander video
We already need to scroll a lot to find the doc in pin
Honestly might want to unpin some stuff
Or just re-pin the doc
True most of the pin stuff is in the doc anyway
way better
yes.
The slander video should be in the drive for sure 
It's official fan-lore
If they can have amogus in the doc we can have our video
Still "open" on the SoundCloud no change on that front
yeah unpin stuff that's already in the google drive
where
repin the docs
@hybrid scarab ^
premiere
aye
in a few days
thursday/friday
the timing is around when stream usually ends, or a bit later than that
Clean the pins 
unpin stuff that's already in the docs
Because currently it'd take new users a long while to scroll in pins to find them 
it's getting cluttered
Or unpin stuff yeah
like the big walls of text of youtube description and stuff like that
All the big text that take so much space don't need to be pinned
keep the slander video though 
Masterpiece
what is going on now?
the new video seems unsettling
idk what will happen after 3 days
i wonder what the ending of the ARG will look like?
The swarm activates
is it a good thing or bad thing?
It's good
just thinking, the new thumbnail is the same as "uʍop uǝllɐɟ" on study, which comes after "i don't want to be human." where she gets darker and darker. she gets inverted and the same static effect from "i think i saw a ghost"
this 'ghost' may be what in the general static void 🙂 who knows.

its good for the swarm
public static void
it's just gonna be him making fun of you guys for chasing "static-sama" lmao
doubt anyone in charge would make fun of anyone here. wholesome community
new banger in 3 days 
Public Static Void
The main program? Gosh, I haven't heard those things together since I last touched java a year ago
new SCHIZO theories <t:1687474800:R>
video thumbnail https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ymYFqNUt05g/maxresdefault.jpg
"Public Static Void" when "Private Unstable Plentiful" enter
[vince mcmahon meme.gif]
wtf static sama is canon
no
if we stall enough, we'll get full ep of number soon
yes
it's a programming term that was adopted by the fake static sama
they're real for me 
Cringe
Cringe
Itisag full cover
Finally!
what could new video be about
more schizo lore
Do you think we'll have more answers or more questions in total after this next one? 
dies of death. can i get an api call for when premiere was manually started
I can call you on discord
Does it count

Good idea. We should get the YT API metadata and get organized. Even if we don't have the video yet we can still get started on the doc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YaYAVWfOIgxDCFRkKlu4sp_yvYKKA4Qqydi_kddYGJE/edit
also maybe it's just me, but public static void makes me think more of pseudo techno babble used by jungle dnb/sad breakcore artists.
i can't find any specific examples of using programming terms though, and going into more details on my thinking process on this topic makes me look cringe so i won't
metadata: https://pastebin.com/6qrhd5WE
I could definitely see people using easily recognizable programming phrases in music, yea
"publishedAt": "2023-06-19T10:46:34Z" lmao people are so late with their 11:30 or wtf
Ty! I've put it in the doc, but do feel free to add it directly next time -- if you feel like it!
Fair, but how often are you gonna check? lel
45 minutes is pretty good
if i was awake i wouldve gotten notification instantly because youtube open 24/7
watch hype die in 3 days before premiere starts
id like to report some progress on the fanfic but i seem to have grossly underestimated how long i was planning just part one to be-
;-;
well-
also. not relevant to anything at all
"categoryId": "22"
and also im a perfectionist in writing so i take so long just trying to make it feel right that i barely make any progress after even a decent bit of time ;-;
yes
i understand this
fully
and absolutely
https://www.youtube.com/feeds/videos.xml?channel_id=UCqOK_pl0LS0e8Lp7HMRDZsw alternatively here is an RSS feed to poll every waking minute
It won't be long until RSS will be some ancient tech rediscovered for an ARG
The same RSS feed regarding the new video:
<published>2023-06-19T10:46:34+00:00</published>
<updated>2023-06-19T12:21:01+00:00</updated> <-- that's 1h after discovery
If we wanted to we can track every single update to the video without knowing what's being updated
Stalker behavior
I wonder what changed
Hello everybody! I've been missing from ARG for a while... since I had problems that had to be solved... I checked google drive from time to time... but as I understand it, nothing worthwhile has been found since the release of "Number 2"? And everyone is waiting for a new song from the rising star of music scene _neurosoma?)))
Yeah should be a new video in 3 days 
Think about it... you will listen to it more than anything you have in spotify, iTunes and deezer... and slowly go crazy thinking that the solution is already somewhere near
I was off this topic for a week, free time ran out suddenly, but as I see it's not too late to come back
just in time, not much happened prior to this
There was a meme in the static-sama thread... that the cult of static-sama does not exist, but if you want, you can join it.
I think now you can say the same about the cult of _neurosama)))
Is it gone, or has my YouTube decided not to show me about the existence of subtitles?
nothing in brightened. nothing at all
it is worth noting that it really has subtitles...(forgive me for being too lazy to switch the language on YouTube... this purple inscription translates as "subtitles")
nothing when upping contrast either
i can also split colours but it likely wont give anything
Oh, if the video was updated and the CC tag is now gone, then there may not be any subtitles after all lel
Ok, my YouTube decided just not to let me know about it
"Public Static Void" has a vibe of "the beginning of an old method/generation."
Looking forward to counting syllables again 
Ty!
it'll be fun... if soon we will have another instruction that we will not be able to interpret correctly
"closed captions" in firefox 
"open captions" in firefox
im thinking we might get another part of the lyrics of numbers
since from the sound cloud we got the 3 first lines
Another number video to go crazy over?
Lyric reveal!
anyone using vanced 18.19.35? my youtube is bugged, i can see that the video is 3:24 long before it glitches batck to premiere
what if you watch a different video and go back? I intuit that it's a clientside bug - no data leaked from the server
same results. i probably don't have embed perms, so i'll just paste the img on docs and see what you do with it
Corrrect and sure! Worst case scenario, we document a bug. And that's not so bad :p
inb4 the puppetmaster changes the video to be 3:24 long 
isnt vanced dead? my 18.02.33 shows neither "cc" tag nor video length
am using revanced, sorry. i'll also document my patches and see if someone else can recreate it
in theory, it can be used... but it's better to use revanced
nvm, can confirm it is indeed 3:24.
:{"browseId":"UCqOK_pl0LS0e8Lp7HMRDZsw","canonicalBaseUrl":"/@_neurosama"}}}]},"lengthText":{"accessibility":{"accessibilityData":{"label":"3 minutes, 24 seconds"}},"simpleText":"3:24"},"ownerText":{"runs":[{"text":"_neurosama","navigationEndpoint":{"clickTrackingParams":"CBQQ3DAiEwjgkJ2T3M__AhUZIrcAHRCmBX0=","commandMetadata":{"webCommandMeta
leaked. what's it from though, what is the api call asking for
the problem with revanced is that, unlike vanced, developers do not create apk files themselves... this burden was placed on users (in order not to comprehend the fate of vanced).
And for example on our analogue xda, which is called 4pda... users, in addition to collecting ready-made builds themselves, also modify it.... which can lead to different bugs... and the fact that you saw may be a common bug.
I did this:
- Get to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymYFqNUt05g
- Open DevTools > Network, leave it open
- Back in YouTube, click on Share > Embed
- Back in DevTools, click on the search icon, and search for “3 minutes”
- Find out that the video is 3 minutes 24 seconds long
The API call itself needs cookies and a JSON leaking my IP and timezone, so I'd rather not replicate it with a curl
turtle.... clue
||this is a joke... I understand what this means)))||
so you're just watching devtools? because i can't for the life of me find anything related to 3 minutes or 3:24
Yeah, but you need to be at the Share > Embed dialog. After selecting the search icon and typing in "3 minutes" into the search bar, you should be able to see it. I use FireFox btw
Of course I know that I'm not a very good backend developer... But at least I understand something... and I can't find a query about "3 minutes" too...
i am in share > embed dialog, heres opera, firefox and chrome, am i missing something
Same. the only result I can find is coming from the recommendations
why is this video showing in my recommend now
did you all click on this shrek video
I thought it was the way they tuned it that made it sound different. Even if its not her, my reasoning for that conclusion is listening closely and I heard lots of things eleanor does
Maybe its a different vocal synth? I don't think its neuro singing
ahahah... either YouTube's algorithms are too brilliant for this world... or big brother is watching us
youtube is in the arg thread confirmed
why wouldnt it be neuro singing, surely it'd be easier to tune v1 voice than pay for eleanor and make it sound more like neuro
i feel like i am getting massively scammed, google's own youtube api docs are outdated by more than a year and there is literally zero python example code with new authentication flow on the internet.
do i just use a wrapper library? what if its outdated too lmao, last commit on dec 26th 2022
i found some code that works and it is indeed 3:24. tbh i am kind of disappointed it's so short, but at least it's not numbers with 1 minute runtime
i'll try to find what other parts i can request
also captions confirmed. i am going to paste this fake json instead of the one that's currently in the docs unless democracy decides otherwise
Vedal college theory confirmed??1??1?!!1¡?
Pretty much - since he mentioned "going back to college"
he already said in some interview he went to college, so that's known, and also that he wasn't studying programming
holy crap I was right after all
@hollow flare has leveled up! (5 ➜ 6)
I literally just joked about vedal college like a week ago
it must be a clue 
INCOMING
so captions were indeed updated
not even that actually, last updated 11:22:58
Can't wait to have to decipher the lyrics again
noo, i cant just download captions from an unreleased video, how could this be happening to me.
i do wonder what this update is about tho, since this and captions update are an hour apart
Maybe it has something to do with how I only saw it at 11:30 and posted here. I was sure I was checking the page within 10 minutes prior with no sign of the premiere
I'm sure it wasn't there 45 minutes earlier
I knew i heard vedal say the title today
https://www.twitch.tv/vedal987/clip/ExpensiveAggressiveSangTwitchRPG-D91ZyD_O34B3o69F
youtube says it was published at 10:46, so it is published at 10:46, everything else is a skill issue.
you're late with this clip it was already posted. and also vedal said public static void in the very beggining of the stream, you're missing out
Can you publish premieres and leave it private though?
Well, by the fact that I think it won’t be long to wait for the premiere, so you guys are great.
I'm not saying you're wrong but I'm sure I didn't see it any earlier and I was checking the channel and my subscription page for sure within 45 minutes
But it doesn't matter anyway
make sure someone records the premiere in case the video goes away
#1112082183235047506 message
What is the background song used in this?
accurate
Can you force-start a premiere tho?
Yes
Oh
At least from a phone. Even if you can't, you can change the time of publication
So, yeah
Ah the schizo gang I can pretty much confirmed the upcoming video is 3min and 24sec
Industry baby I'm pretty sure
Yugeee
Thanks!
It's this version looks like https://youtu.be/-IudP7eYVLc
I took Lil Nas X's Industry Baby and sped it up. Ngl it actually is fire.
Original Song-
Lil Nas X, Jack Harlow - INDUSTRY BABY
》https://youtu.be/UTHLKHL_whs
Download X Stream-
》https://lilnasx.lnk.to/IndustryBaby
Follow Lil Nas X
》https://www.instagram.com/...

And yes, a cool video, of course I'm waiting for the second part.
It takes about 27-30 hours to check full range from 0 to 100,000,000,000.
Wow
idk if it's supposed to be that slow with aes though...
It's kinda slow
you ever just main string args
Maybe it's slow because I gave part of it to a different core?
I don't really know much about multi core stuff
Might just be AES or the lib your using for AES
it can be slower e.g. if the task is too small the communication between cores might make the whole thing slower than having everything on one core
also: I don't remember if you're using python but multiple threads in python on windows can only run one at a time so you'll need to use multiprocessing for it to speed up depending on the task
Ahhh sorry, I fucked up. Not 100,000,000,000 but 10,000,000,000,000 for 27-30 hours.
On one core 100,000,000,000 it's about 15 hours.
Or I'm doing something wrong with my math, this numbers...
10^12 = 1,000,000,000,000 - so this is how much I checked?
you were checking for all 16 byte numeric keys with 4 digits being fixed as 17 and 24 right? then 10^12 should be correct 👍
Yea, is it slow or fine?
I'm planning to lend 10 pcs with 32 core cpu each and run the script for 30 hours to check all possibilities in 1 day.
10^12 keys in 30 hours would be around 10 million keys per second. I think thats fine.
Okay, good.
I tried using multoprocessing and threading in Python to make this faster
it had really weird results and in the en dI didn't really draw any conclusion
But I did find that read/writes caused a massive overhead and storing / writing keys and decrypted data into the RAM made the whole thing significantly aster
-- tempfs
--- 100 threads ThreadPoolExecutor
53.2613707339915
--- 10 threads ThreadPoolExecutor
45.0695832969941
--- in-line for loop
33.173981311992975
--- normal for loop
32.38514685600239
--- Multiprocessing
8.181967821001308
-- SSD
--- 100 threads ThreadPoolExecutor
56.34450344200013
--- 10 threads ThreadPoolExecutor
46.603114452002046
--- normal for loop
33.72468258900335
--- Multiprocessing
DNC
This was tested decrypting study description using AES128, the Devglan IV (t) padded ot 16 bits or chopped to 16 bits and 26,000 keys
Essentially, when loaded into the RAM, multi-processing was much faster. Threading was always slower than normal for loop.
When I tried this with my actual key dataset it ran for several days and I'm not sure if multiprocessing really helped or not
It produced 16GB of decrypted data, none of which had low entropy 90% of file signatures but of the ones I tested none were real, then I got bored and gave up 
Never give up and go to your goal and overcoming obstacles you will at its very top 
hi
instead of 2


