#programming
1 messages · Page 533 of 1
Nah, someone else #programming message

Still have UB tho iirc
ow i see. then ig it was in my past reincarnation here
yeah, failing Miri 
turns out not everything that is correct in Zig is also correct in Rust
if it behaves 1:1 under every scenario does it really matter
(yes it does, iirc they're working on fixing the miri issues at the very least)

I probably won't use bun for projects in the near future but bunx my beloved 
i am afraid of ☆♡《♥bny🐇lop•idol~★》♡☆
I am not 
I am afraid by the atrocity that she commit tho
does anyone even talk about programming here
@brisk laurel @nocturne olive my schizo voice i can do with 0 effort that i said the other day lmao, i think if i watched random voice transitioning yt shit i might be able to make it sound convincingly female lmfao 
Believe it or not, yes

i dont even know why i can comfortably talk so high
(and higher)
i think for female voice i need to get a brighter voice somehow
on accasion
out of the 24 hours in a day, mmaybe 4 hours are programming
#programming is more of a people than a topic
how many hours are people with ai psychosis
2 or so
And then we have the time when konii has cyberpsychosis
half the day is spent on autism


Cute

It looks too much like pocong here 
TIL Indonesian law book is called Burgerlijke Wetboek
Sam, please translate 

its very normal behavior frankly just dont let konii get close to any actual cybernetics

what
Master
Chief
Soda
Entire day 

when you always autistic your time is never spent on autism

Because the rest of the time is spent on ADHD
how! (wise) 🔺 “orz,”
question mark
does that help @olive sable
no
is that the popular way people talk about to admit defeat?
i think your incorrect usage of punctuation mad eit worse
that or in this case worship
I use it more for worship but I think defeat is more common
Owww
i have no clue what orz means
it looks like a little guy orzing
i still dont get it
🔺 orz
im kneeling in front of the triangle
imagine i am neuri sama. and you misused my avatar. how would you take your pardon?
it's a pictogram
neuro-samaa!!!!!! Moushiwake arimasen
and orz in front of me right?
wow, no wonder japanese people have the best physical conditions during their entire lifetime

oh ok thanks for telling me
Japanese people can grow new torsos 
Bear in mind when you ask models about their own systems like this they will also just hallucinate shit a bunch of the time
nah the reminders were firing off every other response half way through the conversation
so i knew there was an injected classifier somewhere
it happened earlier in another conversation too
but the reminder was much shorter over in that other conversation and was consistently appearing in tool outputs
did claude just.... provide you the base prompt
logs over uart
shouldnt that allow for a prompt that counters the base prompt
I am slightly regretting my decission to install gentoo

Ihave spent the last 30 minutes debugging why i cant make VMS because of iptables kernal module refusing to load
ehh I could just do the low effort thign
and just reinstall arch
or I could ride it otu
That screams RS-232
Or like, an actual terminal terminal
Get a USB-UART and use minicom/putty
wtf is this font rendering man 
I will, im just doing some cable labelling first
ehh fuck it I mayaswell just get arch atp
Don't be like me and use all white colored wire without label 
However, the earlier error suggest that some SPI device are not functional
So you can already narrow down the issue
Probe more line to see which is SPI and which device does not respond
It would be funny if it is the front display

there are many reasons the display could've not been working
I wasn't expecting it to be "displays not displaying"
Have you checked if the SPI return line (MISO) give any data?
But using oscilloscope tho to see if the signal integrity is good
Because it may respond but due to garbage signal integrity it got corrupted
don't have an oscilloscope
and also uh
finding the spi line on this is gonna be a pain in the ass
as all data comes through those ribbon cables to the display
Hmm, I wonder if the black magic probe has a custom firmware that support rudimentary oscope. But then the signal integrity are fucked because of wrong measurement instrument I guess 
EW
wHAT
short r

Also, pro tips when buying scope. Prioritize channel count rather than bandwidth. Most of the not so specialized electronics bandwidth will never saturate a 50-100MHz scope
It is especially nice when you are debugging SPI because you can hook all the 4 signal and use sck as the trigger 
Install NixOS. You won't regret that decision.
idk what the cursor folks are doing for forms to be like this 
3323 CPU cores + 1916 GPU cores (SM + CU) total i own in my room rn
dunno how that compares to datacenters
the 68 piles of xeon 6164 and 46 piles of 6148 really skewed the numbers


without them







total passmark score for:
9655 + 3990x + 9950x3d + 7950x + 13900k + 13900 es + 13950hx es + 13980hx + 14900hx + 12900 es + 14600kf + 5700g



Apparently google I/O also release HTML in Canvas 
As if we don't have enough complexity already
what
Try using Emergent's specialized agents in parallel to build any full-stack application - https://app.emergent.sh/?utm_shift=redirect&via=fireship
At Google I/O 2026, Sundar Pichai and Demis Hassabis set out the roadmap for Google's 'agentic Gemini era', with Gemini hiding inside every product like the microplastics in your bloodstream. But wh...
The very last one
4:10 in
Please don't 
Seek help instead of using html in canvas 
Because I know where the direction it is going
what the fuck kind if ai generated slop advertisement am i watching?
is this really the guy voicing rick sanchez or did they clone his voice?
it has to be ai cloned
huh
i found it
This video was prepared based on the best developer news of the week via daily.dev
00:00 Amazon injects additional $5B into Anthropic (deeper AWS-Claude integration)
00:04 Microsoft open-sources Agent Governance Toolkit with AI “kill switches”
00:09 Python 3.13 No-GIL builds hit a major multi-core stability milestone
00:13 Visual Studio 202...
this shit is being given to me as an ad rn
Premium. Got music for free 
you mean the gradient ones?
i think they're kinda nice but that's just me 
Google sites still exists?
Oh, the one that is killed is google code repo
And google group
And google plus
i hate the blue in google sheets, it doesnt make sense
gives me bad vibes
same thing with the other green ones actually
Forms is efficient Human Resource Management.
it looks like 3 humanoids laying on top of eachother
I finally got fight me bite me in an ad you have no idea how excited i was

fight me bite me?
I lowk dont understand who made this decision 
vocaloid song
it’s possible to roll it in the youtube ads
i see
but you have to be either extremely autistic or extremely lucky
for the algo to give you it

the comments are just as bad as the ad itself
this is pure sloppers
they're fucking protesting against linux inside of it
"My name is Lena and i regret switching to linux" shut the fuck up Lena
you're AI generated, your opinion doesnt matter

guess all android phones are bricked now then
More like, no more internet 
that too
Look at him all smug about stealing my sleeping space 
Welp, time to eat (not the cat tho)
Why bro
AI gen logos
Did neuro draw this? 
idk what the animators trynna do
but if google pulls a spotify and overhauls their entire logos
A note taking application
Twitter will blast em into oblivioin
I have successfully solved the iOS-Win VTS mismatch
Ai vtuber model puppeteering coming soon ™
Don't get me wrong I hate cheaters but wtf
Idk somehow the CachyOS Kernel still gives me the fastest performance
It kinda sucks to hear the hardware just being destroyed like that
the 6164 is oem locked, so the 6148 would be the only one i could use. would be an upgrade over my 6138 but not worth going through the effort of importing it

wait they destroy the hardware???
that's sueable yo
i think it just became unusable for cheating
Damn, they do be advancing hardware development of a country just for game
Firmware modification with or without the game running 
Kernel AC would totally allow for that because they literally have access to the computer on an extremely low level
that doesn't sound like it's just unusable for cheating, that sounds like a permanent change to the device
why else would they brag about it becoming "paperweight"
from 6138 to 6148 is a 22.7% increase
23664 to 29037 in passmark
Why would a DMA card have the capability to self-destruct
It’s probably “it’s worthless for intended purpose”
Because the kernel can do anything it wanted to the hardware
Kernel ACs can write anything anywhere including the firmware of on-bus devices
Kernel is just one step removed from the actual hardware
Sounds like too much effort to do on any vendor part to purposefully go after some DMA device model
Besides, that just opens vendor to lawsuits and shit, no?
Kernel ACs are literally malware
If you say so
Not really, no
most Kernal ACs really don't do there job that well atleast imo, some do but most dont
from the screenshots it looks like they just messed with Hyper-V IOMMU stuff, and the DMA card firmware wasn't built to deal with that
They have this thing called EULA that they use to scare away anyone who tried to sue
I still disagree with them as a whoel
Sucks to be the guy buying the 5000$ DMA
How does neuro's memory system work? how does she remember things?
https://x.com/Pirat_Nation/status/2057703252410692033
according to some random person it changes the device's firmware itself, so it is bricking them
depends on your definition of malware. ussualy you odnt install it intentionally
so it's not that the cards are bricked, they just don't work because Vanguard has defenses against that now 
DMA's can be used for legitimate purposes
which
most of the time you don't know you're installing these anticheats
do you not?
Now imagine if someone managed to get access to vanguard and issue disk wipe 
https://xcancel.com/daaximus/with_replies
This guy says it’s bullshit so it probably is
You can do the same with VAC
i feel like most people know about easy anticheat
Which runs in userspace fully
many games with AC don't even give me TOS or anything to agree nor explain anything
Very competent reverser FYI
not bricked
just mostly useless
Malware is anything that acts in a way on your computer that works against you, in this case by disallowing certain hardware to be used
It cannot do firmware wipe to the disk. At least not without the OS supporting syscall
They just silently install with the game
no one telling me how?
i thought you’re supposed to know since you’re #programming but they’re not worth anywhere near that. it’s the firmware that’s expensive
Anything that isn't actually a kernel program should stay as far away from the kernel as possible
there is another yep
Only vedal knows the true answer
Games have no business going poking at the kernel
They have a brain and understand the threat model, though
because it's not public, only Vedal knows, so nobody can tell you
i don't understand the people that go "the cheaters deserves it" its not even about the cheaters, if the software could cause such incident where it could totally brick your PC, its a security issue. a major one. and i would never ever trust these kind of softwares.
that's kinda sad
nobody knows, vedal doesn't talk about any implementation details
I get that, but I still think most of the time its stoopid
I agree
i guess i'll work out how to do that myself
It’s either that or HvH on official servers
Pick your poison
if a software, whether conditionally or unconditionally triggered could brick your firmware, its a malware. intentional or not.
valorant hvh
look at pins, it can be helpful
the lil image

can give u a starting point
Here is an idea then. ID verification for TOURNAMENT/competitive level and casual can get whatever
ok
Kernel anticheats are literally malware
Casuals should still get a playable experience
that is a statement I think we all agree on
that doesn’t work
Why tho?
Simply do real security and make your anticheat serverside you lazy developers
real
Its more then possible
because people are going to cheat?
Serverside anticheat would work just so much better
How’s that working for Valve
Evidently Valve is lazy
Yes and if they got found out it is harder to find new fake ID
it can be done well
OK in what games
Implement the cheat detection server side
Valve wins by doing absolutely nothing anyway
most high tier tournaments get tourny provided hardware, verification and private servers
you said id for pro play
look at how that worked out for cs2
Fun fact: official CS2 tournaments run FaceIT anticheat
I don't play CS
Then at least put the anti cheat only on those tournament
Shows how much Valve trust VAC
I have never even seen CS gameplay 
ye, server-side heuristics + manual review mabe 
tbf idek why I care, I don't play FPS games, or games in general which would even consider using kernal anticheat
The shit I play wouldn't use it
lmfao
The Windows version of VRChat in question
During the preliminary or literally anytime else, it shouldn't be mandatory
not all of them, there are multiple ACs, and guess what people still cheat in tournaments
Like, make the anti cheat OPT IN
↪️ Replying to @Vigty0
@Vigty0 @GloriousEggroll LARPers everywhere and people looking to displace their anger onto something they don’t understand (monkey find blackbox scary!). Only to look really goofy because they keep perpetuating blatantly incorrect information.
I run it natively on arch, and I haven't played vrchat in nearly a year acc
Without anti cheat you cannot play competitive
get that
Linux VRC uses a non-kernel anticheat as far as I'm aware
thats fine then, considering I Was considering reinstalling
I will check tho
This way not everyone need to install it
that is true
the way he speaks doesn't make me want to listen to anything he says even if he's right
Do the experiences of people playing casual ETC not matter
agreed
Nope
Or hear me out
Make it opt in
anything that's not "competitive" is just gonna become cheat central
it uses EAC in user space 
And server that enable anti cheat can only be played with those that enable it
Which is fine honestly
EAC is one of few anticheats that has a userspace mode
I just want to make it opt in
and thats somethink I like abt EAC
Not all devs enable Linux support with EAC tho
EAC is fine, as far as i've experienced it.
They have in-house code obfuscation too
not really, that makes the option pretty much useless 
ruining the experience of everyone else is fine?
Like, if people are cheating anyway, heck there may be a specific categories for the tournament
High intelligence people
end up with the “antiaim bhop across the entire map at mach 3 nospread rapid fire” queue
the thing is that the vast majority of players are noncompetetive and cheaters ruin normal games more than tourneys, because in tourneys there's stringent review and you'd be permabanned from ever competing as a person if you were found out cheating anyway
Pretty sure it's kernel-level on Windows
Yes
yes
Linux fixes this
but as i said EAC is fine

Just use linux and don't play FPS games
Linux also fixes your Fortnite/Rust/Apex framerates to 0
simple solution
we technically have custom shoes for in he house
And if u play any of those games, you have other problems :0
Bro is reviving shoe thread
here we dont
EAC so far haven't done any bad shit to me, and i regularly played vrc for 20-40 hours straight nonstop whenever possible
it was the message my discord was focused on
According to le UC people they have better tech than Vanguard
But trusting le UC people is not a good idea and you should verify yourself
i do think that devs should engineer better serverside anticheats, and provide better self-moderation tools, so people can report and kick cheaters
Fair point
not fundamentally, no
you're from belgium aren't you ?
yes
also i put crocs
crocs 
lmao
vanguard's literally a malware.
the what?
is blocked
in neurocord?
kernel anti-cheat could very much be a thing on Linux
-# and probably should be tbh
bro, whats up with that name of yours? 😭
Look at those crocs
mass message deleteion is happening above

i excuse myself

just wanted to share crocs
you will not excuse yourself

When Linux gets stable kernel ABI
because crocs cool
cloud smite em
hii cloud
- off-topic here, please keep conversation to programming
Also IIRC GPL is stinky
alr
not needed
Soft bricking PCs on purpose as a corporation is still outrageous behaviour
Why tf is it triggering auto mod
percisely
right. can you help me in making my olamma bit smarter?
Is it the combination of picture
Well it blocks the DMA device from working
Not cheating fixes that behavior
And the feet
this is the point
this. its literally malware
DMA's beyond cheating exist
no just the words alone
I hope you know
Ahhh
i'm not experienced in machine learning, apologies 
cause i assume weird people
y'all spreading misinfo here too?
can just force user to use a particular signed kernel
doesn't matter. i wouldn't want to gamble it to be triggered by accident
learn python make script with huggingface
↩ (@AzakaSekai_)
For additional context, Vanguard is not "bricking" hardware. The device's firmware is unharmed but cannot properly run when IOMMU is in full force, presumably with HVCI-assisted enforcement.
︀︀
︀︀Further reading
︀︀www.unknowncheats.me/forum/anti-cheat-bypass/753122-vgk-update-locked-dma-firmware-sata-nvme.html
︀︀www.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/intel-whitepaper-using-iommu-for-dma-protection-in-uefi-820238.pdf
I'd hope not
I was trying to send my cat anyway lol
very easy
↩ (@AzakaSekai_)
I think a lot of people are having fundamental misunderstanding regarding this specific event: IOMMU, HVCI, DMA Remapping are all hardware/software features that are already present in your system.
︀︀
︀︀They ensure no malicious PCIe hardware can perform tampering (specifically for DMAGuard policies backed by HVCI) or reads (DMA can't just read everything when IOMMU is present) - they're just usually not fully enforced. Any privileged processes can already tell Windows to enforce these protections. Anything that supports DMA Remapping (which is really any legitimate hardware that supports the official Microsoft drivers) shouldn't be affected.
**❤️ 5 👁️ 829 **
vanguard is malware
Mister daaximus was fighting against misconception too
nothing has rights to touch the kernel
i've been saying "firmware" so far as the convo goes so...
the fact we've let people in the kernel is bad
accurate
you should be complaining to Intel and Windows
no one should touch the kernel except the kernel
and all which think differently are wrong
Should Process Explorer be banned
this doesn't touch the kernel...
Or Process Monitor
we created the rings for a reason
id rather keep their phones out of my kernel
it should be part of the kernel or banned
only use APIs
any privileged process can enable and enforce HVCI and DMA remapping
they shouldn't be privileged
Yeah but cheaters should be banned not have their PCs attacked
please consider reading the addendum in the tweet
no more privileges
guess you cant be sure that programmers are undeads who can not die or they are nechromenchers who can rise up when time. litereally today is the first time i am watching mass spamming here
https://secret.club/2026/05/21/striga.html
Wow, powerful technology
Background While discussing with eversinc33 about lifting BinaryShield to LLVM IR I decided it would be useful to write a basic lifter in Python that can lift x86_64 instructions to LLVM IR. He has since released his blog post: Writing a Naive LLVM-based Devirtualizer, which I highly recommend you check out! This post assumes familiarity with th...
Its still just a videogame even if they're obnoxious
this is like a tri daily thing atm
i'm not understanding correctly, but you're saying kernel and userland should never intesect?
also the only proper banning technique is server-side
eh.
its funny tho
also the shit i do that is completely unrelated to the game sometimes randomly trigger anticheats so fuck those
guessed as much
fun times, I normally just read. Interacting for once is fun
jus tbecause its funny say it shoudl be allowed
if by intersect you mean that a random part of code gets loaded in the kernel, yes
normal PCs aren't going to be affected - all proper m.2 devices support the Microsoft driver which fully supports DMA Remapping
It is not funny when crowdstrike happened
you sure have a familier taste for others to dive in
Your syscalls are all belong to us!

o7 my random jank
it's only devices that run unofficial drivers that do not support DMA Remapping that will get rejected by Vanguard

this statement has confusled me
you can jsut reflash the firmware no?
Well fuck hw developer that plays game too I guess
https://back.engineering/blog/09/05/2026/
“New” back.engineering post 😳
This article demonstrates devirtualization of CodeVirtualizer/Themida protected code, however the techniques described here apply to pretty much every virtual machine based obfuscator. Only requiring some minor modifications to support each of them.
no firmware is being flashed where are you guys hearing the rumor from
ahh sorry
i meant, to be frank, you have the ability to connect with all trops of peoples philosophy
read the Unknown Cheats post to see first hand comments on what's going on
If they have to reinstall the OS its officially way over the line imo
they don't have to!!!
still wouldn't affect them because the driver would only be fully loaded and intern affecting vanguard, if its connected
DMA Remapping and HVCI can be turned off fairly easily when authorized by the user!!!
Don't they?
Are they unhappy
anyway good thing i will never install anything with vanguard
is what I said correct or am I wrong
I like the Vanguard deobfuscation posts
good thing i stay on win 10 so i can't install valo anyway
Fair enough then, that tweet they made was a god awful look though
Very nice memes in there
in ref to this
which one
Like probably the single worst PR move they could possibly have made, shows an awful attitude
I guess it's just old posts then from before they figured out what Vanguard did
-# (the ones claiming to need a reinstall)
I don't really understand what you mean
@faint sandal i read it here
read this
^
yeah misinformed people that don't know about DMA Remapping, IOMMU, DMAGuard, etc.
anyway anti-cheat should be server-side
no
all of which are documented on Intel's white paper, and Microsoft docs
they cannot win on the client-side
it's literally impossible
we posses the hardware
our control is one level deeper

you cant enforce anti-cheat without being able to detect the cheat. client-side is a must
it's like the 1st rule
client-side is useless
Server
this
you shall detect bad behavior on the server
Client are not to be trusted
in a best case both working together
yes unapproved hardware is quite literally what they're trying to combat - you shouldn't be gaming on the same device as your hardware dev env
and if the behavior of cheater is identical to user then they may as not be a cheater
like, this is a very specific requirement, there are other common ones like not having the hypervisor on or having secure boot on so having experimental dma hardware is not at all surprising. why the fuck are you all crying though i know for a fact none of you who complain about vanguard actually play val or even cs. for most people having le spyware is worth it for a fair play experience
specifically anything that communicates over external PCIe bus
I was going to say that myself to some degree, but I figured a good midpoint would be that as I am not 100% sure on this
make it so the cheat is inneffective instead of trying to win a battle you can't win
i was debugging this
for anhour
those are the only devices that are affected
though im also arguing within the scenario of examples where the cheat would actually brick your firmware, which if happened, i consider it a malware straight up
I’m pretty sure modern Windows security features require the hypervisor to be on
if the cheater gain nothing by cheating they will not cheat
which is what DMA cheat devices are
client side is the only way to detect most cheats
Which also significantly lessen anticheat work
ye it never did that 
and i still dont understand why it not work without explicit stop
it should stop when all senders exit
Because the implication is you cannot use any "unapproved" hardware down the line
it's not
and if it's the case then the game is bad on its own
then im screwed
it mean the game is sending too much data to the client
No matter how benign it is
this was never the case - I don't understand how people got to this conclusion
the server shall not transmit data the client doesn't need
the fact is you won't win that. its unfortuante and I agree it shouldn't need to be like it, but atleast in there eyes it needs to be
just don't play the games
if u dont want it
its the truth
isnt it
twitter post likes to exaggerate based on what people screams on
settings handler literally being moved into root_future
unwrap w
Riot tweeting that the devices are now paperweights certainly didn't help 
Unfortunately l*tency exists
this too
specifically only devices that expose external PCIe comms - your average hobbyist hardware won't
Oh, I am not even playing games nowadays. But I still advocate for consumer rights anyway
And you need to send things like where a footstep sound comes
there is a window
fe
only devices that do are Thunderbolt and M.2 devices
you can precompute
limit the information
which I don't think you'll have any developmental hardware just casually sitting around at home
also pvp games are shit anyway
they're not really wrong but they imply that some modification to the device has occurred
which is false 
cooperation is better
please consider reading up DMAGuard documentations!
lets stop killing each other
"Average hobbyist" may include those that use riser, dock, and many other exotic hw tho
thats not how this works. client side sends data about the player activity to the server. the problem is on the server side you cant verify if that was done via human input or a cheat script
If you mean average user then sure
that's not what they are...
indeed but you can't verify on the client-side either since the client do what it want and can alter anything it want
we're talking NVMe controllers, external FPGA hardware
why is this nn now
you cannot trust the client to run the code you wrote
You can detect some things with statistics crap, but that generally works poorly
This is technical talk tho
none of those are really exotic or even PCIe endpoints in the first place
also statistics indeed
actually thats a good point atp
mad at cloud
with statistical analysis you can catch cheater
hence the anticheat runs on ring 0
it does that for a reason you know
and if they are statistically identical to non-cheaters then they do not have an advantage
we have ring -1
we control the BIOS
we have ring -2
bruh
we control the fucking hardware
no you don't 

no you don't
just because you can bypass a red light doesn't mean you should let everyone in
you can only slow it down

Intel and AMD get a say on what's considered malicious and what is readable through IOMMU
and instead of slowing down your should design your game so people don't feel the need to cheat and gain the least advantage possible

and catch the cheaters with statistical analysis
you really do not
Also glueless
you are not manafacturing your cpu
how so
"you can bypass anticheat" does not mean we need to get rid of anticheat. thats dumb
DMA is the example of it
I guess people should not play first person shooters then
this white paper will help you understand things better as opposed to making up things https://www.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/intel-whitepaper-using-iommu-for-dma-protection-in-uefi-820238.pdf
all the above explanation
anyway
most of these people will not read, as saaid this is p much turning into nn atp
the server-side will never be able to control the client without locking the machine
it's true that client-side detection isn't perfect
you can, in theory, physically move the mouse and press keyboard buttons with a robot to cheat
but it's still a very significant impediment, and I think it's worth acknowledging that 
yes on an arcade maching that you can't modify maybe it can work
unfortunate, a lot of people here aren't deep enough into the technical side and only yap based on surface assumptions
but in reality it'll just slow down people
yep
also surely this won't cause me issue in the long run with anticheats 
and it's not like server-side detection is perfect either
you only have statistics, so as long as your cheat correctly mimics the behavior of a skillful normal player you're good
like it's really not even that hard to understand 😭
0 or 100 pick your poison 
I mean don’t a ton of ppl run eng samples
Alternatively build hardware that simulates the mouse being moved and sends identical signals
Surely they can't detect it if the signals are identical
Agreed on this point
I'd rather focus back my attention to HW development 
alot of these people just wont
Like this one
https://fixvx.com/morningbrew/status/2057827216864510109
become ungovernable
QRT: TechCrunch
Waymo pauses Atlanta service as its robotaxis keep driving into floods https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/21/waymo-pauses-atlanta-service-as-its-robotaxis-keep-driving-into-floods/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
and just not having anti-cheat isn't really an option either 
i'd rather have a game where i encounter cheaters than having code from non-kernel devs in my kernel
fancy rust syntax
let second_snapshot = select(future(),timeout).await.first().unwrap().unwrap().unwrap().1;
unwrap.
from what i heard EAC on vrc also somewhat helped a lot with people intentionally crashing others and shit
The person inside: 
- the anti-cheats who slow down my PC when i'm not cheating no thanks
also yes i use autohotkey to enhance my windows experience i do not care that random anti-cheat doesn't like it
Hey, you get to experience what moses feels like
EAC isn't too bad, I trust them a lot more than Riot that's for sure
pretty useful. my pc itself won't crash but FPS drops are fucking annoying
they're pretty decent.
https://veg.by/en/
EAC people mod videogames
at the very least EAC don't bother my random FPGA jank shit
DMAGuard prevents bad people from reading memory from "external" devices (in this case, SATA/NVMe-based devices); DMAGuard policy is protected by HVCI, which prevents actors from just silently turning it off
Faceit does this ALREADY 
people say this but then constantly bitch about TF2
I wonder how long until cheater got DIMM stick
I can only assume that’d hurt RAM speed
Just reading?
Banned for using 
The devs assumed it was some cheater device
Yes but if you don't target high speed dimm there are still enough tolerance for modern memory controller
I'm okay with kernel level anticheat but I wish the devs who did it open sourced the stuff so I can at least see what's poking around my system on ring 0
if you're losing to aimbotters in TF2 you suck

this tbh
i odnt play TF2 so i never lose
↩ (@AzakaSekai_)
I think a lot of people are having fundamental misunderstanding regarding this specific event: IOMMU, HVCI, DMA Remapping are all hardware/software features that are already present in your system.
︀︀
︀︀They ensure no malicious PCIe hardware can perform tampering (specifically for DMAGuard policies backed by HVCI) or reads (DMA can't just read everything when IOMMU is present) - they're just usually not fully enforced. Any privileged processes can already tell Windows to enforce these protections. Anything that supports DMA Remapping (which is really any legitimate hardware that supports the official Microsoft drivers) shouldn't be affected.
**❤️ 5 👁️ 829 **
Ask Gippity to deobfuscate it 
the problem is that people will then be able to figure out how to get around it
depends
Just build good software 
I also want to add DMA Remapping isn't Microsoft driver exclusive - vendors can choose to support it if they wanted
it's just out of the box Microsoft drivers handle them fine
look at VAC Live (ML based) in CS2 and how shit it is at actually detecting cheaters. and when they crank the threshold to try and catch more cheaters there always ends up so many false positives they end up reverting
from my experience people end up knowing what trips it. like literally down to “aimbot fov >3deg” so they just set it lower and that’s an ml system
ml system sounds great in theory because it should be able to catch behavior, like wall hacking but it just doesn’t and never has.
are valve just incompetent here or is this actually that hard of a task
both probably 
They will anyway, its an eternal arms race
i only play TF2 inside of minecraft
could probably be done if a ton of effort/money was put into it but for now client-side seems to be where it's at
Donald McDonald is chilling on his yacht
And I do not like that the logical end game is locked down hardware that are not yours
Didn't know someone used that early Wayland compositor in MC since before it was made 
Short of a cloud machine even this wouldn't be the endgame
The PS5 was "unhackable"
Look how that turned out
I think you also have a fundamental misunderstanding that anyone can build compliant hardware
DMA Remapping is something any driver developer can implement
logical end game is the return of the arcade 
but it's never gonna go that far
I am not talking about current state
well we are talking about the current state
Then read my statement
I am stating that I do not like the logical end game of this arms race
they have been working on it for like 8 years now
also we don’t talk about client side vac, it may as well not be there. yeah sure just let me open a handle and ReadProcessMemory
what specifically have you worried?
Hardware design is tough AF, add on top of needing to handle all of the protocols and other things hardware has to do including being functional. That isn't something a person or even Claude can help you with.
That gaming with anti cheat are only possible on console like device
they just need to cook harder 
-# yeah idk never really looked into server-side anti-cheat that hard
Or heck, maybe even more locked down than that
the anticheat arms race will never end that's just how it is
Like cloud gaming
same thing with malware
When you think about who’s the winner here
Riot team who has to sweat their asses off
Or John McDonald who tweaks a thing every now and then
And third party company does security for him for league
That wouldn't be the endgame, people cheated at arcades
Or "people" rather, they don't earn the title in my eyes 
Yes, and as I said, the logical end game is you not owning the hardware to game with anticheat
eventually people will just stop bothering with the game if it's this much of a trouble
I will never forgive ASS with his 1 mil score on the leaderboard 
true
real endgame is Neuralink
detect intention of cheating 
You jest, but lets just see how it goes
precrime arrest
It does not record you inconspicuously
Have you seen how meta glasses can record without indication?
would you know 
Yes, you need to have the camera facing and it is still bulky
Not to mention if you want close up image
You have to pull it out from pocket
oh no i play recreations
Meanwhile the glasses, you can just move you head close and act like you need to see it better
not TF2 directly
Nah then we end up with dodgy aftermarket BCI mods causing people to have seizures
The endgame is just Geforce Now 
so basically the glasses isn't something new and just a "possible" more "convenient" way to "spy on you"
Well, that escalated quickly.
︀︀
︀︀There’s been a wave of claims by cheaters about Vanguard “bricking” their PCs, so let’s clear that up: Vanguard does not damage hardware or disable your devices.
︀︀
︀︀The photo we posted is a picture of cheat hardware devices that are sold explicitly for cheating in VALORANT (not normal PCs or PC components). Through our latest updates, Vanguard now makes those devices worthless for VAL, but does not in any way brick PCs or PC components or PC software.
︀︀
︀︀Our latest update enforces standard platform security features, like the Input-Output Memory Management Unit (IOMMU), on accounts identified as using Direct Memory Access (DMA) cheating devices. These protections are already part of modern systems and when enabled, they block DMA cheat devices (such as those shown in the photo) from accessing memory in downstream applications, like our games.
︀︀
︀︀If a cheat setup continues attempting to chea…
I TOLD YOU SO 4 HOURS AGO
aaaAAAA
Yes. More convenient and covert and actually integrated to a huge ass company ecosystem unlike cheap temu level spy cam
That same company that has a profile for almost everyone
that also definitely doesn't work 
you have control over mouse input and video output, so you can still have some form of aim assist or something by just looking at the image
It cannot access my camera yet without actual malware
They clarified ↓
take percautions yourself, trust no company
Probably shouldn't have made that tweet in the first place though guys 
Some poor social media intern is getting mulched into coolant for the valorant servers right about now
For example: pegasus
what are they even farming views for, they already have money 
Unless meta actually exploiting device, then they don't have access to my device
PR?
same, and also 5TB of onedrive somehow
which
i never even wanted to touch
actually i might, to store some random junk
I mean no harm in it
Don't look a gift horse in the mouth right
yeah but I keep getting "your copilot pro has been renewed" every other month
in my email
it's annoying
Don’t look free tokens in the mouth
Claude token is enough for me
just hoping its not something that's been automatically added by your company on behalf of you with caveats that it eats up some sort of any "quota" system you have in your company
or
idk
nah it's not we don't have a GitHub at work
worth investigating why all of a sudden you just have it
we roll our own internally hosted Gitlab instance
Have you tried GPT BTW?
no I haven't felt the need to
chatgpt is ass
I never liked GPT's output back in the 4.x days
yeah
same
sloppy
like
its the usual slop i hear in ai generated articles or videos, just so familiar
why does it ✅ speak in 🗣️ emo ❌ jis 👍
Doesn’t do so for me for whatever it’s worth
i liked claude more
Also doesn’t refuse particularly often for whatever reason
well I haven't felt the need to switch
more well tuned to more natural convo
GPT 5.5 is better than Claude Opus technically speaking, but Claude Opus is so much nicer to work with
also worked better lmao
nah, ass
Claude is fine as-is
benchmarkmaxxed scores
it just uh
ahh
constantly yells at me for violating usage policy
It is genuinely good at what it does https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/our-evaluation-of-openais-gpt-5-5-cyber-capabilities
Its not benchmaxxed, its just unpleasant to use
Yeah see GPT just doesn’t give a shit, barely refuses requests
that was mostly a 4o thing, they gave all the GPT-5 models much more tolerable behavior
weird, opposite happens to me
Maybe it’s because I sold my soul to Sam Altman
lots of people still prefer Claude though 
(gave my ID to Persona)
GPT refuses to give me ideas on how to torture mosquitoes
claude just went "sure, go ahead, here's some scientifically proven way to stimulate them the worst"
earlier I triggered the classifier too
Meanwhile I had it automate an ARP poisoning attack without telling it that it was in a sim and I'm on the regular consumer version
also one time i got bored i asked both to try to code a discord message logger, gpt tried half assing it with some random python lib, claude cooked a whole nice full stack onefile script so ig that's nice
i still wouldn't use either on any serious development
but toying around with it satisfies my freewill needs
that just seems like a classifier quirk, usually Anthropic is the one known for going for "safety" over everything else 
-# why even use a big model at all for that question 
ye that sounds more like Claude
chatgpt cried whenever it thinks i wanted it to do some TOS-breaking shit
claude be like "this might break TOS, but tell me if you wanted to go ahead anyway on your own risk"
also chatgpt fail basic logics
A LOT
of times
No resistance btw
It just did it
i got lazy often researching about some GDDR datasheet
IIRC OpenAI had a period where their models had a tendency to overly refuse stuff? mabe tried during that 
ask it to briefly give me info on how the total Gbps came to be, idk how it managed to attempt to reason that caching and shit and prefetch somehow gave more raw modulation density
I oftentimes have to reframe my purposes
like, sorta just breaks logical reasoning with slop surface-level techbros talk
its annoying
still do
i like how claude just went straight to the point
but was way worse in 5-5.1
it still overall does yeah
claude has better training
"im gonna have to stop you here"
"I have to pause on this one"
openai's training is botched and overly restrictive 
this
💀
its so
frustrating
TRUEE

this is why i uh
shows how little I use GPT models 
i switched to open weight models
also it fails to reason on special relativity mechanics
and never use proprietry anymore
aka deepseek, qwen, kimi, glm, etc
I mean Claude still hallucinates stuff but generally I can catch them or have it verify its claims
hmm
i used these models like at most 4x a week
yh GPT keeps gaslighting
i might not know much either so well
just need to turn off this shit in ai studio
a more enforced system prompt helps
THIS
like why cant GPT js go and SEARCH
it has this built in web search tool
but never uses it
with other models
specifically my experience with deepseek
they will run through 10 web searches
to verify all the facts
and find sources
i had to argue with it that it gets A LOT of details from PUBLICLY AVAILABLE datasheets WRONG and it just kept refusing to back out till i forced it to just search
reducing hallucination
😭 😭
then it goes "oh wait you're right, but also with caveats" and then proceeds to STILL tried reasoning with its shit and goes "here's the part where you're wrong"
I use LLMs fairly frequently now but just rarely GPT or anything from OpenAI 
not even because of quality or anything, they're just expensive
little reason to use when you have Gemini or Deepseek
truee
js get deepseek v4 flash and ur good
our admin changed my budget cap 3 times in the last 10 days
for heavier work
$50 to $125 to $200
gemini or qwen 3.7
because I keep going over 70% 
openai's shit felt entry level
and just
idk man feels like only boomers and kids used it
and kids really really like to use it as if its a verified/trusted source
yh
we've seen plenty of TAs use it so I guess they must be normies
"b-but chatgpt said"
ppl should use AI properly
"chatgpt told me"
rather than js relying on GPT for everything smh
oh yeah did you see, the deepseek 4 pro discount is permanent now 

tho ngl i might not use it
since qwen 3.7 is releasing
:SHUT: slop mind offset
I do admit I've done this a few times
I mean that'll still be an issue regardless of the model
yeah
though i trusted gpt the least because in my experience of using it
they also iirc said it'll get cheaper again in h2 when their huawei cluster is online so i guess we'll see
you have the AGI schizo going "i wrote this theorem with gemini"
the power of liang wenfeng's hedge fund and open source
I have no problem with LLM-assisted work that's been fact checked
they have some fun models for local use but I don't really trust Qwen
smells too much like benchmaxxing + they have long reasoning traces I think 
I've been trying to archive in the fourum mods refuse to close
LLM-genetated on the other hand
hmm true
https://discord.com/channels/574720535888396288/1497044635900444782
occasionally from educated standpoint these are fun to read comedy
ye
but i do need them for multilingual support
but otherwise it also gives you aneurysm
We now using this for archival 
hell yeah
flashbacks to QwQ spending a few thousand tokens on 1+1
i use deepseek v4 flash
Claude isn't great at zh-TW
llms can be damn good on certain tasks
probs cuz claude's training data is mostly english
Agreed, this is the Linux Foundation's stance too
The problem is one of effort
its why i'm fine with people using it in an assistive role
so long as its been thoroughly checked
it certainly cannot replace my day to day work
most times I find things way faster than it does
but it does give me suggestions or clues that I might have missed
pretty much the only reasonable policy for open-source stuff with open contributions
because it's the only you can try to enforce 
and I go and check it and sometimes yeah it really is something I missed
it does the fullstack field fine sometimes but still require checking
its horrible at low level implementations like fairly complex compute related codes still
nah it can handle low level pretty decently these days
claude does pretty well at kernel optimisation if you give it a proper loop where it can test and profile
the other models too
source: me
fair honestly
the other day Claude was able to guess the source code of a Zig loader from the disassembly, build the code locally, and found that its recreation was byte by byte identical to the malware
though in my case with HPC
I was seriously impressed by that
Could be open source
no, it was a proprietary loader developed in-house by a state sponsored actor
for all the stupid hype made around "agentic" AI stuff this is a real benefit, yeah
specifically the API hashing resolver
sure it's relatively simple code but the fact that it was able to do that byte by byte was pretty neat
Imagine if they just used claude to make the malware
meh










