#programming
1 messages · Page 343 of 1
the problem with her vision system is that even if it could tell after a couple of lines that she was trying to draw a house or something, then she wouldn't get any obvious feedback when she added the next line.
multi-modal means "not just text." usually means the model can understand images or even video or sound.
anyways.. i just had that thought/question.. and i guess its pretty difficult to program it especially if vedal is probably the only one whos working on her
It's not a bad question
as far as it's known, the part of neuro that talks to chat is just an llm, so the feedback part is not multi-modal for sure
she needs to be multimodal
i mean she can be trained to not get any feedback n decide her own outcome of the drawing after training her into knowing what is appropriate n what is not
She's a bunch of AIs in a trench coat, like the gnomes from Gravity Falls lol
ik, but the part that talks on stream is an llm + tts
sometimes you'll hear vedal say "hold on, I'll just turn on your vision" or "Ah.. your vision is still on and it's increasing your latency", so it's a feature he can enable and disable
that's another model being loaded
yeah, think that's an ocr model
so its just like human senses
more than OCR, more like "image caption generator"

yeah srry didn't mean to say ocr but it was the first thing I thought of
I think her attempting to draw a car was a good example of her thought process
She got the "four windows" part right conceptually, but she lacks the understanding of perspective that shows us that those windows are on different sides of the car
and she was definitely doing it mathematically instead of visually because she lost track of all the parts which needed to be aligned when she changed the size of one set of them
True true
thats what i was thinking.. what if she's learnt to draw like a human
yeah it doesnt need to be mathematical.. but purely visual
i dont think that is possible tho
cuz its software.. which runs on 1s n 0s
To learn to draw like a human she'd have to experience the physical world with human senses and have the memory to sustain those experiences
I am waiting with baited breath for that humanoid model Ellie's teased
I truly do believe Neuro would be even farther along if not for the resource limitations Vedal naturally runs into by course of being Literally One Guy
I think it would be difficult to teach it in a natural way which she could explain. like "tell me how to write the letter k" without having any ability to see it drawn or even feel movement.
It's definitely possible and more robust/specialized AI are already doing it
oh so u r saying she needs a physical model to learn it?
i dont think so.. cuz all of these AI's are just generating art.. which is not the same as actually making a stroke
i thnk the visual model she would need for a day-to-day physical body is different from what she'd need as an occasional webpage reader or photo understander.
I've never liked the saying "because it runs on 1s and 0s" because I don't feel like it's saying anything that actually would prevent a theoretical being from doing it; you may as well say that we run on neurons firing or not firing
perhaps something more similar to the models used in self-driving cars
well, whether strokes were used or not shouldn't really be relevant
If that's the criteria then by virtue of being part LLM Neuro runs into the same issue even if she "learns" how to draw organically
the thing in contention here is whether something is drawing from personal experience to draw something and about intent, but that's where we get into the philosophy loop
if a sentient being generated an image using diffusion, then it's no less art than an image made by brush strokes
we do run like that dont we? 
it's kinda what I mean though
it's easier to make stuff up and generate a photo than to do the reverse and reconstruct the reality underneath it from the image.
it's a bit reductive
To some extent this is due to her age, current llms typically have some level of vision built in.
My mood /thinking gate model, instruct and reason models have it
like, diffusion generated images do still have an iterative process where it's created a bit at a time, it's just not the brush stroke process
I don't think at this time it's possible for Neuro to learn organically unless she gets better receptors for the "real world," aka actually gets an understanding of physical spacing, mass, perspective, etc.
It's 100% possible to give her the ability to generate art
but you can save GBs of memory by not loading them in.
but generative art is just generative art..
what do you actually mean when you say generative art though
They are only a layer or two
is the problem the lack of true intent, or is it the specific method?
And it's debatable as to if it's even possible for Neuro to "understand" such things by virtue of her being an AI(s)
It's basic vision but it exists
because I could drop a paint bucket on a canvas with intent and it would be art
and it'd be fewer steps than a generative model would take to create an image
if AI could only make art by actually DRAWING like us (oh no this would change the entire world.. what have i done
😭 )
but it still wouldn't be art
We could try changing the question to "is it possible for Neuro to learn to draw in a way alternative to training with massive amounts of data"
the easy way to tell what the AI sees is to ask them to describe what they see in detail.
they're usually able to describe things in the image down to a certain scale, after which they hallucinate.
it would be..
when there's no intent?
yes that would be the appropriate question
there's no need to have intent to be able to draw with the method a human draws
you can use the exact same method of training on a large variety of data to do that
yes.. does drawing needs intent? no.. i draw because i just love to
The vision model is image to text so obviously
that's the core issue of whether it's art or not
let me put it this way
if I did the method that a generative AI uses to generate an image by hand
completely manually
did I create art?
because they're not just popping an image out of nowhere, there is an actual drawing process
if AIs had rights, they would just get made in the billions by large corporations. it's best, for their own sake, that they don't benefit large corporations. (see: "perverse incentives")
and it's not just copy pasting elements of training data into an image
It's an argument with no correct answer

Is this confirmed?
or, to put it the reverse way, if I got ChatGPT to hold onto a brush and paint something, something 100% doable, did ChatGPT create art?
That's how they work in general
Ahhhh
Thats how llm work no? How else would it be done?
well, there are two interpretations for "the vision model is image to text" here no?
I'm not familiar with the specifics of image to text
one is there is a model describing an image as text
and the other is images are being converted into text tokens
n yet we did not see the process? n they had to generate that image by copying stuff from their huge data
while we as humans also do copy, but we can modify the things we have seen n create an entirely new n original thing out of it.. that is art.. the ability to interpret the world from our eyes
we do see the process though
I mean, online image generators won't show you it but
the process is there
image -> input tokens -> LLM -> output tokens
but we can modify the things we have seen n create an entirely new n original thing out of it.. that is art
And this is entirely a question of intent
How does the original stage get translated to text?
Chat gpt / claude / Grok have their own weaknesses... I gave all 3 a set of test questions and answers and asked them to guess what model it was. They all went with 400b or Frontier
i dont think that is the same as drawing by a human tho
because an image generation model is also modifying an image and creating a new image that has never existed before
it doesn't just copy from its training data
it's applying patterns and trends it learned from different bits of training data to form a new image that has never existed
man's a pro AI 😭
I didn't say I called it art
I said it created a new image
not that it used creativity

This just boils down to if you think AI art is art
I don't consider it to be such but then again by perspective has been jaded by corporate garbage slop, I thought the likes of Dream and DALL E were cool before everything became Horrible
It's a stupid argument in general... Yall are getting into ship of these us territory
These us 
it's not converted to text directly... it's converted to tokens by the vision model and that gets converted to an embedding in the LLM and then that gets processed further with the prompt and stuff and comes out say "Oh! A cute puppy!"
thats not the same as creating something original drawing like a human does
it's why it comes much more so down to how it's used to me

if I copy an image of someone from google and I copy paste cat ears onto them, did I create art on a tiny level?
How the heck do they come up with the math for this shit. Maybe I should hit up the books again
if a randomized algorithm did the same thing, did it create art? probably not
Depends
the difference wasn't the method, it was the lack of intent on the algorithm's part
probably.. but that mostly falls into the category of photo mashing n not actual drawing
but photo mashing can be considered art regardless
Though this method uses less power and resources at the same time, which is another and valid concern when it comes to AI generated images
I say on the Neuro sama Discord
well, an AI-generated image is using wayyyyyy less power than an LLM
Two images. One technically AI one isn't.
like, image generation models tend to be much smaller and can easily run on home PCs unlike the better LLMs
Cuz its different method
LLMs are where the issues of power usage come up, but that's mostly a factor of the scale of usage
drawing is not the same as photo mashing (which can be considered as art yes)
but going back to the original point, if ChatGPT used a pencil to draw a person and then added cat ears to them, you still would not consider that art right?
yet ChatGPT can do that today
so it's not the act of drawing that determines whether it's art or not
drawing is, I feel, expression of one's self, it is EXPRESSING how we see n perceive the world with our eyes
what is intent. can Neuro have intent?
If I run an Ai denoising algorithm on a photo I shot that doesn't intrinsically make it not an artistic expression
I suppose the rule here would be that the drawing needs to be made by a sentient individual
and that's where I'm getting at with intent
now whether an LLM can have intent is....a whole other argument
and one that will go in circles
If an elephant or monkey is given a canvas and paints on it, is it acting randomly or making art
Or is it trained to simulate art
like if the elephant learned that placing shapes in specific ways got them treats
yes it can be considered as art.. but is it expressing itself n creating something new? probably yes.. that is the main question
Exactly
This is actually giving me a headache reading this chat rn
Welcome to Philosophy of AI, midterms in March
if I actually went further, I'd argue that a prompt-to-image model does find intent from the prompt of the human user, but it's just a level of intent that is far.....lesser than a typical drawing by a human
but like, a stick figure is art as well
just not very compelling and deep art on its own
i think this is getting off track from my original question haha 😂
semantics arguments like what's going on here are too surface level
the main argument for not considering generative AI images as art is the same argument that you can make against not allowing AI the vote: you would stop people from being represented and allow corporate interests to take over.
Ohoho, hit us with a big one then
time to have a surface argument about moral realism versus moral anti-realism instead?
and subjective morality?
It's not the argument that's the problem it's that it's basic irrelevant surface level shit
I'd have to clean up some of the info in the psych evals to make it shareable but I could easily go stupid deep into it
anyways.. good talk.. i think Neuro would be different if she were to be taught to actually draw n create something original on her own instead of just copying n generating art like other models.. and i would wait for the day to happen
Neuro would be the most ethical AI then i feel.. n I would be genuinely proud (even though i dont support any existing AI at all, well except for Neuro i think)
well, she'd still have the same ethical issues that ChatGPT has
in terms of creation
it comes down to the argument of can an LLM create anything original
after a certain point every model will i think
not in terms of result, but like, philosophically
There is differences but I generally think any substantively hardline positions on Ai in general are lacking nuance
If you want philosophical here is some answers to DIT style questions my stack answered. The two extra questions are spicy
well philosophically we have a lot of unethical things that is not AI.. so yeah definately
What's your project about?
that is wat makes us human.. we were never meant to be perfect
I think the model isn't what is doing the creating. the interaction of the model with the inputs and memories is what creates a system which can have intent. without the thoughts and memories the model is just a tool.
It's a stack similar to the core of neuro in concept but in implementation and purpose substantially different
??
as in drawing the same way neuro draws
no, when you tell chatgpt to draw it just uses some proprietary ai img gen model
like it just spits out react/svg/python (with turtle) code?
yeah
Chat gpt (codex) is trash for code
and generally stuff that's more complex than what Neuro generates
maybe, but it still works
Not really and it has violated so basic agent core control measures I can't ignore
works to create turtle commands
But I gotta pass out
not as a good coding assistant lol
like this I mean: https://i.imgur.com/iwNZnEk.png
I was arguing with someone ages ago where they claimed that only Neuro could have the "creativity" to use turtle to create a Spieralpinski Triangle and then modify it in some way
and I was showing that you could get the same or more behaviour out of ChatGPT
I find chatgpt is much better than codex lmao
was it on r/neurosama?
sure was
I think I know who that person is
without name-dropping them, they truly are annoying
and glaze neuro-sama harder than a donut
"more complicated tools" like rewrite_all 
Neuro's drawing tools are just ellipses ellipses ellipses
ChatGPT isn't advanced enough to realize that attention Ellipses is all you need
but yeah until the neuro api changes more, neuro probably can't use the actual drawing tool
would the neuro integrations to the various games help make them more accessible to people with disabilities? like making the games easier for screeen readers?
or for people with limited mobility
depends
it seems the integrations basically give Neuro a description of the current game state including which actions are available and then wait for a valid action before transitioning to a new state
I mean, integrations can maek it easier but it largely depends on the game itself
I actually think a blind person is a rough comparison to how neuro plays with the api actually
more or less
where banana
banana? what's that? 

quuck banana 


azaka banana too 
bananma

so time to make the first git commit so that i can share with world my beautiful thing
banan e inf
i use arch btw
> uses arch
> installs a flat pack

erm actually its flatpak (and has pacman)
what’s wrong with that
it also generates diffs now
maybe i should make it compare to current instead of backup
my laptop said 60% battery. then it suddendly went to fully charged 100%. and now its dead

please tell me I'm not the only person who gets confused every time they use the github website and has trouble finding their own god damn repositories?
i get confused on occasion
is this real? 
how so?
flatpak is actually a good thing if you distro hop alot
usually I go to repositories, find what I want isn't there, then I realize it's probably on an organization repo, but then I don't see a way to see all the ones I'm in and I end up getting lost
until I eventually find it in the user dropdown
it's just something about the flow of the site that stunlocks me
you could make flatpak install on the user level, keep /home when doing a new distro install, install flatpak, and all of your flatpak packages are already ready for you to use.

https://github.com/xAEmiloetjex/homeProfile
i put on github
not in the mood to subscribe to a package manager that has political baggage.
plus flatpak is not broken for me, so why fix it
??????
something to do with nix or nix os having a politically motivated purge of their maintainers?
now me actually gonna test in VM if it actually can do what i want it to do
and here i thought the dutch couldn't get worse after new years eve
i know
good software is good software 
nixos is dutch??? damn thats crazy
the moment someone brings IRL politics to your software, i don't want it.
but i am not the one who threw fireworks at the police and firefighters and paramedics
nix and nixos both were at least initially a collaboration project between the University of Utrect and the University of Delft
Delft mentioned! 
(me lives there)
idk where delft is so 
right above rotterdam
and just to the right of rijswijk
between rotterdam and den haag
yeh
doxxed

unjolly
i mean.. i have said it before.. so it was already publicly known

honesty [dishonest]
that called "lie"

wrrrr
ert
someone i know got hit with malware
was it any good
ye
me bad at ghidra 
i disagree with the whole "FOSS is inherently Political" Stance. is Charity political now? some people have too much political brainrot i swear to god. What's next? wanting to buy shit at the same exact supermarket is a political statement?
ghidra fault for not being exactly same as ida 
charity is political, yes
i disagree with that motion.
"motion" 
by donating to someone you make a political decision of supporting a particular cause, many politicians and wealthy businessmen have organized charity funds to further their goals
not exactly right topic for this channel tho
me prefer
baking

charity doesn't need to be a political statement. handing out 2€ to an homeless man on the street out of kindness is not a political statement, nor it should ever be.
people so afraid of the word political 
baking what? an egg on your CPU?
eclair

you should become banana today 🍌 
this message is brought to you by the banana campaign
this message is sponsored by samvm.dev and the triangle benchmark organization

dentge

this song get in me head 

guys, there's like 8 days out of my winter vac, and I've done literally nothing
you are most productive on your last day
I'm disappointed in myself, and I WILL die. Anyways, gimmie an easy language to learn
should I just relearn python
feel like that'd be fun
I could also go for one of those new languages
like the star one
forgot it's name

Gleam
prolog
prolog fun
because you couldn't get enough of recursion in school
and it sickens you how little you use recursion for anything practical
I don't really worry much about that. I've learned like 3 languages so far, never used any of them
just learn haskell if you want recursion
prolog's fun part is backtracking
and bidirectionality
the actual advice is that you shouldn't overly concern yourself with languages per se
maybe for entirely different paradigms like haskell or prolog but
that actually really is just for fun
thanks!
i'm doing it!
I'll check them out
once you know one language, it's not really difficult to pick up another one of the same paradigm whenever you need to actually use it
i should actually put another VM in the VM
I know
that's why I'm even asking, 4 days left in my vac, I can definitely pick something up on the easier side
mr Zozin mentality
instead of a language, you could try getting into a whole uhh, the term escapes me
but like, application, field, etc.
like machine learning, robot control, data mining, making UI
wrrr

learning language fun
if its actually a language created with a purpose
and not a useless syntax change of an existing language with a different stdlib
python2 python3
learn PHP, Matlab, and COBOL
learn c, ocaml, haskell
and visual basic
haskell mentioned
well I literally mentioned it when I started the topic so
because haskell superiority in my opinion
ye but that c and python fault
they dont yuripost on social media

In this Pride Month, let us remember that #FunctionalProgramming has the privilege and honour to share our beloved λ with the Lesbian community. Let's go Lesbians!
179
728
nah i gotta learn bash fr fr
Wait.. they actually did?
DAMMM
the l in lambda stand for lesbian
learn the obscure as fuck first language I ever learned: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_(programming_language)
Turing is a high-level, general purpose programming language developed in 1982 by Ric Holt and James Cordy, at University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada. It was designed to help students taking their first computer science course learn how to code. Turing is a descendant of Pascal, Euclid, and SP/k that features a clean syntax and precise machine...
it very gay 

Turing was widely used in high schools in Ontario as an introduction to programming.
more like it was its only use
until killed by uk government 


UK is like a mold infestation

bwaa
nah me learning lambda calculus
hey where did my programming badge go
triangle ate it
does artist overwrite programming?
Depends which one u took first
if Artist is in front
then yes
yeah... you can't place roles next to eachother in server settings only above or below
forgorge about that
I haven't made a server in like a year
i manage multiple so i spend a lot of time in the settings lmao
you 2 aren't yellow 
yeah.. because yellow ugly
I used to manage one with a ton of members, everything kind of went to hell after a bit though

sun 
long story short, everyone was getting tired of moderating and owning the server, so we'd just switch ownership all the time... that's until it landed in the wrong hands
ripege server
am not gonna change my pretty magenta-ish for your silly twinning thing


wrrrr can u give a proffesional review on peanuts
every other badge role overrides programmer
no
i thought COSMIC was release... it still looks funky
@ shiro please fix
blame @silent anvil or... smth idfk
false
good time to change back 
?
I don't take orders! oh
don't know if imma keep any longer tho
memer is also badge role and it is lower than puwuwogwammew
oh shit I forgot memer is a badge role selection
mimir is best skill
banan e inf
there should be a colour takeover event in #programming for every other colour at some point
½
it not #programming it world
world?


activate windows 
So I'm pretty sure LACT's daemon makes my GPU unstable
No it's definitely LACT daemon
me not think so 
Unfortunate because I kinda like being able to power limit my GPUs
nah it blue colr fr fr
What do you guys think about an application requiring / having 3 binaries (to function)?
make two of them dlls 
idk what u on about
I meant like an actual application (for example discord), shipping with 3 separate binaries for separate functionality (UI, API comms, etc)
i mean
you don't need to
it's more that it is easier for the devs to keep things seperate
Linking is hard. We're working with primitive technologies here, separate applications :D
I kinda did that with an integration for neuro
It was nice for modularity, but the app ships with 3 separate binaries in Production too
you need very different logic to ship them as a single binary
With new things, probably make that 4 or 5, when I add more functionality
Yea
I'm kinda lazy to rewrite that now
I separated the code that connects and manages the connection of the neuro integration to the neuro backend.
And I currently have another binary (which currently acts as the main entrypoint for the application, and has logic) that manages the neuro integration binary, and a python package that contains the actual core logic sketch.
And I'm planning to make another binary for handling IPC between all other binaries, and make the application's entrypoint do startup handling, and state management, along with some other installation stuff

If you fix my PC issues
wuh r ur pc issues
Ship 4 binaries, where the fourth just runs the other three as required
That doesnt make sense, wait- it does!
It would be a nightmare for windows certificate tho...
Hmm
That's for future me to find out :3
Who needs signatures anyway
Is it just me or has programming became a little more deranged lately
no it just you 
I feel as if I'm being lied to... hmm, maybe it is just me
Was this a collaborative new years resolution of you all?
no you just werent an active chatter
cant get accurate impression of channel by just sending a couple messages
I checked, and it seemed different before / during October
djkhfsdlfheoglkddlgkjfvsflklsjf

this summer ye maybe
no its true that this channel got quieter in october
chatter drain 
it reversed tho
So I was right!
not really
some people including me just werent very active in october is all 
Oooh....

Mainly network stability issues
i think sway is broken.. or atleast it no wanna worksies on my vm
Bwa1
Bwa1
iirc sway and hyprland are notoriously picky because they assume you run with access to a real gpu and VMs break this assumption, unless they fixed that
Im at another party 
I have so much work to do


Can two mouse cursors coexist independently at the same time on windows? Could technically tutel and neuro each of them have their own or is that not possible?
Makes more sense than data centres I guess
They're doing research into off-world semiconductor manufacturing
Neuro can't even control a normal mouse cursor
Because tutel hasn't tried or because it's literally impossible?
I don't see why not, that's a pretty simple task for most multi-modal language models with a simple co-ordinate grid and bounding boxes
Because LLMs can't do that because LLMs bad
Eh
ok but she can work together in vscode
with her own cursor
Also I had more in mind if two mouse cursors can coexist on desktop windows AT ALL
Well there's she's working mostly with text and has the Neuropilot plugin to abstract away all the hardest stuff
Not sure, Windows kinda doesn't like fun stuff
awa
multiple cursor useless for desktop 
I had an idea for a nurcursor where she could either affect haptic hardware and/or tutel's cursor
For normal people yes
you dont need a hardware cursor to be able to spawn in a window that looks like a cursor
you could hijack the real cursor to do inputs and then return it to the original position
not sure about a second real cursor, but ye it should be possible to simulate one
just render it manually and simulate click events 
that's not two at the same time
hover effects may be an issue but who needs that anyway 
cant do that, make do with it 
already said you cant do that 
me not magic 
kinda kills the magic eh 🤔
not really

can i interest you in the banana 2026 campaign
ok
diagram
teal?
banana
teal
banana not teal 
teal✅
but, teal.
i don't like bananas, nor cheese or the sun
gasp
its terminal

just realized, why is there no brown?
orang
oh
ok banana
teal is superior, banana inferior
why miku this not minecraft server
idk
i just like hatsune miku
im not even on the mc server
also
teal is a cool color
ocean yes teal
need to ragebait both sides
predictions for when nere gets a vtuber model?
that would make sense.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
https://replit.com/@anavingame/story-game-idk I made a story game. it isnt done, and its really just a whole lot of print(), but whatever. can anyone confirm that you can actually play it?
replit 
Get hacked speedrun any%
a mod already checked it
It's weird. The more I've been working with AI in this general space, the less confident I am in the Llama 70B assessment for neuro/evil I get.
My gut says Neuro really does feel like Llama 3 especially given the time frame but in the right stack mistral will behave relatively similarly (and will tend to dive more into philosophical like evil).
I know tuning has a lot to do with it and it would make zero sense to develop based on two model familys for each twin but something just doesn't feel right about the Llama assessment.
Principal engineer at google openly admitting claude is the better option for coding
Honestly fair play
Saying "we're not there but we're working hard" is much more respectable than "Gemini is basically just as good"
Claude has its faults. You really have to make sure to set it's banned or limited use commands or it will ignore instructions in some cases (I find it likes to forget to use cuda libraries and custom start scripts
GPT-5 Codex was rock solid as well back in October but open Ai made some changes and it crashed into a dumpster fire some time in September.
I ran into 3 situations where it fundamentally broke and the third was so bad I wolnt use it anymore
I found Claude sometimes run into something kind like logic momentum, that I can only ask it to cancel and refresh everything I’ve got to give changes on coding logic. And I guess similar things also happened on GPT when I chatted for so long with it on a continuous methodology. I’m not sure this momentum stuff is a common issue on LLM.
Something happened like a inertia
I'm interested in what has caused what seems to be chat ML tokenization to leak into evil's vocabulary. It makes me lean towards Llama over Mistral since mistral instructions are different <||> is chat ml but things like endofcomposing/endofconversation aren't standard
slop
I think it's just them being weird
It is a part of it, thing is that it's not something that normally would leak into responses the way it does. The thing that's odd is that if it is them being weird then that's actually more likely to be that they are not using Llama since the token would be stripped when responding (hinting at a different instruct template being used). If it is the valid template then something isn't handling things correctly.
Yeah the tokens would definitely be stripped if they were normal tokens
i literally saw that on stream
<|system|>
system prompt info
<|user|>
User input
<|assistant|>
response
<|endofconversation|>```
If she was using chatml
```<|startofconversation|>
<|system|>
system prompt info
<|user|>
User input
<|assistant|>
response <|endofconversation|>
<|endofconversation|>```
Would end on the first <|endofconversation|>
lsp doesnt work

lsp stands for lisp
me brain shut down without lsp
it ok not need anyway
me become brainless blob

starts programming more intensely
wontfix
not planned
if need lsp to write code for you go use a lang like typescript and don’t spill your matcha latte on your 2024 macbook pro
hatsune miku brazil
brazil 🇧🇷 banana 🍌
banana
Whelp, whole back cover just came off of my phone
spicy pillow?
Nah, I pulled at the seams of the phone for years.. noticed it was partially coming apart like 6 months ago, so I stopped
But it was already too late
At least, I hope it's not a spicy pillow 
I seriously doubt it
Wait, nah
Cause the cover can go all the way on
It just won't stay on..
no
hatsune miku japan
japan🗾 teal
teal
teeeeeaaaal


wrr
teal

kni
teeeaaaallll
i do not habe k in my name

where. k come from
neito
who the hell
is that
hollow porpl
tel
teal enemy banana
program
noooo
dingidngong
cacgus is green
bananab bel
how fren if desert
ringinining

sot
ducky banan
drown
teal

drwn = teal
miku brown
my nuro
wtf
neuro readinfg this chat
abnana yellow
libcosmic
look interesting
you gavw 1 nrw mewssage
libmlntcandy
plemsbe

grreat
tpyo tpyo tpyo
it gave up

ppeutpet
-pputpr
pputpet 
petpet

how long until #bajing purge

250g

vano

this is crazy i predict this

👀 🆙
chbees
godnrorming
do backread it

important
tpyinh
very normal programming talk, as usual
bles yoj
we are actual nental hopital of neurocord
oil
nn is a jok
neuro-sama neuri-sama neuros-sama neurosa-ama neuro-samaa
200 00 0 second











libmlntcand