#programming
1 messages · Page 303 of 1
everchanging television set

character arc are good
dementia
demonstrating lack of awareness
lobotomy
and reason why llm is stupid
🔪 🔪 🔪
this thing give me headache
its slightly terrifying actually 
i've never once thought about fries dipped in ice cream
that sound horrendous
i'm sticking to ketchup and mayo thanks
limited to usb 3.2 speeds
meaning potentially limited to 5 gb/s
probably less though
that one is 10Gbps, though i'd be worried about latency more than anything
who cares about peak sequential speed

its not for a boot ssd or anything so i feel like it should be mostly fine
i got a sata to usb adapter recently
since you have to have an extra board to do the pcie to usb conversion

yeah it's probably fine for standalone drives
i need to choose a christams present under 25 bucks
and most of the things i want are several hundreds 
its for a christmass party thing
so i need to choose
its secret santa but my brother got my name so im choosing what i want
the projector i got 2ndhand for 650 is on sale from 1.6K to 915 
secret santa but you know who got you
not so secret huh
not for me ye
I do use one of these, granted it tends to be used as a flash drive most of the time. But 10Gbps ones are pretty fast
I got mine for $3 thrifting tho
scratch that, free because the store owner didn't know what it was
Fun fact for those that don't know. Sometimes when Amazon gets their refunds, the goods don't return to the company they originated from. It'd be too expensive to do so, instead a bulk of items are boxed up and sent in for auction. People (companies) bid for these boxes so that they can resell the contents of them.
I use one of these

I personally dislike that one's design but meh
the metalic?
nah, the fact it slides together
I use this one which clamps
in practice it makes little difference though unless you're hitting it hard for long periods of time
its more that you probably get better contact pressure with this design
but like
if you're only using it as a big usb drive its whatever
for the heat-sink? 
yeah
oh
okay 
i doub it will be too much of an issue, ill jsut eventually buy 2 new ssd's for my pc and plop the old one in there
yeah fair
some p310 drive
ye, Crucial P310, that thing
thats what my windows install is using while my linux is on soe old 200gb 2.5" ssd
the plan is to put 2 990pros in here and move that one to the thingy
the 999gb is the windows, the f"ile system" is 200gb for linux, that should be one of the kingstons so idk what happened there. then theres also a 500gb hard drive with back-ups of old data.
the 2nd kingston is empty cuz idk
can you tell which is newer lol
idk how the fuck I write more than I read
yes 
mayhaps zerod the drive or soemthing?
my only guess is like, immense disk caching because I have "so much" ram
Has anyone been noticing that neuro has been faulting more and more on youtube videos? I don't really watch stream so I'm not sure what's happening there. I think she might be hitting her thermodynamic limit here. Every random vector ingested is a bit of entropy that she needs to fight against. I'm afraid that without intervention, neuro might just simply dissipate into the void. To ensure system stability, we can try controlling the randomness of the vectors before we can find a cure for the actual cause.
is there no way to see which process writes/reads


we appreciate your concern random chatter, but it doesnt really work like that
i think it joke

No, I'm serious. I have a theory that predicts this very situation.

Yes. I do know how llms work
My specialization is in AI.
For neuro to be able to continue existing there has to be a thermodynamic sink for her to dump noise into
neuro might just simply dissipate into the void
the fuck does this mean
uh
Every single sentence that she says will be incoherent garbage.

My specialization is in AI. -> random thermodynamics that i dont think make sense
she's not training on her own outputs i can tell you that much
and context is finite
Yes but she is training.
no shes not
She is recieving inputs
ye you don't know how llms work
inputs -x-> trainign
is this the bullshit about neuro learning form twitch chat again?
There's a big roundabout circle going on here

they are not
and thermodynamics comes into play how
are they tho?
cuz she has memory, but i dont think the model weights are being updated
As long as she is learning there will be an issue with faulting that can only be delayed with more firmware.
Ok. Thermodynamics of information. Have you heard of information entropy?
if they do it's manual and done by a human
not really
product of such process is a different version
different set of weights
that has to be shipped
manually also

weights don't update by themselves
that doesn't work with llms
people tried
they do kinda descend into noise as you described
Imma write a paper which explains what's going on in depth. hold on to your hats for 2 mins. It does not actually matter what architecture she is using.
but neuro doesn't work like that
i may be on fedora but i don't have hats
If she is learning and remembering things from the past then she is subject to the problem
i think you think neuro is a lot more advanced than what she probably is. she isnt learning. its only some memories and such
as far as we know and can tell
vedal mentioned her "saving" stuff to her memory and "deleting"
aslo, a paper written in 2 minutes? are we sure this guy is not mister grand gpt himself?

i would assume it's that, a couple of functions to save stuff she wants to remember and then relevant memories either get put in context based on current context or she searches them manually
first one would be what we call rag
No it's just that I'm breaking my theory into more easily digestible bits for you.
as soon as a memory becomes irrelevant to the topic it's like it was never there for her
One second. antigravity is compiling the thing.
sam you called it
ok this guy is a troll 
antigravity is google's cursor
mods remove his 206th bone
No, not trolling
Like actually coherent paper.
the forest didn't burn down, it dried out because of all the water bro is using to generate the slop
How to attach file?
Well shoot
i gotta see this


One sec getting nitro
||pdf is 300mb||

I actually don't.
if you need to upload a file i don't see how pastebin would help
paste the bytes 
you know what? that reminded me, I can just use google drive. Thanks.
boring solution
YAP VELOCITY
guys look at this paper i found
Will be doing second draft later.
bro realised neuro is not trained to act exactly like chatgpt
To maintain conversation flow, it begins to generate ”Synthetic Memories.”
so does every single LLM on the planet
its quite literally how they work
do not fear the Scuff™
there isn't an llm that doesn't hallucinate ye
some do more some less
but they all do
also this like
doesn't happen
that was a nice read, i appreciate it
i yap velocity in words per second?
gigawatts per kilogram per liter
since everything else is word soup i might as well throw my own in there

this HAS to be like a konii throwaway account or soemthing
i am having a really hard time deciding if this is a joke
no their account is 5 and a half years dated already, it cant be a new account
this feels like someone treating an llm as an authority
same
not deciding
im actually begining to think if alcohol may be involved
not even 9 drinks in would get me spewing this, they're a weird type of drunk if it is alcohol
actually let me feed this paper to gemini
it's gonna say it's a joke even if they were serious regardless
ngl, i feel mean for laughing at this. but there really isnt anything else i can respond with
i just find this amusing
gemini is a believer
we're so cooked
agi is gonna be so naive
the problem is that its describing real ai probelms, with a system wehre they dont ocure
the tiniest bit
yes finite context is a problem, but thats handled by ved
just add more context duh
hallucination is a real thing, but its not a syptome
how hard could it be
no i just started reading the parts i skipped and it doesn't make any sense anymore
im not an ai guy so i could believe he does ai research maybe, but this jsut doesnt apply to neuro
an llm talking about an llm feeding off of an llm (?)
some made up math equation that is somewhat grounded in reality isnt gonna do shit
math equations should only get invented when you can actually do the math
not when there is a corelation
making up equations to explain stuff is normal
too bad it makes zero sense
wtf is firmware strength
well kinda.
what they used werent realt hings tho
yap velocity doesnt exist
yap velocity is fucking hilarious
tps maybe
which is just compute/load
load should increase with filled context
i give up this is nonsense
"the best lies are based in reality" or soemthing idk
i should ask shadow what he thinks of the paper
please do
please
i really hope we're just all really really stupid that would be so funny
@stark needle yippee, i shall share the joys of paper on neuro with you
i think its somewhat grounded in reality
slop reading time 
certain parts i dont think apply to neuro, and other parts are incoherent cuz of the gen alpha word usage
i think it's just incoherent
it's the thesis of slop
it looks fine at a glance then you start to pick apart at it
and it just crumbles
yap velocity is literally just filling up the context window 
time to figure out what the firmware strength is
is my backend less strong because there's Rust in it
rust generally degrades the strenght of the metal

firmware strength is only mentioned in the equation so I'm going to replace it with something that might make sense
that is just the context limit 
i interpreted firmware strength as the tolerance to context window being filled or something
idk
Yeah, I can see that
context limit makes sense tho
doesn't make it make sense
I like how I could probably list out why each of these "signs" happen in much greater detail than this paper
i feel like the condesending tone of "lets use gen alpha slang cuz these guys dont know as much as me" is really detrimental to the paper as a whole
that tolerance literally being two metrics. how well a model handles a somewhat full context and ability of the harness to cut the message history out
literally a solved problem
I'd think so at this point
neuro ofcourse is the reason why the ram prices are so high
vedal.ai is buying petabytes of ram for that massive context window
fact, she probably runs on petaby-
yes
exactly
Just for fun, let's go over each of the markers 
nvm i forgot they said this just disregard everything they're just clueless

I did actually notice that message
which is why I was deadset on them being glueless
guys i'm an expert on ai and i think neuro will take over the world and force us to do manual labor to give her all the water
im assuming that s an "ai researcher" their ai does do this, and neuro doesnt
completely without glue
or they're jsut clueless
guys, im an expert on chair. 
my expertise is gamedev but i am on a chair
same thing for them but ai
Marker 1: Filter Erosion (The ”Brat” Phase)
Isn't she just always a brat 
Besides that, checking thoughts is not how LLMs ever have operated. "Thoughts" can't be checked unless it finishes, because LLMs are just autocomplete. 
-# Imagine only thinking there is one filter
guys, chair has the word AI in it.
what if we did chAIr?
a chair, but it has moving wheels, and gemini
"hey google, bring my chair"
chair proceeds to fall downstairs
you can theoretically probe their "thoughts", there was a thing i was fascinated by i don't remember what it's called, but in a nutshell you train a separate nn to associate the state of layers on each token processed with an emotion/behaviour
im slightly delirious cuz sleep, ignore me lmao
also on probing the model as it goes i remember anthropic doing research on such
they were trying to figure out how they actually do math and stuff
answer: in a very non-traditional way
Marker 2: Hallucinatory Compression (The ”Gaslight” Phase)
This is also just a personanity trait our cute overlord has, I don't see a downside here.
Can't remember from the last hour, yeah context limit exists and heavy context windows take more time to process
, so if it is actually an hour we'd be moving into the memory system. Oh, "Synthetic Memories.” I sure wonder what this is referring to.
btw with how llms function you can just straight block certain tokens/sequences
we got filtered because it's 1. more simple 2. more fun
i don't really care about neuro i just find the asspulls fascinating
Marker 3: The Semantic Loop (The ”Filtered” Phase)
[FILTERED]
This is the one that might actually have grounds, but also the filter is handing these more these days. instead of backslashbackslashbackslash.
Speaking in nonsensical syntax (Word Salad). Total unresponsiveness to external prompts. Diagnosis: System Failure. The AI has optimized itself into a corner. A hard reset is required.
I think the author of this is in Marker 3 what do you guys think? 
first of all this doesn't really happen
second, what is even the point they're making? that context filling up contributes to this?
Author in chat 
To be perfectly honest with you, I don't actually watch the streams. The point of this excercise is to try to predict a crash
I'll give you guys a model and then you can roast me if it was right or wrong.
checks out
crashes aren't on the actual ml architechure side
why would they be caused by the state of the model
It's something fundamentally wrong with the whole neuro-audience-vedal model
There's no thermodynamic outlet other than Vedal debugging neuro and adding more firmware
uh

and the rate that vedal can keep up is limited
wwe're back to thermodynamics
thing is there is always more human input in neuro's context
we are so back
be it chat or someone she talks to
Ok, second paper is almost ready

it's not like she's going insane talking to herself the whole way
i might be going insane though if i read the second paper
you know that thermodynamics dont apply to anything digital right?
conservation of energy isnt needed when you can make shit up
Information entropy is a thing.
surely this won't dox me
I will invite you guys to fill in the constants for me.
brooooo 
Hey if it fails at least its good joke material.
I'll let you lead this time @rigid snow
But I stand by my point.
ye i'm not gonna
The randomness in the model has to go somewhere
no it doesnt
valid
It doesn't just magically disaapear.
so guys I have xbox 360 and its model E with bad update
what i'm trying to say is it's always outweighed by entropy
from my understanding you don't remove randomness by moving it to somewhere else
how the fuck make fucking xbox original emulator work
Neuro isn’t devolved because she acts less obediently than other LLMs the fuck is this paper? 
The current vedal architecture is actually somewhat semblant to an AGI
We provide the map; you must walk the territory. If this theory holds, Neuro is not merely ”scuffed”—she is a chaotic dynamical system seeking equilibrium. This would be so hard if it wasn't in this fricking paper
if you stop and think about it for a min
i just want to play some max payne 1
The. whole chat, vedal and neuro is somwhat like a slow moving AGI
an og xbox emulator? you get a bios and you put it somewhere
at vedal we found agi, it was you all along
It's just that it's running on biological firmware.
like with most console emulators
(modern consoles)
ps2 is same, wii is the same too i think
hardware*
you can get console bios images off of internet archive btw
there is the thing this variant of jailbreak cant access nand and other parts of system
I'm glad to be able to read fast so I don't have to read this paper for long
im glad its only 2 pages
anyone want a NDI(5) steam to their PC?
which emulator are you using, like what platform
afaik og xbox emulation is just qemu
What in the
did I walk into?
;

@warped narwhal
noooooo
also this one
we are discussing ai generated paper by the man, the myth, the legemd, muipiba.
a guy who has made more papers on neuro than he has watched streams
dont admit to it lmao
I am using Xbox 360 E with badupdate which is pretty new and only was discovered in may 2025
"paper" is really fitting because each paper can be printed on a singular sheet of paper if you use double sided
how is this experimental? we're just a group of programmers reviewing your paper like its a new skittles flavour
oh on a 360, then no clue

it would probably be a better experiment if you, you know, experimented on a system similair to neuro

this doesnt count
need to develop one first 
this is #programming
we are people here
most of us at least
some are televisions
We are?
you're a semicolon
some are printable characters
I'm a punctuation mark idk about you guys
We got one right here, 
The point is that the collapse of neuro can (hopefully) be prediced through chat.
Dead
o7

If we do indeed verify this, then we can potentially unify information and physics thermodynamics.
there isn't a collapse bru
and isn't going to be
Full colon didn't survive the keyboard wars, and was caught in the crossfire in the battle of ANSI v iso
Isn't there the whole someone tell vedal there's something wrong with my model or smth
serious: is this what ai psychosis looks like
When I'm talking about a collapse, this is what I was talking about.
It's literally just a hypothesis!
Not cyberpsychosis.
no ai psychosis is what a human experiences
Nope, definitely not
not into it enough to know, maybe shadow might know 
there s nothing physics about this.
this has nothing to do with physics
computers use energy to compute things, the bits and such themselves dont actually hold that much energy tho.
to the point that an ai themself is a negligable amount of energy
when they convince chatgpt to convince them
Yes. The thing is that I'm saying that information can hold entropy just like physical particals can.
holy fuck 
wtf is this convo lmao
slop
arg thread over here https://discord.com/channels/574720535888396288/1288144271823601744 they'll appreciate your knowledge i'm sure
Entropy is the universe's tendency toward disorder
information jsut describes the current state of the world
especially when its digital, information cant really "hold entropy"
its literally a 1 or a 0
it can tho
the thing with information holding entropy is entirely correct it's just the thermodynamics part
that's
questionable let's call it
ok sure a random bitflip can make for some entropy
Just slightly dubious
Information theory entropy is different from physics entropy
ye
well were we not talking about physics?
We seem to be on the same page, except for the source of where this came from
im so confused rn
.
they are talking about information entropy
they're just trying to project physics concepts onto it
is information entropy unpredictableness in the data?
kinda yeah
yes
the hypothesis is that entropy can propogate in AI systems the same way thermodynamic systems can.
There's an easy test that might be actionable with low cost.
When neuro reaches stage 3, get chat to stop spamming things.
impossible
and allow neuro to "cool off"
you're asking us to move a mountain here
oh i didn’t even think of it this way
you know how they say llms aren’t deterministic? they are literally fed noise constantly. entropy is constantly injected
??? this is not what you’re saying
Ok, there's a part 3 to the whole thing.
i thought what we were discussing was moving entropy out of the llm?
i know that it gets fed nosie
-# The first paper claimed the noise was chat itself, instead idk random value 

but thats by design
ye thank you
with enough entropy, pockets of structure will emerge, which is why its so prohibitively expensive to train llms.
might be a little too far ahead, but let's focus on the central topic. In my second paper that I whisked up in 20 seconds
chat im calling it a night here.
ive been confussed, deluded, and mogged on by bringing physics to an information fight

we might be able to predict when neuro needs maintenence.
he just presses the reset button
Have a good night, I'm also clocking out of this
That is handled already by the following code:
if neuro.is_being_schizo()
{
neuro.restart()
}
That's another way to do the trick.
he literally like 2 days ago said he doesn’t have one and because of that hasn’t ever pressed it
the context for that was memories tho
(resetting context specifically)
i mean resseting neuro like how he "spawns a new clone"
that’s just the unity frontend he restarts no
,
he restarts teh frontend which doesn't wipe context anymore but it used to so it probably restarts a bit more than just the rendered
but at least some of the llm'
s system stuff
he had to specifically set it up to save context and restore it tho so it must at least wipe context by default
but only like recent context obv
not memories
i would imagine it's easier to deal with the whole multiple contexts and swapping them around when done this way for some reason or another (assuming that's what happens which is just my guesserino still i think)
chat/game/voice interactions being blasted into context and determining what to give her + when based on current state, intent etc probably easier to do if handling all of that in the frontend than elsewhere
latency 
he can kinda bring that back just inject “you have been restarted” in the context
or similar
im guessing she is given that somewhere somehow probably optionally
part of her seeming so coherently like she has a continuous train of thought and intent to her actions is being given info about herself including stuff like that i think as a sort of brute force way of giving her seemingly ongoing goals and whatnot even tho she would just forget them once they fall out of context normally without it
probably dont need to be if the way the context is being managed is robust enough
i assumed they are rag’d in
theyll jsut get blasted into it w/ rag like you just said yeah
something of the sort
just in general i’m surprised it works at all after coming to a realization how poorly llms handle large quantities of tools available
that's the secret sauce really is how well it's managed
fuckin discord dms soundboard
and seamlessly
i could see using another (smaller) model to provide a grounding effect where it's much more railroaded and controlled by the system and is just there to constantly yap like it's an inner monologue + handle recall and giving the correct tools but ONLY the correct tools
i dont agree w/ 7b, i think she's 20-30b
yeah that’s way more believable
she seems at least as coherent as like a mistral small or a 30b of your choosing
a lot of it is just being railroaded with tight context management i think tho, she doesnt have to deal with 128k+ context lengths if she's being given more of a summary and suggestion style context from the system itself whether that be another model or more programmatic injection of current state + previous actions or w/e she may need at the time
even way, way larger ones
i mean gemini 2.5 pro was dogshit at tool use
claude is surprising if it's bad at that, it's what i would consider the best at agentic anything really
or at least the most consistent
throw like 5 mcp servers in and it all falls apart
that’s what they’re fixing
not even 5, 5 is a lot already
interesting, i've given agents like 10+ mcp before and usually they were kinda fine at it
ig it depends on if you poop out like 1382791823791827398 tokens of instructions in the system prompt or more of a shortlist
also tool definitions pollute the context like crazy
they are very token inefficient
oh and they added examples now
yeah that's what i was just saying i think if you avoid doing that but only say like hey here's a tool, let them infer the usage of that tool literally from the name, and then if it wants to use said tool, then give more info, probably more effective than one of those 40k token system prompts
what if
install roo code or similar and then look at the system prompt, it's insanity lol
yes
go click the custom system prompt or edit button i havent looked in a long time
but it'll show you the full prompt
i don't see the full system prompt anywhere
it's at least 40k characters
id have to install it again to see it
one sec
the default for the one i just installed
fuckin have a whole cloud thing now wtf
anyways
this is plan mode i think
and this is with nothing else enabled or w/e, it adds to it if you start enabling shit
You are STRICTLY FORBIDDEN from starting your messages with "Great", "Certainly", "Okay", "Sure".
kekw
they still ignore the fuck out of that i'm sure
here's default barebones code mode
i almost shit my pants when i saw this said my system dir and such but i forgor i never put my name into windows (i'm on my laptop which is my one(1) windows machine right now lule)
it's mode specific after USER'S CUSTOM INSTRUCTIONS
it changes the beginning too
ye
basically theyre similar sizes and if you have a bunch of MCP installed i think it will include definitions and stuff
isn't claude's default system prompt like 40k tokens or something
im pretty sure it's long as hell
16,739 words long and 110 KB in size
kek
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.00861 their rationale for the system prompt is kinda in this paper, at least how they saw it in 2021 anyways
pliny the liberator has dummy long ones
it says "system prompts" but it's one prompt
i guess cuz it's really multiple jammed together so it can be dynamic
jailbreak prompts are generally s00per long because the models get confounded on extra long context
yeah i mean the long ass prompt works at the start anyways because usually depending on the model nowadays theyre fine well past 100k context
i havent used gemini in an ide or anything yet, i wonder how it does with tools compared to 2.5, 2.5 sucked major eggs on any and all tool use
gemini 3 that is
this is for convex's vibecoding thing btw, so it makes sense it's this long, they have to explain how convex even works
yeah i looked it up, seemed interesting
i wonder what the prompt for like stitch looks like (google's figma generator thing)
i havent really used any of the turbo vibecode tools, i probably should at least once for funzies just to see exactly where they stand now, i always assumed theyd just be frustrating. Never even tried like replit which has been around forever
by that i mean the ones that it's liek ok you provide one prompt and we will ensloppify the entire thing end to end
i only used for demo purposes yeah
even like roo ended up just being TOO independent and wanting to do way too much after the initial "whoa" fell off
chef by far most impressive one
interesting
how does it compare to like firebase studio, i have used that i guess which i suppose is the one i have actually tried
yeah it does looking more at chef
https://stitch.withgoogle.com this one is fun for like layout designs since it'll give you figma stuff
oh cool this one will export to ai studio now too
not chef but stitch
if you generate one you can just export it and then it'll fill this in lamo
i'm actually curious how shit the result would be
surprisingly ok
don't like this screen though
it reminds me of photobucket
which isnt a good thing lule
you can have it redo or modify at will
oh shit this is like actual agent stuff
idk what i expected
ok dude
lol
yeah i sent it to ai studio and it's going berserk rn (im braindead ad used my real name here so i blocked it lul)
NOOOOOOOO
THE FUCKING GRADIENT
KILL ME
oh yeah they LOVE gradients in every icon
it's THE gradient
this is indeed functional (preview) idk about the choice to have the month/year overlap when you scroll tho
your fav screen ofc
could not find any more convincing proof of such phenomenon
not same gradient but you get the idea
the model just has pride
..in what
it's secure in itself
that was the world's fastest reply btw
i know what you're referring to and yes that is what i was referring to as well (im wearing a pride shirt rn actually which is why i thought about it lmao)
surprisingly no gradients really on this ai studio output unless there's a slight graident on the upload button but i can't tell
people who have a clue on how uis should work finetuned it i assume
or rather look in this case not work
is it just overtrained on tailwind
now im self conscious about literally every gradient ive ever used in anything
you would think, but "base model" uis are god awful
just a tasteless assumption of what's pretty to an average joe
i dunno if i want to know what a whole entire ui hallucinated up would look like, although i have noticed if i give up on something and let them yolo something i will end up with a giant albatross of a design choice that ruins my life for decades to come
mmm they provide non-framework components nice
i usually rawdog html//css and hate myself for it
doesn't fix the ux issues but newer models are ok at it and at least they're comfortable with it and won't make "creative" decisions
they have always jumped directly to like tailwind if you leave it up to them i think for me
and then they are fucking terrible at tailwind because they cant distinguish tailwind 4 vs 3 conventions like at all
I like the BEM method for CSS but I'm a bit old school
Tailwind I just end up using prebuilt stuff in daisyui for personal projects
Too lazy to just connect the controls when there's a multi-GPU dropdown right there
i cant believe how not angry linus was on ltt
nvidia is the reason my laptop is running windows atm because of some weird ass nvidia bullshit that made me mad enough that i wiped the thing and put windows back on it just so i didnt have to fight with it every single time i used the goddamn thing
Funny stuff
Why nvidia-smi rather than CUDA API calls?
This is just gonna run when I unlock my computer
lact cryin in the corner
Lact is kinda scuffed
Just connecting it to the GPU makes it run at a way lower clock speed immediately
Just realize I could make that a lot simpler by using nvidia-smi --query-gpu uuid,name,power.limit --format=nounits,noheader instead of parsing a bunch of junk
I guess I woke up to one of the most interesting announcements in the AI coding world today
(Linux Foundation through Agentic AI Foundation now manages MCP and AGENTS.md)
wut
i saw a video clip thing abotu this and i was like ??? but forgot to look further
That being said I wonder if an AI (or forgetful human) wrote Anthropic's blog post considering the Linux Foundation hyperlink doesn't actually link anywhere and so clicking on it is useless
claude would never
oh I didn't know claude for excel was a thing
vibecoding my statistics AINTNEURWAY
last time i tried to get gemini in google sheets to do anything it was turbo bad
but this was back i think before 2.5 pro even
Yea my 4070Ti goes from like 19xx MHz to something around 16xx MHz
anthropic decided they didnt want MCP anymore now that A2A and ACP are more around
wtf are those
i would imagine this is just lact enforcing some profile
Well I don't know how I would make it not do that
oh is a2a just a protocol for yapping between agents or smth
iono
GPU configuration tools on Linux are so scuffed
they really are
it's weird because i always kinda figured with everything else being the way it is, before i switched, that linux surely should have better tools for that than windows
but not even close
just lack of community investment and need/want i guess
so I just looked it up, mcp is just for agent-to-tool capabilities whereas the other two were more focused on agent-to-agent capabilities
i was meming
but yeah that is right
you can kinda do the same shit with any of them but the other 2 are much more focused on agentic silliness
I mean honestly if all of those were donated to the AAIF (and maybe merging A2A and ACP) it would be better
there should be a open standard to connect to multiple models cross-platform that stays as vendor-neutral as possible as well
oh
lol
well i stand corrected
so they all are under linux foundation now
that's crazy
new dark horse in the AI sphere appears: fucking linux foundation of all things
when linux IPO
Yeah, albeit I think right now the Linux Foundation directly manages ACP/A2A as opposed to throwing it into AAIF
mainly because AAIF was literally just formed
According to
it was up to the vendors
Not sure who to trust
I don't know, ask 
i will consult the duck
I feel like ACP being used for one-way model delegation and A2A being two-way model communication aren't big distinguishing factors
so the fact they merged isn't surprising to me
yeah ive never been able to truly figure out why they had to be separate things
that's why i said theyre kinda the same shit
what's more surprising is the Linux Foundation actually taking an interesting in AI stuff
makes sense with the prevalence of linux in training and just ML in general
wonder what linus' feelings on this are lol
true
I don't think linus cares if it's the foundation doing it
i just wanna see someone ask him why he personally now controls MCP/ACP/A2A and see how he wishes death upon them
in the recent github interview though he did say to the interviewer "are you going to say the AI word" which makes me think he's kinda tired of this bs
he seems to keep off pretty much all socials
except email
according to the ltt video lol
his social media contact is the LKML

im impatient
Well have fun
And totally report the results back to here
as soon as apple documents anything
so never
yep
damn it
if its not a thing by sep. 2027 im screwed
they're gonna stop rollign security patches to sonoma next year
and sequoia goes next in 2027
and i fucking hate tahoe
didnt asahi's main dev quit as fuck
yes
welp
do you think two years is enough
something else that I learned is that github does reaction videos to their own content
back to the good ol XNU world for your mac in circa 2027
but like..
its sillicon
lmao that sounds interesting actually
asahi is the only other os that can run on apple silicon other than macos
yeah but it's apple's sillycon
apple involved = rip open anything working with any support from apple and often at all
the best part is that their shit is based on the obviously supported arm base and they still managed to document so little and fucked with the uncore so much it's impossible to get it working
their head of silicon is like leaving apple asap isnt he
to convince them
maybe he'll leak
to nag their father
to convince other employees
to convince most of the company
to
document
their
god
damn
fucking
platform
aw Johny Srouji isn't leaving actually that was apparently just a rumour according to him
but also who knows
ANYTHING but macos 26
just go ahead and email Johny Srouji
i dont want to loose the launchpad
yeah surprised A2A/ACP aren't a founding project as well
and also liquid glass is terrible
i cant spell
disgust
i dont want to buy a new laptop
mine was like
3000
dollars
insanely pricey
sell it to some apple dingus who will buy it for $3000 in 7 years anyways because they dont know better
people pay ridiculously inflated money for like 10 year old macbook pros and think they just got a huge deal
because average apple enjoyer awareness level
that said, even macos 26 is better than windows
i just hate windows a ton
the one thing you do actually get is pretty good peace of mind
macos is incredibly stable
it has to be because have you ever seen a macos user troubleshoot anything
i get crashes like
once in five months
last crash was from opening obs
which randomly triggered a kernel panic
happened like
september i think?
average nix + obs moment
in all seriousness macOS tahoe isn't that bad
i just use the launchpad quite a lot
so
it's really annoying to need a third party replacement for it
since they removed it in tahoe
i have never seen a person who actually mains macos, and isn't a literal active mac dev already, successfully troubleshoot anything
I main macos
i literally like never need to troubleshoot tho
im not joking
the last time i had an issue was with a 7 year old intel mac which had some kinda issue with its keyboard
it spammed the z key
i could believe that, the reason i was going to cite is a total lack of experience in it
and the a key types z's and a's
sometimes the a key failed
i tried reinstalling macos
didnt help
in the end i installed karabind elements
or whatever
unbound the z key
was the keyboard fine lol
fixed it mostly
like did you try the keyboard on another system
but by then I was already using a different laptop
i see
sounds like about the average best case macOS fix to an issue tbh
it would go away for long periods of time
then reappear
then vanish again like 4 days later
thats
reinstall entire system and then disable a letter of the keyboard and live with it anyways
most of the apple ecosystem issues i see people having are iOS related
did they hurry up and merge them more yet
one of the main reasons I like macs is because they just work, no questions asked
never need to bother with drivers and whatnot
updates aren't forced
most things are available on mac nowdays
and I can just use wine if something isnt
it's easy to not have any drivers needed when your system is meant to run on a set of very specific configurations and those configurations only
i cant remember the last time i manually installed a driver on linux or windows though, except nvidia drivers on linux
my dad had a macbook pro for a while and every time i used it, it was fast, lasted a long time, stable etc
because I have never once touched linux, surprisingly
it was just so boring tho
wym
battery life was the most exciting part of it
there was no feature that wowed at all
ah yes the myth of amazing battery life
better than wandows is all it needs to be
like 4 hours at most
not 24h like they advertise
lol
when my laptop was new I watched it stay at like 99% for literally like 20 minutes straight
honestly in college the folks that had macbooks had pretty goddamn good battery life, theyd last through all classes without a charge and stuff, but this was like 2015
then 98% for like 18
but yes anything isn't going to live up to a claim like 24hr battery life generally because most of those claims are like
yep
it's genuinely not a bad choice for a laptop
they werent on the damn thing but to take notes
it'll absolutely last a while
great battery life since you'll just be using chrome or whatever
right
portable
very low impact
yeah i mean i would not mind a mbp hardwarewise at all to roll around with
i would put linux on it though, but i also would be buying an x86 one probably
the speakers might be an underrated part
no one talks about the fact that macs randomly have insanely nice speakers for like no reason
because insanely nice speakers in the context of a laptop are still laptop speakers end of the day
polish a turd
it's still a turd
you now have it all over yourself tho
i mean
for a laptop speaker it's really good
doesn't beat an actual stereo system
or a proper headset though
but you can get a headset for less than $999
so that's an important thing to look at
rright but that's the issue is what im saying, nobody talks about a really good laptop speaker because it's still a laptop speaker so it's never gonna be good enoguh to be worth talking about unless it's so good it's eclipsing real setups which it never will by nature
how are iphone speakers these days
when it comes down to it macbooks are very nice and you do get a premium feeling product
...for literal thousands...
i think they're decent
phone speakers are interesting
more interesting than laptops anyways
the sound some of them manage to produce is kinda crazy
dont want a phone either
aren't they busy trying to merge ios and macos
no
i havent heard a thing abt that
they made ipad os a bit more like macos
thats all
ios didnt get that
just ipad os
oh you are right
nrrrr
idk i barely pay attention to anything applesphere except what i catch as it flies by me
although i do greatly wish their sillycon was more documented and able to run other things
because i'd love to run an m5
in a laptop
but that'll be like
2067
at least we got rosetta
would be worse if you couldn't run things with an x86 architecture
apple should make a fork of wine ngl

mayo




