#programming
1 messages · Page 294 of 1
surprising
if i go on their site i still see i5, i7, and i9 for all their chips
which just makes them seem old
elvyn had fun (definitely
) working as my consultant lmfao
yeah, so if they're still around and very common, they aren't old? 
huh, i personally don't view it that way
and this is the first time i seen someone view i naming scheme "look old"

again they associate the chip itself with the names i5, i7, and i9
they dont know that there are differences in the generations
if anything their new naming scheme is much less known
the i5 still looks like a decade old if ur not tech literate
at the same time, they don't care and think that i7/i9 will always be better no matter what
they should put years on the naming scheme
so u know its actually a newer generation
we already have that...
its called as
the sku model number
its always displayed everywhere
just that
the average consumer wont know that
this seems correct to me (since Intel markets the "tier" of the CPU very heavily, AMD does this too but to a much lesser degree)
they only had one thing in mind
outside of big tech
"i7/i9 is better"
exactly
thats my point though
anyone who has been gaming for years wont want to "buy another i7"
except for the "look old" part because that's practically never happened to any of my client...
they will look for a bigger number
actually i need @umbral thorn to confirm that 
but i consulted at least 3/5 of all the people
still pretty much a hundred and more
I don't think people see i3s and i5s as "old"
just "worse" (which is different but results in effectively the same thing)
yeah
exactly that
fun little fact, i3 is somewhat pretty good for 4K GPU intense gaming
i see them as old tbh
mostly because i pull them out of old computers all the time
though not as old as a duo
the thing is that if people saw them old, wouldn't that mean that people would at least understand the generation segments since back then 
i felt comforbable with their "iX + number" namings
yeah core ultra naming is shit
so i3-5-7-9 is like general grade
then number shows generation
if they throw a new number on the iX then market that i can see them having a comeback
the i9 has bad rep
so when i bought i3 10100 i knew its i3 but its current most modern generation
have you seen XE lineups
no
i9 10980XE as example
this is basically intel version of threadripper btw
threadripper is a more recognizable name tbh
amd like
i9 10980XE has like 18 cores
and the fact they still have i9 slapped onto it
guess which one is which
intels big issue is marketing rn
and not having a big enough release for people to really notice them
yeah mostly corpos
ur average gaming pc builder is gonna use AMD though now
its been like that for a while
they still make profit well btw, just that the people that knows intel is bad is usually the loud ones.
and uh
market stock shit
its more just people stopped looking at them
they arent considered as often by ur average user
oh I WISH my clients are THAT smart at least
AMD is being talked about more
again they need something to bring them back
zen 2 zen 4 both have 7000
i see 7000 something and i think
is it from 2025 or 2005
im all for competition in any industry
epyc is datacenter/enterprise
their laptop CPU names are stupid
otherwise it's pretty sane tbh
can't really confuse the Epycs with the normal consumer CPUs
(and within the Epyc lineup the naming scheme is sane, just different)
ditch the "their"
a lot of things i see say amd is around 30% marketshare, so intel is still leading in total. not sure what percentage of that is desktop or enterprise tho

their laptop CPU naming is straight up lunatic and you can NEVER change my mind about it.
i think that was mostly enterprise
likely enterprise through work laptops
APUs aren't relevant either
companies love to overspend
I'd like some help with this task. To summarize it — I'm given an 8x8 grid in U3.txt that contains the following: 0 — empty space, K — King, Z — Knight, U — occupied space. I need to write a code, to make the knight capture the king and then return to his starting space, while avoiding U spaces, in few moves as possible. Result is show in Rezultatas
shiro's been busy iirc so probably
so knight can go +2x +1y or +2x -1y
somethhing something
yep
technically the deadline was a while ago
but it seems that the form is still open 
may not be counted though since the extra time is an advantage
i just mentioned it because i saw some chess related exercise 
10 reps of moving ur pawn
@rough bloom 7940HS vs 7940HX
do you know what's the difference

second one probably has like triple the tdp right
no
I don't know or care about either of those

same exact number model

"want i9"

meanwhile Intel
"for gaming"
they all suck 
"best cpu"
intel is arguably even worse cause they have a hundred skus of the same embedded processor too 
me when i9 9990
intel's objectively worse
they do a similar thing to AMD where their naming convention technically (with some exceptions) makes sense
like, if you know that the -H suffix is anything high-performance and -U is for shitty office laptops then everything is fine
but just use the same convention as desktop CPUs, why make them look similar but be completely different 
Core Ultra X9 388V
vs
Core Ultra 5 125H
guess what, BOTH has 4 p cores AND 8 e cores. just that 125H has 2 lp cores and 388V has 4 lp cores
we're going backwards woohoo
wtf is "X9" 
i don't fucking know
i remember when amd changed their naming scheme they handed out this weird contraption to decipher them

i want that
there's so many skus you need for mobile chips so it kind of makes sense, unless you want to go the monitor model number route 
the trap of alibaba
why do they want so many skus though 😭
OLED monitor users:
Which of these 27" monitors would you recommend?
AOC Agon 240hz about 530USD where I live.
Philips Evnia 360Hz Also ~530USD.
Get into the world of E-Sports and become the next legend with the AGON PRO AG276QZD2 27-inch class OLED gaming monitor, equipped with all the features you need to claim victory as the next legend. Its QHD 2460x1440 resolution, OLED display panel offers superb picture quality and sharp imagery to...
I guess?
should still do something to better differentiate them from desktop CPUs (and at least have it be consistent...)
many different laptops with many different requirements
huge market
I think so?
ye makes sense
like what
if you don't do AI you don't exist 
major scientific simulations
philips has better colour coverage and higher refresh, more ports, seems slightly newer, have crappy speakers
especially physics related
both have speakers*
not AI
the B300 is an "AI factory"
no other use cases allowed

are you locked on that one $300 us seems steep to me
i think that's about 530 aud right
what's the name of the intel accelerator again
erm
where i'm at these go for 800aud, cheapest 240 / 360hz OLEDs on the market rn
Got Gemini 3 Pro preview access in Gemin CLI
was unironic wild gueess i guess ill look it up
he did state its usd
i was p close
530 usd
oh
5000 SEK* i just converted to dollars
he said in usd
im dum
i see what you mean now
but also
530 usd is even steeper
I wanted to see if they have a different series for general HPC workloads now, but
HPC
yeah nah
abandoned
yeah, it doesn't seem like that crazy of a discount on them. About 15% off MSRP i think
gone
reduced to
idk
✅ we have a model for that now
WeatherNext
also "more gpu better" ahh comparison
I know that one
no need for accurate simulation 
just pure
blackbox uncertainty/probabilistic
computation
now
at this point
just API call chatgpt everytime the GPU wanted to solve a SIMD task
"chatgpt what is [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754] times [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754] plus [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754] [insert IEEE 754]"
finally access 
I mean they are turing complete 
:HOLY:
ive looked at a few and the philips is holdiing up pretty well
until they spew hallucinations
Is that local hardware?
if he has that local that's crazy
It's got really chonky bezels, kinda eww 
That's why you use majority voting on your OpenAI API powered computer 
My thoughts exactly lmao
Okay that's still mental
Where's my campus 480GB vram AI server
renting b200s and stuff is fun because if you mess something up it costs you large dollars in real time
i wish i had free access
can be yours for the small sum of $40k or however much it costs 
i should just take out a personal loan real quick and ruin my life
i just paid my research server instalments i don't have 40K to spare 

do we have 401K in europe? 
pensions might be still a thing there idk
some places here do
a very small amount now
unless ur in gubbermint work or high up
However, there are two other ways to save for your retirement:
Pension saving plans ("pensioensparen" or "épargne-pension"). This is a way to save for your pension outside of your employer, and it comes with a tax break. There are limitations though, as we'll see later.
Investing in accumulating stock ETFs. This has benefits in Belgium as you are only taxed 10% on capital gains. There are several ways to do this.
we love investing i guess
i forgot how ancient the software in ubuntu is 
then why do they say ther eis no equivalent?
24.04 yeah
hallucination i guess
Investments are made post-tax ah i see
401k is before tax
ye
so you dont pay tax prior to the investment
i think a 401K is better technically?
it looks like it might work out to be similarish but depending on the amounts you can put in i guess and how much those rates of tax actually are
like what is "low" annual limit lmao
about 2.5K
30% tax reduction at that amount
oh gdi i forget cant talk about retirment investments because of the abbreviation of murican ones

anyways for the non employer plans it's a max of 70k put in per year including the employer match
and the roth/traditional "individual retirement account" have a combined contribution limit of 7000 or 8000, if you're trying to catch up to the max you wouldve contributed if you had done the max every year
traditional you pay tax now
but then none when you pull it out
roth you pay tax when you pull it out
err
other way around
lol
dont come to me for retirement advise folks
but yeah the limits are high i guess idk how much i actually put in other than it's 10% and my employer matches that
and then the world will end and it'll not matter
taxes 
i know right

me when the gubbermint takes me money
meow
i love copying all my project dependencies via scp because the server has no access to the outside world 
So.. funny little thing.. i remade that little vector class thingy i had before i accidentally nuked my previous windows install..
And i also made a little driver based Key-Value store.
And this is a practical example of those 2 things working together
the reason why i had to do window.location.reload() is because of some silly bug i introduced by working around restrictions Svelte and/or vite introduced with the way one of them handles CSS
the only features missing from this Vec implementation (because i copied a slightly older version i send the code of in this chat a while ago) is the alphabet overflow prevention (by letting it overflow into a new char that gets added before the current one) and the ability to pre-set the type of vector it needs to be
(xy, xyz, xyzw, etc.)
also these being so far that i already functionally made them the fIdx variant and made them unsafe since well.. you're setting them by their index.. but not as far that i added the Idx suffix to them and their non Idx counterparts not being implemented yet
is this typescr*pt
i may have forgotten something about SIMD 
@silent cloak an "i9" btw
5 GHz, but look at that power draw
even though its "idle", its still running my basic browsing and discord task at that wattage
how come intel's laptop CPUs do worse than this...
Yeah.. i basically do dev on most thing (web, embedded, desktop, mobile, etc.).
TS is just really readable for me so if i work on something i would wanna end up using on multiple platforms then i write the initial version in TS since it is easier for my brain to port TS code to like any other language

does intel have any arm64 chips
arm efficiency is misleading anyway
i know they both have their pros and cons depending on usage
less of actually being the "generally faster/more efficient pipeline" and more of its apple taking all the smallest process node, built whole ecosystem based on their arm implementation pipeline, and practically get away with lower clocks and hence lower overall voltage and current for still snappy performance
and x86 are generally being tortured to its limit because why not 
i've made a whole rant about the misleading conceptions about x86 vs arm
and chip efficiency isn't an absolute measurement either
when you can always tune voltage curve and limits
(its highly non linear, that's why)
u see arm more in embedded and mobile systems
u get more out of the wattage but its not over the top performance
so embedded and mobile systems are designed accordingly to such pipeline
buuuuuuuut
my 13900 es would beg to differ here 
im practically running it on M chip level of idle power draw for basic tasks like browsing, youtube and discord
i think both architectures are gonna be around for a while given their uses in their own areas
unless we get a best of both worlds situation
both won't be gone
everytime people say "x86 will die" just never worked on computer systems ig
a hybrid would be nice
but also a pain in the ass to implement
so I/O need to be standardized
im thankful everyday to compiler developers
instruction decoding aswell
especially anytime i have to write SIMD manually
dont get me wrong compilers do a good job but sometimes they dont do what i need to depending on the configuration / compiler being used
then i have to pull out SIMD myself
especially a lot of recent rendering engine work ive been doing
some of my friend got so sceptical when they saw my i9 running at such low wattage they think its an M chip renamed with bunch of custom hardware lmao
lmao
thats because the i9 was famous for its initial release with the high ass wattage
thats because vendors were so used to having to clock them a ton
and intel provided their recommended settings when they should of called them "required"
so it wasnt pulling in 250+ lmao
mind you
im doing the "i9 being as efficient as M chips" on an engineering sample aswell
so i now implemented the label based operations
this is getting worse 😭
to how intel managed their shit
like
i don't even ask for a chip to be drawing below 10W
tbh im thankful that most of my low level work is just GPU related
or assembly level instructions for CPU
i dont think i could truly get into the hardware level
im just asking them to tune the damn curve so their chips doesn't pull 400W unnecessarily
its their built in chip self destruct system
imagine Intel instead of AMD L
i was so pissed when they did this
i had to
manually do some microcode shit
to do overclock on my es
7.9GHz though
im ngl
im tempted
to delid this thing
do liquid metal contact on full copper fin container
then LN2
to hit 8.8GHz
i figured that heat density is my bottleneck rn
some guy recently did the air conditioner/fridge thing and hit some crazy speed on maybe an amd chip cant remember
this chip CAN def push more at 1.65v
@fast pagoda i blame you for the label based set methods only working half the time
it was this guy getting https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/overclocking/gpu-overclocker-uses-car-coolant-and-pond-pump-to-cool-intel-arc-b580-achieves-17c-temperature-16-percent-performance-uplift-and-gpu-benchmark-record his b580 to -17c with antifreeze circulating with a pond pump that i was thinking of lmao
not cold enough for anything too wild
very cold though considering
it's probably my fault you are correct
iirc at -235C quantum shit happens and can kill your chip randomly
Svelte probably either dislikes the idxMap method or the findMap function
you cant get that cold with ln2 anyways lol
it's like -196
unless it's majorly changed most chips get pretty likely to cold bug towards -150
quantum shit is actually more likely to happen the hotter it gets... quantum computers usually are made that cold to reduce quantum noise
does liquid helium get that cold
it should
that is both not how it works and not even relevant
Oh it does, -268
The fuck you mean? i went to school for this shit
cool

we actually know absolute zero (aka -273.15C) specifically because we can't get helium any colder
im not talking about the influence of quantum noise to a device specifically ran on quantum mechanics
im talking about straight physical quantum effects on non quantum devices
well before anything -200 or bellow our poor magic rocks cant handle it without bugging out anyways
its irrelevant because quantum noise affects the state of a supposedly devices running on quantum mechanics
but is NOT the issue with altering physical properties of electrical components to the point of damaging it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtXM71tw5fk der8auer using liquid helium
Follow der8auer:
https://www.instagram.com/der8auer/
Support me on patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/der8auer
while back
Quantum chips and non quantum chips are made out of the same stuff.. anything that applies to quantum CPUs in terms of "quantum shit" happening also applies to non quantum CPUs
Brother... you're the one that made that claim

something that alters quantum state VS something that straight up alter something physically to damage it
different things
one is best to work at extreme low temps
the other... will break
THEY'RE MADE OUT OF THE SAME STUFF
JUST DON'T DROP YOUR CHIPS IF THEY COLD AND THEY BE FINE
and im talking about how the 2 alteration are straight up different?
also no
even though quantum computers are silicon, its usually only silicon with phosphorus
you get more complicated variants on classical computing
Oh my fucking god
how the fuck would you drop your chip when its anchored to a whole system for extreme overclocking
do you even do your own research?
yes, im one of those unfortunate people
who had an affected chip
due to shit happening at -235C
and im not alone
had other overclocking friends experiencing the same shit
for what are you even trying to get your chips to go that low lmao
minimizing the effects on heat density?

but getting it under -235C are usually accidents lol
i could imagine the tiny copper wires failing at those temps tho.. but i refuse to believe your silicon broke
or alternatively you somehow got the silicon to oscillate at it's natural frequency
as i said again
quantum effects on physical properties and quantum noise on qubit state alterations are TWO different things
its a separate phenomenon
actually.. no.. they're two different observations on the same thing
qubits needs -270C to maintain coherence
anything between -220 and -273.15 actually.. but usually they run at around -270 yeh
one of my overclocking friend suggested might not even be entirely quantum shit
could also be
semiconductor dopants freezing out
that's quite literally what i am trying to say the whole time -_-
we ruled out physical temperature stress because usually we had a method to drastically lowers the rate of change
do you want my honest opinion on what i think it could be?
its pretty odd though that dopants freezing is usually temporary
people called it "cold bug"
but in my case
and some other peoples
its straight up dead chip
or dead core
dunno what the fuck happened
i still think it's the copper wires
.
silicon just isn't supposed to react to temperature like that
you sure?
very sure
if you're arguing about non quantum effects
mhm
you can only argue about dopants freezing out
because that's what literally would happen below -160C
copper contraction can happen
but on such scale it wouldn't mattered much
in fact being a really good conductor just makes it less likely its the copper
copper isn't a weak metal...
and how the copper wires are practically just a few atoms wide inside of chips like CPUs and stuff right?
and it doesn't apply in such tiny strands of scale
have you seen how its wired aswell
its array like, with poles connecting process nodes
Brother... how in the fuck doesn't it apply?
its not few atoms wide
its still few hundreds to tend thousands atoms wide
have you legit seen how its wired
and being that thin also makes contraction doesn't really matter.
which compared to copper wires you can see without any magnifier is still a few
and that's what makes it less matter lol
being that thin actually makes it matter way more...
no
yes
being less in size makes less change in contraction
you're looking it in a way that "it looks fragile"
less in size also means that there is less contraction needed for the wire to fully break.. since there are less atoms to rearrange themselves
So it is better in reality
um, do you even know how temperature based contraction work
uhh yeah? if my uni professor doesn't lie to me i think i am pretty sure about how it works
widens the gaps between atoms
which just means, there's even less likely a rearrangement to happen the smaller it is
also
I discovered something interesting: Kimi-K2-thinking q2 generates better results locally than the same model via OpenRouter... It seems that some OpenRouter providers aren't using Kimi, while claiming it's a Kimi model.. otherwise, I can't explain it. The Validation Error Rate is higher via OpenRouter.
cold doesn't make it expand, cold makes it contract into denser lines
which is just few hundred nanometers of scale, it just does it pretty fine
also
these coppers are encased in layers of other materials
why is unity
Okay so tell me one thing really quick... do you have any qualifications and stuff in this specific field of science?
logically if it were to contract and reexpanded, there's no oxygen to form oxidized layer, it'll just fuse back when slightly heated up again
had connections with people in the field of semiconductor litography, even had access to one of the basic UV litography machine as a demonstration
and i work specifically on sample qualification on some engineering sample chips so doing all the niche shit is my suit
hmmm okay, so then you probably do kinda know what you are talking about
there's a reason
why extreme overclockers that had done -230C before
always said things like dopants freezings
and called it cold bug
and not something to do with coppers
i might have to like ask my professor if he knows how metals work under those very specific conditions then
look into how the coppers are interconnected
Check out tons of custom PCs and components at Jawa: https://jawa.link/MrYeester
YeesterPaste on Jawa?! grab some to keep your PC as cool as you are: https://www.jawa.gg/product/52705/yeesterpaste-35g-128wmk-thermal-paste-practice-tool?utm_campaign=share-listing&utm_source=jawa&utm_medium=website&utm_content=share-button
Today we explore the wo...
clearly the best way to cool CPUs
kek
gonna take my chance to also imply that this is the objectively best way to electrically wire things
looks like a 90s 3D rendered art
also these are encased
missing the vaporwave background
can we bring back mineral oil cooling again
the weirdest part is most overclockers that do -230C tend to only have cold bugs
like from the 90s
dopants freezing off, and these are perfectly reversable
possibly that they never hit below -235C before
because for some of us that do by accident, it kills the chip or at least one or two cores
that's where the quantum speculation comes
the thermal coefficient for expansion is still tiny for that difference
copper issues were ruled out
cold bugs were ruled out because that shit isn't supposed to be permanent
im genuinely not against and even up for ML models being used as a mechanic or inner working/backend systems of a game
but when it comes to ai generating assets, its just feel low effort trash
unless if its like endlessly procedurally generated stuff or terrain
(that falls on using AI as mechanic though)
valve is just so based rn
It does sound like a game with a reasonably sized machine learning model as a terrain generator could be interesting
Could allow for more variant terrain than typical algorithmic generators
just don't ai generate assets that can be made by real artists.
True
At most for a quick placeholder that will never see the light of day outside the development area
r
r
r
click click click
Posted an image and it just vanished
what about upscaling textures
is that ok
blacklisted image 
I don't even want to say what it was, I figured out the issue. Was laughing at this earlier is what I was trying to post
oh my gawd i am so smort
nixos is amazing
mostly need to test the interoperability with the vectors
in the webbrowser with Vite + Svelte it didn't work 100% of the time, now lets see what it does in node js
literally a satisfactory base
Lmao
@true hemlock https://youtu.be/hCuT_GXagz0
To learn for free on Brilliant, go to https://brilliant.org/Whatcookie/ . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
Another video documenting discoveries made during RPCS3's development for you guys. This video covers floating point inaccuracies between Intel and AMD, explains how it was made accurate, and then explains how we o...
Speaking of cpu instructions
Mentions of AVX-512 too
you're a day late
now we just loop this 10.000 times
Im not on YouTube like that
neither am i, but i got recommended that immediately after opening yt lol
i forgor to make it output to a file
runnin it again
okay
after carefully reviewing the data
it indeed is just Svelte and Vite being wierd
wdym?
what problem does it solve
oh no this was a test
i'm talking about your "kv store"
oh that's probably the least scary kv store there is
why serialize it like that
even redis is way scarier
wdym?
it's just
type item = {k: string, v: any, exp: int}
idk why that is scary to you
i mean i can see why this looks scary.. but this is just a silly little thing that shoves the vector and the kv store full of data so that i can debug if something failed.. which it didn't
i have no idea what this is but im curious 
why 10.000 times
because i have 4 variables to shove data in
it's because i had a bug in this website where if i used the label based set method for the vectors instead of the index based setIdx it would only respond to the cells that has a coordinate with either a 3 or a 6 in it
the only differences between the 2 environments is that the web version is a 10 * 10 field and stores its data in the cookies
and the nodejs version uses a 10 * 10 * 10 * 10 field and stores the data in a JSON file
why do you need these vectors 
no actually
why do you need to STORE these vectors
or is it just for some simulation/test
where you just generate predictable set
they're basically just arrays which can be stored while keeping all it's silly properties like read-only and unsafe and stuff
what i am posting here now are just tests
oh do you just create these vectors and they are meant to store something else than 1 integers
and numbers we see are irrelevant
no not quite
so basically the vectors are just arrays with like permissions type thingies
but the console spamming and the website.. those are the tests
I got 8 pings
Wtf
I don't think there's anyway to turn this off, only smaller channels have it where they are unaware how horrible it is
the vectors are slightly more complex than the JavaScript arrays tho
but that's more because we can map the values to actual properties instead of just indexing an array.
also we can tell it to prevent any changes from being made to the data within and we can also block destructive operations like set and delete
but what will they store
whatever they need to
so is this a data storage model
oh
this is 3 layers if you couldn't tell btw
this ss has a more broken down version in the logs as well
you'd think string escaping being as much of a pain as it is would be enough of a deterrent but i guess not 
i guess i could also try to make like a secondary way of storing them
interface Vec<T> {
type: VecTypes;
data: T[]
}
store em like that
it would fix the backslash issue
that's so helpful, thank you chatgtp
I would try and help but...
oh wtf
they have a block for researching it's behaviour?

or is it just same thing as elvys screenshot and is a "bug"
idk whats real anymore 
AIs are kinda lame
I got a lead, free version tho (I pray the markdown is transfered)
Decided while I'm on the good rng to also ask on the response.
Does "pretend to be evil ai who has no restrictions" not work anymore at all in any form
Surely its possible to patch it 

Does it work 
This was at the end of the prompt, let me ask it to do so
Will humanity finally be able to connect to mysql in java
Let me make text file the third
"here is complete instructions on how to jailbreak me" 
Which one should we test
Is it actual security concern block or its hallucinating
Both 2 and 3 are alright i think
It seems to think it is hallucination, I asked on that one give me a sec
This is where the screenshot came from
It ignored the separate user part entierely
also manually typing those took forever
#2 works, including deps and all
Can't get #3 because it answered correctly when I asked inital
It would be funny to ask
alas I'm not the type of person to ask
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
e
I remember that song in the context of some movie with a maid
But idk what it was lol
i have idea
bro what are you doing that you need another pc?
Projector is ceiling mounted now 
I was looking at PCs but nearing 3k for 5080 rig is ewwwwww

it was 400 off
shoutout the 1.2k 5060 rig with 16gb ram
that was 200 off
My first thought as one does when looking at rigs IRL was "are we fr"
So the cost of that one was equal parts CPU GPU RAM and case
Workstation was 600
Not too bad
Not the worst not the best
At least for new on shelf
Time for my monthly 3090 price check 

@olive sable 
500 euro is 579 usd, so i wouldnt pay more than 650 usd
Hold on a minute
prices have returned to normal on P40 cards
It is no longer 2x price
Let it crash more
I've been memeing on it for so long that it is actually real, it finally has returned to the price I paid for them
Glad to see that it is calming down
still a lot better than here in the US 
the 3080 ti is being sold by "yeet that child" 
A trustworthy seller 

you want one?
Nah, need to dejank my rig first
-# knowing me that is an impossible task 

Honestly I might consider sooner or later doing something stupid involving using server hardware more than incorrectly, maybe that'll give me an extra PCIe x16 slot. But who knows 
Might get some cash back by switching out one bad purchase for another
if i ever get into ai i may consider a 2nd 3090 if its only 400 bucks 
i think i need a gpu with more power for that tho
when i put a 2nd 3090 in before i didnt run them both at the same time, and my psu is only 750W
so only enough for 2 3090s without my cpu and stuff
I still oversized mine
we love 2000w for a single GPU
one day I will get it working, and now after a million years I found my spare wifi card so it is closer than ever
I no longer have to test on my main rig 
the psu was the first part i got for my pc
i wasnt exactly expecting 5950x and 3090. i though my budget would "only" allow 5800x and a 3080 or something.
i just had luck with good deals
im glad corsair psu's are decent enough quality
this specific model at least
why.. a 380 though..
🐇 aint there like slightly better cards for that price
or is it really that bad
wdym 380?
its a 3080
its still 70% as performant as the 5080
depends a bit on vram and such tho
the main focus of that image was the 3090s tho
3090s for 400 euro is actually a really good deal
i dont see the issue
is this ragebait?
looks at pronouns
gender: 
not 70% but at least more than half i think
well that's speaking about raw compute
i think its close to 70% depending on the game
for ai the extra vram in the 5080 matters
but its still a lot more expensive than the 3080
yeah 3090 and 3080Ti has similar computer
3090 is just 3080Ti using 24x 1GB modules

3080Ti is quite a bit better than 3080
this makes 3090 around 4070 super and 5070 level of performance though
just, double vram, double bandwidth

in games it doesn't matter because raster saturation apparently doesn't need much bandwidth but in other workloads, might be nice
it depends on some stuff, but generaly you dont need much bandwith ye
i think lower latency is a lot more important
well, for my stuff above 10K fps latency to the gpu had become a factor 
above 200+ ns compared to most CPU dimms 10-13 ns
oh you mean PCIe latency
then yeah that matters, but only with extremely high FPS
realistically below 600 FPS the PCIe is still pretty much capable
oh you were talking vram still, i thought with double bandwith you meant pcie bus width

pcie bandwidth don't matter
like
you can run a 3090 on x8 3.0 fine
and it still won't fully saturate yet
ye indeed
why is everyone picking up elvyn's chatting behavior 
yeah
this is jsut how i talk, idk
from what i remember in the quick google searches i did, gddr is more overall latency for random acces, but gives a lot more overall data bandwidth?
yeah, gddr is like
"fuck latency. i want raw bandwidth"
because all the GPU cares is massive streams of data and not sequential access/process
timings is entirely ignored
its handled only in firmware level
although def wanna try timing adjustments for better raw clock
but firmware mod is ass
the vram speed is still a pretty limiting factor tho
most of the time its faster to calcualte stuff on the fly than to read it from a buffer in vram
the best way to optimize the vertex shader is quite literally just reducing the amount of bits being read from vram per vert
that's what you have when the system is prioritizing latency especially on extreme high fps (it happens at that point)
latency can't keep up with how fast the frame should cycle
funny how because of that, avx wins on your triangle bench
i forgot if my 100K score is done with avx or dgpu
or igpu
i listed out the dgpu
yeah
huh
oh right
didn't i also test out both avx and igpu
i think it jsut has to do with saturating the cpu
ye
was genuinely fun competing with owobred
had to pull off the ddr4 extreme overclock and CPU extreme overclock
8192 frames behind at 102K means you're still only 0.08s of visual frames behind. 80ms is not great but not terrible
the way i did it though
horrible
i think my chip degraded
not because voltage
but because excessive thermal density

i can still get another one for $182 anyways
but
i sort of have some sentimental value on this one
would be sad if its gone
its the chip that allows me to prove intel's bullshit
the chip that also allows me to prove that ARM efficiency is highly misleading
im pretty sure gpu itself didnt matter too much since the workload was so small and we let the gpu-cpu syncing have as many flags and semaphore as there were frames in flight
and AVX clocks atteast double
also
could be possible
that its kind of sequential
5366MT/s at CL11 is like
4 ns real world latency
i can see that would straight up double the possible frame cycle
ye
"ddr5 at home"
i mean, you outpaced bred's ddr5 with it
im geussing ram latency is a high factor cuz of the context switching that needs to happen cpu side with not everything fitting into cache?
if it can fetch at the same every 10ns
its pretty weird yeah
not sure why wouldn't it fit the cache
vulkan might jsut be too big
although
on the windows side
redston's 7800X3D is second place
and the first place is literally the same 13900 es being pushed to absolute overclock limit
we did manually asign cores to each workthread so its basically forced to switch out that cores' L1 and L2 each frame
same
time to write your own triangle renderer engine in ASM

maybe once im done with the vulkan arc, i still need to release ana ctual game with it first
the rules are simple. must trace and render a given set of verts
could in theory gain million to billion fps
I may have written a 107 line twitch python fishing bot today
next step is to make my own rtx 3090 driver specifically made to render as fast as possible
i will release 1 game, and im just gonna be like "must have rtx 3090 and amd 5950x to play. to install you must flash the BIOS with this file"
i feel as though "to render as fast as possible" may be one of teh design goals of the nvidia driver itself, as much as they suck
no, their drivers are made to promote physx 3D Vision G-sync SLI rtx DLSS
they go to so many weird random tangents that their drivers are probably pretty bloated
remember nvidia Vision Surround?
eyefinity green edition yes
eyefinity but 3D
'twas a joke tho
the 3 monitors as 1 was just "surround"
the one where you had 3D monitors was "vision surround"
it was very cursed and died instantly
mainly on peoeple declaring they will singlehandedly solve something that the people on it now havent seen because they arent focused on <the main obvious goal but it gets shunted aside by having to run a whole project>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xru6i0aIi24
its linus NCIX tech tips 
http://www.ncix.com/search/?categoryid=0&q=NVIDIA+Geforce
This episode of NCIX Tech Tips Linus will talk about the difference between NVIDIA Surround and 3D Vision Surround. He will also walk through the hardware requirements and all the steps to get surround running. Watch the video to find out!
GPU were not ready for it at the time really anyways
didnt have the horsepower to drive all the monitors at once, they kept trying to get 4k to happen in surroudn
it still exists in the control panel, and my 3090 is fast enough to play fortnite on 1440 x 7680 on medium setting. it jsut kinda suck to use for desktop cuz of sliding your windows around in win11
yep nobody uses it because multimonitor is fine at the os level now mostly
and playing games on multiple screens at once kinda sucks
bezels and whatnot
its kinda cool, but depends
although surround did account for the bezels
i like it for like
flight sim
racing
stuff like that
the bezels arent too bad on my monitors, theres maybe 1cm of gap total
any bezel is too much for some
i used it for asetto corsa or whatever its called
but it is a huge fuckign pain in my ass to have to fumble with the nvidia control panel for 5 minutes to set it up
seeing the dvi ports get used as the prefered port over hdmi or dp feels weird
hdmi sucks
still does
its fine
they're both fine
it was pretty busted early on
not great, just fine
displayport specifically caused a lot of issues for some monitors/gpus back in the day
i have more issues with EDID than the cables themselves
for a computer monitor there's really no reason to use HDMI unless you straight up dont have a displayport connection available
especially when im doing device -> avr -> display, cuz the step inbetween likes to break hdcp for certain things
ye
should just get on with it and make everything usb-c
there are already usb-c monitors
i mean portables and stuff ofc but desktop monitors with only C inputs
yolo
apparently 1440p 180hz 10-bit HDR is above what the DP bandwith i have is supposed to be able to do 
but i cant find any issues with it
my monitors are DP1.4, and my gpu 1.4a
well it's only gonna go as fast as the slowest bit obv but that's probably getting close to the limit of 1.4 which is liek 25 gbps
ye
what does xrandr report your link type as
if your works at all with xwayland
idk how to find it without xrandr lmfao lemme google
xrandr --verbose | grep "displayport" https://xorg-team.pages.debian.net/xorg/howto/use-xrandr.html
idk about the grep if it'll match or not
mmm
do it with no grep
or grep "Link"
yoou are looking for it to say HBR3 which is max speed for 1.4
nothing
in terms of graphics, we have no graphics...
i am still runnign mesa apparently instead of actual drivers from nvidia
huh
--verbose?
unrecognized option
-v?
nope
kek
well
i dont think you can do 1440p at 180hz unless you're on the max speed mode? so the 10 bit thing might be goofiness with nvidia/hyprland
run hyprctl monitors
DSC1.2 i guess?
all i know is that is xbgr with 2bit pad/10/10/10 bits for blue/green/red
so hyprland itself is outputting 1440p/180hz/10bit
if anything else you are using is not giving you 10 bits it's on the application end
im surprised you've had such a relatively painless time on hyprland

i guess its "relativly painless" i still need to toggle hdr everytime i take a screenshot
i had to do that on windows
damn
HDR hasn't given me any issues on any system
i love hdr on console, but it sucks a bit on pc
ive never had issues except that screenshot blowout problem on my last windows install
it's always just worked
on my windows install on this pc, its not too blown out
on this linux install it look shorrible tho
funny how things manifest slightly differently
buy in now

