#programming
1 messages ยท Page 268 of 1
just needs one of these
hell ye
you also need to fit one of these in the bottom pcie x4 lane
roughly 80 million i think
ok maybe i'm not sold
mmm, liquid helium 
that's an expensive fridge
thats on avarage 1 million per qbit, since that one has 70
i do wonder how much a cryocooler like that could be minimized
Mirona (topo conditor ) and willo is is break through
Willow has less error
While mirona is as break
It will get more latency then evey
nnnnnnnnnnnn

the sun, the moon, the star
"the star" 
konii has deleted all other stars from the universe
there is now only "the star"
singular
naa other ones never existed
oh so its that kind of deletion
interesting
if the sun still exists, and the sun is a star, then "the star" is just the sun 
The Star




is that an osu map?
I thought ure in bili bili
mentioning osu, i havent played the game cuz i was waiting on the tablet protector thingy
and its been like a month and idk what happened to it
rrr
Its being shipped apparently
Cheak my website
If any improvement need then tell me
Forgot again to add port forwarding
dont port forward, that would leak your ip adress

!watching
!cookie
๐ช
Om nom nom
You've given me 1 cookie! | I've received 256043 cookies total!
Client WebSocket ping: 23ms
Discord API ping: 131ms
256k
@stiff mica CHEAK RAMDOM STRINGS

reinforceBridges();
saveBigramMemory();
const cand = sampleBigram(currentWord, t, recentWords);
t
if (!cand) break;

i made that before going to gamedev classes
honestly that tutel model is pretty bad now that i have



probably
yes
and somehow 1kb while having like 30ch
i was so close
damn i have an eye for char count
?
I'm back
Next time I will make sure turn off the discord api
i have decided persistently mapped uniform buffers are bad
hi i
hi konii
t
hi sam
const SAFE_MODE = true;
if (SAFE_MODE && containsNSFW(input)) return "Safe mode active. Message ignored.";
Done !

Hi bro
I'm just fixing inappropriate things
||breakcode i need fix ascll || well today was tired day fixing some suss things and troll function
not necessarily duplicating whole or half front end though. most hyperthreading components are just extra instruction register/buffer line and a switch component
hyperthreading do add latency, but in the case of huge AVX saturation its actually somewhat beneficial with the fact that AVX component are pretty large they took advantage of hyperthreading to stream a compute request twice per run
the thing with e cores is that they often either share the AVX 256 part or have a significantly smaller one, often shared between all 4 e cores
we tested running AVX heavy benchmarks and you guessed it, hyperthreading gives quite the boost
only way to fix it is to do gpu fence stuff, which just makes it just as much latency as the one that is supported in webgl
so im just going back to the easy one, i wasted like 3 days on this
i use the word "just" a lot huh
i need to fix my vocabulary
slightly misleading, it wasn't due to space. rather its just scheduling issues. when execution and branch prediction improves there's just actually less headroom for more general int/fp units to be saturated, and the scheduling latency is what causes the tradeoff in the first place
but hyperthreading apparently still scales really well with properly multithreaded workloads. just that most programs with occasional thread spawning didn't benefit much from it
intel was having a bad rep in the gaming side so they figured that if they removed hyperthreading, games would actually run better
as a tradeoff, highly multithreaded workloads are at slight disadvantage.
300GHz is just flat out unrealistic. we can already reach GHz because we learned that streaming execution unit can be done, not because we can make it cycle actually fast enough to hit GHz
number too big
IPC is a factor, not just clock speed.
your 5GHz is useless if all it does is one simple 16 bit arithmetic per clock cycle compared to a 2GHz that can do 8x 32bit at once
they don't act as ram. they're dynamically addressable bank of memory which can be used to directly reference a memory address' stored value.
these took way more space than your normal dram
they should just remove e cores except for mobile chips
its so shit to work with them. the asynchronous problems is a headache
I'm back
I'm agree this one
core ultra X9 388H have 4p + 8e + 4lp btw
current "12 core" intel cpus are only 4 cores of usage and 8 cores of dissapointment
literally as much as my core ultra 5 125H
except it has 2 more lp cores
which is useless
lp = low power?
yeah, much weaker than e cores
Yep
wasnt that what the e cores were for? low power? efficiency?
its literally comparable to really old intel 4th gen series cores

even slower but lower power usage than e cores
My country phone is gaming
They want test ai on phone
core ultra X9 BTW
is the performance/power ratio at least better on those cores?
having the same core layout as a fucking 125H
it doesn't matter, there's no valid usecase of it
its sad but ye, new intel being bad
intel seriously ignored the basic cs law of multithreading
i mean, if i were on 5% battery on my laptop, i guess.
but for a desktop its utter dogshit
if they wanted more multi thread perf per watt (since that's what core ultra 9 are for), they should add MORE cores and run them on LOWER voltage
instead of the opposite
istg
the problem is that even if its few times more efficient than e cores, the overall tile especially I/O is still gonna be a power hogger
so it literally doesn't matter at all
oh
yeah ๐ญ
i really really wanted to email intel directly
and out right say how stupid they are
My phone just crashed due to 0x18a0000
so the io and cache and whatever for the core will mean powerdraw is not even that much different from jsut doing it fast? so in theory there is a good ratio to balance between speed and power?
yeah
and in general running more cores under low voltage gives you better multi thread performance over using less cores ran on higher clock and voltage
which is supposed to be what the core ultra 9 is
but no
they turned the core ultra 9 for laptops into a fucking low-mid range ๐ญ
Wtf
i thought the most expensive cpus were meant to be good at both. have like a couple really fast cores and then a couple that were great at multi-threading?
product segmentation Idiocracy
shit at multithreading
e cores shares AVX units
thats the simd thing right?
so in a cluster of e cores there is only 1 that can use simd and such at a time?
what even is the point of e cores man?
generally speaking, in raptor lake an e core is half the performance of p cores
at least e cores are clocked lower so you can schedule the AVX itself to clock at higher rate but its still stupid
i feel like it would jsut be better to have a full p core cpu
istg
bring back hyperthreading
kill e cores
dump lp cores
and VOLTAGE TUNE the cpus if you wanted to use it for laptops man
my i9 13900 can run at under 6W for most basic tasks
why the fuck is my core ultra 5 125H running at higher wattage on the same exact tasks
Do u update the ure motherboard?
i tinker with the microcode myself
look, intel
if i can do it
and make your i9 more efficient than ANY macbooks out there
you can do that shit
but no you had to fumble the HARD way
๐ญ
there's not even a valid justification for them to remove hyperthreading in the first place. the margin on scheduling latency is negligible enough they're just desperate with single percentage improvement on games
intel had the advantage
but somehow, despite how amd is known to fumble at capitalizing advantages
intel does it way worse
intel HAD architectural advantage, no joke
they just hellbent enough to not only rely too much on their shitty fab
but they brute forced a lot of things including voltages
turns out their clocking component degrades heavily under such voltage lmao
intel would've won if they had not being so hellbent
but nah, fumbles
then next time fumbles again with core ultra shit
intel is still dominating the laptop market though
because despite their cheaped out mobile chips, they actually designed a pipeline well enough to be pretty responsive
but that's just it
soon we'll going back with core ultra 9 class of chips having 4 p cores ๐ญ
4 
arent there i5 class products with 4 p cores?
then you might aswell get an i5 and maybe overclock it a bit
I have plans to upgrade
=>
Odd, I did implement my own GEMM algorithm once which got close to MKL, and hyperthreading did nothing. I guess that was bandwidth limited though.
sometimes it did nothing yeah
highly depends on implementation
depends on how do you manage the I/O aswell
im also assuming that the whole FMA unit itself were fully saturated considering that you're working with whole matrices
but sometimes working with vectors gave boosts but also depends
so yeah i'd rather they keep hyperthreading
you can always disable it on the bios, and that HT section of the chip won't even get current
bonus point the extra die area gives a bit better thermals
yeah that too
// Load 8x8 floats from B into YMM
// Compilers aren't good at doing this with arrays
#define EXPANDED(k) __m256 b##k;
#include "expand8.inl"
#undef EXPANDED
// Don't mask since we took care of zeroing the extras during the transpose
if (__builtin_expect(p == 8, true)) {
const float* b_ptr = B.data;
const size_t b_stride = B.stride;
#define EXPANDED(k) \
b##k = _mm256_load_ps(b_ptr); \
_mm_prefetch(reinterpret_cast<const char*>(b_ptr) + CACHE_LINE_SIZE, _MM_HINT_T0); \
b_ptr += b_stride;
#include "expand8.inl"
#undef EXPANDED
} else {
#define EXPANDED(k) \
if (k < p) { \
b##k = _mm256_load_ps(B[k]); \
}
#include "expand8.inl"
#undef EXPANDED
}
if (__builtin_expect(m == 8 && n == 8 && p == 8, true)) {
const float* a_ptr = A.data;
const size_t a_stride = A.stride;
// Manually load A into L1 ahead of time to reduce pressure on L2
#define EXPANDED(i) \
const __m256 a##i = _mm256_loadu_ps(a_ptr); \
_mm_prefetch(reinterpret_cast<const char*>(a_ptr) + CACHE_LINE_SIZE, _MM_HINT_NTA); \
a_ptr += a_stride;
#include "expand8.inl"
#undef EXPANDED
The only time I've seen manual loop unrolling and prefetching help
everything is breaking
this code uses _mm_prefetch but you should be able to use __builtin_prefetch

might help the compiler a bit
somehow alogn the way opengl is still doing 12K fps, but vulkan dropped to 10K
idk why
imma restart my pc
is it purely cuz im doing 16:9 now?
yep, that seems to be the case
in 1k x 1k vulkan is faster, in 1080p opengl becomes fasster
probably cuz of a difference in their api's, cuz neither is saturating the gpu fully
i also improved the opengl performance so that also contributed
Simply improve Vulkan more

if only it was that easy
there are ofcourse improvements i could do, but they would take some time
Well can't let OpenGL win over Vulkan now after all the effort of making Vulkan
in a real game environment where the shaders wont take nanoseconds to run, vulkan will def win
Sil
the uniform buffers stuff is a bit eh tho the way i implemeted it rn
i honestly should be doing push constants or bindless
CHUNKS IS BETTER BRO
?
Why windows never use chunks to help files transfer
One file (899 mb )
It trying copy all not chunks
Serval data has curuption and no use
( due to election, unstable voltage,)
BYE AGAIN I NEED RECOVERY SOME DATA

b2 fan ne

from what i can tell they have some type of discord api on their account, but most of the time its an actual person and just esl
also the way Intel handled and keeps handling AVX512 is honestly 
They made the specification for it, did a garbage implementation on their consumer chips that ran slow and hot, then decide to ditch it from 12000 series onwards for consumer chips (the server chips still have it), all the while AMD is just adopted AVX512 with a great implementation and serious performance gains.
And because of Intel (at least temporarily) ditching AVX512 from consumer chips, it has created a lot of uncertainty with developers about if implementing AVX512 instructions in codebases is even worth it, meaning that no one benefits from AVX512 aside from niche applications, this uncertainty probably even delays AVX2 mass adoption for most things
intel is just a litle insecure rn
its where the hate with avx 512 being "inefficient" comes from
amd casually implementing avx 512 easily yeah
sad its not on the threadripper 3000 series :(
i have avx 512 now pog you made me check
delays AVX2 mass adoption for most things
do those things really need avx2 if avx2 came out in 2013 and it's q4 of 2025 right now?
this dude didn't know shit at all about computing
i don't think i have avx 512
"yeah guys floating point arithmetic unit was invented 1936 its old we shouldn't even use it nowdays its 2025"
i have avx and avx2, not 512 cuz of amd 5000 series
mnhhmh yep thems extended instruction sets
just need to make the motherboard support that cpu
how's the memory speed on that ES gonna be lol
We love fp16
AVX should also be backward compatible btw like if you have AVX512 it should also come with AVX2 because simd are scalable
is avx512 some bundle of instructions?
its fun
yeah for vector computing
well it specifies avx 1 & 2 and then 512 so i guess that's why
so it does multiple value computation at once with vectors
everything inbetween is included from just 512
per clock cycle
pretty neat
sad intel doesn't have avx 512
I mean the fact that first AVX2 CPUS came out in 2013, basically all x86 CPUs support it, but software is still built with some version of SSE instructions by default is pretty sad
I get the backwards compatability argument but bruh I just want to use the capability CPUs had over a decade ago
blame intel for implementing it shit way
but its actually well supported now by every modern softwares at least
how long are zen pipelines
i would think avx 512 doesnt add stages just widens it
but now i realized i havent thought about this since prescott had 31 stages
Do U mean advance vector extender
well, avx stands are advanced vectore extensions
it made me think about the number of stages per instruction
but the ni kinda figured avx512 wouldn't add stages but widen the ones already in place is all
i tried gogoling it but it doesnt seem theyre releasing this information about the modern chip families yet which makes sense
::1 - - [03/Nov/2025 14:35:42] code 404, message File not found
::1 - - [03/Nov/2025 14:35:42] "GET /book.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
NOT ANOTHER TROUBLE SHUT
reminds me, i have a 12900 engi sample that i can delid and do a die shot of if i wanted to take a look at how they do the avx
need to find my microscope somewhere aswell though
I THINK I WILL LOCK WHOLE DAM SYSTEM
see that's why i asked because i figured you might have some of the info haha
was able to find apparently for like m4 it's ~~10-12 steps depending but usually arm has a shorter pipeline than x86 as a rule of thumb i think
arm pipeline are shorter yeah
so my dream of the 80 step pipeline and cracked branch predictor is dead
which is why they have so much headroom for more IPC
eyeah
it's fairly comical how much ipc per thread they can do compared to sota x86 parts
also the only chips with avx 512 i have is uh
i think i have only 2 lmao
and both were engineering samples

maybe the magic tthing jensen neeeds to hear
is
LLM BRANCH PREDICTOR
the slowest and shittest predictor of all time
GPT api call at every branch
SNN branch predictor 
it would have to fit in like a mb of space and complete inference in like 2 cycles
"chatgpt what will the flag branch be for this cycle of ALU"

oh right, found this
golden cove, it has avx 512
mmmmmmmmmm this article sparks joy
Hmm getting knowledge
332*256 bit / 242*512 bit register for the AVX
branch prediction is the part of the cpu i find the most interesting
but yes this matches about with the ~10 stages
i was seeing
for their p-cores
in intel's diagram they don't specify
i think they way they did it is scheduling the 512 bit entry into 2x 256 unit
means it seems they did widen it
instead of cycling it with stages
i didn't realize amd had been eating intel's lunch on the branch prediction front, i kinda figured with intel's lead in ipc (at this time i think they still had it but i could be wrong, i was still waiting on upgrading lol) they would've naturally been ahead there still
intel's slightly behind in ipc apparently
now yeah
they were ahead
till raptor lake made them chicken out on actually progressing
then amd's 9000 series comes out with pretty decent ipc uplift
they love doing that, i mean haswell -> cascade lake there was some increase but
it was like
so shit
until ice lake
i swear they did it on purpose because they knew amd was sitting there with bulldozer & its relatives with the shittiest apus of all time, and wouldn't have zen for a while, so they barely improved anything
that seems conspiratorial though
so maybe they just get writer's block
but they seem to rest on their laurels immediately if they believe they're leading amd much lol
even liek
ice lake
is only 18% ipc over skylake
4 years earlier
ohhhh this is when they were stuck on 14++++++++++++++++ as well i forgot about that
that probably is a large chunk of it alone
no autoscaling from process shrink
"spend less on R&D then we get to state that we earn more profit"
yeah...........
not quite as worried about getting that new process ready when amd still flopping around with garbage anyways
intel had the advantage...
architectural advantage, still competing despite using an objectively worse process node
but nah, you get to have them not giving shit about long term
@true hemlock any idea how high syscall overhead is on x86_64 systems?
the whole thicc core bulldozer thing with a giant pipeline and shitty branch predictor making it throw out half the branches garbage cache speed & i think also aa significantly worse process node, intel was like about to go sub 20nm and amd was farting around with gf 32nm
i really thought amd was on the brink of just going out of business or something back then
old amd cpus don't even have thermal safeguard
yeah those old youtube videos of people running althlons and sht without heat spreader
i just burned an old fx series some time ago lmfao
even their GPUs were shit
i got an ATI HD 6850
i had cheap laptop with amd chipset from 2014 
for practically no cost
i stilll have some goofy comment on one of those videos stuck in my head, was like
sometimes, when i'm gaming, my cpu cooler gets in the way so i have to take it off to see better, that's why i will never buy amd
dunno why but i remember this randomly actually all the time and chuckle at it
it deserved to explode
that mf combusted in front of me
put it out of its misery
but damn now AMD is doing great
should be illegal to even sell those things, i still see random FX apus appear in like low cost minicomputers and shit on ebay
should be a crime to charge the same for that as even like a shitty n100
little fun fact, RDNA 4 is objectively architecturally better than blackwell 2.0
ancient shit sold by "i know what i've got!" boomers


rdna 2 was also objectively better than ampere
cant they just make cuda too
rdna 3 was shit though relatively to ada lovelace
cuda is proprietary
double fp units but didn't improve schedulers
i heard its shit
it's just not as supported really
cooda and rock em
ok but why cant they just make cuda too
people have tried
is it patented
it would be a reverse engineer which is generallly not gonna fly
not for amd to do anyways
they could reimpliment it
but
licensed, so legally not allowed to.
also reverse engineering is really hard. cuda has specific instruction stages that require AMD to refactor their own shit as whole
yeah, it would require enormous resources
and they already have one
it's called rocm so
that's a lot of waste and by the time they had it actually usable in a competitive way, might as well have just supported rocm adoption during that time
if they even could
not like cuda is static

make rdna 5 have 10x perf
but then you have to deal with uh
waste 90% of it on emulation
when cuda asics
but according to this link, someone just made a github project to solve this problem entirely (says near-native performance)
why couldnt amd do this themselves.
It's called the h100
when cooda expect this vector to be distributed like this
but rock em wants it other way around
it is licensed
its third party now
i think
and its software level emulation
not hardware
also i think
says near-native performance
i don't touch zluda
It doesn't even work I'm pretty sure
For anything remotely complicated
ok
IF IT WORKs, it's kinda similar to CUDA perf
that concludes it
seems to be only for some cases
yeah
its really unfortunate
AMD still have a 2:1 half precision rate
there are more than 1 attempt at this
If only opencl was actually usable
nvidia doesn't have that anymore
well nvidia does but they also doubled the fp32 so its technically 2:2 on them
but nvidia's cuda unit is like 2 IPC
hipify exists for this but it can't do everything
AMD's is 4 IPC
There's only so much you can do when it's so tightly integrated with the hardware
and only nvidia is allowed to make them unless someone cleanrooms something that can execute cuda calls in hardware from scratch
and then somehow passes nvidia in terms of being good at doing that
Waste of money and time
given nvidia has functionally infinite resources atm as well
really hoping the ai bubble burst quick so they shut their bullshit about fp4 whatever tensor whatever
why do you expect it to burst
and continue focusing on gaming cards while also still works with enterprise card with proper general compute
we doubled ipc!!!
-# chart for previous generation is fp16 precision, blackwell is fp4 sparse

there's like zero ipc improvement since ampere for tensor
since ampere to blackwell
they just make monster chips
they just do the
bigger and bigger
isnt the problem with gaming cards that they just got too expensive and there are no many games that need high specs coming out
each tensor still only do 256x fp16 btw
and then sell a bazillion dollars of them to openai who then pledges to give you a bazillion dollars for more gpus
we're on different pages ig
it's the same bazillion dollars too
Hardware still gets crushed by path tracing
blame consoles since that's what most games target
well that and ever increasing environment rendering complexity, higher resolutions, more overhead
and people trying to run it at ultra siccko mode 8k
yeah its just for those who push to that kind of unnecessary performance hogs
gaming is fine rn, just that we want better gpus with better raster
not whatever the hell "1000 TOPS fp4 sparse" is it
the product segmentation between 5080 and 5090...
ridiculous
amd genuinely had the advantage to release a segmentation in between that
but they chickened out
yeah nope instead nvidia gets to sell $1900 5080s
and you gotta pay $4000 for a 5090
Wasn't there a prototype 9090xt or something
i'd rather chop my hand off than pay 5090 msrp for a shitty 5080 with half the chip chopped off
9070xt chip being overclocked to extremes ๐ฅ

they just genuinely need to design a bigger scale of the same die
that's it
but nah had to stop on navi 64
๐ฅ
I wanna see a maxed out arc gpu
even
do amd have the same driver segmentation issues as nvidia when it comes to gaming on the radeon ai pro wwubba dub dub edition cards or is it better than nvidia there
where b780
blackwell 6000 pro is using GB202 with only 188 SM
not even the full 192 SM chip ๐ฅ
back in my day they called that a 1070
5090 uses the one with 170 SM
Huh I thought it was the full chip
i get it, perfect full die bin is rare on semiconductor litography
but they sold that shit for insane prices they're just greedy with wanting to oversupply

2x? The thing is 10k
yeah i mean with the performance it has, that's fine, that can be the 5090, but they are charging for it like it's impossible to make those dies when it's a got a bunch of TMU cut off
i was talking about the 5090 not the 6000
Ah
5090 die cost a bit under $300 to make btw
considering their yield rate rn

I'll give them one thing, it's nice having a 96gb card with RT cores
Ignoring the price
except for titan v
V100 chip straight up
@umbral thorn have 2 of them
we thought you were overpriced but we didnt know what we had
16gb right
32
12GB on the titan v
oh v100 itself
but there's ceo edition with 16gb
the datacenters had 32 right?
v100 comes with 16 and 32
yeah that's why I was asking
i only interact with v100 thru renting it lewl
eh
there have been some better implementations of spreading models
TITAN V objectively best looking GPU of all time
the golden deagle of gpus
i accidentally knocked off 2 nF caps off the PCIe traces though on one of the titan v 

so one is only able to run on x4 till i get a replacement for the caps
at least you didnt dumpster them

i need to put like my old 1070 in a shadowbox and hang it on the wall or something
instead of having it sitting on the floor half in an eleectrostatic bag
once you have a gpu in your position
posession even
keep it secret
keep it safe
never let it go
it's precious baby
same
i love how that card looks
w/ the backlit surfaces on the front of the cooler
having random hardware laying around is the way really
my whole room is hardware
its been only since early this year i moved in to sydney
been only 4 or 5 months in this place
but i've collected like
idk
yes whole systems on the floor
couldn't be more quack-y than this
i only have a few hard drives other than this junk on my desk right here + the floor nas/network master outside
and then a lot of phones and tablets and shit
idk wtf to do with the 970
5900x i am too disgusted with its pins to move
these are pretty old pictures from months ago, it has changed since rn but too lazy to take a pic
insanity
let me check
it's across the chip from the notched corner
how did you even manage to break off a pin
it came out with the busted cpu coooler's shitty pump

ah
i took out my 5900X with the cooler too but luckily "only" bent a couple pins
though i'm pretty sure it's still kinda fucked because it doesn't post half the time 
its memory channel B
yeah see i saw it was memory channels on that edge and i was like fuuuuKkkkk
i was gonna just shittily bend them back but that went ouf the window
i just didnt actually look enough to know for sure
just said fuck it and immediately went to microcenter instead
unlucky man
if it were like 1 pin to the left or 2 pins to the right it wouldn't have problems
oh well, the 9900x3d is comically faster than it anyways
x3d... the only chips i didn't own

it was on sale for $499
i kind of wanted to test using one
which was nice
less expensive than the 9950 at like 650 or whatever the hell it was
i wanted a 9950x3d but not for $150+ more
if this one was still $599 when i went in there was a good shot i walked out with a regular 9950x
but yeah 7000 series was a decent uplift from 5000 but not enough to give me fomo but then 9000 was
only am5 i have lol
7950x right
yeah
was the initial plan for a build for elvy because it'd be so cool with both of us dailying an eng sample
but the B850 didn't have the microcode for it
This poor guy was basically 90+c for a year before the end because I'm pretty sure that cooler was slowly dying

o7
Just for the eng sample?
Damn
gonna yoink the eng sample microcode from B650
Hype
Yep that's why I also pulled the trigger on the mini pc
Before they went back up when equipped with dram
guess i'm waiting for zen 6
its why i've been crashing out here lately cursing at open ai should just go bankrupt
Unfortunately they might be at critical mass when it comes to inertia
Depends on how long they can hold up the charade of bazillion dollar deals
but eheheheh
That picture contains 82 million dollars
Worth of dram
In the apocalypse when all currency is DDR based
the fact that i knew this would happen 2 months prior
You will be loaded
sorry i forgot to tell everyone ๐ญ
I'm just glad the only memory other than the 2nd 64 gbs of ouchie here for the 2nd slots was
$30 of ddr3
For 4 sticks to 32gb lol
Board doesn't support ecc ๐ฟ
They aren't even xmp
They just have jedec
of 8gb ddr3 ecc
I kinda want to get one of those ultra chinesium x99 boards for $50 and one of the Xeon 2680 v4 for another 15 bux
And some ecc
To fart around with it
But the boards have bad io
Usually
was the ultimate meta for third world country budget builds
Yeah I mean that's insane perf for the money
Just so many of them laying around from derelict servers going out of commission Ig
especially when you want multicore
i have a few 1U nodes of them
and at least like uh
2 of them is close to this 9900x3d multi core
but those are mostly some LGA 2011-3
The heat spreaders make them look like poptarts
Thus edible (poptarts are already stretching the definition of edible so the comparison doesn't fall apart for me)
But that table is about what I picture when I see the ones listed for $10 lol
xeon gold 6138
those are also 5700x level
god
i have more core count in my room
than some whole town total core count back in my home country
I 79020 data and documents
have more cores than even some data centers actually
same reaction
Now question is how to put this much data on model ?
in the grande sillycon wars when sama comes looking for sand to recycle into more nvidia gpus
you need to go into hiding
Already 400 layer are build
rag deluge
Hmmm
Model need explode
I CAN'T BUILD NEURO SO MAKE OWN AI MODEL FROM SCRACH
TOOLS NUMPY, Skirt LEARNING , BIAS ,TORCH
Model has overload ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ


Cafe
What are u doing bro with cafe
Kek YouTube is apparently deleting videos about how to get around win11 activation requirements
Incredible
What
The fuck
Real
GPU?
I i get it i read how to bypass windows 11 requirment
Yea
What GPU?
A100 gpu
linux ad campaign:
40GB or 80GB?
40 gb
They giving me 600 compute
And what does that mean?
Or I will use L4 gpus
600h of compute time or 600 A100 40GBs?
Yea
Google colabe

Linux Mint mentioned !!
Very cool little system
Well it is resources bro I used too much for ai train now i have 139 left
Resources in what units????????
GPU hours? TFLOPs?
Bro i rent gpu in notebook!
Well you should know what units the limits are given in
How hard is it to answer a simple question, what units are the compute limits given in?
Each USESS takes 10 to 50
๐
I used on traning ai
Compute and flops neatly 20 flops
Of what unit? Hours?
What is the unit????
๐
Whoever this i is they feel like they have the question understanding of an LLM
Which is to say not very good
ttbf with the frameworks available i dont think you really need to know exactly what's going on to produce a slopbot 9000as long as you're slightly coherent with the data (which you prob wouldnt be but who knows) chosen to train on
a 40gb a100 though that thing is making one(1) small low rank lora before ooming on an 8b fine tune
or has a low batch and takes ages
40GB isn't much for LLM training yeah
Only reallly good for learning
You'd need a much bigger cluster for an actually useful LLM
Thus why I stay away from LLMs and stick strictly to vocal synths, at least those can kinda be trained on 24GB
well ive made fairly robust loras on like small gemmas on this shitty 10gb 3080
but it just takes
Speaking of have a Melt
Don't worry about the tuning it's from an UTAU
it do be sounding utau
@nocturne olive not a dig or anything, just wondering why for https://discord.com/channels/574720535888396288/1434197599929368677 you didn't use the offical instrumentals?
Meanwhile NeuroSynth is up to 256 batch size and I still have VRAM headroom
It was a collab with CHXI
fair enough
i dont have it :(*
It's on VedalAI website
i dont go on that stinky website
just wanted to make sure you weren't reinventing the wheel by accident

Yeah it features big pitch spikes that are definitely much more suitable for an UTAU, they don't sound natural on a voice bank that uses NeuroSynth's arch
Yeah definitely no NeuroSynth arch banks around back then
Who knows, maybe some time I'll adapt the tuning to work well with NeuroSynth's system
crazy that supercell brought that album out within like the 3 months miku was out in 2007

I usually use at 2 hours so
Server now it using 0.05 tokens units
While I was using 6 tokens
total using now is 16.35
U will use later so last now I'm using now at 7 am to 9 am
Most details
2% USING now
Gpu
Well I need improve me English first
So true Elvyn, I'm convinced i is an LLM assisted user

Sounds about right
500 parameters is not enough
But u guys have 15m parameters
BYE IM BACK SOO SOME ENGLISH CLASS
( I FAILED AT LANGUAGE SUBJECT)
when elvyn doesn't understand you, you are doing something wrong 
Truu
there's nothing wrong in a lexical salad
there's nothing wrong with pregnant sonic
osu is so weird, no problems on my previous monitors, but longer tab outs on a new one
bro how tf
what am i looking at
also thanks for reminding i have a thing to optimise myself ugh
TEAMMSSS @patent walrus
at first I thought it was like render frametime but 1.5ms is still pretty good
its actually so obnoxious that teams is so ass to the point that I need to open multiple tabs to use it effectively
but every single fucking tab I open sends notification sounds
and if I need to refresh a tab (often) it will discard what I had open and instead use the latest button I clicked on another tab
how long it takes to (almost) fully load a gltf model
it's ass because imagine if i had hundreds of models
or thousands
that's a whole second dedicated to loading models

oh well, that's what i get for handrolling my own gltf and json parsers

bella040572 was banned. | Self promotion

i just opened the chat and wanted to read it, buh

I just logged on but this ๐คฃ
Hey shiro do u know coding?
Which language?
Hmm what about ai os ?
She will help in asm part or EXE TO APP FILES PART ?
can shiro translate voynich manuscript then
Hello
@real sierra why didnt you do it yet
thats a very good point
That one is on general
gotta leave some puzzles for everyone else
wouldn't be fun if i solved everything
...
Today day : Useless
Experience: 103%
Goal : complete all project
Project: make ai more human like (agi)
2) Full Ai os
3) take other mistakes and learn it ( mean adding voice mode )
4) fixing bigram ram
5) making videos and audio generator
6)cheak system

AGI isn't happening with LLMs by the way
Windows 11 is already AI OS
Don't do video generation
Audio generation only if it's a vocal synthesizer and not a prompt to song generator
Today: eh
Experience: 70%
Goal: heal
Project: None
- go to school
- pet my dog

have you tried giving more money to openai?
No that's stupid
Have you tried giving money to me? 
14 on persuasion check
Have you tried donating to NeuroSynthProject?
have you tried giving your money to me?
lets cut out the middleman, and dave gives his money to you
you gotta roll
i didn't say i wanted the money from dave that you got
well thats what you're gonna get
!21
damn it
I'm gamble addit
how do you roll 21 on a d20?
What u got ?
14
Mine was 20
i somehow got 20 on the first roll
one point on what? we're trading fake money
you roll 9 and 10
Abby 5 โน
you cant roll twice, that's against the rules
Thank god my now it 0
5 indian rupees?
i did a persuasion check irl for the lolz
and they all started copying me
unoriginal 
5 indian rupees is 5 euro cents. im down to gamble 5 cents








15M param llm



