#programming
1 messages · Page 266 of 1
because ANNs are highly inefficient and power hungry
hence needing entire islands just to make them answer wrong on a test

beep
they dont have a concept of time either while SNNs do
data hungry
because they rely on "spikes" which are closer to human neurons
all for this
I need some help
Formate
([#fill here anything ])
real time learning not even possible on ANN since its heavily based on statistics
i hate distilled models so much man
ANN fake neuron aswell tbh
Ann ???
dont get me wrong they are good for many uses, but for anything that uses NLG, hell no
whole point of NN to begin with
different level of accuracy though
and they are incapable of actually thinking too unlike SNNs as they are continuous
SNN "continuous"
is it just analog processor or what
continuous isn't the only determinant for capability of thinking though
of course not but they are capable of actually learning instead of feeding itself with it's own context over and over
Subprocess.run([])
it interesting because it obviously discretised, i think human brain discretised too ne
if i may ask how do you roughly implement synaptic plasticity in your case 
might be interested with sharing my research
ANN just artificial neural network kinda generic term ne?

talking about neural network architecture
if you mean neuromorphic hardware, its specialised
yes the hardware
also ive returned from JEP106
mfw i dig throuhg the module manufacturer thinking the thing actually gave me some info and the "module manufacturer" is listed as bank 5 0xCD which is
drumroll please
g.skill
there is no "learning" the model weights are left untouched.
and i know those mfs dont make modules
modulated STDP
kind of a newer one to the table
but it shows promise
i was talking about training phase when "learning" to use "thinking"
probably means learning as training

fuck sleep, im more curious with how others that are also involved in this field actually also implement this 
thats the difference
konii got me
SNNs are capable of learning post training
yeah that is super coolio i was just
aka repeating the same thing you said about traditional models and their "thinking"
??? are you running it in simulation in your normal cpu or what
do you have actual processor of that kind
u can run SNNs on normal hardware its just not as efficient
what is the "research"

the research is essentially math which isnt the most fun
I have dopamine as a factor in my model because i based it on DA-STDP
lacking the entry level ML knowledge to understand me think
which is a type of modulated STDP
need go and watch some videos
that's how GPUs are where they are, there are ways to make specific accelerators for these jobs that beat GPUs which are of course general purpose, but they brute force it and have software support so running them is what we do even tho the hardware isnt really built for it (well, increasingly it is now but)
they arent a GPU technically
yeah im talkin like running any model in general and just general purpose hardware vs not
NVIDIA malds at the potential of SNNs
kek
konii your entry level is like top 0.00001% level i aint watching 50000h of videos 
nvm then i'll just ignore this topic
ne not ML knowledge
@true hemlock https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05341
Three-factor learning rules in Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have emerged as a crucial extension to traditional Hebbian learning and Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity (STDP), incorporating neuromodulatory signals to improve adaptation and learning efficiency. These mechanisms enhance biological plausibility and facilitate improved credit assign...
there are too many things in this world i havent heard about
a good read though not the only paper on that version
my ML knowledge is pretty introductory
me systems programmer not ML
just go watch 3blue1brown's intro on neural networks if you want a basic idea of how at least pre-transformer style models function at a conceptual level as well as how transformers themselves work (again, conceptual and visual) in comparison
not much material out there about SNNs designed for someone with no prior background in ml or at least a passing interest to have the baseline of understanding
i think i watched it
but did you WATCHED it
with SNNs, is it possible to represent less important parts of the network with fewer states? i.e. reduced precision
me not know 
maybe i watched something else
idk
i cant connect that to what you are discussing here
i mean weight quantization is always an option though there are other methods too
since when are they making fucking processors that are based on that and which do work
why has nobody ever mentioned it anywhere
do they suck so bad its just like a toy project at its peak
though u also have the option of temporal based thanks to SNNs being temporal based
isnt the typical issue with quantisation is its global and quite lossy? additionally its a post-processing step which isnt really suitable for learning from
which, im not sure how that affects snns but ye
i mean its pretty much only used to shrink ANNs because of how hungry they are
yee
SNNs are already far lower in power requirements but u can still employ a number of methods
@silent cloak what you think about this https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4117/6/11/304 because it got mailed to me (by fuckin grok lmao who i have send me ml news every day) this morning literally
i was under the impression SNNs dont take input in the same way traditional neural networks do
all neurons get input simulatniously?
they get input ...over time
@true hemlock

so it depends on time too
and then each neuron's signal decays over said time
so its similar to how the human brain works
you could say that's it if you simplify how our brains work too
but then you're not talking about the wobbly signalz and shit
so its far less power hungry
yeah they generally don't. depending on implementation, in my case its stimulation based so depending on which cortex net loop picks it up then dynamically propagates it to other loops
and because the signal propagate u have many options of learning beyond the initial training if u employ neuro plasticity
normal ANNs cant learn by doing, only by training
kinda like sensory neuron in brain?
sure u can fill the context with history but that just increases the demands more and more
the first layer yeah, then second layer and so on but all the "neuron" per layer received it at once. its literally just linear algebra though
quite literally, adding, multiplication, and the application of a single function per weight
this is regarding ann? and for snn?
not for snn, at least on some implementation
the basic implementation of snn is still linear
just works with timing based firing with thresholds
btw for an example 2-bit operations on neuromorphic hardware is generally 16x faster than 32-bit
4-bit 8x etc
they dont demand as much
some do
its experimental
just like ANNs were
i only found vedal originally because AI as a subject was obscure back in the day
though machine learning still had its uses
they are new
ish
the first Ai related thing I made was LVQ network
at least in the way that people are excited about and researching and implementing them
then i moved to NLU and to NLG
big NVIDIA researched them years ago but they cant make as much money selling GPUs if it pops off
u can find some old presentations and papers they did
tbf they probably kinda sucked compared to sota of like, unet and other CNNs etc at the time which had more interest and support around them even then
snns as a concept have been around a hot minute though yeah
i dont know when this was so idk what they would've been comparing them to
i am gonna go try to find paper though kek
one of their presentations they did i think was in 2019?
oh so that's against transformers and like unet type shit at that point
its not efficient back then. we're more forward with SIMD based compute so CNN and later on some other popular ANN pops up faster
also people gets the comparison wrong often
thankfully we dont need either for these
makes sense
your typical SNN would suck at most data generation workload
they use spiking neural circuits in some of the hardware to do two's complement and binary matrix multiplication
is a rig with my specs decent enough to get a toy SNN running?
and they honestly are able to work just off of INT2 for a lot of processing
i have no gpu, 32 gigs ddr5, and a ryzen 5 7600
they're much better off doing decision making
if im ngl
llm suck at decision making
indeed
you can offload the decision to daughter networks though
considering that it has no concept of timing
or adaption
what does concept of timing have to do with all of this
SNNs are very popular atm for visual and audio processing though
temporal information in models and using it for anything is so hard for me to understand somehow
SNNs are event driven
Neuro when given the option to do nothing or enter a menu when she's about to win a game: enters menu for 2 minutes after the game has ran for 10 seconds
and timing is needed because the spike signal must decrease over time
"annoying bubbles"
if i had a drawing board i could explain it better
evolve devolve evolve devolve
does each neuron have its own "decrease rate" or they do it all in the same rate
SNNs wouldnt struggle so much with that loop she got into in plague inc
because they retain context
excalidraw dot com
they have their own decay
draw it share it
thats their "weight"
SNNs are kinda like async while traditional networks are more continuous and linear
there are a few different neuron designs rn though
am i horribly wrong here
because its all so experimental
on one side with ANN you practically have a complex network of matrix multiplication to determine the data to be predicted. yeah these models don't have the capacity to think nor have the concept of time, its just predicting data as quick as the computer can do
on the other hand, SNN are more related to biological neurons. the firing are more timed
well, you can think of it more like, a traditional network is inferred all at once
whereas an SNN is more "partial" or "async"-like you said
there are cases where SNN model creates feedback loops and it sometimes works as a timing sensing mechanism
so it depends not only on values of input, but also on the time and order these values appeared?
right so it's kinda idle until it reaches activation and as a function of that event firing sort of approach, it inherently includes time in its computation of a result
brain IRL do this too 
bees have sub-second clock in their head
why do

have you ever seen high speed cam of bee wings they propel upwards with both flaps it looks so cool
this is the SNN implementation as a feed forward for a CNN isn't it
showing some of the comparisons
what is that "IF" thing
whats ur favorite neuron as of lately
Leaky is a popular one
Scam bot, call mods
fair, SNN are pretty competitive in computer vision somewhat and ANN also works so its a proper comparison for a specific usecase
and who processes that "bunch of spikes output" into actual data
or its only midlayer drawing
yeah most papers are related to audio and visual
which is kind of how ANNs started out in research
pretty fun.
it's so over
wasnt this their first big popularity thing
in a computer vision contest
i guess it makes sense to pursue something initially that is exceptionally obvious to the layman "hey that's getting better!" and is also easier for us to intuit ourselves
or benchmark
binary neuron
just accumulate until threshold pretty much
neuron doesnt output until it goes over threshold
when does it stop the output? it has decay too?
and its activation continuously decays until it hit threshold
once threshold is reached
similar to an action potential
typically output is an instantaneous event
it doesnt "last" for any time
ohhh so it holds the output while it has enough intput
that's how our neurons work w/ action potentials and the threshold they have to actually fire
at least in part
how the hell can this be applicable to anything
close enough
alot of different neuron types are being experimental with rn in these models
you need some weird input converter and weird output decoder idk
i have jpg image what do i give it
regular models have that too
yee
encoder/decoder
although i saw a paper where they were getting damn close to a practical way to not have the enc/dec step
terrible use of input neuron
need preprocessing
oh so it looks like low resolution black and white
depends on the preprocessing
lot of the challenge in any ml has been getting the information the model needs to operate on
to the model
in a way that is helpful
ok let me explain how the basic neurons with these work simply
more typically, an SNN could examine parts of an image at a time without losing context
close, but this only explain the basis of a neuron (with also missing some other details, though. such as specific axons and concentration on a group of stimulated dendrites)
whereas a normal ANN couldnt 
the water will slowly leak as the neurons forget
but if the water reaches the top, it shall fire
yeah im abstracting it a lot to basically be this
continuing the cycle
and that "can learn on the fly" part? how does that work
this is where people getting confused with
you don't input raw data, these models are meant to work with stimulus based (separate encoding also exist)
dont they typically have rapid decay after firing too?
Depends on the neuron being used

again there are a few different types rn
yee makes sense
they adjust the activation threshold for next time via some magic that accounts for how long the activation took
so it looks at the output and can change itself depending on the output... what stops us from doing the same in ann?
my research institution even made some new types of neuron
catastrophic model collapse
classified, though
its not temporal based
:TOSbutNDAemote:
same
does SNN revert to original state overtime?
essentiall with STDP connections between neurons get stronger when the first neuron helps cause the second to fire
and it gets weaker when it doesnt
if you do that shit on an ANN it'll overfit and learn noise instead.
yeah and they use VALUES not spikes
which is also why they are inefficient
lets say ur on a phone call
the ANN will continue to process all the empty information
snn learns on the fly from the input?
they also use energy when nothing important is going through
SNNs are also generally binary
yep thats why dense ass models are horrible to run
ohhh quuck i wanted to show you a funny thing that i caused chatgpt to do
0 or 1 while an ANN will send 0.7, 0.8, 0.85 etc
take a guess at how many semicolons are in that output
about 17kb of them apparently

you still have to do the non-firing state updates in the neurons in a SNN running on something that is NOT neuromorphic right
so it's not quite as efficient
im not going to downplay ANN either and be the loud minorities of SNN folks though. gonna make it clear that SNN have different usecases.
you don't generate semantics token vector with these model to generate text, nor you able to diffuse noise from these model.
dunno how to make it simple, but i guess you can say SNN are far better with timed decision making, while ANN are more suited for generative usecases
the time steps but the neuron wont get anymore input
think of it like this
an ANN is contantly talking even when nothing of importance is happening
while an SNN will only talk when needed and put the phone down after
and they only do a couple steps for SNNs too anyways even if you're calculating some updates per non-firing synapse
ITS NO NEURON NOVEMBER GUYS WTF
they are more simple mathmatically so they still dont draw nearly as much power
it's no nVedal november actually
i wonder if its possible to run an SNN on analogue hardware
they dont need large values
brain is analogue hardware running an SNN :^)
need plasticity so need specialised version ne
neuromorphic chips usually use a mix of digital and analog
brain is not analogue
right
make sense
why wouldn't you consider it analogue it has materials that aren't in standard digital
biological not analogue
that's too far into the weeds, actually i dont know what most people would even think of the brain as if they had to classiffy it
how is brain not analogue 
analogue computation specifically
analogue to me is just continuous rather than discrete mostly
I see
brain is definitely not continuous
neurmorphic chips run async too which is nice
why not
speaking of which my research institution has quite done slightly outside the general meta for snn rn
i got a question, by any chance is there any publicly known spiking neuron that needs occasional synaptic regulations
couldn't find any of these yet in public papers but in our variation of snn we do have this shit 
because they just run off of spikes and dont need a global clock
but individual firings and such are what like 10 hz or something
evolution ne
how is this connected
dont ask me ask common ancestor of life with brain
ultimately nothing's continuous if you consider planck time the fundamental resolution of time
planck time isnt resolution of time
there is no evidence time is not continuous
of course
one side we have 2 SNN bros
planck time is just the hard limit for measurement of time
other side is bunch of people who never worked with ml fields
lmao
yeee it me
some has, but on ann
im the clueless 
then you have random philosophical statements outta nowhere
ne, ye not know how brain work
without neurmorphic hardware SIMD does a good job though
this is so #programming piled 
neurons generate impulses but they are not continous
a neuron is putting out discrete events
yup
I mean even if you're considering every neural interaction discretized there's meaningful stuff happening between those discrete moments no
some neurons arent really firing at all either depending on the situation
while an ANN is firing EVERYTHING
it amazes me how many people have this misconception btw
that's what i was saying, the system as a whole kinda operates as if it were continuous and certainly our own perception is continous or feels that way so it makes it hard to intuit
planck units arent anything to do with fundamental limits of physics
they are about useful numbers for us to use in computation

then you have the physics bros

it's a fundamental limit of measurement which is a fundamental limit it's not about our instrumentation it's about what's literally possible
don't get me wrong though this chat is entertaining
they are talking about a dimension as if the mathmatical representation is the part that matters
💀
not relevant ne

time is measurable idk where you got where it's not
i mean below plank time
just a representation
there is no absolute time either
u cant measure time from the third dimension
the speed of time changes when you move
planck time is on the order of e-44 seconds lmao we can do plenty above that
because ur stuck in that axis
the sky is blue
i dont want to explain relativistic effects today so pls go explode 
is space continuous
konii is there anything you dont know
yee i dont know where i left my headphones
can you go solve world hunger or smth
there is no evidence that space isnt continuous
neurons if they were continuous would not have a refractory period, it would not have a break to reset the gradients of like sodium and shit that cause it to fire
but the answer is "we dont know"
it somehow took me 8000 years to make this a white background
neural firing is discretized is still not a claim the entire brains function is but yea it's important to understand the model ig
average programming chat
nee its too chaotic and uninformed i feel like im going to die
i love both so im chill
must be how quuck feel when i ask question about ML
i kind of want to become a known guy here since it looks like this channel is bedlam of future world ruling CEOs
i find nothing wrong with knowing yourself to be uninformed and thus speaking to people who do clearly have experience in it, to try to understand better
which is why i do it constantly
people with knowledge dont become CEO they become hermit
they become woz
u have to be old and stupid to be a CEO these days
or young and evil that's a good one too
if u fuck up, you must double down
nvidia at $5t
and insult the customers
Goodmorning 
let them know that u dont care about them and hate them
samuel vanuel manuel
then u will be the perfect 2025 CEO
i hate to bringit up but that's a failing of the fundamental purpose of the company being serving the shareholder above all else and not doing so would be a very bad for the company who is controlled by those shareholders
not that i think it's a good thing
koniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
it's just kinda they kinda gotta (should not work that way)
yeah but the shareholders invest based on the involvement of consumers
publically traded company is run by shareholders
if there are no consumers there are no shareholders
What
well, shareholder want the funny number to go up NOW not in 15 years
how the fuck did we went from SNN, ANN vs SNN, analog, biology, quantum physics, philosophy and then to business and capitalism
being a shareholder is investing in a company in the hopes that it generates profit from its product/work
late stage capitalism is about making number bigger ye
adhd
and so everyone gets sacrificed except ol benjamin franklin on his hunned
unironically this





we are all markov chain chat bots
not me im a tv
reminds me i have something to consume to make me a good boy for society that i've neglected
Idk man i just got here
I slept for 14 hour cuz im walking like gregory house with my injury
based reference
phantom injury
that's good it probably contributed to healing faster
i cant believe this
get well soon!!!
fun fact, axons stimulation only stimulate relatively close local groups of dendrites while being quite far from its own neuron cell
this makes cortex loops possible and sort of giving the branched propagation
Another episode of my series on AI.
In this one, the hand drawn character finds himself going to the doctor for a physical and encounters an AI doctor.
The AI guy was made using AI but this episode used a lot of editing and puppetry over the AI images.
i forgot about this video
alright tringle man let's get your take on the implications of the planck limit on whether or not the brain is digital or analogue or some other 3rd thing (biological system which can fit both in some ways or otherwise)
stinky tracking
accurate ANN representation
pp
my bad i have a thing that usually removes it
yee must be new one
ive seen it show up
i was about to mention having one of those
not in any filters yet
Idfk. I thought the electric oulses were "digital" and hormones and stuff were analogue
I looked up some stuff about planck time and the precise formulation is it's the unit of time below which we are unable to reconcile the math of GR and QM and therefore have no models to predict anything
even hormone is discrete
lmao tthe hundreds of doctor agents
biochemistry is interesting, the way hormones work typically is by binding to a molecule and altering it in some way

definition of analog vs digital is a fight I may be willing to relitigate but I need to look up history of the idiomatic use of analog
I know more about dna then hormones, dna is just way cooler imo
And i only learn stuff im interested is cuz other info doesnt stick
biochemistry go much deeper
dna and hormones are pretty intertwined
DNA fans when their telemeres decrease
I must be song writer
inasmuch as your gene expressions directly influence your response to any hormone
you have 22 mitoses left before you turn into dust

Idk about biology
epigenetic mechanisms in DNA are cool. neurotransmitters are cool because I'm a huge fan of acid and that's how we discovered the phenomenon of the serotonergic system. GO ACID.
i dont wanna be taller i want my telemeres to be taller
among all the diverse topics from different fields randomly spouting out, here we are with outside randoms randomly make noise
New year countdown but for mitosis 
truly #programming piled
could probably make a clock like that
this is just the peak of this channel
based on estimates of course
Mediterranean diet
TELL ME U GUYS
HOW MUCH URE GPU NEED TO TRAIN ?
i have a variation of it and keto
I'm shortening my telomeres like idgaf I don't wanna live to 70
1 epoch, idk
A normal human cell can undergo between 40 and 60 mitotic divisions before it stops dividing and undergoes apoptosis
so it would be easy to estimate how many before death
based on average cell lifespans, general mitosis, and cell count
unless youre henrietta lacks

Can i just get more cells from those stem fuckers in my spine?
I had to read that book for a health data elective, the immortal life of Henrietta lacks
lol the hela cells are fucking creepy to me
it was a good elective
any of the immortal cell lines
i just dont remember anything outside of random information
thats called object permanence
forgot to eat for 10 hours ne
Depends on the model
it's super cool and useful for research but damn
Google server gpu spec
4²
Same lmao
yeee
№2
imagine if telomeres didnt suck
maybe in a century she will be revived
some species can regenerate their telomeres
lucky
a Helamunculus
ASK QUACK TO DO FINE TUNING
im so fucking funny bro
this conversation feels like from another world where everyone knows everything for some reason
me programming SNNs with telomeres
afunyun which char is your pfp
so they eventually die like people
planned obsolescence
iSNN
That i person is so weird
ye
mailman/Incidental 154/guard 1/policeman 2
in our (my research institution) case, the synaptic plasticity does multiple things actually. strengthen "axons" into local dendrite group, shift to a different group, split and refactor groups. the signal propagation isn't considered as synaptic plasticity though in our case
we modelled our SNN variation heavily based on advanced research in neuroscience aswell
could be useful if you're planning something similar but in most cases of SNN only research its not as applicable.
@silent cloak
ty
time to dip
its heavily based on real neurons so yeah
i had to read up quite a lot
As usual, a completely nonsense sentence
oh ok I knew it looked maybe spongebobby I thought Simpsons at first but this makes sense yea the oval eyes
i think its just ESL
ANNs are more math than biology while SNNs are more biologically focused
he tries lol i don't mind the entropy he injects
Snn hmmm
hi
Hello
i am on desktop now
not seen him talk for a while
or was it 404
not sure
though ignoring all the other work that goes into it regarding the math of course
not sure if im willing to invite cipher somewhere for more of our snn research but
actually nah
night drunk rn

take out to dinner first ne
if we have antibiotics, then what are biotics?
Atleast I got idea tho



on mobile
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium
of course
what
average red goop
wait let me try something
soup for shit to grow in a petri dish
ew
programming chat is just spinning the wheel on topics
weird example ne but funny
probiotics and prebiotics have been been fads for awhile
ahem.. so there is this problem where we cant travel faster than light, but i heard there is some trick how its actually possible, have you heard somehting about it @sage crag
I see them extra because california
Well any one has idea to mix multiple image to one ?
we're all just nerds with similar interest i think
if you get enough people chatting at once this chat cycles throuhg every possible STEM/Philosophy/brainrot/gibberish topic imaginable
I'm ADHD as hell and will talk about anything I know about
there is no way of travelling faster than light, but there may be ways of altering space such that you travel less distance to get to a destination, hence creating the illusion of moving faster than light
no actual evidence of such a method existing though
oh yeah of course how do i do that
same
and also things i barely know about
same
invent warp drive that bends spacetime
dunno no one did it yet
welp, im still not able to walk but it hurts less. i might skip school tomorrow 
can you do it for fun
ALCUBIERRE DRIVE
Use #general-network chat
JUST 10 MORE YEARS GUYS
but you know how

until we find a way of bending space to our will we're stuck with the "light barrier" much like we had the "sound barrier" before yeager
speed of light isnt barrier
speed of light is fundamental limit on how fast information can travel
it insurpassable
the speed of light is the great filter 🤯
quite possibly
every now and then konii gets a new word in her vocabulary, and now it is is "ne"
not mutually exclusive
wrrr
ne has been increasing in frequency for a stinky minute
Do u know we are offical stage 0
In technology
wrrr
ne ne, kiiteru?
if i remember, dont you approach infinite mass when you get near the speed of light?
yes
Stage 1 has able to use whole sun engery
yep
given that kardashev is based on energy consumption
if we want to be as high as possible
give NVIDIA more money
diagnosed Autism + ADHD goes hard
pretty much
jensen will figure out harnessing the sun for a megaslopper 9000
Nivida need to make
More gpus 🙂
there's more too it than that though
Schrodinger's state between hyperfixation and lack of particular focus
thats why i was saying it is sort of like a barrier to getting fast enough
otherwise you would still be able to get to the speed of light in a vacuum
E = mc^2. so mass becomes big
barrier is a fine word to use there konii was nitpicking imo
he'll just dump money into iter or the others
full equatation is actually E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2
i think the problem is that barrier implies there's something behind it
where p is momentum
ye, but i didnt bother to remember that one
✓
this is the reason that photons can still push things despite having zero mass
pc = personal computer
we've defined the things behind it like tachyons we just don't expect them to exist
tachyons are poorly defined
because they probably don't exist yea
part of the fundamental equations that define our reality
true... then again we may be still stupid enough to not realise that things may exist beyond it
i certainly am
ne speed of light is one thing we are pretty confident about
cant go over it without creating infinity somewhere
Bye I still
Coding dump things on ai
what about those warps you mentioned
gl i
shrinking a distance and then moving that distance, to circumvent the speed limit
would that mean, that you can get negative energy for things with negative mass?
i mean for all purposes our best way of exiting this bitch of a earth's gravity is still strapping millions of tons of explosives to our ass and farting it out at a lunatic manner just to get up there
in principle energy is a scalar
there is no negative energy
bwaa
wait but doesnt distance shrink too when you approach speed of light
i know antimatter has positive mass, which is kinda sad
its jsut oposite charge or something
scam
E=mc²+AI

opposite quark composition but yea
nvidia is writing that down now
how would one get a negative mass on something
it appears to shrink but its not actually shrunk
its a relativistic effect
oh so just visual
not quite
distance as observed by another person would remain the same
but for yourself it would appear to contract yes
make mass out of nothing, and then you have the negative mass left?
idk im not a scientist, im a sciencefictionwriter at best
would it increase the mass of something else instead of its own mass
because imagine it in the sense of money
you have + money (no debts, only cash)
or you have - money (you have debts)
i know it sounds stupid, and it is also stupid, but it would be cool
does it mean it will appear that you are moving "slower"
to yourself
i have 3 kids and no money but i want no kids and 3 money
ye as you approach lightspeed you appear to become slower
or more accurately, everything slows around you
in fact, photons dont percieve time at all
its so hard being a single mom when you dont have children and you're a teenage boy
which is why its not really accurate to say that they travel
everything slows around you yea if you move fast enough the whole universe will age faster than you
look at yourself in the mirror and cry that the version in your mirror probably has it
so photon sees its destination right before its eyes but it looks like nothing is moving?
its more that they "propagate"
(lets pretend it has eyes)
if you were somehow able to break the speed of light you'd basically just be timetraveling because then you could pretty much send information to yourself in the past
you could be philip j fry
and be your own grandpa
no its more like, from the photons perspective it already reached its destination
entire universe is 2d for photon
photon has no concept of time
right?
yeah that dimension is just gone
universe still 3d
time dimension gone though
steins gate moment
classic banger
Yes
photon is ann 
hey speaking of discrete vs continuous, there's some debate about whether or not spacetime itself is even continuous or discrete due to qUaNtUm ThEoRy
erm
yee already mentioned
i have no clue
like i say, no evidence that spacetime is discrete yet
however, lots of fundamental forces are discrete
oh ok i missed that part 
does it even matter tho? we'll never see the end if it is discrete
No
you would be time traveling i think
if we had a working tested theory of quantum gravity we may be able to identify if spacetime was discrete or not
my personal guess is its probably discrete, but the only thing i know is i dont know shit
my personal guess is that spacetime can be infinitely subdivided and is continuous
time is relative, right
nooo
so
you have same time perseption for yourself
What
god im tired of this
Yes
in theory you'd just be going so fast that relative to the outside world, a few billion years would be a single second
and you'd just get to the heat death of the universe
sorry konii i dont have unlimited brain 
Not sure
i know you know more about the big bang than me, but i thought since space supposedly expanded from there it would have an end?
are u talking about the effects of falling into a blackhole
everyone keeps saying how to go back in time... how to go back.... i ask how the hell you go forward
oh nvm then
no
that one's easy
death
going forward in time is the easy part thanks to time dialation
But if we do
gravity effects the 4th dimension
affects*
quick someone bring up the 2 slit experiment where people totally misunderstand what it is trying to demonstrate and then go off on a conspiracy theory about consciousness
oh wait i just did
yeah but i dont have a damn blackhole as easy access
quote of all time
No
ngl

haha this guy can't pull black holes
put it down in the louvre to replace that lost stuff
observing quantum particle changes its behaviour 
from what i remember it just makes a gradient where the waves collapse or increase each-others' amplitude. something about probability idk
🧉
and by "observing" we mean bombing it with other particles
i cant even pull women how do i pull a blackhole bruh 💀
Yes
how can this happen 
hologram theory
just put a small camera near it smh why disturb it with other particles
No
doesnt work, too small
observing an electron fixes it to one place, otherwise it's in all places at once
transparent to any light
yeah and observing means like
there was a good veritasium on the two slit experiment and all its implications can't remember the name tho
tryna see where it actually is
you need a microwave, a 42 inch crt tv, a mobile phone, a dr pepper, and a cool lab coat
not just looking at it i dont think
"nah bro if its transparent just put night vision on it then you can defo see it"
Yes we do
observation in a quantum sense is just literally doing anything that forces the wave function collapse
konii left, this conversation is doomed

people just misunderstand what observation means and think it has to be a conscious person doing the "observing" and that somehow us looking at something is some sort of magic effect that causes the info to manifest
nobody to resolve the questions
Fuck that Doomsday
then switch to a topic we know
Ok
which name do i give to my chess bot
steve
ligma master
chess_bot.py
why did ijust fail to load my own bio
chesster
do i make super cringe name
shitass
when will phone manufacturers let 685 die
but that's me
holy shit
t i have a question
thats what my roomates nickname is uni was
well it was "ass shit"
wow why would you block urself like that
but same thing
did he deserve it
my boy dingleberry
Oh yeah the Chess competition
I forgor
Guess I won't have a bot
he was from italy and one time he said "im hungry as shit" but his accident made it sound like ass shit
Sad
yeah same
so we started calling him ass shit
woops!
me just now
Ok
mmm ass shit
Shir disappeared from here so everyone forgor
our nicknames for each other are "street light pole", "dipshit", "horse shit", "glue sniffer"
classic italian dish
i forgot what they called me
for some reason graduation mans name existing on my screen got rolling girl stuck in my head idk how that works
Cat
lmfao
which one are you
that smug face of garfield makes it better
i ham happy this is my pfp for this
it does
unfortunately
nothing here will ever really hit starboard
because
my name is squirrel fucker
there's not enough people for it
or w/e it is
they gotta lower starboard req here to 5
:?
they have starboard tuned for gen and nn which can get like 60 stars in 2 seconds
interesting.
s-sandy cheeks?
we did get the triangle art to hit starboard that one time
very interesting.
did we
yes
👍🏿
My bad
i forgot toned emojis exist lol
came from a misconception when i was in a park and a squirrel kept pissing me off and biting me so i kicked it
then i accidentally left the mic on while flushing and the kids thought i flushed the squirrel and some kid said "he probably did that after fucking it"
the rest is history
stupid fuckin mistakes man
what kids
all this time i was on a discord call because we were doing an important project
ok
i see
this is getting more concerning
No
my first thought was irl streaming lmfao
school grade 12 final project
No
one of them is just straight up called senator gaylord nelson
(hes gay allegedly)
gaylord is a normal name believe it or not
i cant find it rn bwaa
i have a video of me in my sunday best (one(1) pair of boxer briefs) getting convinced to dive into a lake when it was like -15c outside, then running away into my car
hell yea
my hometown is unironically called gaylord
ok??
i know its the guy who made world enviroment day
lol
i was meaning to reply to jester's anecdote but then i saw gaylord lol
must have been chilly
brainrot
it was
idk why what you said reminded me of that
just stupid ass shit back in the day i guess
no we do stupid shit all the time
its important to do dumb shit
😭
it won't let me add another star this is 1984
its such a shitty drawign compared to everything else on starboard, its beautifull
someone advertise it in genchat they will defo star it
what's the lore behind red triangle
vulkan
i am the subject of a halloween legend at michigan state, at least for a while, because i was gumby wearing a lebron james jersey for halloween and got so crunk that i blacked out and woke up without the costume
and found out the next day that, the previous evening during the time i lost, there was a kerfluffle involving several campus police tackling lebron gumby to the ground only for the wily man in the suit slithering out of it and escaping into the woods
the vulkan triangle
we did a contest to see who could render it the fastest
making a triangle render REALLY FAST
I see
quack won at 102000fps
lmao ty
my pc topped out a 44K
p2w...
yep
yall should i learn vulkan
i know opengl
how the fuck did you tapeworm your way out of being tackled in a gumby suit
.... did you wake up buck naked the next day?????
but its a bit aging
are you a masochist? -> yes -> go ahead
-> no -> maybe don't
nah i had clothes on underneath i just didnt have the suit anymore
nor did i have my damn gold chain necklace
rest in police custody, gold chain necklace

I was at 47K fps for triangle, Still beating Sam's PC on laptop
will it give me the last 2 frames per second on my rotating cube
igpu is where its at for low cost high frequency renderinng
lol
this was the triangle leaderboard



