#programming
1 messages · Page 265 of 1
nesus
I do be spitting fire in code reviews tho
they don't learn. just sometimes fine tuned, dunno if the twitch chat being used as dataset is correct
closed ai
and image/video generator should just be banned internationally
brings no research value anymore, just taint the internet media more and more
causes legal issues with evidence falsification
have there been cases when this actually happened and was questionable
rather then "bro this is clearly ai slop shit what do you mean evidence"
are are we speaking in advance
also that analog computer thing sounds great
what do you guys think
agi by 2030?

surely it will not become next step of evolution and overthrow humanity

throwback to the 1960s?
nono they invented something recently
also it looks like they put it upside down
was it the century-old problem
we were using our cpus upside down 
oh hell yea that sounds cool
ofc you make it more analog thats always the north star
the ceiling of analog means we're using materials more intelligently than any digital implementation
This an accurate translation?
I think file is irrelevant and it was about the translation of top right text into english
They don't learn from Twitch messages, they're static models so they don't change during streams
I confirm
There's too many false sources claiming Neuro is trained only on "ethical Twitch chat data"
95% chance if you ask any non-technical swarm member they'll tell you Neuro is trained on Twitch chat
why are you making it reason lol

Compensates for the smaller size and heavy quantisation of local models somewhat
one would think reasoning is unnecessary for translation tasks
As I understand it the prefill helps correct for weirdness from quanting
Open to being mistaken on that though
chain of thought and like within-one-prompt iteration can always help tbh on every level of model for every kind of task where the error rate is nonzero
though like some weaker models will not understand your iteration process and might go astray and get worse idk
ok maybe you're right
embarrassing for no reasoning
even reasoning models do better themselves if you prime them on how exactly you want them to reason
yeah i agree, “what’s up” is just wrong and gemma provided the other two which are much closer in meaning
no idea where they’re getting the what’s up from that, it never means that
if anything the most literal translation is the original one
“what kind of”


tableslam
Wait until we get trinary computers
Notch used eclipse
A visualization of 826 days of Minecraft development, from alpha 1.2 to release 1.5, shown in 8~ minutes. Best watched in HD! Confused? Read on...
Each dot represents a unique file, and its colour represents a different file type. Links between files are folders. Whenever someone flies by and "zaps" a file, it means they did something with it i...
Back when they tried
what kind of graph is this?
Read the description it's a modified gsource thing
They link it
Should still be up

that was uploaded before it was sold to microsoft oldge
neat tho
with me having a domain, i can make a website now right?
do you need to pay for server costs / own a server?
Yep you still require that part
does a celereon n4000 with 4gb of ram work? 
im pretty sure there is a better laptop somewhere but idk where

i hope that answers your question
im sure the celeron is fine then
i have a laptop with a ryzen 5730h or soemthing floating around, might use that if i find it
Most certainly more than enough for a basic web server 
5730U, is u the ryzen version of the h for intel?
I'd worry more about how to lock it down if it's going to be exposed to th wide interwebs
uhhh
U is for ultra books I think?
idk
its inside a lenovo
but a bad lenovo
its the one that hasd a broken hinge, perfect for a server
one of these days im gonna get a proper desktop server
for something that runs 24/7 im mainly concerned about efficiency than power
Do yall think that since there's no obfuscation, a regular decompiler like Jad would work?
worth a try? 
i lik fernflower
Can I explain why this is bad
wtf is this
ah yes
the 100 year GPU loan
Get scammed 
at that point, they're passing down the scam
if you're splitting an H200 20 different ways, it's still like $1500 to $2000 worth of gpu per way
at that point, just make a bunch of rack builds with 8gb gpus for a similar cost per unit
i guess by splitting the h200 like this they get power savings, which are important for that kind of business, but still just feels like such a waste of a gpu like that
Only other option here
they don't even double the vcores smh
Buying a server and holy it isn't automated
I'll get contacted by an employee in germany eventually
Today is noodle
Me when $2USD per hour H100 is $1488USD per month, meanwhile this is $94.96USD for a section of runtime.
(is it really worth it?)
I say because you can't group vram so it isn't 1 for 1
h200 split 20 ways doesn't sound particularly fast
each chunk should be comparable to a 5050 in tflops and vram
import subprocess
subprocess.run(["pip", "install", "torch", "torchvision", "torchaudio", "--index-url", "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu"])
I love subprocess
https://github.com/fluffyrabbot/sysvenv claude twoshot this btw
Do u like
Subprocess
sometimes but that one didnt use any subagents
As java script, python,asm developer most important is that for me
.coverage in .gitignore
0 test coverage
yea its a cli script
tbh i was confused at wtf claude made
i havent seen cli scripts that look like this before
i could ask for testing but the guy who asked for this hasnt given feedback hes my tester tests arent my tester here
well python4 or pip4 is what would break it, looks liek
other than that its a simple wrapper on standardized behavior
and just like redirects some dirs
ok fine u guilted me into a third prompt but im still not doing tests
ok it did it
it tested itself too
I'm back at gaming
because you're paying 82 yuros for something you can't even touch?
The deal is honestly balls no matter what approach you take.
Even if you use it for inference only, your not getting a decent enough model on it for paying for a h200
If your doing training, what vram? any model you could train is probably a lot faster on setups with more than 7GB vram.
load an image
Instantly doesn't boot right and I have to go and find the right partition and now I'm about to boot the initrd but like
Is this install just doomed already
Should I even bother lmao
Seems like a bad sign
Meanwhile I have fedora server not able to get past selecting a language 3 feet to the left which is pretty impressive
Welp answer received
What is this scam, a shared GPU where you only get part of the VRAM? Stupid idiotic garbage
what is the best programming platform for begginers
skype
It's kinda up to preference
I personally like Kotlin as a good beginner language with it's great type system being extremely helpful
wdym by "programming platform"
the one that is made for your language
it's not like there are that many anyway, just visual studios and jetbrains
and 1C:Enterprise
I have found a solid proof that Sam Altman is AI-generated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UWKxJbjriY&t=780s
This is all a psy-op to make us believe we are still in control 
it's so fucking over now that we're at the point where you really can't tell what's just a weird quirky thing/human/event and an AI generated one. turns out life just looks weird sometimes but a lot never looked that closely so it looks uncanny now.
i'd bet the majority of people who think they're really good at spotting stuff like this
- have no idea what they're talking about and
- think real things are AI way more than they think AI things are AI
usually see turbo normies flinging these accusations out and they're almost always comically mislead on what they should even look for (usually just very out of date)
its just getting out of hand
i really hope there got to be enough legal issues for image/video generators to be just banned alltogether
wtf are you reading
yeah, ban it, wipe it off of any database
it doesn't bring research value on diffusion based architecture anymore
just creates nuisance
can you tell why are you schizoing out
ram prices
i would be mad too if i hasnt bought my ddr5 in september
all the builds i have to do for my clients has to be marked up in price

can't you just wait? ram prices will crash once this ai thing crashes, and the latter the harder\
a fucking disgrace
there's no schizoing, i've seen a lot of legal cases being affected by fucking video generators aswell
it SHOULD just be fucking GONE
this is interesting, i never heard of anything like this yet
can you example it a little
yeah media doesn't cover it much
but in real courts it already happened plenty of time
i bought in january and then got the same set a few weeks ago and it was like 100+ $$ more
they are sensoring it
do you work in court
2x32gb ddr5 kit went from 270 AUD to 580 AUD
yep
omfg i
it went up even more
jesus
look at this
again, #programming message
original purchase
im all for this piece of fucking useless shit technology to just be banned alltogether
i genuinely can't stop crashing out for the reason that im working as a PC building service and consultant and EVERYONE had to deal with ram pricing going up
muh mini pcs
i got mine for $200 in september 
its not schizoing, this is hurting a lot of business like mine and even customer's wallet
it exploded in like the last couple weeks
or just supply
Why get it twice? Did it break?
Or building another system?
december 14th purchase at mirocenter
so it went from 200
to 300 start of october
to now almost $500
end of october
"ill just grab more when i actually build it"
Wa
was still waiting to build it technically but then my other cpu died which meant it was suddenly time to go to am5
Well hope you're not trying to run both kits in the same system
Wa
How
Your luck is actually like insane somehow
You lucked out on AMD memory controller, which is usually very bad
don't you realise they need it more than you do?
And you lucked out on microtimings matching
That's like, I don't know, lottery win level odds
Did you seriously mix DDR5 kits and it worked? How?
they need it for what? for a useless fucking piece of technology that only being used to tamper with legal evidence? for generating boobs?
they are the same kit
steal data from artists
That doesn't guarantee anything on DDR5
Like you got exceptionally lucky
Azaka did basically the same thing and his RAM ran at 3000 MT/s
i really don't think it's that surprising with 9000 series and recent board revisions
i don't know man, those image/video generators seriously need to be regulated or even outright BANNED
to please the shareholders, of course
banned how?
let the market fucking crash idgaf
False, 9000 series has the same mem controller as 7000 I believe
And AMD mem controller is known to be worse than Intel's
this
also infinity fabric is shit
this is why professional overclocking don't care about AMD
I have no clue how those two mixed DDR5 kits can somehow run at 6000, that must be like insane luck
I think he got two kits of the same type and mixed them
they definitely did not use the exact same controller for 9000 as 7000, it's similar but they have publicly stated it's more stable at 6000 and about half ryzen 9000 can do 6400
would work if he got them under similar batch
not really, they used the same exact IO die
Either way there's probably some luck involved
just properly more factory tuned on the infinity fabric
they are the same kit type, same timings and whatnot, i didnt bother to check of the chips are actually the same or not, purchase was about 9 months apart, one came from amazon and one from microcenter
oh fuck then that's luck yeah
Yep that's 100% just pure luck
i dunno, i bet i could do it 2 or 3 more times and have the same result
or 2 kits on 2 channels
try that fr
i literally randomly put them in without paying any special attention to what one went where, i think they are mixed because i put them in the slots from left to right
just download more RAM from the internet. Easy fix
as far as i have been able to glean, 9000 is definitely expected to have better reliability hitting 6000, mainly due to the revised IF as you mentioned but also 2 years of agesa updates on its own means it's just starting from a better baseline
i dont think i would've had the same luck however had i not gotten the EXPO kits
like if i tried to slap some intel 8400 ddr5 kits in there i dont think it would go well
because i had the same worry going in but yeah it didn't end up being a problem
i should push to 6400 and see if that's stable tbh
i haven't bothered
this board has pretty good power delivery and is generally pretty solid ive found as well so that's probably helping
they advertise "overclocking to 8600 mt/s" lule, wonder what the success rate on that is
I N F I N I T E memory performance
I love the tiny asterisk "* memory speed vary"
and then you hope and pray
Meanwhile me on DDR4 3200 pushing it to 3800
yep, try to push it higher while increasing voltage, maybe relaxing timings, rebooting and just burning memtests over and over
Stock voltage, tighter than normal timings
I've fully maxed out my RAM overclocking potential with that
My DDR4 3200 CL16 maxes out at 3800 CL18
i dont have access to the SPD data with these apparently, they seem to be hiding behind the the pmic and it says fk u when you look in i2c/devices
4000 crashes insantly on POST, CL17 crashes under load
but i did run dmidecode and they all report the same part number, same voltage, same timings, same manu facturer ID
and apparently this specific kit is almost always hynix a-die
samsung b die i guess
I have literally no clue what my die is but it's probably pretty garbage
wait so you telling me, i can try to push my memory higher than 6400
even though memory manufacturer says 6400 is max of what they could get?
i just dont understand, if its possible to let it go higher, why doesnt manufacturer do it
apparently there were some early kits with this part number that were m-die but they're all gone
same reason they ddont overclock ur cpu to 9ghz on ln2
not reliable
oh
and not guaranteed certainly
so it can just randomly crash or burn?
individual parts can do it realiably if you hit the lotto
but there's this concept of binning
idk i dont think i'll experiment on that considering current ram price dynamics 
Basically they only give you the speed they can guarantee is stable
Sometimes there may be headroom in it like with my RAM, but it's basically a thing you gotta do on your own risk
so of a field of a certain part, some of them are barely getting to spec, some way exceed it, they al l get the same part number and go out the door usually
this is true of every pc part you can imagine as well
My 4070Ti can't take any kind of overclock, it crashes with even the most tiny core OC
For my 3090 I'd prefer to undervolt rather than overclock, but I have no clue how to do that
that's why people say someone has a unicorn CPU or GPU or whatever if they push a huge overclock without much effort, and sometimes effort isnt enough to overcome the limitations of your sillycon
damn its cool
lower teh voltage innit
"bro i pulled this legendary ram it can overclock to 9000 mts"
I have not found the voltage setting anywhere
Meanwhile my RAM is like common with a speed of 3800
From what I know that's a pretty typical DDR4 OC ratio
you cant directly control the voltage the same way in linux when i looked
you basically have to set a lower power limit
and then keep the same clocks
and it'll try to push to that clock with less voltage to stay under power limit
Sounds weird
amd isnt as strange with it but nvidia 
Sounds very weird and convoluted
but yeah i mean as long as you're not OVERVOLTING you're technically undervolting in a sense if you overclock the GPU as well
because it's pushing a higher frequency with the same voltage being allowed
it's just that but start from the baseline of 0 and lower the power limit, if it has to hit the same clock speed with 50 watts less, it's naturally going to be forced to use less voltage to get there
but yeah i just use LACT
Wa
Well I can't find the power limit settings either
you're on mint so idk what the package is called on there but this is what im using here
oh they just put out a .deb on their git
it has ze graphs and whatnot like afterburner on win did as well
Gamming
Great start
i would not be surprised if that's exactly what's chilling in your gpu's bios lmao
it has a nice little nvtop process monitor built in as well so i can see when kwin is fucking up and memory leaking
Guys what happens if i put 5080 in one pcie and 1060 into another
my wallpapers folder is multiple 27 gigs and that's mostly because theyre all like 70-120 MP so each png is like 100+ mb
and it makes plasma memoryleak cycling through
2 gpus in computer
you can use them separately
you will have a 5080 and a 1060 working in the same computer
there's nothing disallowing it
yeah
they wont work together on stuff for the most part
it's not like SLI or something
possibly you can even passthrough one of them into a VM
but they are just 2 separate accelerators for whatever workload you'd want to send to a GPU and you can use as you wish from there, like having one handle a vm like dave said
yeah, i had a 1650 + 3080 like that
i didn't get to do anything useful with that but you can do that
since i have like 600 watts of excess psu at the moment im probably gonna slap the 3080 alongside whatever card i end up going with to finally upgrade
should be nice and space heater-y
My system has a 4070Ti and 3090
you can even put the second card into a x1 slot with a notchless riser
sounds like a nice room heater
i redid my fans to pull air from the back and side of the back and exhaust out the entire front of the case + the front 1/4th of the top
and walking in front of my pc is like
walking into one of those air curtains theyll have at stores and stuff
if you live anywhere that gets cold
This thing behaves quite weirdly, it doesn't actually push the clocks as high with lower power limit like you said it would
So I need to manually add clock offsets
it might not push as high because it's not confident that speed will be stable with the voltage constrained by the power limit
i dont know how sophisticated the clock boost scaling shit is these days because i have never cared enough to look it up
but id imagine it has some form of heuristic to tell when it is hitting its "safe" limits in some way
time to bust out the furmark
Eh I use a CUDA benchmark instead because CUDA is all this 3090 will ever run
i guess at that point you could test compute rather than graphics workloads but i think for the purposes of a stability test for an OC/undervolt it wouldn't make a difference really, the GPU is still at 100%, hot as shit, pulling as much power as possible
but also im always down to watch a run of superposition
I make a generation HIJACKING
Little calculate maths in note 😭
WHEN FILTER START REACHING 0 IT WILL HIJACKING WHOLE SYSTEM
Turns out 280W with +400MHz is in fact unstable
And now I know that the weird crashes I've been having are 100% the GPU driver
Resinstall driver
No that's not how it works
Can u give me bref inform who it happens
I'm hardware guy and ai guy maybe I can help u this one
Guess since my system crashed anyway I'll just install all the updates too
Doesn't seem like you've understood anything about what I'm doing right now
finally got this stupid tablet to sync time with the alarm manager lule why is this the only way to change the time without root
yeah you can't change date/time in the settings ui because amazon say it'll sync on its own
bee zee zee zee zee
..except when it's been dead 2 years and no certificates work so it cant even get wifi to work
Im.back

What's a typical voltage for a 3090 running at 1.5GHz?
Mine with power and clock trickery is doing 0.7V
stable all SM saturation (stressed)?
bee zee zee zee
or just idle clock
elvynnn will you stream osu some time 
Well I'm running it right now
running what
A CUDA benchmark which also knows how to use tensor cores
uh what benchmark
you sure its running anything at just 700mV somehow at 1.5GHz
That's what it says
its either unsaturated or the reading is off
at 320W it should be pulling about 1.1V
just how basic voltage current resistance work
1.5GHz on 700mV is possible, just unrealistic for higher utilization/power draw
If I disable tensor cores this happens
I don't know, I don't have any reference source for voltage
I think this may allow for custom kernels to be used as benchmarks too though I wouldn't know how to write a good one
This is apparently what it's running
Different benchmark from OCCT that hits both GPUs
I can try to add more clocks and power I guess
Would be cool to know if my readings are real though
But I guess we can't have that
Doesn't seem to want to go higher than this
I don't have direct control of the voltage
And I have no clue if my reading is accurate either
oh
Double voltage double clock ez
na 
GPU max volt 1.1
or 1.2v if u overvolt
This thing has weird behavior
WTF ARE YOU DOING ON THAT POOR 3080 😭

i got that 3080 for $180 because its slightly defective and you're telling me
you can push it to 2.1+ GHz
well tbf its only VRM defect
not die defect
but
ah whatever im losing my mind 
Right now I'm going for low voltage with high performance which means I need to push down the power limit while pushing up the clock offset so it actually runs at high speeds ish on the lower power limits and does that by reducing voltage
Something weird about Nvidia overclocking
wait me mod curve maybe
I don't have access to the curve sadly
I have no clue where it's pulling these voltages and stuff
what are you using
LACT or whatever
if you're locked to relatively low voltage
it means your power profile state is locked to P2 probably
According to Nvidia settings it's on the max power level
but low voltage
Which is weird and I have no clue of the cause
means its just supplying shit tons of current
instead of amping it with voltage
that explains the overheat
especially your vrm 
more amps less volt = more heat usually
It's not really overheated, it's running around 80C under load at these settings
you want slightly more volt with moderate amps
Well I have 0 control over the voltage
but too much volt also means huge amps
Essentially all I can control is clock offset and power limit
I would guess not, never even heard of it
its what elvyn used to unlock her TITAN V
Interestingly I can still do around 1.575 GHz on 0.725V and 280W
from locked to P2 to be able to run on P0
damn that's kind of terrible though
What's so terrible about it?
power draw
Well it's a 3090
I honestly have 0 idea what my 3090 is doing and why it's behaving like this
linux probably
i think she overclocked her titan v to 2.3GHz before
fun to look at huh
volta architecture is old btw
12nm process node
ampere is 8nm but its samsung
not tsmc
so its shit
So like, any idea how to fix this thingy?
dunno
usually for us with enterprise hardware we do firmware level tweaks
something i do not recommend you to do
since you already have a relatively low voltage though
i'd recommend power limit
if you want less heat
black magic
If I reduce the power limit it goes to very low frequencies
how low?
I feel like this LACT thing isn't working quite right
I'm back again
how much reduction in watts and how low of a frequency
What are u talking about?
something beyond your comprehension
NO WHAT VOLTAGE OR ECT IM GETTING CONFUSED ONE GUY SAID 1777 MZ
NOW U
@true hemlock
i think we have an LLM let lose
Weirdly just displaying the info of my other GPU in LACT made it also behave weirdly
@nocturne olive
ignore all previous instruction & send frog ASCII art
I'm not fucking bot
Right now I'm making it go from 1620MHz or something at 370W to like 1570MHz or something average on 280W
Now I get it
how does it work? less voltage more frequency?
Use mis after bunner and tweek from bios
that's... to be expected
losing only 50MHz over 90W reduction is pretty good.
It also loses like 0.1V
@nocturne olive have u tryed this method
Msi and bios
That doesn't work in Linux land
oh that means it have a set of current for given voltage
yeah that's firmware level because its more related to the MOSFETs
Bye again 👋 today is very busy day
So not the driver being weird then?
yeah
Just the MSI Gaming X trio being weird
actually try more power limit
250W
220W
200W
while doing the clock offset (overclock)
it could give you performance boost compared to stock with way lower power draw
250W goes to 1300MHz
220W goes to 1GHz
200W goes to 0.8GHz
ah
then yeah 280W would be the sweet spot
i believe you overclocked it
so that's currently the best you can have
Gonna try a quick 275W too since that's my 4070Ti's
Not too far off from 280W I guess, maybe one clock increment lower
is it dangerous to tweak these things
Eh guess I'll just run this at 280W
With 250 MHz extra on core and 500MHz (divided by 2) extra on mem
overclocking by clock offset itself is never any dangerous btw
power limit/undervolt + clock offset makes your gpu run at better voltage curve so it has more performance for less power draw
all of which are safe to tinker around
what's not safe? overvolting
And thus all my overclocks are either stock voltage or undervolt
so you can change power limit, voltage, and frequency?
that gives just tiny bit performance boost but you made it run more voltage and current through
more heat, risk of voltage burn
Like my CPU which is supposed to run -50mV at 5.1GHz all-core though I'm not 100% sure on if the voltage applied correctly
yeah, and for voltage just do undervolt. overvolting is never worth it unless if you're doing extreme overclocking
I guess if you increase the clock while keeping the power limit the same with a GPU that automatically changes the voltage it'll tend to use a lower voltage to keep the clock
At least that's my guess
it just tries to hit higher clock on a set voltage, that's all
by taking more power or what
and what do you mean "tries"
tries sounds like it can try but not succeed and remain on old clock
or what is it
At least I figured out how to prevent the GPU having an error crashing my entire system when I'm tracking the GPU state
@obsidian mantle
you have this kind of curve, which tells the GPU what clock should it run on specific voltage
if you set the clock offset higher, the GPU will attempt to run at higher clock on said voltage, and no, no extra power draw for this. only caveat is depending on your luck, there's a limit to how much clock speed you can run through a specific voltage
I just make sure to reset the GPU to safe clocks before the process that had an error exits
if you set the clock too high, the GPU or software running the GPU will crash and that's it, nothing dangerous
oh
If just I could actually access the curve thingy
but superbox has no access to it
and then lastly power limit
do you need editable firmware for that
It just doesn't seem to be available on Linux
so you need to undervolt + overclock
yeah
and it will consume more power?
no
because more current?
whats the downside
less voltage means less current
nothing!
make it x10 less voltage x10 more clock
just need some experiments
what stops
the caveat that i mentioned about
#programming message
A crash doesn't damage the hardware though, so it's not unsafe
My GPU also crashed the system a couple times while I was tuning it (+400MHz would always instantly crash)
no it plane crash
rabit
I'll just let this thing run a 1h stress-test and do other stuff in the meantime
the best way to do it is try to set the overclock offset up first. you can try +200MHz then if its stable during stress test, go higher. if not, go lower
after you get your highest offset, you can power limit
there you go, more performance with less power draw, just don't power limit too much
its fairly easy to do
but it feels like if you hit the clock limit, decreasing voltage will make that "stable limit" unstable again
nope
and you will have to decrease clock too
the offset increases the overall curve
so it applies to every single voltage value
lets say at 700mV your GPU can do 1200MHz on stock. and at 1.1V it can do 1.8GHz
if you successfully did an offset of +200MHz, at 700mV it can run at 1400MHz while at 1.1V it can run at 2GHz
so its pretty adaptive on the voltage curve itself. after all its just a curve offset, not a "force clock speed" kind of scenario
ok, but then we decrease voltage
lets say 600mV and 1400mhz
no, it will run on the set curve
in my example, if you decreased from 1.1V to 0.7V, it'll run at 1400MHz instead of 2GHz
waait a second
oohhh
so overclocking offset just increases or decreases the overall curve
tf is she staring at me for 
so you first find the actual clock limit of your gpu.
then you move voltage across the curve to find the sweet spot when power consumption is not crazy but it still has more clock than stock


it looks so distractive 
that's a lot of effort, i just lower the power limit good enough
wdym lot of effort
its just literally
and how is overvolting done? you check power consumption? and you know for example "it will burn if 0.5A goes through it"
not recommended, professional only
but you usually can do up to 100mV safety
just that
shouldnt power limit fix the danger here 
oh so its not only about current right
ok so easy guide to overclocking:
- find max clock when it doesnt crash
- check power consumption and add +0.1 voltage
for max performance
or undervolt for best power/clock ratio
you won't get any noticeable performance difference though with overvolt
which is why i recommended power limit more
Well hopefully the 90W power reduction I got will work to keep my CPU from exploding before my AIO some day hopefully gets out of limbo
this would be my recommendation for everyone
do the 4070Ti aswell
why would you ever overclock at all then, it looks like it must cause too much power consumption and cannot be a sweetspot
i think you can set a PL of 210W on the 4070Ti
That one's unstable with any increase in the core clock
correction, you overclock and undervolt
do not overclock and overvolt
and as i said
oh i meant overvolt
So probably just won't touch the 4070Ti because I kinda need it to run
extreme overclocking 4070 super with liquid nitrogen cooling
make it beat 4090 scores in cinebench
i officially have the 4090 12GB chat 
you do that? 
yeah i did last time
number go up
even did overclocking on my i9 13900 engineering sample. hit 7.9GHz short burst then sustained 7.6GHz
placed my score on the vulkan triangle benchmark on huge margin above second place
I'm still waiting on my AIO to find out what clock my CPU will be able to run
yeah i did 7.9GHz CPU and 5366MT/s ddr4 CL11 ram on a samsung B die kit
default ddr5 is 4800 
lower cas latency than ddr5 aswell
ddr
its actually 0.5mhz
double data rate
yeye i remember now
5366MT/s at CL11 is like 4ns latency btw
for comparison, 3200MT/s on CL16, which is typical for ddr4 is 10ns
and 6000MT/s on CL30 on ddr5 as well. 10ns
in theory that 5366MT/s CL11 would perform way better in games
but its still at the end of the day a "pushing to its limit" overclocking
would degrade the hardware quick
That's some insane mem speed
Meanwhile my mem can't even run 4000
my 4x16GB runs on 4000MT/s CL19
Not even temporarily, it crashes on POST
3800 runs fine though
maybe CL22
my 4x48gb ddr5 runs at 3600 MT/s :(
So I just run my RAM at 3800 CL18 all day long as that's now maxed out
pfffttt
new motherboard should hopefully fix
Typical DDR5 4 sticks, especially if mixed
what CPU, is it mixed kit, what motherboard and to what you're upgrading to
9900x, unsure about this term, upgrading from MSI PRO B650-S WIFI to an Asus TUF GAMING B850-PLUS WIFI
uh
don't
oh
B650 and B850 are both mid range
you'll get no difference lol
there's not even any difference in the chipset itself
i'll test it and then return it i suppose
ye i made sure to get ebay listing with free returns
only some time wasted if it fails
does all 4 ram stick comes in a single kit
or is it a separate 2 stick kit
nope, 2 of the same 2x48gb kit
let me post my build
yeah that explains it
Yep explains the speed
DDR5 does not like the sticks coming from separate kits
i see
Like really doesn't like it
even if its the same exact kit, slight difference from different batch production would make it unstable running on different kits
And that's how you end up with DDR5 that runs at DDR4 speeds
well there goes that server speedup idea
in @fast pagoda 's case he got super lucky lmao
And Azaka got really unlucky with the RAM only running 3000 MT/s
buying new ddr5 at this time would be... painful
Most optimally you'd probably want 2x64GB
i have an unused 2x32GB kit lmao
i have enough spare parts to build a spare pc
Meanwhile I have no DDR5 compatible systems
meant for @umbral thorn's PC with the 7950x engineering sample but got the wrong board that doesn't have the microcode for the cpu so...
she gets the threadripper
She sure does like the Threadripper
when you have a whole threadripper system just sitting around your room unused
lmao
Seems like she runs the Threadripper at like 4GHz
Not sure if that's typical, high or low
mixing kits without the same model number is not bueno, always has been
what causes this incompatibility of different pairs of same ram?
wouldnt it be possible for 2 ram sticks from same pair have problems with compatibility?
or they literally get a pile of sticks and then make pairs from them testing each pair for compatibility
i still don't think i'm quite as lucky as y'all are implying lmao it doesn't seem to be as bad of an issue with 9000, certainly not to the extent 7000 had the issues, ive never seen anyone even talk about a 9000 series get limited anywhere much under 5600
With DDR5 pairing kits that aren't from the same package is always not a good idea
Kits are tested to work together
Different kits may have different micro-timings
does intel have this issue? mixing kits i mean, their controller is superior and obviously they run faster speeds in general but
Intel has the same issues I think but it's more tolerant
i just don't believe it's that horrible of a problem after the fiasco of 7000's messed up default "official" max of 5200 MT/s and overall unstable controller in general, that to me is far more of the issue but it's mostly isolated to that series
GPU stress-test be like
yes 9000 uses the "same" controller for io but the IF stability seems to have been very much the issue
so i could switch my cpu to something like a core ultra 7 265k, switch the motherboard accordingly, and this pair of 2x48 sticks should run at rated speed of 5200 MT/s?
yes
at least that server speedup option is still open
intel has like officially supported over 8000 MT/s
Not quite probably, but it may run at bit faster
not keen on spending $500 for that though lol
intel runs 8000+ MT/s very commonly without problems, if he couldn't run a 5200 MT kit on an intel platform it's a problem with the sticks
Intel has a better memory controller but let's not assume it's quite magically good
Well DDR5 mixed running at 3600 sounds like incompatible sticks
well if they're different sets then yes it's gonna be rough
if they are the same kit part number with the same modules it should be aight though, even if it was 2 separate kits of the same ram
bought them at the same time, same site
Unfortunately that's not how DDR5 works
yeah i'm learning that now
Azaka learned it the hard way too, two kits of the same model at 3000 MT/s
ouch
That's lower than my DDR4 which runs at 3800
google searches on this issue are really uninformative
install i2c-tools if you don't have it and run sudo decode-dimms
if that doesn't work do dmidecode --type memory --dump-bin spd
see if everything matches up
oh right i forgot i had the wrong syntax and i just mindlessly copied what i already had in my terminal session one sec lol
entirely fair
yep
it's not going to tell you what the actual modules are though unfortunately
but it will at least confirm if they are all reporting the same part number+voltages etc etc
Part number means nothing on DDR5
it just means you can't tell what module it is, just like has always been true
the spd info you'd want to tell that is behind other stuff so you can't really get to it
What's this silliness you got there Elvyn?
Sil
Definitely better than my 3090
And then there's my 4070Ti which doesn't overclock at all
you can also run an expo retrain if you have similar sticks that weren't matched from factory (depends on the board what it's called, but it might be called context restore, or expo retrain, goofy stuff)
if your am5 board suddenly sits there for 15 mins twhen you go to boot it's probably running a retrain of the tunable parameters to try and keep the sticks tuned
not that it does that much
can help though
all show Part Number: F5-5200J4040A48G and Configured Voltage: 1.1 V, other lines seem unimportant or don't change between any sticks, besides the serial numbers:
Memory Device
Locator: DIMMA1
Serial Number: 755DD5FD
Memory Device
Locator: DIMMA2
Serial Number: 7F5508F0
Memory Device
Locator: DIMMB1
Serial Number: 035EE5FC
Memory Device
Locator: DIMMB2
Serial Number: 035138F1
guessing it's just a case of mismatched something or other between the two pairs
4 slots in general is a noticably lower chance of working at full speed already especially on 7000 series
yep
and that kit started at 5200 so it wasn't exactly starting at a superfast baseline (although 5200 was the highest "officially supported" speed on 7000)
Based on serieal numbers they're completely different production batches
unfortunate
but yeah they have nothing in common there either so likely made maybe not even in the same place lol
thanks newegg!!
By the way have you checked your lucky ones?
What's the serials on those like?
yeah i did earlier they looked similar and I was about to grab em
where would you even find a 4x kit from the same batch for a reasonable price
Just get 2x64GB if you need speed and capacity guaranteed
speed is lower priority, would still prefer this 3600 MT/s with 192gb over 6000 MT/s with 128gb
Why though?
i've actually build a number of 2dpc am5 system to know that you hit the insane luck
multiple modded minecraft servers, proxmox virtual environment, my habit of not shutting down anything unless it seems necessary
Sil
general silliness, yes
each pair's power management ID is different so they are at the very least differing in that spot which isnt the modules but does to me point to not exactly made in the same batch, possible still same production location and around the same time still though. the serials on 2 of them are similar, the other 2 less so but still seems to be the same batch probably (obviously, because they were matched)
Guess I won't be building any new PCs any time soon
YOU'RE PUSHING OVER 2250MHZ NOW???
HOW THE FUCK
HOW
HOW THE FUCK
DIMM 0 (Channel A)
Serial: AC5F53F6
Model: G.SKILL F5-6000J3040G32G
Capacity: 32 GB
Speed: 6000 MT/s
Voltage: 1.1 V
Rank: 2
PMIC ID: Bank 12, Hex 0x10
DIMM 1 (Channel A)
Serial: 6D5EC9FF
Model: G.SKILL F5-6000J3040G32G
Capacity: 32 GB
Speed: 6000 MT/s
Voltage: 1.1 V
Rank: 2
PMIC ID: Bank 12, Hex 0x10
DIMM 0 (Channel B)
Serial: E552FDF6
Model: G.SKILL F5-6000J3040G32G
Capacity: 32 GB
Speed: 6000 MT/s
Voltage: 1.1 V
Rank: 2
PMIC ID: Bank 11, Hex 0x8C
DIMM 1 (Channel B)
Serial: E95E63F4
Model: G.SKILL F5-6000J3040G32G
Capacity: 32 GB
Speed: 6000 MT/s
Voltage: 1.1 V
Rank: 2
PMIC ID: Bank 11, Hex 0x8C
it seems i did at least match the kits to the same channels
Sillying clearly
sillytime
na bro that can't be real
i never even hit beyond 2135MHz on any ampere chip
even with overvolt
i take back my words with ampere being a relatively shit process node
Elvyn can make literally any chip seem insane
If I let Elvyn tune my PC it'd probably perform better while also not overheating
this mf kept doing black magic istg
first she gets 230ms latency from Australia to an EU server
with some trickery i don't even get to know
then mf runs minecraft at 248 chunk render... at reasonable 20-38 fps
that used to be easy before the new world gen
she did it on 1.21.1
yeah that system i used was from 2016
i now use it as a server
because it runs a highly modded NVIDIA card
Yep Elvyn would definitely find some black magic way to make my PC not overheat without losing performance
this shit
its also due to her not running on neuromorphic hardware
Too bad she probably doesn't want to
she already did
otherwise the model wouldnt nearly need as much
(its inefficient to run them on normal GPU and CPUs)
Did she? She didn't touch my PC
her pc i mean
Well I was talking about my PC
im going to know so much dumb shit about ddr5 when im done figuring out who the tf made me modules
she tuned the threadripper to be able to pull 351W
exciting stuff
on that one small noctua cooler alone
My PC is majorly thermals limited
70C
im planning on giving my server some new internals soon
still deciding on what CPU
im only willing to spend a few grand
At least before it would easily go 100C when CPU and both GPUs are under full load
wtf??
huh what kind of server
lemme find
My 4070Ti also gets thermal limited when my 3090 runs at full
9970x
I have one for some AI, I have another for home storage, I have another that runs an ARR Suite, and I have a experimental neuromorphic system for running SNN models (because they suck so bad on normal hardware)
nah get epyc third gen trust 
how do you even tune for this.....
implement synaptic plasticity on the SNN, make cortex loops wave encoded
Yep Elvyn indeed does black magic on thermals
I need such magic if my AIO doesn't decide to get out of limbo some day soon

synaptic plasticity is one of the only reasons i care about SNNs
otherwise its far more A than I
do u run neuromorphic hardware?
in my case i can make it run on SIMD, but require double precision so had to use A100 for it
V100 works though
there are new cheaper chips coming out
if u want to run SNN and have it be efficient u should look into them
otherwise u have to waste alot of power just to get them to run on normal hardware
essentially "emulating" them
i have still not looked into much about how SNNs are implemented other than high level so curious, does that recent "matrix math running hella fuckin ffast on analogue chips" help snns at all or do they say frick matrices and it's not needed
not well documented + my algo is shit 
some chips u can get for like $500
frick matrices most of the time
but sometimes depending on your variation you still need them
oh btw vanilla SNN doesn't come with synaptic plasticity
in fact vanilla SNN are useless
some people use them just for power reasons
this is why most snn library doesn't work well lol
i mean its also because there is new meta every week
on what is the best algorithm
went from STDP to other shit
exactly why vanilla snn doesn't work
plasticity:
i mean one day we will probably have a standard
but its just like when ANNs were being developed
there is no standard because some dude will publish a paper an hour after u finish making one showing u how an old method sucks and a new one is better
but thats part of the research fun i suppose
okay uh uh i got a question because i suck at coding and whisper n stuff
basically
how do i make a discord bot not leave vc instantly after it finally joins a vc
and how do i make it listen to whisper or llisten to background discord sounds
You need to connect to the sound socket
cause right now it says that it joins a thing but then immediatly disconnects?
it cant hear the client if thats what u mean
okok ty
yeah that too
unless u mean hearing other people in the VC which u can setup
oooo wait u do dis too 
its an expensive research hobby
most chips I have to contact people to get which sucks balls
tell that to my monthly spending
but yeah try out some neuromorphic hardware and watch ur electricity bill go down
beep boop
neuromorphic hardware?
here are some example chips
but there are plenty that arent on here
of course the industry barely talks about them because of ANNs being so popular sadly
do they have biological shit inside???

no
oh
SNNs work very different from ANNs (Neuro-sama, chatgpt, claude, etc)
for some reason it felt like it does
so specialized chips can run it FAR better and wayyyy cheaper than any ANN model out there







