QOTD N.7 - July

[weary belfry]

[ <@&944935221093081089> ]

Good day, everyone! It's time for the Question of the Day, where we encourage you to share your thoughts and insights on a wide range of topics.

Today's question is: ** What is the nature of knowledge, and how can we differentiate between mere opinions and justified beliefs? **

Let your imaginations run wild and share your ideas with us. We can't wait to hear your responses! ✨

[fiery juniper]

not gonna read allat

[wild fractal]

Nature of knowledge comes from our beautiful minds of thinking. We get information and use it to hang things together to become our created knowledge of any specific topic or specialism.

Using Growtopia as the context, the explaination is as below:

Farming, fishing, building, Startopia, Surgery and Cooking is our knowledge.

To see a Growtopian passing by with a digger spade on his hand creates your justified belief that he does have the ability to 1-hit dirt and cave background blocks. On the other hand, we don't know if he will use the digger's spade ever in his life assuming we only meet him once, so believing that he is a person who regularly does clear world service to others is just mere opinion and not a justified belief of him, since we don't have the information of him clearing worlds in his life.

[austere kayak]

First of all, that’s not AI written, and is entirely created by sean. Secondly, there is not a spelling mistake in either QOTD, or his response at the end. ‘Mere’ is used correctly in this context, and using ‘more’ would be the mistake.

“How can we justify between MORE opinions and and justified beliefs” just sounds idiotic. Also the fact that you are accusing people of using AI to respond to these questions, while you yourself have used it in the high stakes QOTD, or rather the one with rewards, simply boggles my mind. And you can not deny this fact, as I have compared your previous responses with some of the responses on the prize included questions and they are vastly different. Striking me as being off, I ran your responses in an AI detector and all of them were detected as being 100% AI written.

You even edited your message to make it look like you actually put forth some effort into your response, rather than just copying and pasting some words. How diligent.

[livid sigil]

ngl sean's answer does read like it was generated by ai but (and no offfense) i dont think an ai would make as many linguistical errors

also that site is not very accurate, if i remember correctly it claims that the declaration of independence was written by ai

I have compared your previous responses with some of the responses on the prize included questions and they are vastly different
Ok i somehow skipped that, he mightve actually used ai for that one

[livid sigil]

imma check if these websites flag my writing as well

ok i guess they have gotten better at detecting ai since i didnt get any false positives

my bad then

[austere kayak]

It's all good. There's definitely still false positives as it just looks for the perplexity of the writing. If everything is uniform and equal, it will mark it as AI generated content.

I only decided to run his response because he is always complaining in these QOTD channels about other people writing. Poor's responses are always less than a sentence and then he complains about people writing longer responses. Only when there is a prize on the line, he drops a magnificently written and well thought out response.

For the most part, I would not care to look up one's response, but since he continues to complain and call out members for simply speaking their mind, I will call out his crap.

[lean smelt]

my guy got smoked

[tall furnace]

Impressive answer

[real sonnet]

Knowledge is we learn from scratch into something . We can distinguish between mere opinions and justified beliefs by analyzing circumstance. These are just words from my mind that just came out

[snow tiger]

i would have genuinely wanted to see what was poor’s response

[tall furnace]

Take a look at the last month QOTD