#Project Drama - Black Mesa Roleplay
1 messages Β· Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Good looking chart
That's fine, I'm still gonna continie
Plus this version is Unfinished as all hell lol
π
Best of luck on your future endeavors
Not gonna let Ordinance go to waste
Yeah you're not gonna be able to finish it lol.
We'll see, even if I don't That's okay because I'm having fun developing it
Suit yourself.
I will, thanks
Well I think we all know who the friend is with the conflict π
Looks good though my man, keep up the good work π
Appreciate it, working hard on it lol
@modest shore I require your email for a legal inquiry.
I'm not handing you my email unless you explain
Is this about the AGPL license?
If you wanted me to make the schema open source you could've just asked
Unrelated.
This is a formal notice.
You are currently presenting a project under the "Project Ordinance" name and implying ownership of work derived from a private repository you no longer have access to.
You do not have permission to use the Project Ordinance name or represent this work publicly.
You are required to:
- Remove all references to "Project Ordinance"
- Stop presenting this project under that name
If this project is made public or deployed using code obtained from the private repository, further action will be taken.
I came up with the Ordinance name, I created the graphical designs.
So by this account, and also the Canadian Law you need to remove my designs
Ordinance is also derived from the Combineoverwiki.
Project Ordinance also isn't a copyrighted name by law
You're right that parts of this were developed together.
That doesn't give you the right to present the project as solely yours or continue using it under the same identity without distinction.
The original organization and repository were created and managed by me, and parts of the work within it are my individual contributions.
If you want to continue your own version, that's fine, but you need to:
- clearly separate it from Project Ordinance
- avoid implying ownership of the original project
- remove any assets or work that were created solely by me
Right now you're presenting it in a way that's misleading, and that needs to be corrected.
I never claimed it to be solely my creation. I have provided credit where it is due in the schema and directly visible in our credits
You're doing this because you want to see me fail that's the only reason
You left the project because you insulted my girlfriend to my face and i got pissed
This is your fault Connor
This isn't about personal issues, so I'm not engaging with that.
My concern is how the project is being presented publicly.
Right now you are using the "Project Ordinance" name and presenting a continuation of the same project. Regardless of credits, that creates the impression that this is an official or direct continuation.
Project Ordinance is not copyrighted
I'm asking you to clearly separate your version from the original project identity.
If you want to continue your own version, that's fine. It just needs to be clearly distinct and not misleading.
And where is the legal documentation that states the copyright?
That's not how copyright works.
Copyright applies automatically to original works like code and graphical assets. It doesn't require registration to exist.
Well shit idk how it works lmao
But I'm pretty sure, from what I know, you can't just force someone to stop using a name if it's not copyrighted
The project name itself isn't the main issue here. The issue is how the project and its work are being presented and used.
Okay okay, run through it with me once more.
How is it being presented
From your perspective
Because your name is very clearly credited
And if I were to publicly open-source the schema, that would be fine since you open-source the schema as well
All I would have to do is make a fork
Alright, I'll explain it clearly, if you would stop cutting me off.
This isn't about the name being "copyrighted".
I'm not talking about the copyright anymore
The issue is how your version is presented. Right now you're using the same name and identity in a way that makes it look like a continuation or official version of the original project.
Can you let me talk?
We are texting just speak you monkey
Credits alone don't fix that. Someone looking at it can still reasonably think it's the same project.
What I'm asking for is separation, not shutdown.
It is the same project, it was OUR project. You left it on your own accord
I just continued what we started
If you continue your version, it needs to be clearly presented as an independent project, it shouldn't look like the official or direct continuation of Project Ordinance, anything I created individually shouldn't be reused without permission
But I created the name dude.
About open-sourcing. The current public version is under AGPL. That means forks are allowed, but they must, keep the license, provide source if used publicly, not remove attribution.
And it was never just your project it was ours
Stop claiming that you're the only one who did anything
It was never just yours, I had 50% ownership
Okay I'll just do this then
We never agreed on any kind of ownership split, so there is no "50% ownership" here.
Oh so now it's 'we didn't agree'
You're a fucking rat you know it
We worked on it together, yes. That doesn't mean either of us gets to present it as the same project after going separate ways.
If you base your work on the public version and follow the AGPL properly, that's fine.
Also, keep it respectful. There's no reason to turn this into insults.
You know what you're doing you piece of shit. You just want to see me fail
Stop pretending to be this victim here.
I have people supporting me and this project, people who used to be your friends and now they are sick of you
I'll do what you say, but don't forget this is your fault
I'm not continuing this conversation if it turns into insults.
My position is already clear. If you base your work on the public version and follow the AGPL, that's fine. It just needs to be clearly your own independent project and not presented as the same or official continuation.
Then just leave because you know what you did
You are a snake and a terrible person
Anything I created individually is not to be reused without permission.
If you stick to that, there's no issue. I'm leaving it there.
Project Drama - Black Mesa Roleplay
Good luck mate. ChatGPT is not good for legal things π
Also this is not the place for such conversations
It's fine it's fine, I'm doing my best to try to just make the project I want for fun and so my friends can enjoy it, but can't have nice things
mogged
People just want to see the world burn, as alfred said in the dark knight 
We get it, you're a smart fello
Means nothing darling
I like you, yknow you seem like a free thinker.
Alright even though we don't like ChatGPT and shit, I did make it do a deep research on the internet since it's kinda useful for that sort of this and I asked it this (see image provided) and it came out with this:
"No, he does not automatically get to say you can never use "Project Ordinance" at all just because the repo was under his name or because it wasn't copyrighted.
Yes, he may have a narrower argument if your use of the name makes people think your version is the official Project Ordinance or his continuation, or if you reused assets he personally authored."
I genuinely needed an answer for this situation so I just asked AI to search for laws and shit
Don't know if this holds up, someone can tell me if it does or doesn't
Either way, donβt use this place for conversations like such. Take it to the DMs chaps. This is a showcase place not a discussion board.
I was just trying to show off the cool stuff I made π
I know but this definitely went out of control. Leave it there, continue that specific conversation somewhere else. As for the project. Both of you have done a splendid job. I hope one day it can be completed by either or both parties
okay? thats interesting to say the least
Riggs is getting his goons to just say shit now?
I'm done talking here, this is just immature lol
Don't even know him lol.
Riggs I'm not an idiot, I know who Savor is
You know him too
legit never talked to him
Don't use Ordinance as a name then.
You legally can't prevent me.
I'll proceed with a cease and desist then.
Alright
@modest shore You might need this, pal. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/canadian-intellectual-property-office/en/guide-copyright
Mk
You didn't make the name and just because you owned the repository doesn't make it your property
All of this over Gmod is pretty immature
If the cease and desist really does come with anything, I will take my leave
I'm not as pathetic as you, I will use that as a way to finally quit playing Gmod
Honestly might just quit now, since no one is as ridiculous enough as you to send a fucking cease and desist over a Garry's Mod project
Fucking judge jury episode over here
Nah yeah I quit, I can't believe we're doing cease and desists over Gmod in this day in age
Fucking pathetic, seriously an embarassement for you @opal stump
I'm deleting Ordinance, you can sleep easy now
Also GShader is one of my favorite addons, good yard
one thing we can atleast agree on
where is that π
im so glad im too old for hl2rp
it's to our benefit i suppose
i saw that
RATE LOOOKKK
okey. thanks. whats others?
11
rate look!!!!!!?
okey i am glad thanks
bonus picture unlocked
thats all Good night
lurking and waiting for new messages about you is not something you do if you're quitting forever
saw some vids of p2, pretty solid job tbh
Unrelated.
wtf happened here π
if the projects codebase is on the workshop im pretty sure its legally bound by the steam subscriber agreement
nothing related to the project source code is on the workshop, it was all privately hosted on github
can we add 18+ tits to gmod as default content in gmod?
or here request already exists
we need a legalize of NSWF
server rules!!!!!
Okey GUYS. THrow up ur big finger on this request!!
[Server rules] Legalize NSWF content #3152
Not acceptable
If riggs is quitting then he just should, instead of picking on people who try to continue without him
yet another 2026 addon with charts