#Was the ussr good debate
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Elaborate
Space competitions are nice to edge the grooves of competitors, but certain studies and directives to remove expressions and unnaturally attain quotas and means result in disasters and loss of genuine talents
Say what you mean
space race good, the science that enabled the great leap forward bad
pros and cons in regards to a topic so vast the USSR is
such as aspiring socialist arts
that do no justice to a certain battle royale to the death island at the time of Stalin
Rocket accidents?
space exploration and such technologies being new, accidents are definitely very prone
Like how gargarin almost blew up?
so too are infrastructural and environmental accidents in the pursuit of outperforming rivals
just like rejected tank prototypes, some could become functioning powder kegs
Yes, end of debate
Even rockets today still have a high chance of exploding
It's an unreliable and inefficient technology to begin with
But the only one we got so far
Losing talents? Pffftttttt just arrest them 
Ussr was evil
No
Ussr just poor
Ez
No regime sees itself as evil
Only the others see it as such 
Your wrongs are my right 
Hmmmm that actually sounds good
Facts
Define poor
Idk ask google
Many ways to define poor
Do you mean like broke at times
Gulags, extensive police state, and oppressive policies would beg to differ
That's like only acknowledging slavery when talking about America
If you can't define poor,then don't call it poor
Usa got rid of slavery, USSR suppressed it's people for almost it's entire existence
USSR got rid of gulags yes, but they existed for a good chunk of the USSR's existence and they still didn't stop suppressing dissent
What suppression
One party state, no freedom of speech, no freedom to leave the country when they wanted etc
Vs the "right" to be unhealthy,ignorant,and depressed?
Yeah I still prefer the union
You can be all those in the USSR too lol
Those have nothing to do with the government
They won't try to make you that way in the ussr
It's a very different take in the US@keen wind
I would know as I live here
A scarcity of basic goods would definitely make you unhealthy, and the lack of political freedom and human rights would make you depressed
ahh yes, captivity, my favorite method of labor recruitment 
Didn't even happen within the last 30-40 years. Once again,it's like talking only talking about America to talk about operations Condor
Berlin Wall
USSR bad
honestly it was bad on so many leaves, one being Lenin goals was to overthrow the autocratic tzar and create and "communist utopia" however he and the Bolsheviks overthrew a dictatorship only to establish one themselves, not to mention large amounts of what they ended up doing lead to starvation, terror, corruption that helped to nearly drag the world into nuclear destruction.
Scarcity of basic goods was most prominent in the latter half of the USSR, what you said is just not true
^^^
sorry but what does this, mean, are you pointing up or something?
None of the satellite states were allowed to leave the USSR
It means I agree with you
okay
extensive police state
fails to prevent an airplane landing in the Red Square sometime in the early 1980s
no wonder Gorbachev jumped the hardliners
make that the late 1980s
Wouldn't surprise me if someone took a bribe to look the other way
or be in stress of even identifying a civilian plane and mistake it for bogeys and friends
Just a border from what I know
On the plus side,they had protection from western colonizers
No they didnât lol they were kept as a buffer between Russia and the west
Sure it sucks to be trapped,but if you're trapped in a good place,it's way better
A border that didnât allow people across
If they get attacked,Russia send vast aid,or attacks back.
Crossing into a completely different economic system is no joke
Russia didnât care for the satellite states which is why most of Eastern Europe is poor
That doesn't even make any sense
They collapsed,and do did socialist economic support
Iâm confused
No? They were poor whilst in the USSR
Define poor
Imma have to stop you right there
Money is intangible
Human living condition is tangible
Major difference
dollar bill
You can't consume currency like food or beverage
Neither can you build a house with it
The use for money is intangible
Your could have da dollar bill hosue
You can live in a place with no trading system and still have a happy and fulfilling life
I've watched plenty of interviews where people walk around and ask ex soviets citizens how it was
Also what does intangibility have to do with how poor a country is
The term poor is irrelevant by the standard of what you define as poor
How
Like I said,you can live in a place with no money,and still live a fulfilling and happy,healthy life
Ok
Poor or rich means nothing about how good the country is
The USA Is rich as hell but its still a shithole
What
What is a "modern society"
Current society
All
There's plenty
Wait lemme rephrase
How do I put this
ah whatever I canât figure out how to put whatâs in my brain into words
No rush
You gonna say that you need money in every country?
Ye
How about, we use more definitive statistics
Like life expectancy,birth mortality rate,fertility rate,etc
Go on
Because last time I checked the USSR is still better than many or most of western countries

Especially considering the date/preformance ratio
It did collapse 30 years ago
You can look up tons of statistics on the union and it still looks good
Anyway,you can pull up those same statistics on those eastern European countries during and after the union
The first website I found on mortality rates shows that the USSR had a higher mortality rate during the 80s compared to the US đ
Mortality rate of what
Birth mortality
Wat
Depends on how they died
what
Don't ask me look there yourself
Nah western is better obviously
No it just shows that per capita the USSR had a higher mortality rate than the US
Source-trust me bro
Your source?
Cause of death doesnât matter
What is a "per capita mortality rate"
More deaths per capita
What if you're a terrorist and they sent you to death row
I'm encouraging you to look
I'm not a terrorist
Okay what stats
Yeah this guy is trolling
Doesnât matter, itâs still a death
You aren't even providing stats 
True
Yeah idk either why cause is relevant
Which is why it's a trash measurement
Like I'd rather die from obesity in the US than starvation in the gulag 
-of how good a country is
Why is it trash?
It was built to keep people in because everyone in east Germany was trying to escape to the west
Shouldn't a low mortality rate be a good indicator of a country's health infrastructure along with how nourished are its citizens?
I never said anything about a mortality per capita,I said birth mortality last time I checked
Also you completely ignored my money point
Okay source?
How so
Which sucks,but those same people are chasing absurd consumerism
What's absurd with consumerism?
People just getting what they want lol
And if I don't respond to ecir,I blocked him
âThe infant morality rate in the Soviet Union rose from 1971 to 1976 by one-third, and today is at least double and possibly triple the rate for the United States, according to a Census Bureau report written by two experts on the Soviet Union.â Excerpt from an article published in the 80âs
Poor = bad living conditions
Lol just proves me right
Or, they are trying to escape an oppressive police state
Define poor
Bruh
Define oppressive in the soviet context
Isn't that only a thing in the early ussr though?
lacking sufficient money to live at a standard considered comfortable or normal in a society.
Stalin era
If you scroll above,I've mentioned more Definitive statistics
It got less after stalin died, but it was still present
Yeah that one though
Money is a definitive statistic
Talking about Stalin is like talking about Hitler or nixon
Stalin
Let's talk about Stalin guys
Wasnât a very nice man
True
You're arguing that money doesn't matter?
Made people into bricklayers
Tru
Living condition stats are the facts,and money is a suggestion
He's a commie, ofc he thinks like that
Yes
Money correlates directly with living conditions
Money is also a fact
Money does not tell the entire story
I bet he stole his device instead of paying for it đ
Money has and always existed, even in so called "communist" countries
It tells a large part
People often forget that the USSR has a currency
Which is better,life expectancy,or income when determining health
Its a big factor, less money = worse living conditions. More money = better living conditions
Both are important
It's pointless arguing with him
Toodaloos
Money is like trying to hear if a gun sound healthy after putting the suppressor on
It could mean bad living conditions,or it could not
What does that even mean?
What
It's just not enough information
You can have no money,but that doesn't mean you don't eat
You could killed an animal and ate its meat
Speaking of life expectancy
Money is still a big factor
Omg man doesn't know how money works
âIn 1970, life expectancy at birth in the Soviet Union and United States was fairly similar, at 69.3 and 70.8 years respectively; a difference of 1.5 years. As the decades progressed, however, this difference widened. While improvements in the recording of such statistics in the Soviet Union gave a more reliable picture of life expectancy across the region, especially in Central Asia and rural areas, the largest influence was due to the side-effects of deteriorating economic conditions. As lifestyles and medical care in the U.S. steadily improved, the decline in life expectancy the USSR was largely due to preventable causes, particularly alcoholism and accidental deaths among the male population. By 1985, life expectancy in the U.S. was 6.3 years higher than in the Soviet Union. â
So that point is null and void
I bet Paladin doesn't even do hunting nor foraging lmao
He lives in the US
He said earlier
The mere existence of his device is proof that he is a beneficiary of the conveniences that money can offer
The hypocrisy
Just saying, phones might not even exist without capitalism
Wrong
Well that's debatable
Most things wouldnt
Or atleast
Like they litterally had phones in the soviet union
Most things wouldnât exist without money
But Capitalism did allow for phones to be accessible to the consumer
Innovation under capitalism is a false advertisement
Along with competition driving its improvement
Communism in theory creates the perfect society, but in practice it never works
Space race
Proceeds to use discord
They don't care about Innovation,they care about money
Just untrue
đ
They care about the money, that's why they innovate

Which is why modern capitalist products are seen and unreliable and soviet equipment still works like tnew to this day
HAHAHA
đ
No it doesnât lol
I can't anymore
You're right, they do care about money, and innovation = money
Why would they care about the betterment of humans when you can easily get the human to settle for much worse and walk away with more money
Bruh
Only for a little bit
I think this guy hasn't heard of a boycott or competition yet
And then future versions of that same product fall into the same trap
Because they care about people?
No, because if a company doesn't innovate, then another company will and the first company will lose business. Also by innovating you make the new product better then the old product and make people want to buy the new product. Innovation = money
Itâs called being a human
If innovation was powering capitalism,then why is it a literal meme that apple products don't even improve, or that ford cars fall apart after the warranty
No they don't
Theyâre not human?
Man literally thinks apple isn't improving
CEOs are statistically having a high chance of being a psychopath
Apple's M1 is arguably the best laptop chip there is
Still not all of them
And also doesn't suffer from thermal throttling
Are you saying that Hitler and Stalin weren't human?
Source? Lol
Not where I hear it from,but https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackmccullough/2019/12/09/the-psychopathic-ceo/?sh=24a03490791e
If capitalists cared about humans,we would have had exploding Ford pintos
Bullshit
If capitalists cared about humans,we would have the entire opioid crisis
Humans don't necessarily care about other humans
Apple inc.
Whilst both were horrible people who I do not like, they did care about people
People, as in strangers
There's samsung
Ye
And huawei has been gaining ground too
Aryans and Russians

Little girl got cancer while working for them and they give the family 50k to compensate
You don't seem like the type of guy to hype up the Chinese
Tbh I feel bad that Huawei got that google ban
Like there was hyper toxic chemicals In the samsung plant
I'm not, I'm just saying there are other companies as you seem to keep implying that Apple is the only one
You were the guy who said "innovation=equals money"
Source?
Werenât we talking about whether the USSR was good or not?
Video Sponsored by Ridge Wallet. Check them out here: https://ridge.com/jaketran. Use Code âJAKETRANâ for 15% off your order!
â
Buy our flagship masterclass â
Click here âĄïž https://evil.university/war
đł Learn the ONE SECRET that has made every giant corporation and government successful
đ€ Make around $100 per referral with our Hustler's Univ...
Yeah,and part of that is comparing other (rival) countries
Jake Tran lmao
Fair, but this isnât really comparison at this point
We arenât comparing anything
@frosty spoke just curious, if the USSR was so good, why did it and it's satellite states collapse?
If it was so good, why did Poland blackmail its way into NATO?
Why did China create special economic zones?
Sabotage
- Gorbachev and yeltsin
Gorbachev was going to keep the Union
- A horrible,violent,un democratic,coup
Wasnât violent
He literally introduced anti Communist policy
They literally gunned down protesters and genocided the remaining soviet politicians by blowing up their building
That was the soviets
Well
Then russia would be in the same shit hole
The gunning down civilians
How
No,I'm talking about the post union war
Iâm talking about the breakdown of the Union
Because capitalism turned the USSR into what is essentially a miniature America
capitalism turned America into America but small?
Consistently Agressive and imperialist and capitalist like America
Oops
My bad lemme fix that
In terms of success in endeavors
What would be
Forgets the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan
If it was succesfull it would still exist
Russia exists
Probably not for long though
Due to events I cannot talk about due to rule 3
Forgets the Vietnam War
Forgets the Korean War
Forgets the Georgian War
Forgets the Ukraine war
Georgian and Ukrainian war are both Soviet interventions
Correction: Russian interventions
There's a reason you can only name 1-3 American style colonialist "intervention" the USSR had pulled
You named 2
Ussr was just russian empire under communist disguise which might have made the conditions even worse
What
It's because it violates the whole Marxist leninist theory
It still was hella imperialistic
Ignoring my point btw
Which point
And from certain moment was run by one man in power
Because of which wars
Yeah like literally evey democracy ever
You named 2 âAmerican style colonialist interventionsâ that america did
No
Thatâs not how democracy works lol
Not all democracies have one man with absolute power
And 2 other capitalist Russia
The USSR has had elections regularly
Russia is run by Putin who wants Russia to be like the USSR again
These elections were a joke
If he did he would have reverted back to socialism a long ass time ago
Just like todays korea or china
Dig up some false soviet elections
It doesn't matter if the guy has as much power as castro,you got to vote for him
Or the other guy obviously
Than why wasnt stalin overtrown
I admit i dont really have any sources because it always seemd obvious to me
Omg I'm tired of bros talking about Stalin
Because he was a dictator
It's like:what if I talked about why Hitler wasn't overthrown in capitalist Germany
Thatâs Fascist Germany not capitalist
Both were present
I mean, it would be hard to do so
Ussr easnt good because it certainly rigged the elections in eastern europe
Who's gonna say no to putin in his KGB face
Ok, that doesnât make Germany capitalist all of a sudden. It was Fascist first and foremost
It annexed baltic states belaruse ukraine invaded finland
Russian Citizens?
Holodomor
If a man is half Caucasian and and half African he is easily both
Reason: Mass emoji
Germany wasnât half fascist half capitalistđ
It made a pact with hitler to invade poland
You have to be trolling
Berlin war
The economic system of nazi Germany was capitalism
Fun fact faschizm is form of communism, or socialism at least
That's literally factually wrong
That doesnât make the country capitalist
Prove me wrong
It was fascist
The nazi party was national socialist wha do you have to say about that
Communism love for all?
Dont make me laugh
Then why did they literally have a whole round up campfire where they chucked socialist books into the fire
Communism was literally described as war of classes
Cause they were idiots
That's why I put it in oversimplified terms because if I had to define both in depth,I would die of old age
Read the entire rest of the script
They chucked books besides socialist works, but yes a lot of socialist books were burned
Ok lets stop for a moment
Hitler called it national zocialist to confuse people
Its stops looking like a debate for me
And more like trying to call each other out
Sorry if i was rude
I really do not mind insults
So what are your arguments that ussr was good?
Anyway in Communist theory it's literally that all races are equal
It doesnt mean that ussr was good but ok
From my opinion I think it was good because.
- Protected countries from becoming colonized
- Made out of this world contributions to technology
- Had really good living standards and was socially ahead of its time
Was explaining why fascism did not stem from socialism
It had bad living standards, and as i said previousley it had satelite states like eastern europe where the elections were 100percent rigged
- Colonised nations
- Semi-fair point
- They did not have good living conditions
None of the satellite states wanted to be in the USSR
Having a modest life is not poverty and you still have to prove the election fraud
The elections were just rigged in eastern europe
There is no discussion around it
The 2nd one is fair but the same could be said about most European countries and the US
Its just common fact
And the 3rd point is just wrong
In This Series Of Russia Public Interview We Make Street Interview With People In Moscow And In This Video We Asked Russian Elders About the USSR and How Life Was During the Soviet Union, How was it in the USSR?, Is there anything you miss and nostalgic about during the Soviet Union?, Would you like to return the USSR?
This Video Contains (Str...
Has a boomer ever told you that everyone who ever lived under socialism hated it and was trying to escape? Have you ever met a defector who has nothing but terrible things to say about the land they traded for a life in the West? Well, it's time to meet the silent majority of those who stuck around under socialism!
Girl who wants to go to the U...
Also all Russian
What are "satellite states"
North Korea started the Korean war and the last 2 have nothing to do with the US besides them sending military aid
Did you even take history đ
Basically entire eastern and half of central europe
Like poland
a political term for a country that is formally independent, but under heavy political and economic influence or control by another country
Stalin himself said that trying to make poland communist is like giving cow a saddle
And it was a response to some crackheads proposing to make poland another socialist republic of ussr
The history taught Americans is that North Korean forces attacked South Korea in 1950 and almost overran that new nation until the US military came to the rescue. This is true but does not explain that the United States government wanted a war. Major American industries had suffered with the loss of military business after the end of World War I...
So you can talk about like 14 soviet leaders but you only care about stalin
Crackhead from poland
I'm sorry, but anyone who has studied history knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that North Korea started the Korean war, the US went to defend South Korea
Some idiot actually proposed it
Can you tell me whet soviet leaders ussr had?
I can recall lenin stalin trotsky gorbachev and thats about it
Lenin,Gorbachev,krushchev,trotsky,
And like 10 others who I can't name because they aren't as relevant
I mean you can always ask google
Trotsky eas all about invading the rest of europe and spreading communism that way if im not wrong
But he got oofed by stalin who wanted to get rid of him since he was a thread to him
Indirectly of course
Yeah buy that guy served like 90 years ago
Its not like atalin himself shot him
I wonder how did ussr ensure that everyone actually works
I mean if everyone is paid the same no matter whether you care or not than why should i care
They made sure the people were secured financially with work
Just for the sake of doing good
You dont get it how did they made sure people actually worked
And doing what's on their capacity
Instead of doing nothing and still getting paid
That's not how that worked
"You Work for me I Work for you"
There was no welfare queens
Or on the other hand when there wasnt enough work to be given where would they put unemployed people if there is no place for work
There's always place for work
It could be in entertainment,or adding redundancy where it counts
You know here in poland there was a saying during communist times
I don't need sayings I need stats
He's a commie, it's difficult to convince him otherwise
Czy siÄ stoi czy siÄ leĆŒy 1500 siÄ naleĆŒy
- The video claims south korea attacked north korea, this is not true
- The video claims that the US could have prevented the war by saying they would defend south korea, even if this was the case it does not mean the US caused the war.
Can you imagine bananas being rare?
Yeah. I'm going to nope out of here, I've got better things to do
He's just here to proselytise people into communism
My teacher told me once how they bought a banana and didnt know what to do with it since its next to impossible to get during these times
I do not know how this is relevant to the topic at hand
The video claims that the cia backed south Korean attacks and then north Korea came back at em and they won and then the US just wanted to protect businesses interests
Well
USA needed allies in asia
And south korea was a good choice
But the video is wrong
Also paladin blocked me bruh
The north koreans swung first
Gulags having worse conditions than german camps doesnt help ussrs reputation
SK fucked itself over in secret attacks and then got folded in the counted invasion
Jus instead of racial enemies they staffed it with political ones
You know how fast they discontinued the gulag?
Both koreas were fked over
Discontinued means to cancel the usage of an asset
Than Gulags still exist to this days if im not wrong
Stop or shut down
No, the gulags are no more
Maybe after the union was canceled
Basically stop
Where putin can hide his political prisoners
The camps are still there, but nobody is running it
Regular prisons i guess
I know
They arenât regular prisons
He's referring to Russia's prisons
I heard multiple stories aout them.
Mainly from polish pow after failed september campaign
September right?
What month did ww2 start?
September
September 1939
Right after aeptember campaign
You get same sentiment in Italy but for Mussolini, it doesn't make the USSR good, plus these seem to be Russians, no Latvians, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, etc so it isn't telling the full story
You can't look at a state that violenty deported or murdered ethnic minorites (in absolutely horrid conditions), sided with the germans until '41, sent tanks to crush democracy-seaking protests and violently repressed any opposing political opponents and say it was a force of "good"
Cancel culture.
Also look up the Chilean 9/11
And Atleast by our standards,it's still good
the repression of the prague spring = bad is cancel culture?
What happened before 1956 n the SU
Is basically irrelevant to represent the entire SU
It's like talking about the American slave trade
well the political repression didn't end with Stalin i'll tell you that much
It's not definitive of modern America
the soviet union lasted from 1917 to 1991, seems like a big bit
So what
Go relevant
the debate is if the soviet union was good, we can at least agree that the first 35 years of it were not
At that time
- Humanity was still figuring out how to operate
- People were crazy back then
That's a very bad way to look at history
I too hate most of the early soviet leaders
ok, so from when do when do you consider the union to be good?
ok
Lemme guess,you're going to dig up a one-off tragedy that happened during those years
well you still have political repression, repression of religious and ethnic minorities, the police state, economic instability, poor living conditions and a severe lack of democracy and individual freedoms
you guessed wrong
I'm going to need you explain why you came to all of those conclusions
these aren't conclusions, they are events
you want me to list the political opponents murdered by the KGB?
because that's going to be a long list
Name them and why they were targeted
+dates
you have a wonderful list on wikipedia (which obviously isn't perfect but i don't really want to cite independent sources for hundreds of different people
As for the repression of religious and ethnic minorities there were several attempts at "Russification" by Krutchev and Brezhnev in notably Ukraine and several attacks on religious symbols, figures and etc
Can you provide full names?
i can give you a few
Nikita and leonid? is that what you are asking? I don't get your question
The full names of those guys
ok then i just did
have you ever been to the soviet union or a puppet state?
have you ever talked or listened to a dissident?
@silent orbit have you?
Never heard of the word
I have yes
Which
Romania
During?
ceausescu
?
Nicolae CeauÈescu
Can you tell me when you were in Romania
i was young but i remember going to the mountains, if you give me a day or two i could find the name
So, you never saw what soviet misery looked like and you never talked to someone who lived under it
why should i listen to you rather than someone who actually lived under the regime?
By our standard of governments
I mean you're the one who went out of your way to talk In here
How would I know if the aushwitz death camp was bad until I talked to a survivor?
that's not what i said, i said that i'd rather take the testimony of someone who was a victim in the camp than someone who has no connection to it
Then go away
Shoo
Scram
because i don't take your word as fact?
Because you don't want to hear people's takes on history if they haven't had close experience
Why are you even in the server,let alone on the internet
I heard it, i'm telling you it's wrong
why do you defend a tyrannical regime?
like there's a reason why once the union fell nearly every post soviet state turned to some form of liberal democracy
Because I think that
- Not tyrannical by modern standards
- Better than the governments we have now
No,it fell In a violent,undemocratic coup
Modern day estonians for example have a way better life than in the Union
Seeing how long vlad has been in office,I wouldn't necessarily say democratic
I'm talking about what the puppet states did after leaving, not why they left
MOST
- Isn't a feat,
- Explain why
Better living standards, better healthcare, more purchasing power, freedom of expression and of the press, a true democracy, economic growth
Because they didn't get the best attention under the union and
2.they would get invaded if they went back to socialism
Pull out some stats
and you can't really talk about democracy in statistics
Hold up,the soviet union was taken away,how do you expect to compete from the grave
You can see a clear stagnation of the life expectancy
unlike in democracies were you see a steady growth
we live way better in our modern governments and have way more political freedom than under this dead empire
During what times
look at the bloody thing
Thought you meant the soviet union
As technology advances,the faster it advances
soviet citizens lived shorter lives than the ones living on the other side of the wall
Soviet citizens in what country
every
i mean have you ever looked at some stats?
Have you considered that the soviet union had existed for less than a century
does that justify mass killings?
does that justify a total absence of individual rights?
Don't change topics
You were talking about life expectancy
i'm talking about how the soviet union sucked and sucked even more for the minorities in it
and how no decent human being should claim that it was better than our living standards today
You can't have a gotcha moment of you refuse to specify what you're talking about
it's not a gotcha moment
I'm not going to respond to the mass killing,the minority opression,or the low individual rights claims if you don't talk about why you said those things
Then don't act like it
i didn't
Does that justify the the genocidal acts of the west
When did west germany do a genocide?
like the big majority of genocides done by "the west" were also before stalin's death
See that feeling? It's the feeling of someone in the argument making serious claims without elaborating
the problem is, it isn't a serious claim
Then tell me where you got all those claims from
About the mass killing,About the minority opression,ETC
i already gave you examples
like the Russoffication of, notably Ukraine,
TELL ME WHERE THE LINK IS IN EXAMPLES
When
Tell me more
seems like you didn't look around enough
Give me a specific search to preform
the Russification of Ukraine during the soviet era
and how he pushed for the decline of the Ukrainian language, national identity and culture
From what I see,Russia has been doing this to Ukraine since the big bang
so it justifies it?
No
there
You forget that I said by our modern standards
yeah and by our modern standards it's still a very uncool thing to do
especially when compared to liberal democracies
Yeah what about when all the "liberal democracies" came together to obliterate Yugoslavia with bombs?
there's this thing called the bosnian genocide
What about when Isreal constantly harassed Palestine by constantly attacking residential areas
you're singling out one thing and generalising it
You're the one who mentioned liberal democracies and I mentioned other governments as a factor
Oh yeah stop a genocide by starting another genocide
What about what Saudi Arabia and what they do to yemen
You may think I'm pointing out random atrocities,but you just have to reflect on the countries I'm referencing
bombing is a genocide?
Saudi Arabia isn't a liberal democracy...
Yeah if you bomb residential areas it is
So the germans are victims of genocide?
(during ww2)
Who are they friends with though?;who's enabling this
The citizens,yes
And that (depending on the situation) is a war crime, not a genocide
no it wasn't, a genocide is aimed at erasing a culture or a religion from the face of the earth
Yeah I didn't rape an 5 year old girl,I raped a 10 year old girl
in 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group."
That isn't bombing civilins
There's alot of definitions of genocide
Can't talk about modern politics but let's just say things are changing
This one is the one that will land you in the hague
The one that I used is "killing and destroying lots of stuff to cause serious damage to a group"
Intervention in the yugoslav wars weren't aimed at destroying serbia
But that isn't the one that will land you in the hague
Where was the U.N during the Vietnam War
Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
Point is,don't ever trust the U.N to define genocide or war crimes
What is the Hague
The US intervened to support the south vietnamese government, not to eradicate vietnamese culture
international court
Yeah,they wanted to eradicate north Vietnam entirely
No
no...
They wanted a democratic government that was pro us instead of a pro soviet communist government
They wanted the south to win
well "democratic" but yeah
Then why didn't they pull out after the massacre? Why didn't they stop when they knew for certain they couldn't stop the war crimes
That was a typo
I mean the country
vietnam? bosnia?
If they weren't put under political pressure,they would have sent the north Vietnamese back ro the French days
wrong again, they wanted the south to win, same situation as in North Korea, South Korea
That was another reason,not the full reason
They wanted to destroy the northern Vietnamese land?
Was south Korea put back under japan?...
Yeah
eradicating vietnamese culture surely wasn't one
Napalm bombs,agent orange. .
That's a war crime, not a genocide
Are you even paying attention???
He asked
They didnât do that just for the sake of it
If they did that the American businesses would have easy access to slave labor
you think the USA would of enslaved the north vietnamese?
They did it to aid troops on the ground by allowing more conventional tactics to be used
USA corporations would
In order to help the south win
I mean american business goes worldwide for cheap labor
Is that what happened in south korea?
Sure but it's not slavery
Thatâs what they want, less expenses more profit
South korea? I've heard about them using South Korean sweat shops,but no not then
You think south korea has a sweatshop economy?
Anyway I gotta eat because I have a life outside discord
I said no already
You have to take into account purchasing power
In today's money
You wouldn't be able to eat under the soviet union
again, purchasing power... not inflation
Bro what is you talking about anymore
If they had the purchasing power it wouldn't be considered a sweat shop
you don't know what you're talking about...
Elaborate
What the fuck did you just said
What the fuck is wrong with you
He doesn't know about interviews
Probably thinks everything is staged
I don't think you understood what I meant at all
He asked "why should i listen to someone with no connection"@hybrid iris
This conversation makes me lose brain cells
fr
alright my opinion is it had good intentions in the start and it was better in human rights than imperial russia, which is not that high of a bar in the first place
after 1924 i don't know enough until 1936
but i know that they invaded several countries, regions and cities that declared independence during the civil war after they won against the white army, including the forces that fought with them during the civil war like anarchist ukraine (i think anarchist ukraine did?)
also contributing a massive amount of soldiers and resources to the allied war effort and winning ww2 was pretty based i think
They also subjugated the countries they occupied during ww2
I don't disagree but i still think that there were worse crimes committed in the 4 years of axis occupation in eastern europe then the 40 years of whatever you want to call it combined
I'm not your economics teacher
The ussr failed (in my opinion) to properly execute communism and a major part of this is corruption.
and very very bad leadership
I don't know what you meant by I don't know.
My opinion is almost the opposite
Without the USSR the Germans might have not been defeated in WW2, without the USSR Stealth tech will not have been invented because a soviet scientist invented that. So it was good in my opinion that they existed
A hypothetical Russian empire (or republic) could of still pushed them back or at least hold them off for an allied invasion
Also we do not know how a world without a big scary communist power would be
It's what we're living in right now.
I was talking about the 1920s and 30s... plus look east
Wdym look east
đšđł
China just isn't as powerful at the USSR was unfortunately
Unfortunately? 
Yes
you complain about modern life and then say that...
He's a communist saying stupid shit lol
good point
explain why
What's your point?
@broken lodge I think the ussr was in it's prime near the end
You complained about modern living conditions then wish that one of the most horrid regimes of the 21st century was more powerful
seems a bit hypocritical to me
You actually trust western reporting to be sincere about its enemy? You've gone too far,and it's beside the point anyway.
I can say the exact same thing about you.
In what way?
You actually trust autocrats reporting to be sincere about its enemy?
Auto crats from where
well you seem to enjoy any regime with enough red in it's flag
I get the feeling that you have malicious intent. I always find myself questioning your statements even more than the logic,and then when I intercept what you mean,you just change topic,accuse me,and try to set up for a gotcha moment
You said autocrats from where, i responded with autocrats from pseudocommunist regimes
nobody changed subject
Can you quote me to prove I trusted an autocrat?+
well it's post 2012 so i cannot
Let's not debate China like I said
there's nothing to debate about
China IS a violent authoritarian regime
that isn't an opinion
yet you still support it because "usa bad"
1.off topic
2.source?
3.any thing can be an opinion
4.there you go trying to accuse me
5.by that logic I can say USA is factually horrid,but I won't be like you
- No it isn't
- Look around
- It literally is a violent authoritarian regime
- You said you wished the PRC was more powerful
- Yeah the USA did some pretty despicable things, doesn't justify what the PRC does
2.look around where
3.SOURCE?
4.i couldn't explain why
5. SOURCE
- Great leap forward, cultural revolution, tiananmen square, more modern stuff i can't talk about
- Try voicing any opinion in the PRC that doesn't follow the main narrative and you'll see where it lands you
- You don't need to, it's still despicable
- You don't think the USA did some despicable stuff?
indeed
I mean source as in articles,stats,photos
I think you missed the point
Again, i cannot due to the pre 2012 rule
Omg bruh
THEN DONT TALK ABOUT IT!@silent orbit
then don't support it
Great Leap Forward, in Chinese history, the campaign undertaken by the Chinese communists between 1958 and early 1960 to organize its vast population, especially in large-scale rural communes, to meet Chinaâs industrial and agricultural problems. The Chinese hoped to develop labour-intensive methods of industrialization, which would emphasize m...
"about 20 million people were estimated to have died of starvation between 1959 and 1962"
@silent orbit then don't oppose it
It's not the moral thing to do
It's still post 2012 to oppose China like this
No it isn't, the PRC has a long history of killing people
If he can't oppose it, then you shouldn't be able to support it
@silent orbit how far back you willing to count?
Not here then. That's OK
well the civil war ended in 1949 so from there to 2012
They say leftists push cancel culture....
what tf are you on about?

also what is a "leftist", it's such a vast group
Tiananmen Square incident, also called June Fourth incident or 6/4, series of protests and demonstrations in China in the spring of 1989 that culminated on the night of June 3â4 with a government crackdown on the demonstrators in Tiananmen Square in Beijing. Although the demonstrations and their subsequent repression occurred in cities througho...
"The governmentâs count of those killed was 241 (including soldiers), with some 7,000 wounded; most other estimates have put the death toll much higher"
Lol there is never convincing this guy
Man instantly blocked me when I told him the truth
Apparently he believes in the Soviet cause because his grandpa loves telling him stories about it
He despises anything west and staunchly believes society can function without the use of money while at the same time taking full advantage of the so called exploitative capitalist products of profit to proselytize people into all things commie
It's pretty simple and straightforward that the Soviets lost the cold war, funnier is the fact that the Soviets and the PRC also uses money bruh
Man doesn't exactly know what he believes in other than the thing that he opposes all things western
Step one: starts a discussion about the USSR
Step two: surprised everyone disagrees
Step three: blocks opposing voices
Step four: liberals owned
Anything from that long ago is basically irrelevant to judge that same person you've talking about
@robust zinc I blocked you because you were obsessed with trying to insult me and mock me and you never actually paid attention to the argument. You aren't debating,you're just taking up the personality of the annoying little cousin at the family reunion that your parents forced you to go to
Your claims still are dubious and your critique of modern society is based on cherry picked arguments
Where was this energy when you were trying to say I was "just x" or "just y"?
What
Exactly,now leave this forum
To hell with your goofy ass reaction image
To hell with your blind supporting of violent regimes
To hell with your blind supporting of violent regimes
Ah yes the violent regime of... liberal democracies
Free speech amirite
Ah yes the violent regime of...socialist economic systems
Just why exactly do you think that western society is that flawed compared to your communist alternatives?
Ah yes labor camps
It sure must be nice when the state seizes your private property just because you're a bourgeoise
Never saw the swiss driving tanks into protesters
Never saw the soviets commit a massacre and keep the war going
dafuq
You denying holodomor and the gulag concentration camps?
Or how they invaded czechoslovakia when they tried to break away
Never saw the soviets use country destroying bio weapons to help their troops see in the enemy's terrain
Never seen the soviets stay in a pointless,profit driven war (especially not to end up losing)
Man, wars are never profitable
Just why exactly is expending equipment a profitable venture
They have little relevance to everyday civilian life
And don't act like the Sovets or the Chinese didn't produce vast amounts of military equipment either
Most of the minuses you are pointing about the west are largely restricted only to their military ventures
Rarely do those penetrate the everyday life of its citizens
Unlike how the Soviets managed to create fear inherent in their society with just how much the NKVD penetrates into their lives
Lockheed Martin and Colt would like to disagree
Ah yes because it's only two corporations
Dude wars are entirely political in nature, rarely are they driven out of profit
Lockheed Martin is not the one that decides if the US should go to war
And plus, in the west military equipment is only produced when there is a necessary demand for it
So that defense budget would not eat up the country's economy unnecessarily
It's one of the flaws too with the US military
Its industry is not prepared for war because right now, there isn't much of a need for it
Unlike in communist regimes where the state heavily supervises industrial output so that it has the appropriate machinery to shift into a war setting instantly
Even if that means buying and keeping a machine that won't be used for the next 20 years
Why do you always think that profits are bad?
Economies aren't a zero sum game where if one party benefits the other must suffer
If that were the truth, then man would've been stuck in caveman mode since there is no progress to be made
oh do I also have to mention the fact that the US military industry is their form of socialism lol
Man it's pretty simple to understand that profits are not meant to rip people off
Think of yourself of having to make a living by selling products that are useful to people
Would you be happy if you sold what you made for 10 dollars only at half the price?
No obviously
You'd starve
cough Afghanistan cough
what does that have to do with civil liberties? also oof
Reportsâ proof they did it. Also didn't specify what the bio weapon does to humans
Also "capitalist freedom" is abstract.
It's more ridiculous freedoms for the rich who obtain their riches through malicious bidding,and no guarantees for the 99% of what are just industry standard human rights in the USSR
Throughout 1960-1989 there were relatively no homeless,no illiterate,and no starved USSR citizens
Soviet Russia,for example,immediately turned into "escape from tarkov" IRL when capitalism was introduced and its been still been shit up to 2011
Try saying anything against the soviet government before Gorby and you'll see where it lands you
These stats for the average American have literally only declined ,because that's the intended result of capitalism
he thinks the USSR was "good"
I've an idea gentlemen
I'd rather be homeless than shot but hey
- I hate Gorbachev
- If criticism of the government is the only main struggle than that's an easy life
Wdym shot
- I don't care about your opinion
- No it isn't
go ahead
The only Russian citizens getting shot were the ones who protested against the coup
@frosty spoke you saying USSR was good or communism in general ?
I was saying the USSR was still good by modern standard,but you know where these debates go
Why don't we have him explain what was wrong with USSR's communism and how could USSR have used communism to succeed as a state
Modern standard, after the war even the largest empire collapsed under its own weight
What Is said "weight" in your opinion
Ask any Estonian, Latvian, Ukrainian, Lithuanian, Pole, etc if they regret soviet times
Weight as in they couldn't manage their own colonies after exploiting them so hard
Get my point ?
*even
Are we talking bout economical and influential terms or quality of life?
No,they actually got sabotaged
Do explain
The latter 2
Ah
Check out my Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ComradeHakim
Apologies for the audio!
Just a quick little video about the dissolution of the soviet union.
Sources:
Dieter Nohlen, Florian Grotz & Christof Hartmann - Elections in Asia: A data handbook, Volume I, page 492.
Understanding the Cold War: A Historian's Personal Reflections by Adam Bruno ...
Quality of life was sire as shit
Back it up with stats or interviews or maybe some personal stories
Whilst influence which on moral standards doesn't define as good method and bad method still had some effecf
Ah yes, let's use the openly marxist-leninist guy as a source
Just get the evidence to back it up
For ex Egypt and India are still to this day Allies with Russia which began way back with the sovies
I mean you're anti Communist and I'm still debating with your
Let's see where all your sources came from
It's like saying your anti nazi yt I'm here saying nazism wasn't bad if we ignore racism
Yeah, the vast majority of decent human beings aren't on the extreme of political spectrum
I don't care about your opinion
Well,what are your criticisms of socialism/communism?
Nothing
???
Then what's your problem with the(60s-80s) union?
I won't tell where but I'm from a fairly decent democratic country and we've a state here that's literally the best
And it's communist
I mean democratically communist
Which is?
unlike the soviets
Which is what? I said I won't tell plus it's already Modern plus politics
There you have it
The soviets has elections wtf
Soviet Union was largely just oppressive and Authoritarian
yeah so does north korea, doesn't make it democratic
Tell that to countries under eastern bloc
democracy is more than a ballot
I'm not talking about North Korea
Want proof for this ?
Just look up how many man made famines the union had
The gulag
already tried lol
Which countries in the eastern bloc
There was a point in Siberia where families literally ate their children
My God, everything that were "communist"
warsaw pact
It's like criticizing modern American and talking about Vietnam and chile
and when the czecho-slovaks tried to become one, they were met with an invasion
Vietnam and chile aren't client states of the USA
neither are they allied to the USA
I've seen Twitter kids dig up newer dirt
If the people had elected a communist government and the commies had largely failed in fulfilling the workers utopia shit wouldn't they elect a non communist administration?
I'm talking about the invasions
that has nothing to do with his argument
They're horrible,but they happened a long time ago
Your relating is either trash or I'm stupid
Paladin
70% of people voted to keep the union so...
Communism does have a chance to succeed just not under oppressive Authoritarian
70% people of what? The soviet union ? Did ya know that the elections weren't rigged or anything?
They were sabotaged
that wasn't what he was talking about
BY WHO?
Hell were there even a chance for a non communist party ?
BRO WATCH THE VIDEO
@frosty spoke at your understanding device a definition of democracy
70% of soviets eligible to vote
Again, you're using a video made by an openly marxist-leninist guy who believes north korea is democratic, not a source
Since you're the one always bringing up democracy how about you start first
So
A democracy offers people some real choice
Gimme the names of parties of soviet union that contested in elections
And weren't cracked down upon by police
So how about you report all the videos sources? His other takes are not relevant to the topic
I don't expect someone who blindly defends any regime with enough red on it's flag to be impartial
A vote is a real choice. If it's anti communist that would make no sense. You wouldn't see a (real) socialist party up for election in the west,now would you?
"West"
I don't care about your opinion
West is openly anto communist
And it's people aren't that into communism as to take matters into their own hands
In summary,the west is every country in NATO or the United nations to be simple
Lmao
đż
Every country in UN
The capitalist majority
Actually
We do not live in a fully capitalist society
I'm so lost on what the hell we are even talking bouy
Nor was the union fully communist
I'm generalizing because there's basically no other way to describe who I'm talking about without being weird
where people can actually speak their mind and don't go to a penal colony for asking for more bread
Worry not, you already are