#Insert your controversial opinion here
1 messages · Page 7 of 1
is he an introvert?
I could kind of let him get away with this one tbh
but if you dont wanna bother him and finds the topic relevant anyway
Since he was absent for quite some time
just go with it
Which meant that he didn't do anything for the first activities
So I guess this must be his way for making up
But still
This makes me super conscious of peer rating forms
this is getting out of hand lol
Also
XD
want some local rumors from my class
dude
wtf
we have a mayor as a classmate
and he's a freeloader
HOLY SHIT
wtf
He's a mayor
AND
HE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH DOES
revolt
OFF WITH THE HEAD
VIVE LA REVOLUTION
he's literally an executive
REAL SHIT
He's the youngest mayor in the country's history
22
WTF
💀
have u ever talked to him?
he's from a dynasty XD
wot dynasty?
and our class lessons are always about how dynasties harm the country's politics
Political dynasties are basically families who maintain positions of government for a long period
And most of the time they're subject to corruption
yeah but which dynasty
marcos?
what country?
philippines
the fuck
There's a lot of dynasties her
here
wait
si bu
I'll send you a dm of a news article XD
sure :DDD
hehe bang bang
the ones we want to root out tend to be those exposed with the most issues innit?
dawg that's the problem
Nobody wants to root them out 😭
Well ofc we do, but voters don't really give a shit on reviewing their candidates
It's a tradition at this point already to keep electing the same family over and over again
helpless cowards 
and can't trust the populace too...
The worst part is nobody wants to run against them too
the country's ripe for bloody messy change
Since for one you could be a victim of politics (le epic assasination) for challenging the dynasty
me when I begin to tarnish the Armed Forces's reputation 
Then there's the also problem of campaign costs
and chances are any new candidate will lose anyway
Since duh reputation
and entrenched politicians
a millennia more to the dinosaur
Buddy outlived the Queen
@fair hearth has the military technically influenced politics after 1986?
been so fucking long kek 
Well we literally had Ramos as president
Ever since Marcos the military has more influence on the country's politics
Though ofc I haven't read much up yet on the history
still does jackshit in local politics when the local elites themselves have private armies 
military influence in politics could go way back to Magsaysay or even the Quirino or Roxas presidencies
Recommend me some history books fellow filipino
I am in desperate need of context every class lecture 😭
What I have is Philippines: A Modern Jigsaw by Philip Bowring
go for some Xiao Chua & Ambeth Ocampo writings too!
and this was after years of reading old Nick Joaquin 
Ooooo Xiao Chua
He teaches here in La Salle
Some of my classmates right now have him as professor for gerphis
noice
I haven't seen him yet in campus though
Napoleon Bonaparte was not a ruthless dictator. Though he had his cons, he managed to greatly influence most of Europe. Improve certain aspects of French society. In my own controversial opinion, Napoleon was a good leader.
he definitely was a great emperor of the frenchies kingdom
everybody approve that
it's just his arrogance that ruined every of his glories
China is not a bad country
Which China 
People's Republic of China
🤢
Chinese culture is beautiful, I agree.
The food too
The geopolitics? Not so much.
geopolitics + politics + da communist party
but what's wrong with their geopolitics tho
It's not just China. I think geopolitics is dumb as a whole.
Conditions people of different nationalities to hate each other.
Aren't you Vietnamese?
Everyone knows just how absurd their 9 dash line is
i mean the other problems of their geopolitics
They have disputes with nearly everyone kek
oh yeah
Then there's that one china policy
SMH CHINA
Can't they just act peacefully for once
Asean is willing to collaborate with China but omfg
They're making it harder for themselves
they're goddamn huge
and they got power
so they just simply gonna act aggressively to achieve anything they want
now they aint nothing like the yankees but more deceptive and clever
i hate CCP
collaborate
at the same time trying to stay afloat as an intact organization, unlike SEATO
that alone is politics... politics best to stay away from exhausting one's spirit from insignificant discussions
their geopolitics are aimed to make the non-Chicom persons bent, broken, and subservient to the ambitions of the CCP
The "there wouldn't be conflict in the Middle East today had the Ottomans remained." argument is dumb and completely throws the regions situation in the last 100 years of the Sublime State.
Saddam Hussein was not a ruthless and cold-blooded dictator, screw the Western media who used genocidal Kurds and invaded Kuwait to make up that depiction
Also, dictatorship ain't always bad, screw the Western media for the second time for making up that impression
lol it is
As a power structure dictatorships are fundamentally flawed
The reason why true democracies function so well is elections weed out bad candidates
dictatorship is flawed
but it ain't always bad
we have some kind of good dictatorship
such as benevolent one
It's bad because it's flawed
but it ain't always bad
Democracies are capable of that
dude it's not always the case
you should take into consideration singapore
yugoslavia
"often"
yeah ik
Singapore benefits due to its nature as a city state
Along with its crucial location in the strait of malacca
Also I'm pretty sure singapore currently isn't a dictatorship
but iirc its politics are essentially just ruled by one party
Fairly authoritarian
But I wouldn't count it as a dictatorship
it must all thanks to lee kuan yew and his party PAP who leveraged this
singapore had a good geography but
after british pulled out it was just a mess
Yeah but that's because they only got so lucky thanks to competence
under lee kuan yew it was
And elections are a far better system to introduce competitive officials
Or at least if not then the opportunities of a liberal society fosters a competent institutional staff
also iyo do you think one party is authoritarian?
It is
The purpose of multiple parties is to represent different interests and also introduce competition
we vietnam is one-party state so that counts too?
Yes
but do you think one-party is a bad thing or no?
It's a bad thing
personally i don't think so
d-dude
It doesn't introduce multiple purspectives
Plurarity for the most part is always better in politics
plurarity can sometimes destroy a whole nation
just bc too much party
too much opposition = too much chaos
Then there was nation to begin with
The project of nationalism failed
The Philippines is a very diverse nation
Lots of opposition
Not so chaotic here
Thanks to a solid sense of nationalism
Which is worryingly fading imo
no offense but i smell irony here 
How come
Compared to our other neighbors, yes
But it's surprising how we're still one nation lmao
aren't other neighbors more stable?
Multiple island groups make it difficult for Manila
shush
lemme talk about the past
XD
go ahead 
But here's the thing Si Bu
The Philippines is democratic yes, we have a multi party system yes
Pretty good stuff
But one problem
Elections here are flawed
Since the population has a tendency to keep electing the same people again and again
Essentialy the political landscape has no competition
Democracy only works if it has true competition and properly represents the groups of the nation
Vietnam is kind of democratic
At least from what I've read
yes we are socially democratic
a bit politically i guess
representative democracy does exists
it's just we are one party state but i don't really mind about that
yeah, you still make use of democratic institutions
the usual seperation of powers kind of stuff
Not a dictatorship though
it's some kind of incorporation of socialism/communism and democracy
ecir im still confused between nationalism and patriotism, can you help elaborate on this a bit?
I haven't read much yet on socialism other than the fact it calls for public ownership of the means of production
What confuses me though is how socialists often don't count national industries as public property
and instead refer to socialism to welfare state like that of the scandinavian countries
It's just love your country
Nationalism on the other hand is more focused on common ethnicity, culture, or language
so that means you phil unite by love towards ethnicity and culture
not the country
am i right?
Nationalism still calls for loving the country
It basically just wants that a common group of people should have a state of their own
thanks
im pretty sure nationalism is definitely higher than patriotism in the philippines
Yeah
Although imo it is sort of fading away due to stuff like internationalization
And le epic marcos apologists
favor towards marcos is crazy man
i watched a video about a filipino cult
and guess what
marcos is their god 💀
💀
they christ him like crazy
The Nazis won power with only 37% of the vote because of how many parties there were in the Weimar Republic. Too much plurality is also a bad thing.
Welfare states is a social democrat thing. Actual hardline no private ownership of production socialists hate things like the Nordic model because they see it as a compromise between capitalists and workers.
The real problem the Philippines has is that unlike what the US did to Japan (tearing down zaibatsus and shuffled the nation's policies), they kept old wine in new bottles, keeping their surviving Filipino friends among the national dynasties in power, keeping the Philippines in their well-knit national & geopolitical status quo and umbrella security network
Pretty much what is kept in place exacerbates into competitive mediocrity
we sure are a blursed bunch

Average day in the Philippines
Pineapple pizza was invented by a Canadian
Least far-right person in the Philippines
imagine slapping the swatstika with the yellow ribbon of the LP
togetha

former Rhodesia's PM Ian Smith wasn't a bad guy. His action garnered loads of condemnations and controversies, but in the end he knew what he was doing and he did for the good of Rhodesian, all races
Definitely! Intentionally keeping the majority of the population as an oppressed group with no rights, say or opportunity to grow solely based on race, and fighting to the bitter end to keep such an institutionalised and systemic discrimination policy in place was for the good of all Rhodesians.
why is everybody calling it utterly racist bad sh*t terrible oppressive and no rights?
wtf
like
black majority still had some representations in the society
it may not be as prevalent or popular but
Ian Smith was a blatant racist that fought to keep an apartheid system with minority rule.
even in the government there existed some black officials
that's why i said it's "controversial"
When you have laws in place to keep people down solely based on race, and fight bitterly against the world to maintain that system then yes, you are a racist in charge of a racist state.
ian smith never keep all black people down?
didn't i said they had some representation in the society?
"I'm not racist, I have black friends"
The Rhodesian government was marked by minority rule. The black indigenous people had no say in government, laws or policy making. It was the white minority population that had full citizen rights and had higher privilege, opportunity and rights than the majority black population.
it's a white-charged state but how could we tell all black majority are oppressed and stuff?
did they genocide black majority?
Because they couldn't vote, were not allowed to enter into government, make state decisions, have the same opportunities as the white population, and would not have the same chances or opportunity to attend higher education.
did they shoot them up and put them in slums?
dude black people still had education
Yes, they quite literally placed black people in slums and lower housing.
Does it really take a genocide to make someone a racist?
It's not the first time you've come here to defend Rhodesia.
this is why im putting it in "controversial opinion" section
even Ian Smith himself was regarded by many as a controversial figure
Being racist would do that yes
I just bring this up and everybody trynna cancel me
pardon me but are you calling me racist just because i bring this topic up?
I am calling Ian Smith a racist.
oh ok
Which he was
my bad for the misunderstanding
Imagine in the 1930s when WW2 had not yet happened, and people came here to say how Hitler wasn't such a bad guy, I mean Jews were still allowed to live and work in Germany, meaning that Nazi Germany was not really a racist state.
"did they shoot them up and put them in slums?"
Ian Smith is more like being overly villified by the media and his opposition
I think he's getting the treatment he deserves.
black and white rule is pretty much a sensitive topic
but just by a few evidence people start calling him bad and stuff
"few evidence"
As I said before it's not the first time that you come to the server to defend Rhodesia, and you've been informed several times by other people of the racist and discriminatory rules and practices of that government.
You choose to ignore it, your prerogative.
im not trying to be racist or sow that kind of ideals to people here ://
You're trying to convince me that Ian Smith wasn't a racist person, or that the Rhodesian state wasn't a racist government.
Going so far even to say that what Ian Smith did was for the good of all Rhodesians....
i stated all races
By Rhodesians do you solely mean white Rhodesians?
i stated "all races"
not Rhodesians
if i say Rhodesian people will automatically think of white community
so i had to add that line
fine can we stop here
That doesn't fix anything, if anything it just makes you even more tone deaf.


NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
😱😰😬😩😭💀
dies of death
Africa is a country
And if it isnt it needs to declare its independence
Breaking news: Francophone African countries simultaneously declare independence from France's central bank and, joined by the rest of the continent, establish the Republic of Africa.
What it needs is to be split among warlords, like China back then
If any country wants anything from it they can please the specific warlord and their ethnicities
Uranium, diamond, gold, slaves etc
we surely can no longer call American stupid if this gets real
Bermuda Triangle is fake
It is a circle
Oh ye that still exists
Why is it always the Americans
New World can't keep to themselves can they
Aliens, ufos, skinwalkers, cartel
Arent you an american

Thankfully no
Hehe europeans have a magic circle of rocks
Actually where i live has some of the highest ufo sightings
Also a ton of Native graves here
Wendigo moment
What's that again
Isn't that some sundial or smth
Imagine a thousand years from now people discover football posts and call it dueling arena
Stonehenge
The thing it was meant to do
What was that
Do we even know?
No we dont
We know it aligns w the sun and thats it
As far as i know
Roast
So what if Stonehenge was some orgy equipment for giants
Idk
Its a solar calendar
Sun dial but bigger
If people can spare enough time to build one that big
Why can't they just learn it themselves
Like every house, or just teach a shaman and let em ask for sacrifices everyday
north korea is a dictatorship but life ain't way too bad as all might think, no pollution of all kinds, no traffic jam, public transportations and trees are everywhere, lights aint that scarce as media depicted
people living in DPRK have pretty much vibe of their own style compared to us, as they aint affected by those things and famine hasn't hit the country ever since starvation of the 1990s
Nazi Germany wasn't way too bad for the desirable citizens, Hitler bought Germany out of distress and saved Germany and the desired Germans, otherwise for every other soul
*brought
Everyone's got their own pros and cons, slaves were beaten and threatened but atleast their lives weren't as complex as that of their masters
💀
That's a really low standard of living
starvation?
stop spreading lies sir
agree 
it's someway a "high" low standard of living 
right
Wait what kinda idiot are you
You agree with the nazi one but not the slave one ?
what?
i said right
which means i agree!
Hell be darn
Controversial opinion: Black/latino/ other minority history months are just segregation rebranded
There is only one place where I've seen all those names together and it's definitely not about months
where
they are lies

My opinion is that poc history months are tokenistic actions that let white liberals pat themselves on the back for a job well done without doing anything to fix actual issues around racial inequality
Man I just want people to remember the days when slavery was still legal 
cult of personality isn't always bad. It can be considered as one of the way to memorize a great and benevolent leader
Leaders are boring
Some leaders only manage to excel thanks to the fact that they are privileged to inherit robust institutions and a workable political environment
dude, some leaders did an excellent job
they deserve mass accolades and memorization
because they really did that
sounds solid
like calling latinos "latinx" or "latine"
no poc gives a shit about those names
Idolizing leaders are no different to a helpless child looking up to their parents in high regard
They should be studied for their achievements, not celebrated
why should we study not celebrate, according to you
if they did an excellent job celebration is a should
Well you've already mentioned the so called cult of personality
That's one huge ass flaw
If everything depended on the leader then the fortune of the state would be doomed if they are to die
Would it be wise to have the people believe that prosperity can only be achieved through the efforts of one man alone?
that's why some political thoughts are born and named after those great leader
it's some kind of a study from them
not just celebrating their feats
by having that thoughts we learn what is good of them
What kind of benefit would the average citizen get from such a celebration anyway
The way I see it, celebrations are either meant as remembrance or as a mechanism to encourage progress and hardwork
It would be odd if we are to have a single person as the sole foundation for an entire country's memory
And more odd if leaders need to have their ego stroked with these celebrations
kahsljhajhkqhlksqhkslqlhaslhsahsalaalahlahlahlxbzbmbjkgkqguygiuagysgq
i think i put forward the wrong controversial opinion
i should have reversed it
Days of rememberance should just be an excuse to get wasted in the middle of the week, nothing else.
but rememberance of what exactly?
whatever dead person or event is being celebrated.
ahem
Does cult of personality make it easier for people to be rallied for a cause sometimes rather than whole ass nationalism
Just for that particular reason and for nothing else is it good for I suppose
if you are planning to take over the reins, sure as long as it helps by interpreting your ideas as this personality cult's final wishes
celebration and worshipful behaviors towards leaders aren't cult of personalities in all case, it is the right of people and the way they chose to praise them
Until you make it 'government leave'
public holidays
bless the heavens of such festivities in honor of the departed
If anything, the modern Olympics should reintroduce the hoplitodromia
a track sports where athletes, picked from the soldiery, are to bear safe military gear and race to the finish line
Ted Kaczynski was something
Karl Marx may have made some huge mistakes himself when creating communism/socialism
he's been cooking the greatest virulent idea ever known to man since 11800 years of human history
d-dude
stop saying hostile thing about it
he created with good wills and intentions for the people
but there must have been mistakes in his creation that already killed the ideology
Even Hitler had good wills for the Aryan race
Attempts to introduce systemic change out of good will alone does not excuse catastrophic failures that endanger the lives of many
I don't think each word had negative connotations when I typed this in mind
try to think of goodwill when he starts competing with his fellow workers back in his arduous days of labor, especially when he writes his correspondence to others 
is this real?
Yes
He refused to live w them
Cause they were slobs
And never did any work
Source?
Got it from a book
Im not at home
And its a big book
So you’ll have to wait a bit
oh alright
That’s true
Communism shouldn’t exist
noj rants moment
should exists
huge mistakes?
I don't see where any objectively/morally wrong faults in his ideas
seems more like a case of authoritarians just picking any convenient ideology at hand
or rather very strenuous policies
yes as i argued in some previous chat
he thought of the good for people
but the point here is
the ideology he coined focused quite much on collectivization
state ownership and basically some sort of
"labor by ability, enjoy by demand" policy (this is what i literally translated and intepreted from vietnamese description of his ideal cus idk its true name)
but anw
i see some signs of it stagnate the economic growth
like since it focuses too much on collectivization and people enjoy things but not working hard enough to achieve it
the remaining socialist states in the world have also moved pretty much away from original socialism
in order to throw open the door for their economy
the only country that still maintain true socialism left is cuba
Imo, communism is only viable on a small scale with people who all think alike- otherwise it just becomes authoritarian socialism
state ownership of stuff also gave leaders extra power
to which they would abuse
that's the critical issue
Communism requires everyone to agree to the ideology or else it becomes too authoritarian and open to abuse from the leaders
marx may distaste capitalism and that's fine
considering he had seen too much cruelty and unfairness the workers had in private factories
but when building up socialist ideals he may not have thought of those issue
that's what i think imho
that's the saddest thing to me
what the f*ck
Gojo should have died in 2006 when Toji stabbed him through the throat.
He pulled some bullshit about how he made "positive energy" to regenerate his body by multiplying his negative energy. But that's not how physics works. Two electrons don't make a proton, they just increase the charge of an anion. So Gojo realistically should have died in that moment because he only made more negative energy.
Reverse curse technique
France is the best country on earth
colonialism noise intensified
Wermacht noise intensified
pRoTESt NoisE iNteNsiFied
VIVE LA FRANCAIS!!!!!!!! 🥖 🍷 👨🎨 🌟 🏳️💀 🇫🇷
🔥 🔥 🔥
was
not even was
was must be said for a plenty of decades ago
before napoleon lost his power
that's not decades
centuries
the differences of tens and hundreds
Turn around
Turn around again
I'm facing the same direction what the fuck
Talcum powder is a great lubricant for phone screens
apply bleach to phonescreen

m o i s t
Marx was stupid he didn't understand humans he was a blind ideolog
if he was so f*cking stupid as you said he wouldn't have bothered coining the goddamn ideological thingy
instead he could have just become a lawyer as his father's wish and lived on a prosperous life
How does making an ideology make you smart
then why did you say he didn't understand humans
Because he thought his system would work
did you know what motivated him to create communism?
i never said he'd say communism works
nor does he possibly think so
the point here is, his ideology remains some serious drawbacks that should be noted
Why would he make an ideology if he thought wouldn't work
how could you tell he thought it's gonna work and stuff
and do you even understand what motivated him to do that?
How does that relate to him understanding humans
that's what you said
Cause he made it
but why did he make it?
Idk
How does that affect him not being dumb I think your changing the subject here
you're changing it
im asking you why did he make it
That wasnt the topic to begain with
and i was explaining how he wasn't stupid for coining the ideology
and now you're just driving me off the course
You haven't explained anything your just going in circles
i reckon you are the one who created that circle
Proof
then prove im in a circle too
You keep asking me why he didn't even when K said Idk to it have repeated it multiple times instead of giving me an answer
and i said "yeah that's the point"
How is that the point
the point is you don't know
and then you kept asking me
how does that affect him not being dumb
then what?
why would i have to give an answer to that question?
can't you just think on your own?
Give me a damn answer how does it affect the fact that him and his ideology was kind of stupid
what affects?
The reason he wrote it
oh because you don't know what he wrote it for
Ok so how does that affect my argument
why you ask?
since you ask questions like that we're going to nothing
in this argument
In typical commie fashion you dont give me a proper argument you hand some bs questions
yes i hand some bs argument
and you hand some bs questions to me
you started it
I just asked you how that question affects the argument
first you ask how does that affect him being stpuid
and you drove me to how does that affects your argument
that's your fashion?
Goddamn can you just give me a proper answer instead kf changing the damn subject
you don't change the subject then
I never changed it
you did?
You started asking mw about why he wrote it I dont see how that does shit for your argument
and yes when you said idk and i literally replied that's the point
then you began asking more bs questions like
what's the point here
or how does that affects my argument
How does me not knowing why he wrote it do shit
see
you're asking stuff like this
And your avoiding my question
are we going to talk about communism or picking on each other's argument?
you choose
I say we stop
are we gonna stop now?
Yeah
ok
Communism be clapped
Zamn
I'm surprised nobody brought up the holocaust or something
Thank the lord
the Holocaust is one devious plan for world domination
there I said it
The United States of America did in fact land on the moon 🌕
Isn’t this meant to be a hot takes channel?
That's not a controversial opinion. That's a widely held belief.
Cause some people don’t believe that the US landed on the moon. They flat out denied even though there is huge amount of evidence supporting the claim that the United States did in fact land on the moon.
Even so, some people who don’t believe the Apollo missions. Usually tend to believe the Earth is flat.
time to pull some controversial Wehraboo's opinion

one day, communists and capitalists will team up again
the Roman Empire is overrated
the Qin, Han, Tang, Ming dynasties are underrated
Haven’t they already? (World War Two)
How many true commies are even left in the modern era of man?
I hope I'm one
Don't send me to the gulags 🙏
that's not communism, true communism is liberation of the bottom class
Don't bottoms exist to get trampled?
what? no
Clearly you aren't active in the bottom community 😔
they shouldn't be
a society could live an amount of time with out the bourgeoise, but can't live a moment without the proletariat
See, here's the thing. Marxists claim they're the real commies and all other ideologies are liberals. Anarchists claim they're the real commies and Marxists are "state capitalists" or something along those lines. I don't even know what counts as a "true commie" anymore.
I think a true commie is wanting to give more respect towards the bottom class. The existence of communist is to let the bourgeois know, "Hey, we are fucking humans." Communist is an extreme form of respect and treatment. A true commie learns from the prior commies and "invent" a new form of commie. Communistic ideas that got delivered about 100 years ago, needs to be adjusted in today's scenarios, which one of my goals
World War One, despite how horrific it was, was always inevitable. And would thrust the world into the new era. And no matter how many times we could prevent it, it was always inevitable.
Will an ideal 'true' communist respect cultures, traditions, and religions 
yes, i am an atheistic communist, and I respect all religions, execept the dumbass ones like satanism / flat earthers. Does it matter that religions maybe real / no? No it doesnt. Religion shows people an great person that guides them. Religion MAY be fake, but its salvations and guidence are real
I'd like to imagine a world where capitalism and communism can be reconciled
capitalism stop committing disaster and overly controlling the economy
communism could have more intelligent and more liberal leaders to rule
Humanity is too flawed for that to happen most likely
ikr
it'd forever be an imagination 😭
Man I wish we sucked less 😭
that'd forever be just a wish as well 😭
we're not f*cked
but we're suck
we pushed ourselves on the edge of f*ckups sometimes
hell yeah that was the closest of all the close calls
but thank god we're saved by a soviet submarine officer
and negotiation effort of two diplomats if im not mistaken
Mhm I thank The Emperor every day that we weren't blown to bits
sometimes relutance can save the world 
Indeed
communism and captialism should co exist
competion leads to progression
Well I hope not a dangerous one at that
but how could they coexist peacefully while two ideologies have different sets of goal
and a decade-long hostility
if a world of obly communism / captialism exists, it would be bad
they would both try to fix themselves because resources are limited
officially a century 
Jesus
Malaysia's independence isn't real. It was barely a result of collaboration with British colonials in anticommunist ops in exchange for that
years following the independence Brits still had military presence in Malaysia (tho it's just not for colonialist purposes)
I love your mum
you can't
why not
Not wrong.
ensinhower, shut up please
No shit, you’re more likely to be a mainlander I assume
i ain't one you fool
this is like the only forum post that's still going
i think people like controversy
Most of post-Soviet countries (Except Russia) are creatures of Bolshevik's National Policy
If my Republic stayed as separated SSR it would've left USSR too and became Finnish style Moldova
Thank god it didnt happened
France is a cool country

Average Emily in Paris fan
So true
?
The joke is that Emily in Paris romanticises the city of love and French culture when reality suggests otherwise
oof
OUI!
Constitutional and Conditional Slavery is justified, inherent slavery is not
N-word doesnt have bad meaning
At least in Russian language 
Oh ok
Khruschev said N-word in UN during his speech btw
Ninja
What's the russian word?
interesting
Негр
Negr
Like it really means nothing bad in Russian, just "Black person"
It means Bird
Africa ain't poor
That is not controversial...
Africa is exploitable
Now that is how you controverse
YES

THEY ARE EXPLOITABLE
BUT FOR CHRIST WE MUST NOT
EVER EXPLOIT
THOSE GODFORSAKEN PEOPLE
THEY'VE HAD ENOUGH FROM THE COLONIALISM
yes I can, it is after all what my nobility title is all about
the right to do anything in Heishan (Black Mountain)

So the bird is the word?
I´m afraid Mauzer is unaware of our great western culture to understand that reference.
It's song lol
I know it
Said Spaniard wtf 0-o
Western hegemony 💪
Said Spaniard wtf o-0
HELL YEAH
Puppets of Yanks are happy 
Life is good on this side
Emperor Hirohito had nothing to do with Japanese war crimes and fascism in WW2
this has been made clear by the Japanese government in response to a Ukrainian media insult against the emperor back in 2022
Sitting back doing nothing to stop fanatics to take over the country and perpetrate some of the most horrendous abuses of human rights, doesn't make you an innocent bystander.
He is part to blame for Japan's descent into depravity.
He had the power to stop the army from effectively taking over the country, but instead chose to isolate himself from affairs and live in a bubble.
He should have been put on trial and forced to abdicate post WW2, but the americans needed him as a way to legitimise their occupation and cooperation with Japan, so they kept him around.
if we were to blame him we could blame his negligience
but that still wouldn't create him a close linking nor engagements in japanese war crimes and fascism in ww2
so imo he didn't really have too much thing to do with them at all
Not negligence at all, he was aware just chose not to act.
He stained the name of the Imperial lineage.
Japan wasn't punished enough post WW2 imo
The fact that they can get away with denying or ignoring their actions in Korea and China, shows it.
did america have any other intention in their occupation of japan? aside from anti-commie reasons
and to pacify and quell the remnants of IJA
cus you said they wanna legitimize the occupation
Building up trade partners in the region to expand sphere of influence as well as to have forward bases in the Pacific.
Woe to the vanquished
soviets didn't even punish them hard either 💀
i remember there was a japanese criminal trials in the far east back in '46
Yes, the Tokyo trials.
no, the soviet's one
i forgot its name
like they were trying unit 731 members or smt
but ofc those criminals barely got imprisonment and subjected the hard labor
oh hell, it's the khabarovsk war crimes trial
they only got like 2-25 years incarceration
that's way too insufficient for what they have done 💀
Tru tho rome had a lot on influence of europe it really wasnt that impressive
the whole thing about communism IS CONROLLING THE DAMN ECONOMY
The Roman empire itself wasn't impressive
But add in the Republic and it was
true, there were empires that were bigger and more impresive, like alexander's and gengis khan
but none that lasted a thousand years
or almost a thousand years
excuse me
WHAT?
Communism doesnt control anything ever
isnt communism all about the planned economy
but i love socialism
But I love France. We are not the same.
But I love food.
We are not the same……

But I love her head
We ain’t the same boy

(Satire for those concerned)

I hate taxes!
I hate Texas!
You from Texas?
Yes.
Ok sorry man
It’s all good. No worries about it.
I’m not like a crazy Texas fan.
You can tell me that I’m a stupid Californian we eats avocados on toast.
Uh
Oh thank goodness
Well, I will say this, California is wildly different. Of course you have the cities but there are more. When people hear California they automatically think of Los Angeles, San Diego, Sacramento, etc. But California has some awesome scenery that are beyond the cities. Such as the Valley, the deserts, the mountains, etc.
So I suppose, if I wanted to make a comeback, my comeback would be this. You are a TikTok influencer and you live in LA.
You should see the wine fields, beautiful.
I am hate Tik Tok
Ah see. So now I have a comeback. Use TikTok against you. I know this because the vast majority of tiktok people for whatever reasons, unbeknownst to me, move to Los Angeles.
Fascinating. One day I shall see them.
Let’s nuke LA
It will make the world a better place
Debatable yet I won’t disagree.
Anywho, I must leave. I have some homework to do. I shall talk to you later @lunar widget
Ok bye. I’m working on my homework too.
Los Anime 
Nooooooooooooooooooo
What I do?
bringing up the nuking of LA
holup, sounds like the plot for The Creator
a movie where the USA says AI is jungle Al Qaeda
N word , R word and M word aren't derogatory
Nincompoop, runt, and midget.
Willy Wonka ?
I sort of agree its a damn word how can a word carry so much historical weight and if it does carrey so much weight why do members of your race get to say it
I used to ponder what and why they censored an N word in the movie rush hour
Carter says it and gets no consequences when Jackie says it, he's pounded
I used to be very anti Curse/swear word
Same
now I dont rlly get it
I was like, whoever curses is a bad guy
When I was below 10
Now I'm like a beep machine
I still try not to swear since there is still a chance I might be damned to hell because of it (the last part is a joke)
I don't swear at home, I'd swear in front of teacher than at home
And I have sweared before and at teachers
Something I'm proud of
Same here I never swear at home or at my teachers sometimes when i'm with the lads I drop 1 or 2
My motto is
I can do whatever I want as long as there is absolutely no way it will claw its way through to my home
I would do something random somewhere and some dipshit like a fuckin scout reports it back home
yeah lol
I politely swear 


American Civil War is entirely the "fault" of Union of States and the pre existing government of US.
"Fault" cus you let your southerners depend too much on slaves, exploited the slave industry too much, too late to do anything about the already on your land slaves, were so sudden and hellbent on implementing the free man act or whatever so much so that you didn't realize you had just shot your bottom
Zionism is bad
Any form of extremism is, but dunno if zionism is a form of extremism
Hey, think about it this way. If jews were like an ethnicity would you be saying that ?
Cus almost all nation states came to being cus of some nationalistic folks banding together to overthrow the incompetent monarch
Probably

pre-existing
therefore the undefined Federal Government, Perfidious Albion, Slothful España, and Devilish Frankia are to blame then?
The consequence of violent diasporas 
Yes
but zionism was a factor that triggered israeli-palestinian problem
zionism specially existed long before even ww2 happened
jews' minority should not be use as defense for serious drawbacks that zionism brought about
do you know what also existed before even WW2 happened that shaped how Zionism came to be?

yes i do
and i would admit another fact that zionism was originally coined as a form of jewish nationalism
seeking to secure a land for jewish population being outcasted and wandering across the world
but ofc zionism still became a bad thing as of what we're seeing today
typical lens you have 
I may not know it, but a single conflict will not represent the most common interests envisioned upon an idea
And your point ? Israeli Palestinian problem I call that coping issues
Why is Zionism bad if everyone's OK with it
Cept Arabs cus they're obviously the ones zionists wanna screw over after Israel

"everyone's okay with it"
if that was the case then there would be no such thing as anti-zionism
or intifada or israel-palestinian conflict stuff
and that didn't just stop at the arabs
Just a reminder not all Jewish people are Zionists. Saying all Jews support Zionism is like saying all Russians support the war in Ukraine.
Not all zionists are jews and not all jews are zionists
Ortho jews tend to be fiercely anti zionist
Good point
Is there any cases where particular groups of Jews oppose Zionism themselves?
I heard something about American Jews rallying in New York against Israel a few months ago
Me too
Ortho jews
They usually hate it
They r exempt from conscription in israel
Europe would be better off if Napoleon had won and not been exiled.
Explain your reasoning
Why?
Europe torn by a thalassocracy and a starved grand army? Probably never
A French hegemony will not do the world a great endeavor
Not following
Crayfish are the best underwater twerkers
If Napoleon won, modern history would be completely different, and you can’t predict how this would butterfly
World War 2 could still be won if Britain surrendered
Unconditionally?
Both ways
Well
Britain could never unconditionally surrender
Germany never had the industrial base or navy to accomplish such a feat like invading the UK
They could however conditionally surrender, possibly after a major defeat in Africa
Get off the HOI4
NEVER
We;; key word is could Britian was instrumental to allied success
We did all the heavy lifting- America sped things up a bit
(IK this is slightly misleading but idc)
True (America did do more than just speading things up)
D-Day would not have been possible without the US, Britain didn't have nearly enough troops to stage a major landing
Even with the colonial troops- ANZAC, Indian, and Canadian troops, I doubt the UK could muster enough manpower to maintain both the North African and Southeast asian fronts whilst also conducting major landings in France or even Italy
Ok but where did America launch there invasion from?
Yes, i know, the United Kingdom
So it would have been impossible Yes I agree the torch through North africa was made much easier with US assistance
Either way, any landing from the north would be impossible
but El Amein was what put the final nail in the desert fox's coffin in the region
To be fair, the US could invade through Italy, although it would probs work out just as poorly as real life
They would not have been able to invade because if mainland UK fell then it's most likely that Eygpt fell
True
Which mean to where for US to launch the invasion from
Nowhere
Meaning the USSR would have much more sway over europe post-war
And Japan would get obliterated due to more focus on them
Umm actually With no Western or African front Germany might have won
AAnd reached Moscow
Also Japan would not have to deal with british India (Most likely)
As there were may independence movements within the Raj
However, with Britain out of the war, I doubt the US would have any part in Europe, and thus would focus heavily on Japan
If we're assuming that Britain surrenders when France fell, the USSR might not have been invaded
Nahhh Hitler was always planning to kill USSR
Maybe, but i believe this may have postponed it by at least maybe a year or two
This delayed start would allow the Soviets to build up more military capability
If anything, it would've only made Hitler's head a bit bigger and the invasion of USSR would've begun sooner than later
"Statistically, no one has been able to stop us. I don't think the Soviets can either"
I sure love bureaucracy
Pretty much
If the Central Powers won WWI, the British would have economically dominated Europe.
Would you like me to explain it?
Sure
Looking at WWI, entente naval supremacy played a role in ta defeat
Especially with the British
So if the Triple Alliance have not been such idiots invading Belgium and underestimating allied Navy they would have had the advantage in naval power cuz Germany in Anglo arms race
That would have allowed them to crush Russia and france
But that makes their economies bad and cities war torn cuz aircraft. They will use Britain for economy rebuilding
Ah ok
Nazis are socialist.
He's not wrong, just a differenttype of socialism
In Mein Kampf Hitler said he was inspired by Karl Marx.
That's true, depends on how he perceived his inspiration though
Huh?
it's in their name 
and we know now how their popularity and origins came to be beyond their end

Nazis are Nazis. Make no distinction. But they are not immune to bullets.
Britain would have won the anglo-german arms race regardless- The RN had a greater capacity and ability to build warships and the 2 power standard ensured that Britain kept far ahead in the race
Frida Kahlo is overrated
Yeah, the Central Powers could not have won wwi if the British were in
Holodomor was man-made, but it was arguably an unexpected and unwanted consequence of Soviet agricultural collectivization at the time
yes it was man-made but might not be fully imo

based on this meter, which color would you place this recent controversial opinion?
Necessity is the mother of invention, however, I don’t think necessity is always the answer for major invention.
Nixon was a good president.
Ehhhhh
no
diplomatically he escalated the vietnam war
and introduced the draft lottery to the american public
also his cabinet had to betray taiwan in order to pamper the chinese
by replacing them with PRC in the UN security council
the watergate break-in
yeah that was even worse
Not gonna read allat
alright but you got any proof to support the claim?
for him being a good president?
fair enough
