#Insert your controversial opinion here
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
Nah the ciaâs to busy spying on american citizens
They dont fight commies no more
CIA doesnât operate internationally
Thatâs the FBI
they still dont fight commies no more
every country belongs to america
America is a continent
America is a country (aka, the United States)
There are two continents called North America and South America. They are also called âThe Americasâ.
not "america"
no one refers to north or south america as "america"
they refer it by N Amercia, or S. America, or even "Americas"
Valid, but my fam in colombia get all mad when we say we re from america
Lol
Yup
normandy should own britain
the yamato was a bad japanese battle ship
Thatâs not controversial
It is well known to of been more ceremonial and morale support
i know i want to say something more tame
Say something more controversial
being a sonderkommando was a fun job
# americans SUCK
lets be real
god wont add a sex DLC to earth
the devs have abandoned the game for 2000 years ever since jesus rage quit after no one appreciated his sacrifice to save the player base from sins
Muslim conquests in the 7th and 8th centuries aren't that impressive and are generally overrated
The world should be Roman
Nah
This is only controversial for people who are anti west who idealize anything not western lol đ
True, but that still makes it controversial for a lot of people
Why
It shall make sense as Persia moves onwards to the west
and it'd be deserving of the ancient disloyal, treacherous, divisive west to taste the oriental despotism

Wanna know what else is flat?
Why
The world shall be forwardly voided
Dinosaur shaped earth đđ
Germany could have made the nuke if they focused solely on it
Nope
Germany had chased out its top scientists in the topic and the ones who stayed did not have the right information
And Hitler considered it jew science
And had very little interest in it but allowed people to continue as a side project
If Hitler liked Jews then the war would be different
Hot take
The man who nearly killed Hitler should have shot him
Instead of not firing his rifle
The only confirmation of that story was from hitler
And Hitler lies. Sooooo
I donât believe it ever happened
Bro everyone lies
imagine Hitler saw it as another one of his beloved Wunderwaffe
i heard the devs tried to nerf everything in 536 ad
It was jew science and Hitler was a person of WW1. Which made many people view big artillery and big guns as the solution rather than something they probably didnât actually understand and was very theoretical
Thatâs irrelevant. Given that he mythologized his service record And the individual wasnât just some random guy he was famous in Britain
How is that irrelevant? you don't believe a story because you think he's lying? you can do that with any story
Itâs a very large group of historians that now question the legitimacy of the story
Because the man himself doesnât remember ever seeing hitler
The PR stunt hitler carried out with these claims of seeing this hero
And trying to use it to gain support and clan destine BS of his leadership of Germany
He is the only person to back this claim and itâs hitler who lied about the actions and what the unit he was in did during WW1
There are a lot of things that point to the very high probability that he lied about the whole event and it isnât just my opinion.
You can't just solve problems that require brainpower by throwing money at it
Some War crimes can be justified
Reason: Mass emoji
Questioning the rules and arguing with mods is not allowed.
Not you
Explain
UhhâŠ..Israel can be justified cuz they also were victimized by hamas
What war crimes have they committed?
And umâŠ..uhâŠâŠ..USA fire bombing Japan because Japan also breached the Geneva conventions on the pacific front many times
The United States only fire bombed military assetsđ
So war crimes can be justified if both sides are doin it on each other
Hiroshima:
It was a military manufacturing hub
And city
And we did to drop pamphlet saying leave
We warned Japan that we were going to drop a bomb. They ignored us. We drop pamphlets on the city to warn them to get out of the city. Then we warned Japan again that we would bomb them again dropped more pamphlets, and then bombed them again
Bros tryin to justify USA now
Iâm not justifying anything I am pointing out what we did
We told Japan that we were going to attack them they ignored us. We dropped pamphlets on the city that we were going to nuke telling them to go away, and then we dropped the nuke. Then we told Japan that we would do it again, and they ignored us, and so we dropped more pamphlets saying get out and then we drop the Bomb again.
These cities were well known military manufacturing hubs
How about the bombing of German civilians by the USA nad British during ww2
I will blame the British Dresden was a British operationđ€đ»
And wasnât planned
Bombing of London could justify it
I donât think anyone couldâve planned to Dresden
Not true, because Germany didnât target military infrastructure they went from targeting military infrastructure to targeting civilian infrastructure
And openly promoted this being exactly what they were doing
Their actions were terrorism by their own admissions
The Britâs bombed the shit out of Hamburg or smth
And Iâm pretty sure many civilians also died
Hamburg was a very prominent military manufacturing hub and logistics center
And civilian transport hub and living space
Yes
And Iâm pretty sure London also had some industrial sectors
All bombing targets were inline with military targets
He did however, Germany wasnât aiming at those
As I said, earlier in Germany openly admitted that their goal was terrorism to break the British resolve. Thatâs why they attacked civilian sectors of London, rather than industrial sectors granted they attacked all over London. However, they were not specifically aiming for the industrial sectors of London. they were just attacking London, pre the attack on London. They were only attacking military infrastructure. Then they changed their targets to civilian infrastructure.
Sorry Iâm on a mobile device so I canât type as fast but yeh. What about the soviets. They can be justified by the terrible acts on the Easterâs front
Iâm not sure if you know
But Soviet soldiers r*ped German women
No, unfortunately they cannot. They were evil and acted in anger and revenge attacking the Germans and acting on revenge upon them not justice.
Your not getting my point

Like that was the most messed up thing they did during the war
Germans grape Russians. Russians grape Germans
Many war, crimes, committed by the Germans on the Soviets, was then also committed by the Soviets in revenge
There were also events like mass deportation of Crimean Tatars
They were both evil because both acted in hate indiscriminate
I actually know an individual who is a Magyar, whose grandfather thought for the Hungarian auxiliary forces in the Nazi army
The war on the eastern front was really brutal
Considering both sides saw it as a âwar of exterminationâ
â he was not one of the good guys â. As he said it
Iâll give you an example:
Nation A plunders a City (Not justified)
Nation B pluders a City (justified because itâs making the perpetratorâs nation pay)
Indeed
What the hell do Hungarians have to do with this?
No
Ok now that Iâve given an example this sounds so messed up
Tbh I donât expect much humanity when the Nazis or the Soviets literally are calling for the eradication of one side
Be it communism or fascism
The Magyars were a part of the Nazis đđ
And committed atrocities in Ukraine
They more or less were their own thing?
Indeed.
Never heard of an Hungarian auxiliary force, the only one I can think of being much later
aka 1944
When the Germans rolled up into Budapest and annexed Hungary
Werenât there Ukrainians and finns in the Nazi army
I thought you meant being relevant to deportation, but okay
As a puppet state
Finns were their own thing
I simplify it because the Hungarian army existed, but the main fighting force was Germany, and most of the Hungarian military weaponry was hammy downs from the Germans
The Finns were never part of the axis
There were tonns of non-germans in Nazi army
Yeh but they received heavy support
Yes there were some Ukrainians, who joined the Nazis however, as Slavic executions became widespread many Ukrainians, who initially joined the Germans, deserted and joined the red army
Yeah itâs a state in corporation to the Nazis
So a militia?
Yes. Basically a militia
From what I understand, the Hungarians basically made their own death core
Oh
The Hungarians would go around Ukrainian Village, is gathering up all the civilians and executing them
That's not what militia is
*death corps
đ€đ€đ€
The guys grandfather was one of those individuals
I just realized the examples I gave to justify my opinion were so bad
Well Iâm dumb
Thereâs are unspoken atrocities of WW2 that were just collectively blamed on the Germans but an actuality thereâs more to it
Indeed
Thereâs a difference between justice and revenge
The Germans went in and attacked and committed multiple war crimes against the Soviets. The Soviets intern, took revenge, not justice.
That is why no war crime is justifiable
The nukes dropped on Japan were not war crimes
And Dresden was an accident with the devastation and poor loss of life
I didnât know any better. I just read a book on ww2 that said civilian lives were lost in the bombing of Dresden
However, the British officer of the air forces did say âthey brought it upon themselvesâ
Apparently, there was also a fire tornado
That rip people off the street, as they ran away and into a burning inferno
Th-thatâs so brutal
If you look at the bombing of Dresden, there goals were militarily based
If you look at what actually happened, the whole city got burned people died from asphyxiation
It was basically like Pompeii or hell being let loose on earth
I met a guy whoâs grandfather survived Dresden
Had a story of watching a girl. Fly through the air into the fire cyclone
So kinda like when the nazis destroyed Warsaw
He only survived because his mom through him out a window and his aunt bolted fast enough to get away but later died from burning lung
Not even close.
Nazis didnât drop napalm on Warsaw
Thatâs what caused the insanity is it was just the right amount of the stars aligning with the correct weather and conditions to cause the napalm to basically do an insane amount of damage
They didnât, but they did intentionally target heavily Jewish areas of warsaw
And then later ended up attempting to destroy all of Warsaw after they put down the Warsaw uprising in 1944
Which werenât military targets. Thatâs why Germans bad. And war crimes and Americans not bad because we didnât target civilians
Tbf, Britainâs air strategy for bombing was the âdehousingâ of German cities
Aka the destruction of German homes and factories. The belief was that if the German worker would be demoralised if he had no house and no factory to work at
Thatâs the British not America đ
Which given where credit is due, has some work
Yeah but the Americans later followed up although as you mentioned
More on the military and infrastructure
Indeed
Also they did bomb French cities and towns just before d day but that wound be a different story
Which had caused at least 3,000 French civillian casualties
In places like Normandy
But the French pretty much saw this as a necessary sacrifice
So not really a big issue for the French
To be fair âthe Frenchâ
What about âthe Frenchâ
I used to know a gentleman. He passed away a long time ago, but the life he lived was insane anyways during World War II he operated basically as a mob boss in Paris, and proceeded to travel all over France, being a mob boss with his own little gang, and occasionally working for the British in the âFrench resistanceâ. He hated the French. And explained that the French resistance is a myth there was never a joint French resistance. There were British spies, who were French, but there was never an actual French resistance. The âFrench resistanceâ comprised of French Nazis, French fascist French communists, French anarchist, French socialists, and French monarchists. All of which would have many battles with each other and kill each other or report each other to the Nazis or steel each other stuff or sabotage missions.
Some women got reported and taken away by the SS because French communist reported them and it wasnât until the Germans attacked the USSR that they became more active against German Nazis
So when anything bad was ever brought up that happened to the French heâd simply say â the Frenchâ
Ye like accept the competent Jewish scientists
Dino nuggets đđ
fair
i thought he was more radical with weapon design
but i guess he could be skepticle if it could actually work or not
Bruh
Those bombs alone killed more civilians than terror bombings on the UK
Ah yes because organizing thousands of aircraft and specifically using incendiary bombs to inflict maximum damage is an accident
"It was the fire's fault!"
Strategic bombing campaigns in WWII often just got away with their misdoings because it the time the introduction of airpower blurred the line on what makes a civilian target and a military target
Besides
The US use of incendiary and nuclear munitions are more indiscriminate in choosing their victims
Bruh
Yet a dumber take
You do realize war crimes are set in place so that shit doesn't spiral out of control
How the fuck does killing more people solve the problem
It's pretty simple
you can't even murder a murderer lmao
I mean WW2 was a competition for who can commit more war crimes
I explained why it wasnât above
I explained why it wasnât above
Youâre bringing America and Britain to the level of the Nazis and the Soviets which just wasnât the case at all
I mean war crimes are war crimes
What institutes a war crime
Ok actually false
If I bomb a military target and a civilian or civilians die I have not committed a war crime
If I attack a hospital or medical triage full of military wounded Iâve committed a war crime.
I mean like intentioned, not collateral
Exactly
Also yes that is still a war crime
Why would you bomb a hospital
It's literally a whole rule not to kill wounded or medical personnel
I'm going to violate the Mohenjodaro Accords
in the Finno-Korean Hyperwar
sinks all of Mu and Lemuria
To kill military personnel that are wounded and gathered in one place
Indeed. Fun fact. Germans and Soviets and Japanese intentionally targeted medics
Britain and American forces did not do this
American bombing campaigns specifically targeted military infrastructure and military installations.
American soldiers did not go on missions to attack cities villages or towns. That did not have military objectives
A big problem with people is they list things that are unfortunate or sad. As a war crime. But thatâs not how war crimes work
As pointed above thereâs a very clear difference between internationally attacking citizens and accidentally having citizens be effected by the attack
Dresden was the first use of napalm by the British they werenât entirely sure of the range of effect that it would have. they were bombing the logistical networks in Dresden not the people, However, early bombing was not clean or necessarily accurate, they did try to make it as accurate as possible the fires that were started, were far stronger and spread faster and were more devastating than the British and Americans couldâve happened because who couldâve predicted that the weather wouldâve created the perfect situation to cause fire cyclones
Thereâs a lot of misinformation about war crimes in WW2 and especially modern day. things like the Vietnam war. Their were definitely and definitive war crimes committed
When American forces were sent into villages to find Vietcong. Many times everyone would end up being killed
Insurgencies blur the line between civilian and military and we just werenât very good at it
We got a little better in Afghanistan
At the time it wasn't a warcrime
But ofc if it were to fall under modern standards
Itâs still not a war crime
It definitely is
Based on ?
Bombing urban areas with dense civilian population is prohibited iirc
. Thereâs some complexity to this
Yeah there is
But come on the US military definitely knew civilians were going to be harmed
War
They dropped papers saying run
They chose not to run
If I tell you. Your house is being used to create Meth get out we will be there Tuesday. Guns blazing. And then you stay in the house thatâs your fault
Come on the US literally used fire bombs for the sole intention of maximizing urban damage
I know, but It was to poke holes in your argument
These aren't just regular bombs
We told Japan. We will bomb you. Surrender. âNoâ
Hey get out now
âNoâ.
Get out now!
âNoâ
Thatâs on Japan
Blud is really justifying terror bombings
Wasnât terror
The cities werenât just random Japanese cities
"We will bomb you, surrender!"
But killing unarmed and surrendering soldiers is a warcrime, which the U.S did commit
Is literally the strategy of terror bombing
Thatâs kinda how wars work
Terror bombing wishes to influence the political will of a population
Strategic air campaigns are more on damaging the enemy infrastructure
To make the frontline situation for them difficult
If Iâm working in a bomb making factory and I get a paper that says the bomb factory is going to get bombed and I go to work anyway I have been warned
It doesnt intend for the enemy to surrender
Itâs not a war crime
Not a war crime
Your agency is the variable
Factories aren't the only buildings harmed bruh
Factory workers are valid military targets as they directly contribute to the war effort
But the civilian infrastructure surrounding said factories are not
The cities that we bombed with the nukes or primary manufacturing and logistic hubs for Japan
I know
I would think, if they dropped the leaflets, it would be propoganda to make us leave the city
Yet you still decided to use fire bombs
Which are way uncontrollable and cause a humanitarian crisis
Before bombing that we informed the citizens to leave, we informed the government to surrender, and they ignored us within, bombed them, and then ask them to surrender, and then send pamphlets to tell them to surrender, and they still did not surrender
Thatâs your agency
It would've been understandable had you just used conventional bombs
It was an accident
Blud no lol
Again, this was the first use of napalm
I mean people don't pussy out from the russian threats
iirc the allied use of fire bombs were inspired by the damage caused on cologne during their thousand bomber raids
No one could of predicted it go crazy like it did
They were impressed with how much of Cologne was leveled
Itâs agency as the variable
Keep in mind the controversial cases of allied aerial warcrimes always involved incendiary munitions and nuclear weapons
The effectiveness was there
Yes but thereâs a reason itâs debated
Meh
Maybe testing on non urbanised centers
Yeah ofc because at the time aerial warfare blurred the line between what is a valid military target and not
But the problem here is this
With conventional weaponry it is very clear you are only targetting the factories, any casualties caused by inaccutacy are pure accident
If I hold a gun and tell you 3 times to duck because Iâm aiming for the person behind you. Whoâs to blame for not Ducking
But using fire bombs and nukes obviously means civilians are going to be harmed at large scale
Okay, now it's an actual threat, but those leaflets were most of the time propoganda or empty threats
The problem is is Dresdenâs weather had a massive affect on the catastrophe. No one predicted what happened because no one couldâve predicted that the fires wouldâve been able to get out of control the way they did the weather did it not intentional bombing
Dude
It's fire
Ofc its gonna go out of control
Itâs not drama
How about use on military targets than urban centers
iirc fire bombs were also chosen because the allies wanted to inflict a catastrophic collapse to German response
Discord debate
No oneâs upset or arguing with emotion lol
Indeed
im just goofing around
basically fire departments not having the capacity to respond in time
Thus inflicting more damage
Join me plane. Fight for the right to fire bombs đđ€Ș
What ?
The fire bombings, while certainly not an act of terror are subject to criticism because of the use of such uncontrollable weaponry
Indeed to ensure the destruction of their target
Indeed
This is factual
Yeah but ofc that meant civilians are going to be harmed in such larger scales
Unknown scales
Hiding in tunnels wont even save them as the entire city is already destroyed
I mean like logistics hubs or airfields, not factories with civilians surrounding it
Which wouldnât be considered a war crime
Fire bombings give no room for recovery
Logistics are the factories
That's the problem with it
???
If a single conventional bomb just destroys a single building, fire destroys entire cities
Iâve even seen arguments be made that if youâre a soldier and you live in a house, your house is a military logistical site because it is a place of congregation for enemy personnel.
I mean yeah
That's why Ww2 aerial campaigns are controversial
Since the allied leadership basically argued there were military anti air installations in every city
Thatâs not necessarily true remember, and again Dresdenâs fire bombing was not widespread. The bombs were dropped on a specific area within the notable range of error during World War II. The weather and the fire itself spread far more, and became far more destructive than anyone couldâve predicted because the weather, it was not a guarantee that Dresden would be burned to the ground. That was not the intentions of the air bombing.
Which basically meant the entire city is a valid military target lol
Crazy, but kinda make sense
Dude
It's fire
It's obviously going to spread
Fire trucks đ
Dont blame it on the weathrr
Not enough
Bro how do you type so quick
No, look up Dresden
And the allies knew that
What the hail
I know about the fire storm
Oh, you donât understand like if you actually look at what happened in Dresden, the weather had a massive impact on the spread and power of the fire storm
The fire storm was not caused by Just napalm . It was caused by the weather.
But the issue still remains of the allies using the fire bombs
Dude there wouldnt be a firestorm in the first place if there wasnt a fire
love how everyone is apeshit about the dresden bombings but when mentioned the other german cities that got the same destruction as dresden (like cologne for example), no one bats an eye
just whats with dresden bruh
how about the other german cities
they get bombed too but got fucking overshadowed by dresdem
Dresden saw incendiary munition
^^^^
I dont think Cologne saw incendiery bombs
And was an absolute horrible event
That's why it doesnt get as much attention
No it wasnât. Unless someone lied to me. Lol đ
Dresden and Tokyo are controversial since they both implemented fire bombing
I'd say Tokyo was worse though
so its only dresden they get firebombed while the other cities got conventionally bombed
damn allies got beef with that city đ
Since the US literally knew japanese infrastructure is made up of wood primarily
The capital of Japan đŻđ”
allies probably thought dresden was the location of die glocke so its the only german city that got firebombed đ
Dresden is a major logistical hub
(satire)
đ„đđ„ I see no problems here
Bombing it as fine
im just goofing around lol
i have nothing to do
But the issue is why the napalm
being alone in my house is not fun tbh
Because. It allowed a level of guarantee destruction to the target that wouldnât necessarily be guaranteed by a single bomb.
Remember bombing was incredibly random and there was a good chance that you werenât able to hit the factory or the target that you were aiming for so fire if you got close enough to the target the fire with spread to the target
Thatâs why bombing war crime conversations đđ»
ok
Eeeeeeehhhhhhhh
i saw another city that got firebombed too like dresden yet dosent get attention
I get my dates mixed up
hamburg
Dude it was obvious
hamburg got dresden'ed too yet didnt get attention
The Allied bombing of Hamburg during World War II included numerous attacks on civilians and civic infrastructure. As a large city and industrial centre, Hamburg's shipyards, U-boat pens, and the Hamburg-Harburg area oil refineries were attacked throughout the war.As part of a sustained campaign of strategic bombing during World War II, the atta...
It doesnât matter how obvious a defeat us if the guy shooting at you is still going to continue to shoot at you. It doesnât matter. If he knows heâs going to die heâs still shooting at you.
Dresden
Even in the source that you cited, it specifically shows why we hit it
Yeah but here's the thing, both countries are already on the brink of economic collapse by the time the bombings happened
Dress then
Hamburg was a massive manufacturing and logistical hard to even more than Dresden
So its strategic value is questionable
Especially for Japan
Germany was more understandable
Questionable sure but effective yes đđ»
bruh it was one of the largest firestorms like dresden levels of firestorms yet the hamburg bombings gets overshadowed
Japan was not going to surrender
like bruh
But Japan virtually had no chance anymore having lost access to oil in the east indies
Here's the thing you see
At that point in the war you aren't liberating anymore
Well kinda
Because Hamburg was a massive manufacturing and logistics up. It was one of the prominent weapons manufacturing sources, and as it points out, itâs naval yard was extremely important to the Nazi war effort
fair enough but it was still a shithole ig
The thing is is Japan was planning on the mainland invasion. The bombings helped change the governments decision to fight a war on the mainland.
I doubt the US would land on the mainland
#Warsucks
Who are they gonna save from the mainland lol
They would of
They planned to
At least with France and the Philippines they knew they were liberating
same as dresden they both are military targets although i find hamburg to be more strategic and tactical
They had the plans made
iirc Overlord was at best just a plan
And even then
Overlord showed how huge the casualties were
If the nukes had not cause Japan, to surrender America, had the plans made to invade mainland Japan, and destroy it
Are Americans really just gonna let millions of theirs to die just for the enemy to raise a white flag
Yes
We had the plans made
operation dragoon honest reaction:
We had generals and forces ready
If the nukes hadnât done the trick. Weâd of gone all in
But that doesnt show any indication that you guys are seriously going to do it
At best you'd just keep bombing and blockading Japan
It's way cheaper
We had multiple high-ranking officials who all they had to say is go already on the edge of their seats, ready to say go if they needed
No. America would of invaded mainland Japan
Sooner or later Japan would starve anyways
japan wanted to be invaded iirc
They are just a few months behind a severe rice crisis
Not only did they want to stop the Japanese, but also to prevent Japan, and as much of China and Korea, from falling into the Soviets hands as possible
Indeed
^
iirc Japanese high command abandoned Ketsu go later on in the war
If Japan had not surrendered after the nuking we wouldâve invaded
they would raise their fanatic meter to 9000 and will fuck up the americans so hard that they would retreat (wont prevent them from dropping two suns on them)
and hey shermans would now have an actual challenge since they would fight against capable chi nus instead of crappy ha gos and chi has
We also would of gone after Korea and as much of China as possible to stop the Soviets
Man you didnt even commit in the Korean war when the Chinese stepped in
By that time in the war Americaâs military power was at its highest. It would not have been a fair fight however, it wouldâve been a very, very, very, very, very costly one.
The Soviets were coming
The main issue for a mainland invasion is Japan's terrain
We didnât like that idea
dosent prevent the japs from raising their fanatic meter to 999999999
So we wouldâve invaded mainland, China and Korea, to stop the Soviets from taking it similar to how we invaded Europe
Europe's geography despite being ideal was already problematic enough for Overlord
What more Downfall
plus the USSR dosent have enough transport ships to invade japan at the first place
they can only do jackshit at manchuria
the russian pacific fleet is shit
Like I said we had the plans we would of done it. We knew it be bad. Thatâs why nukes. But if theyâd not surrendered. We would of had to do it
The entire coast of Japan is mined anyways
most of their capable vessels is in europe
The Soviets were coming in and decimating the Japanese military on the mainland
I know
Itâs not a matter of whether or not the Soviets wouldâve taken Japan itâs a matter of whether or not the Soviets wouldâve taken China and Korea
Manchuria was so swift
they couldnt do jackshit if they dont have enough transport ships
the soviet navy is like
So the issue that America faced was the Soviets and Japan
They did get it though
Except for Korea
one of the most neglected when it comes to funding
I mean, yes, eventually China did become communist and Korea try to become communist
Manchuria eventually was transferred to the CCP during the civil war
However, if World War II head nod ended with the nuking of Japan
The Soviet Union wouldâve annexed areas that they had captured during the war
Eh kinda
This most likely wouldâve included a large sum of China and Korea
Since they actually did get Manchria
So on top of invading Japan, American forces would also have to invade China and Japan
They just gave it to the CCP
Exactly
Indeed
they finally gonna have port arthur đł
So America wouldâve been on a timeline and thatâs one of the reasons why they dropped. The nukes is because they wanted a immediate victory to stop the annexation of mainland, China and Korea by the Soviets and put an end to the Japanese aggression.
The modern world would have been so peaceful had the CCP just lost the civil war lol
If nukes hadnât put Japan out of business, they wouldâve invaded, and they wouldâve invited everywhere to stop the spread of communism
kuomintang dosent have enough power in rise of kingdoms
It still confuses me ngl
The KMT outnumbered the CCP 2 to 1
Held more territory
And somehow still fucking lost
plot armor
You have to remember a lot of Chinaâs just empty nothingness, kind of like Russia. Yes, theyâre a big country, but a large amount of it is not developed.
ok heres a pretty controversial one:
the domino theory is silly, goofy and just straight up nonsense
That also played to the CCPs advantage
Indeed
Chiang was kind of a bitch to the peasants
like why would someone turn communist just because their neighbors became one like bruh
Which ofc, with the so many land redistributions the communists promise
the only thing that would actually make happen is via invasion
No wonder why more of the chinese joined the ccp
It makes sense
Its not silly lol
Southeast asia all were experiencing communist insurgencies
i mean thats fair enough
You should know this considering the NPA and martial law lol
Although communist presence here is ofc exagerrated
i regret not paying attention to history at elementary (i was only interested in it after i fucking grew up đ )
iirc in reality the NPA only numbered somewhere around a few thousands
But the Marcos Admin claimed they were in the millions lol
Simply because they included those whom the NPA extorted from as collaborators
...
how would they be able to arm them tho
My grandpa was part of the PH constabulary lol
He has quite the reputation in his town
People are afraid of him lmao
one of my family members is a victim of the NPA so i kind of hate them a lot
There was this event that happened
When a chinese cargo ship was caught in the ph smuggling firearms
Marcos used the event as evidence of rampant communism in the PH
I forgot what was the name of the incident though
i kind of remember this although its kinda shady rn
The July 1972 MV Karagatan incident was an unsuccessful attempt by the New People's Army â the armed wing of the MarxistâLeninistâMaoist Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) â to smuggle armaments from China into the Philippines via the ship MV Karagatan. The incident is notable for having been cited by President Ferdinand Marcos as one of h...
Because the communist insurgencies tend to spread
why does that remind me of Griffin
đ
It does look like him lol
we love our rice
unfortunate events & skill issue is what plagues the KMT long ago
Cauc Joji should release some banger AH songs fr fr

that ain't a hot take for anyone that isn't a French n' Francophile
the Balkanization should extend as far as the entire Mediterranean
Beys, nomes, provinces, departments, oblasts, and other administrative division types all across the waters that embody the three continents apart
Genghis khan deserves to get far more hate compared to Hitler for the amount of atrocities committed
Pretty sure that guy is already hated into oblivion
By anyone with a sane and hopefully rational mind
The ppl who enjoy his work are sadists, edgy ppl or well
Less mentally stable
Mostly
Again
Anyone with a sane and rational mind
Also where
HuhâŠ
Absolutely. I have utmost sympathy and condolences for holocaust victims.
But it feels like people prioritize European genocide too much compared to other genocide which were much larger and more brutal then holocaust.
I don't have any issues with that but the over prioritization of holocaust allows many of these far worse genocidal maniacs like Genghis khan,Mao,Stalin to be idolised
Undoubtedly. it's sad how few people know about these other genocide.
We are somewhat really lucky to be living in the modern era. Currently there are some major wars going on. People are outraged by a couple hundred civilians dying.
I wonder if people have any idea how worse wars were . If you were lucky you were simply slashed or burned to death. If worse you and your family were enslaved and worked to death.
I sometimes wonder what Genghis khan would do with modern weapons. The guy who wiped 11% of the global population with horse and arrow. I genuinely believe it would be 50% if he had guns
Thing is, Hitler's genocide is an industrial one
The crimes done under many communist regime is more likely to be called as democide rather than that of genocide
IMO i don't find that distinguishes it enough to ignore other notable genocide. For example Genghis also committed genocide an industrial scale. After gathering all civilians after war each soldier had to meet the quota of man, women and child he had to kill. Similar in Carthage, a genocide caried out in a systematic state wise.
Maybe it's my bias I'm not European. So i fail to see why is Holocaust prioritised so much over other genocide.
The thing is
WWII affected everyone across the globe
And people who've experienced it still live to tell the tale
So ofc it's going to recieve more attention
It's more relevant
Doesn't that make our duty to tell the tale of the tragedy of Carthage, Genghis khan because no one is alive to tell their tale.
I believe history books have duty to at least mention the major genocide if not describe them. I find the Holocaust over shadow other genocide so much many people actually believe it's largest genocide in history. I'm not saying to ignore holocaust but at least mentioned Rwanda, Genghis khan, some other largest and recent genocide.
The holocaust is more relevant to western society
Dont forget that the west also engaged in racial injustice
Thatâs extremely hollow and meaningless when you realize EVERY CIVILIZATION HAS DONE THIS
I know
But present western society tries to learn from their mistakes lol
How is that hollow lol
The reason Genghis Khan isnât hated as much as he use to be. Is because you canât change the past. And he did not go after people just to go after them. He was a brutal conqueror. Timur was even more brutal and people in the west donât even know his name
Human rights isn't even a concept back then
Eh. Debatable
Well yeah debatable
Mongols had a code
But ofc it doesn't possess the same level of international recognition that we have today
And rape was still bad just no one could enforce rape bad when the enforcers are the ones doing the raping
Modern day Peace keepers are a great example of this.
Multiple accusations, evidence and video evidence have been brought to light of UN Peacekeepers raping. Children and adults
And very little has been addressed
Nah this stuff was getting blown up in the Yugoslavian war
All I care about is that big ass kingdom map he made ngl
That's why I said "probably"
That looks sexy as hell
Since UN peacekeepers existed way before 2012 kek
Itâs still going on. But yeah
Lol đ. Indeed
"UN Troops" first deployed back in '51
Unfortunately I donât save anything I read or watch I seriously need to but I donât do it but you could probably do some digging and find the reports. There was stuff happening in Armenia recently and I believe Somalia had some issues as well
Where ever the UN puts their âpeace keepersâ. And theyâre not United States personnel. Thereâs been issues. And the UNs solution is sending the people home and not stringing them up by their toes
The UN soldiers are known to use food as bargains chip for sex, i probably saw it on DW
Mainly in Africa
Because they come from any UN member. Some very shady countries have sent some very unwanted people to wear the hat
I fully support the abolishing of the UN and a strengthening of NATO âŠ.and kicking Turkey out of NATO đ
Ughhhhh
Lol đ
Turkey is a pain in the ass for NATO though xd
The UN while awkward, at least provides a stage where countries can show their opinions on issues
Besides, the UN does some financial aid
Thatâs my historical revisionism lol đ. I blame trucks for the bay of pigs
Better then nothing
Thatâs what Twitter is for
Fair point lol
Look into the money corruption đ.
Neither can we change anything about ww2 but it should be known, the atrocities he committed. I agree he didn't discriminate against who he killed but that doesn't mean we shouldn't hold the death of 11 percent of the population against him.
You can't really expect people to be aware of everything
A private company tried to follow the money for the UNs hunger initiatives in Africa. And they almost ended up getting arrested because they start asking why money was missing
Besides, Genghis Khan is pretty well known anyways
I think this was in like 2004-5 maybe. I canât remember
It's arguable more people even know about him more than Pol Pot
History as a subject isn't even an interest to most people anyways
Plus. Khan had his day of fear. And now heâs just a dude who took over a bunch of stuff and then died
For none historians. Hitler Bad cause he killed Jews. Is like the surface level stuff
100 years from now. People might even ask the question âwhoâs Hitler ?â
My classmates dont even know Hitler killed jews đ
See
You canât expect people who donât even remember what they had for breakfast to remember anything about history that they werenât even alive to be there
My seatmate told our professor the Japanese were the good guys in ww2
To play devils advocate UN soldiers are used as human shields. They can't shoot until shot. They drive through the deadliest area of earth driving in a white truck with a blue helmet like sitting đŠđŠ. You would be surprised amount of regulation and bullshit the have to go through with a shitty pay
That's why private military are so popular
Of course they were their contribution to dealing with frostbite has helped hundreds if not thousands of people be saved and avoid losing body parts to frostbite
Donât ask where they got their data đđ
And don't ask who bought the data
Bought ? Please. We just took that crap lol
Lmao
Today on Mythbusters: can a young chinese boy survive from a hand grenade at point blank range
Next episode: Babies are known to naturally possess the fear of heights, but do they naturally fear the bayonet?
The vet I used to know. Who fought in WW1. Actually watched a guy pull a pin on a grenade throw it and then it bounced off of something and fell back at him
Meanwhile my aunt
Literally played with a hand grenade when she was a baby (or idk maybe a toddler)
My dad got a beating from grandpa after that incident lol
He's supposed to be the one to make sure the cabinet holding his weapons were always secured
I saw a video of an interview Japanese guy that was involved in that. He said they threw the baby from the cliff after beyoneted. The S Abused mother immediately jumped after child. The guy has zero regrets.
Now i get why Germans complained about the brutality of Japanese
Just inside my uni we have a memorial where a Japanese massacre took place
Itâs legally required to Banzai it daily
Pretty tragic considering the Japanese troops literally went to the Uni, got served breakfast
The Japanese government still denies any wrong doing. Wonderful reality we live in
Then moments later they returned back and started killing people out of suspicion of guerillas
Japan keeps insisting their troops were insubordinate
To some extent while true, the Generals despite knowing about these occurences; did not punish their own soldiers for such misdoings
The average Japanese soldier's psyche is so weird man
Who in their goddamn mind would start thinking of killing people as a sport
Video Game Devs
Too bad real life doesn't give achievements for that
I probably have some idea why
Japanese army discipline is so bad
Their government's literal solution to their misconduct is just sending them sex slaves
Ayo wat
The Japanese forcefully took women from several countries and had them work as comfort women
You do learn something every day huh
Given how fanatical Japanese soldiers were I think it worked
No
That's not what made them fanatics lol
iirc the Japanese army has this stupid tendency to stray away from command whenever they feel too stressed from wartime conditions
I was kinda making a joke
Part of that ofc have to do with the Japanese mentality of honor and their bushido code
Even Japan's own government can't control their own armies
IJA is one hell of an organizational mess
You know shit is so bad when the army has their own aircraft carrier
Given their empire needed America to kill. They did pretty well
Lol đ
Tbh it's actually reasonable for Japan to bomb Pearl Harbor
It donât matter how unconventional they were organized If it works it works
If youâre going to do something stupid like attack America. Sure
No no thats not what I mean
Look at the Pacific man
On paper
It was owned by us
The US cant even supply the pacific fleet here in the PH
It was inevitable
Their major naval base in asia lol
Couldnât
At best, Manila could only service the asiatic fleet
Which comprised of a few cruisers
Japan is confident that the US does not have the logistics to create a supply chain that far
Especially after the US just came from the depression
Sure the Japanese are worried about US ship production
Well the goal isnât really to have full on giant navel bases in Asia. Especially since they had a very large air presence in the Philippines, that also got attacked simultaneously, and we had multiple naval bases throughout the Pacific that also got attacked
But it was really American logistics that won the war
Pretty much
And that's why Japan was confident you guys would just back down
It's stupid expensive to take back the Philippines
But Japan definitely forgot the racism factor lmao
A western power wouldnt just accept being defeated by what they consider as inferior
American liberation of the PH is primarily to save MacArthur's face lol đ€Ł
The PH held little strategic value when compared to the alternative of Taiwan
Thatâs a rather cynical view
It's true
When MacArthur left the PH
He made a promise to return
During the island hopping campaigns
Iirc Navy admirals like that of Nimitz preferred landing on Taiwan
As this places US B 29s closer to China and Japan
Plus cuts off the strait of a taiwan and the bashi channel/luzon strait
But MacArthur kept insisting to land here in the PH instead since he made a promise
The problem is, Japan was operating in other parts of the pacific taking back the Philippines was kind of necessary
Taking Taiwam cuts off the Japanese supply lines by a far larger margin
And would allow you to support the Chinese NRA
Yes, but then you would have Japanese forces behind you in the Philippines
Man
Remember the island hopping campaigns
Yeah
The US have always decided to just skip over islands
The idea is by skipping, the islands behind it would just starve out
We never left up island alone that was valuable thoug
Ofc
But in this sense Taiwan was more valuable
And the Philippines was kind of big, and had a very large Japanese force on the island, and it also had some naval forces there as well
Although there is one slight issue why the Navy eventually gave up to MacaArthur's plans
Taiwan is more heavily defended than the PH
Not really
Yes, and at the time the Philippines belong, to us
No ?
Only in Borneo is where the IJN can resupply oil
Yes
Hmm đ€
The PH doesnt have oil
But Borneo does
Well at least the Americans "liberated" us from the Japanese lol
The Japanese were definitely the worse of the two
Lol đ
America's crimes on the PH are more of cultural and economical
Well you guys did some massacres here and there
Along with unequal rights
Neocolonialism!
Most epic way of hiding an empire
Kind of
There was a sultanate in the south
The sultanate of sulu
Whose presence established itself firmly in Mindanao
A lot of the pacific islands were kind of like thatâs even though they were closed they were truly unique and maybe shared similar languages and maybe the same language, but didnât consider each other apart of the same tribe until colonialism unified entire groups of people
Which did become a problem for all three of the colonizers to subjugate the unifief muslim population
It's why till this day we have muslim insurgencies in the south
Islam is a governmental religion so itâs kinda par the course
Some of the Muslims do not identify as filipinos by virtue of not being controlled by the colonizers
Lol đ
And as such possess a different national identity
Smh
Always gotta be difficult
Islam comes in conquering and killing its way through the islands. Then falls apart. Westerners come in and go âđ« the Muslims are here tooâ
Colonialism is what led to the creation of a filipino national identity
But here's the thing
It is us filipinos that came up with our nationality
Not the colonizers
Because nationalism and easier transportation infrastructure
Dissatisfaction towards spanish colonial rule are more of an isolated case
Geographical Tribalism tends to fall apart when you rip a road through the mountains
Really?
Usually due to exploits and harsh treatments is why rebellions would occur
Not because we were striving for a national idetity
Indeed. Very normal
The first filipinos wanted the ph to be a province of Spain lol
African tribes did the same thing
But with such a request being denied, then did we see the need for independence
Spain at the time did hold some accountability for governance
I mean youâd have to actually go all the way to Spain though lol đ
But most of our beef here is with the catholic friars lol
Stuff like being buried in a chinese grave made many filipinos mad lmao
We did iirc
Spain gave some filipinos liberties to travel to Europe
Iâm sure. A lot of people did. But it also took years
I forgot why the reforms that led to the principalia happened
I think 8 months ?
But iirc there was a revolution in spain at the time
Of course
1868 spanish revoltion iircM
Some gobernador general got replaced and introduced more liberal reforms
My history knowledge is pretty hazy
Everything is just wikipedia lmao
Illustrados I mean
Lol principilia
I keep mixing these two elite groups
Tfw a nation with a famous and well entrenched national idea of code of honour and loyalty has less honourable and disciplined soldiers than its opponents
the principalia has been long created when they are made alcalde mayors of and gobernadors of provincial pueblos (the Spanish friars and colonials delegating rural municipal parish control to the creoles/mestizos among the local chiefs)
ilustrados are a generation of highly educated colonial students with better education acquired in their studies across Western Europe
Spanish Carlist Wars be like:
Continues to use the imposed colonial name
try suggesting a fitting identity on us then
we too were slow and hesitant on coming up with a sound term of our nationality
the name made sense as it long stuck among it's colonials since around the early 19th century
Well they were subordinate enough to die in kamakazi attack. I'm pretty sure they are subordinate enough to not to bayoneting babies if if instructed
Tbf the first "Filipinos" who tried to seek a national identity where those of the illustrado class seeking reform to be part of spain. At first the term Filipino was used to just describe the spaniards born in the colony (aka insulares). They were called as the insulares if they are in the PH, and filipinos whenever they visit Spain
And since the illustrados initally sought to have of equal status with that of the Spaniards, it would just make sense to refer to themselves also as a filipino in their many travels to Europe
iirc during the Revolution, the Katipunan; particularly Bonifacio instead chose to call all the natives of the archipelago as "Tagalogs" instead of the colonially rooted term of "Filipino"
The Kamikaze corps is an all volunteer organization
They weren't forced to do it
Pressured by society maybe, but to many pilots they saw the suicide missions as the only rational way of saving Japan and ofc fulfilling an honourable death
To be fair, there were efforts to change the name to 'Malaysia', but Malaysia beat them to it
the Malayans and Borneans of the British Malaya, Sarawak, and Sabah colonies
East Malaysia
The CSA was bad with all that slavery and their reasons were completely corrupted by greed
But...
They did make a cool underwater boat
A phenomenal weapon 
a suicide underwater battering lancer

Mfw when the submarine sinks one boat but ends up killing all its crew
A total sacrifice for the lost cause
Kamikaze confederates
World War II was inevitable
If it wasn't the Germans gonna start it
It was gonna be the Soviets
Was best weapon
Imperial Japanese seal of approval
CSA should invested everything into the underwater boats
Eh. No. Under Stalin. The USSR was extremely isolationist
Germany would of been the only country that had any legitimate interests in war.
If letâs say Germany has its hidden military arms build up exposed and the Allieâs did something about it pre hitler and snuffed it. And letâs say hitler doesnât gain control. WW2 would of never started.
A Japanese American war would of probably happened
But because of Soviet isolation under Stalin. Unless the Soviets got attacked theyâd just sit there
So a war would of happened but not a World war
And I still subscribe to the Great War didnât actually end till 1991
Well the soviets would just let the germans keep control of europe
If hitler made peace with britain and the U.S then there would be one target for german "living space"
And the soviets knew that, but they didn't invade, because they thought hitler wouldn't be insane enough to fight on two fronts and that they could invade easier after the british and major amounts of U.S support helped make another front
Also I do think the soviets would invade japan to gain manchuria like they did IRL
Indeed
Japan will attack Pearl Harbor and America would fight Japan probably alone. And win
Possibly no nukes
Britain would still be included
Why how
The primary target in Southeast Asia is Malaya and Indonesia
Potentially now that you mention it đ€đ€
The reason Japan had to do Pearl Harbor and attack America is the Japanese wanted to prevent the Americans from implementing war plan orange and building up an army in the Philippines
Which the Americans already were doing
I mean and the oil
Pretty ironic how Pearl Harbor lost to the Japanese surprise attack because they mistook the Japanese formation as their own B-17s which were en route to the PH the same day
What
There's no oil in American pacific territories
Most of the oil was in Borneo
It's why I say American colonization of the PH indirectly led to your involvement in 2nd world war and thus solidifying your status as a superpower lol
Without the Philippines as a potential American military asset
The Japanese would've easily just not do Pearl Harbor
Unless the US for some reason intervenes in saving Britain, which is doubtful considering their isolationist stance
I forgot about this but iirc there were claims that the Soviets were planning an invasion of Germany
But as far as I remember
That was Nazi propaganda
^
The Soviet offensive plans controversy was a debate among historians in the late 20th and early 21st centuries as to whether Joseph Stalin had planned to launch an attack against Nazi Germany in the summer of 1941. The controversy started with Viktor Suvorov with his 1980s book Icebreaker: Who started the Second World War? where he argued, based...
It's kind of feasible though considering the actual large size of the Red Army
However the Nazi propaganda part was for the most part a lie, since even the Germans were surprised to find out the Red Army was stupid large and actually possessed a large industrial base
Isolation-ish
God Loves You
Also the french and dutch, tho the dutch wouldn't do much
Vichy France kinda was on Japan's side
Well they hated the Japanese
But since they were under Germany's thumb they're stuck in this situation lol
Hence why Japan got French Indochina without a fight
Meh
Germany succeed mostly in ww2 because almost everyone else sucked
Once they actually hit prepared forces Britain,rearmoured Soviet Union and Americans they did way worse
Yes I know this isnât the only reason why
But all the enemies Germany faced in the beginning were weak France had been devastated by ww1 and had a bad military culture at the time and polish military was outdated
Fair but the other main forces they hit were bad Balkan militaries and a under defended Soviet Union as well
Soviet Union was a 23 year old Nation at this point, Poland had to deal with the USSR as well as Germany, the US just was in the great depression until ww2
I cant argue about France
France was luck
not rlly
It was bad strategy on the french side the way I see it
the way i see it is a soldier high on pervatin can defeat a soldier that is sober
(jk)
Thx for saying you're joking
I wouldn't notice otherwise lol
But honestly
Sheer power wise, France really didn't have to lose
It was a loss based on bad strategy on the french side
Fair point but the Soviet Union and Poland military in early war years still sucked the polish were still using horses
Germans relied on France having a bad strategy (pretty much) which is essentially luck
so were the Italians
Not really fair to say that
Horses were used all the time
France not extending maginot line
Yes the Italians sucked to so did Romania
The Germans used horses also
Noone remembers Romania much
And it's not like the Poles would go charging on horses with sabers, they'd only really use them for transport.
The cavalry units were essentially infantry which could move quicker and with more gear thanks to a large amount of horses
They wanted to extend it into Belgium but it refused
Not really just the french fault
Ok the horses werenât a very fair comparison
And imo Romania did decent
Sad đŠ
They're known for their failure at Stalingrad
Horses were normally used for transporting messages in less militarily developed countries
But otherwise they were pretty decent. Not great, not terrible so to say
That was later in the war when the soviets got their act together
i was talking about extending it on the French Belgian border
(Germany used horses as primary logistical tool)
They were used by everyone
Exactly
I once heard the figure of 80% at the beginning of the war
But I can't back it up
I think Germany was actually really reliant on horses
More so than others
Yeah but the polish military might of been outdated when 10% of the army was Cavalry units
10% isn't that bad by 1939 standards though
And cavalry was pretty objectively better than regular infantry
Not really
Infantry Divisions were at least somewhat equipped with Regular and Anti-tank artillery
Sure, but if you've got a big unit then there might mot be enough
Or when it's winter
And cavalry wasn't?
It's 11 PM so probably not rn lol
Ye
Cavalry kinda sucked for the defense though
Horses are native to the Eurasian steppe where the war would have happened I think they would of figured it out by eating the dead grass
Can't really have a horse bing chilling on a trench ya know
Nvm, i checked, it did
You can leave it behind
Someone still has to tend for those horses
As Wikipedia details, cavalry units were used as a mobile reserve
ie, to quickly react to opportunities or problems on the front
There is a reason why people used trucks whenever available
The Polish cavalry (Polish: jazda, kawaleria, konnica) can trace its origins back to the days of medieval cavalry knights. Poland is mostly a country of flatlands and fields and mounted forces operate well in this environment. The knights and heavy cavalry gradually evolved into many different types of specialised mounted military formations, so...
Sure but cavalry was better than infantry without motorization
And unlike horses
That's my case
You can mass produce them
(except for cost)
Sometimes
You can mass breed horses
In that case, fair enough
I'm pretty sure
Cant really make a horse in a day
Alr then, build a truck in a day
You canât later in the Napoleonic wars Napoleon ran out of horses so he couldnât move as fast to defend France
A day is more than enough for a truck
Ford, GMC, ZiS, Opel say hello
Sure, but Germany constantly had a shortage of trucks
How come?
There's a limited supply of everything
Rubber
Like rubber
Oil
Mostly rubber
There you go
Rubber was prioritized for aircrafy production
There were literally millions of horse casualties on German side alone in WW1
No they had the work force just no rubber or oil
And even then they still had shortages
They also lost a large number of trucks, duh đ
