#cosmetics for pets
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
that sounds absolutely adorable but yeah very complicated
but lunar client is able to make it come true
doubt it, they can't remove a single line of code to improve stuff
what single line of code would that be
snaplook being blocked with freelook enabled
it's a 1 line check, remove and infinite more satisfaction
they have it that way for a reason im sure
besides im sure its not their priority
what reasons could that possibly be /srs
probably a bug fix of some sort
nah, you wouldnt put a check there for it if you didn't need it, it's just junk code at that point
they have their reasons, again its not a priority to fix that tiny thing that 90% of users probably wont even notice
it's not even to stop it being turned on, it's when it's attempted to be USED it decides to not work
IT IS
A
FCKING DISCORD
LINK
here's a gif someone posted
yes, but again, its 100% that way for a reason
who claimed that it was too much work
That's A) not a dev B) Stating that it was a duplicate C) Saying that its hard to backport the same implementation, not that it would never be added 
again its not a huge priority
Saying that its hard to backport the same implementation
..same implementa\tion as what
same implementation as what 1.19.2 has...
anyways im off, good suggestion
you are aware that there is raw input.. for lunar.. on 1.8, just unofficially?
turns out thats a png, @dusk compass