#camping idea

21 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

modern geyser
#

.

heavy dome
#

for what he meant:

He Wants The Campaign To Have Multiple Of Endings
(will likely cost a large debate on which ending is canon)

Hard Bosses As In More Bosses Then Usual.
(Generals are kinda like bosses , but I'm guessing custom bosses?? Idk)

4 Different Difficulties.
(Uh..No? It Probably Be 3 tbh)

Side Levels.
it's highly likely to get added anyway lol.

twin grail
#

Multiple endings would be cool

median canopy
#

Multiple endings would be cool

#

But I don't think it is in the devs plans

wispy parcel
#

multiple endings would spark more convo ngl

heavy dome
#

unless they make the endings very Self-explanatory

#

like straight up
" good ending " or " bad ending "

or even " chaos ending " , "order ending " , elemental ending "

and basic most Self-explanatory ending=

" Canon ending "

median canopy
#

I think it would be better if the endings didn't have names

#

Why does a game's ending need a name

#

It would also add way more debate

#

Which is fun

pulsar portal
#

It's funny how the first comment is just useless and here to trash the subject just because there is an obvious typo and fail to see the good idea behind the subject. It remind me of a metaphor. It was a rat trap with a lightbulb in it. It was meant to represent how ideas could be easily be criticized by the first coming rat and destroying the idea's potential.
When that metaphor was uploaded on the internet, it was criticized on social media by the very first comment which kinda confirmed the metaphor itself.

Anyway, the idea is pretty nice ^^.

sudden condor
pulsar portal
heavy dome
median canopy
#

I feel like if the endings didn't have names it would cause more discussion and you could just choose whichever ending you think is cannon