#camping idea
21 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
for what he meant:
He Wants The Campaign To Have Multiple Of Endings
(will likely cost a large debate on which ending is canon)
Hard Bosses As In More Bosses Then Usual.
(Generals are kinda like bosses , but I'm guessing custom bosses?? Idk)
4 Different Difficulties.
(Uh..No? It Probably Be 3 tbh)
Side Levels.
it's highly likely to get added anyway lol.
I like this
Multiple endings would be cool
multiple endings would spark more convo ngl
^^^
unless they make the endings very Self-explanatory
like straight up
" good ending " or " bad ending "
or even " chaos ending " , "order ending " , elemental ending "
and basic most Self-explanatory ending=
" Canon ending "
I think it would be better if the endings didn't have names
Why does a game's ending need a name
It would also add way more debate
Which is fun
It's funny how the first comment is just useless and here to trash the subject just because there is an obvious typo and fail to see the good idea behind the subject. It remind me of a metaphor. It was a rat trap with a lightbulb in it. It was meant to represent how ideas could be easily be criticized by the first coming rat and destroying the idea's potential.
When that metaphor was uploaded on the internet, it was criticized on social media by the very first comment which kinda confirmed the metaphor itself.
Anyway, the idea is pretty nice ^^.
That's not a metaphor though, and doesn't make a lot of sense anyway.
Thanks for proving the point.
Lackadaisy On His Way To Debate With Other People On Which Ending For The SW3 Campaign Is Canon:
Hehehhehehehehehehehehe
I feel like if the endings didn't have names it would cause more discussion and you could just choose whichever ending you think is cannon