#0

15 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

vale beacon
#

how would that even work

outer goblet
#

don't we have integrated and discrete graphics on laptops? we could use integrated for efficiency and discrete for performance, and there are solutions being developed for dynamically allocating and balancing the power requirements of the CPU and the GPU depending on the software and load

#

Also GPUs consist of lots of tiny cores instead of a few larger and more powerful cores like we find in CPUs

vale beacon
#

i dont rlly see a point to that, just adding more cores and labeling them efficency will not work, modern gpus are already quite something if u think how small the amount is they draw in idle, except arc i guess

#

theyre basically all e cores already

vale beacon
#

how would u make gpu cores more effifient than they are right now? if there was a way to do that they would also just do it for all the cores not just a few

#

could only think of the cores clock at a lower speed as most of them at max speed are not at their most efficient state (arc was at around 1600mhz i think after which increase is relatively smaller) and then adding more cores but that would just make the whole thing more expensive

vale beacon
#

might be worth to get that when buying a new laptop

outer goblet
#

I don't understand how this makes sense
already you need powerful GPUs for high performance tasks so it doesn't make sense for using discrete graphics all the time, and also they are power efficient enough for most if not all media codecs that they won't consume all the power. all GPUs use lots of tiny cores, and if u want efficiency then it's better to switch to using the integrated graphics

outer goblet
#

cheaper ones will typically ignore it

vale beacon
#

since im assuming thats what he wants with this thread